dear cornelius
i am sorry if i offended you. i assumed you posted the article because you thought it threw light on the swedish and french, especially french, attitude toward immigration. why did you ask me to read and comment on it?
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
517 803-8839
harrow@msu.edu
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 7:23 AM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda Works
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 7:23 AM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda Works
Dear Professor Harrow :
Many thanks for the New York Times article on Sweden's Far-Right Rising. I'll pass it on.
Mind you, by merely posting this sort of article and others like it, I don't ask you, " Why do you credit rightwing pieces so much?"
So, we're back to basics and that's why I'm surprised at this kind of inanity from you to me :
"my real question to you is why you credit rightwing pieces so much, pieces that would seem to support positions that would be attacking you personally?"
I'm affronted. It's appalling that you should ask me such an insulting question. Who told you that I "credit" rightwing pieces so much, and where is the evidence for that? Who do you think I am? `Bluebeard? Your little uncle tom? Your Big Uncle Tom? Mister Charlie? The Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan? Or are you only testing the crocodile-infested waters?
I live in the current reality that is Sweden and I have fulfilled my civic responsibility and voted in the past fourteen general elections in Sweden. Do you think that as a humble, poor black & blue, I would be supporting positions that would be attacking us personally? Suffice it to note that just the other day, at my Better Half's birthday party a family member who is a Conservative ( Moderate) brushed past me in my own house, without even saying "Hello, Cornelius." That's how it is. He thinks that " they " are now the Lords of power, and that we should greet first, and maybe that I should even bow, after greeting him...
Here are The results of the Swedish General Election
The last time around, Sweden's Social Democrat Government couldn't get enough parliamentary support to pass their own budget and had to rule for so many years with the Conservative's shadow budget that was able to garner enough parliamentary support - so we had the peculiar situation in which the Social Democrats were governing with the opposition's Conservative budget. This time around, since the Conservatives aim at lowering taxes, and of course, aim to complete their privatisation policies from where they left off the last time they were in POWER, where is the money going to come from to support the so far generous Swedish Social Welfare system - the Swedish Model - that's the question? I suppose that among other things they will be slashing foreign aid to some foreign countries since some of that aid money goes down the drain into some politicians' private pockets anyway . The Conservatives will need the support of their main allies, the kingmakers, the far-right Sweden Democrats, failing which they may have to govern with the Social Democrats' shadow budget. Time will soon tell.
As for some of these insults, sometimes I'm not at all surprised. Try this for size:
Liberman says that Netanyahu uses 'Goebbels, Stalin methods'
For those of us who live in Europe, the latest development in the Ukraine- Russia crisis isn't looking too good. Once the referendum is certified and that part of Ukraine is annexed as Russian territory, any attack on the annexed region would be seen as an attack on sovereign Russia and so if they're not careful we'll have a nuclear war on our hands, maybe starting in Poland.
Just five thousand miles south there's this reality:
On Wednesday, 21 September 2022 at 07:40:05 UTC+2 Kenneth Harrow wrote:
dear corneliusi see articles like the one you posted often enough. basically it is the rightwing point of view grounded in hatred of immigrants, and it claims all real europeans share that hatred.i feel pretty confident that the real truth is that european countries are divided on the question, are not all in support of rightwing anti-immigrant hatred.the piece in the nyt today on sweden reinforces that view. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/20/opinion/sweden-democrats-elections.html
my real question to you is why you credit rightwing pieces so much, pieces that would seem to support positions that would be attacking you personally?
if i were to respond to the piece you sent, i would want to take it apart piece by piece, challenging its claims over and over. but what is the point of that? i realize that people who voted for boris johnson, or le pen or trump share his views, as do many in the center as well. there is a bottom line of what i think of as decency, which has to do with accepting immigrants and trying to put yourself in their shoes, understanding why they ran such risks to come.ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 2:53 PM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda WorksDear Professor Harrow,In view of what you said to Gloria in this thread, I wonder what you think about this unlikely piece of newz:
Marine le Pen wants France to become the next Sweden
--On Saturday, 17 September 2022 at 09:40:32 UTC+2 Kenneth Harrow wrote:
gloriai never get nervous when france or the u.s. are criticized. i try to understand things without premeditation; and generally would consider myself more, much more, critical than in praise of.yet i believe there is a wide gulf between your understanding and mine.why i am particularly conscious or aware or sensitive when it comes to france? i know it better than any other country, am pretty aware of its warts, am learning more and more about them. half-baked criticisms of france or the u.s. don't impress me.ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: Emeagwali, Gloria (History) <emea...@ccsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 8:21 AM
To: Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu>; dialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda Works
KenWhy do you get so nervous when the USor France are criticized?
Praising a tiger for its tigritudeor a lion for its luscious mane doesnot oblige you to indulge in eulogizingevery member of the animal kingdom -unless you are a professional praisesinger.
So Napoleon had to reintroduceslavery according to apologists.That's interesting!
Professor Gloria Emeagwali
Prof. of History/African Studies, CCSU
africahistory.net; vimeo.com/ gloriaemeagwali
Recipient of the 2014 Distinguished Research
Excellence Award, Univ. of Texas at Austin;
2019 Distinguished Africanist Award
New York African Studies Association
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 11:34 AM
To: dialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda WorksEXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
pilger cited pinter as saying:""The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It's a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis."
in fact, all my life, the crimes of the u.s. have been openly discussed and debated. especially after vietnam.
it isn't that the great powers haven't used and abused their powers--who has not? it is that the u.s. is not and was not the only great power on earth.it isn't that great powers haven't justified their use of power/. which great power hasn't presented itself as the great liberator? it's that the u.s. was not and is not unique. at every moment that we can criticize the u.s., we would have to turn a blind eye to not criticize other great powers for their own abuses. think russia and chechnya or china and the ouygars.or think napolean, the great hero of the revolution. whenever i mention to my french friends that he restored slavery after its abolition by the revolution, they explain to me how he had to do so.
i can't believe in the unique evil or goodness of any one people or group on earth. but pilger's account locates it all in one place.maybe pinter is right. we grew up brainwashed, like all children, believing in the greatness of superiority of our country. it is hard to disabuse children. think of all the trump supporters, or those who still believe russia is fighting nazis in ukraine.we have a new word for that now: conspiracy believers. and new techniques for fomenting it: the internet.
how to foment disabuse of false news?? is there a swedish model any more?ken
so much does pilger attack the u.s., in the end even a critic, a leftist, must begin to say, well, wait, isn't there more to this? isn't there another side?ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Toyin Falola <toyin...@austin.utexas.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 9:02 AM
To: dialogue <USAAfric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda Works--*John Pilger: Silencing the Lambs — How Propaganda Works*
By John Pilger
September 11, 2022:
In the 1970s, I met one of Hitler's leading propagandists, Leni Riefenstahl, whose epic films glorified the Nazis. We happened to be staying at the same lodge in Kenya, where she was on a photography assignment, having escaped the fate of other friends of the Fuhrer.
She told me that the "patriotic messages" of her films were dependent not on "orders from above" but on what she called the "submissive void" of the German public.
Did that include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie? I asked. "Yes, especially them," she said.
I think of this as I look around at the propaganda now consuming Western societies.
Of course, we are very different from Germany in the 1930s. We live in information societies. We are globalists. We have never been more aware, more in touch, better connected.
Or do we in the West live in a Media Society where brainwashing is insidious and relentless, and perception is filtered according to the needs and lies of state and corporate power?
The United States dominates the Western world's media. All but one of the top 10 media companies are based in North America. The internet and social media – Google, Twitter, Facebook – are mostly American owned and controlled.
In my lifetime, the United States has overthrown or attempted to overthrow more than 50 governments, mostly democracies. It has interfered in democratic elections in 30 countries. It has dropped bombs on the people of 30 countries, most of them poor and defenceless. It has attempted to murder the leaders of 50 countries. It has fought to suppress liberation movements in 20 countries.
The extent and scale of this carnage is largely unreported, unrecognised, and those responsible continue to dominate Anglo-American political life.
*Harold Pinter Broke the Silence*
In the years before he died in 2008, the playwright Harold Pinter made two extraordinary speeches, which broke a silence.
Get Our Free Newsletter
"U.S. foreign policy," he said, is
"best defined as follows: kiss my arse or I'll kick your head in. It is as simple and as crude as that. What is interesting about it is that it's so incredibly successful. It possesses the structures of disinformation, use of rhetoric, distortion of language, which are very persuasive, but are actually a pack of lies. It is very successful propaganda. They have the money, they have the technology, they have all the means to get away with it, and they do."
In accepting the Nobel Prize for Literature, Pinter said this:
"The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It's a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis."
Pinter was a friend of mine and possibly the last great political sage – that is, before dissenting politics were gentrified. I asked him if the "hypnosis" he referred to was the "submissive void" described by Leni Riefenstahl.
"It's the same," he replied. "It means the brainwashing is so thorough we are programmed to swallow a pack of lies. If we don't recognise propaganda, we may accept it as normal and believe it. That's the submissive void."
In our systems of corporate democracy, war is an economic necessity, the perfect marriage of public subsidy and private profit: socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor. The day after 9/11 the stock prices of the war industry soared. More bloodshed was coming, which is great for business.
Today, the most profitable wars have their own brand. They are called "forever wars" — Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and now Ukraine. All are based on a pack of lies.
Iraq is the most infamous, with its weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist. NATO's destruction of Libya in 2011 was justified by a massacre in Benghazi that didn't happen. Afghanistan was a convenient revenge war for 9/11, which had nothing to do with the people of Afghanistan.
Today, the news from Afghanistan is how evil the Taliban are —not that U.S. President Joe Biden's theft of $7 billion of the country's bank reserves is causing widespread suffering. Recently, National Public Radio in Washington devoted two hours to Afghanistan — and 30 seconds to its starving people.
At its summit in Madrid in June, NATO, which is controlled by the United States, adopted a strategy document that militarises the European continent, and escalates the prospect of war with Russia and China. It proposes "multi domain warfighting against nuclear-armed peer-competitor." In other words, nuclear war.
It says: "NATO's enlargement has been an historic success."
I read that in disbelief.
The news from the war in Ukraine is mostly not news, but a one-sided litany of jingoism, distortion, omission. I have reported a number of wars and have never known such blanket propaganda.
In February, Russia invaded Ukraine as a response to almost eight years of killing and criminal destruction in the Russian-speaking region of Donbass on their border.
In 2014, the United States had sponsored a coup in Kiev that got rid of Ukraine's democratically elected, Russian-friendly president and installed a successor whom the Americans made clear was their man.
In recent years, American "defender" missiles have been installed in eastern Europe, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, almost certainly aimed at Russia, accompanied by false assurances all the way back to James Baker's "promise" to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in February 1990 that NATO would never expand beyond Germany.
*NATO on Hitler's Borderline*
Ukraine is the frontline. NATO has effectively reached the very borderland through which Hitler's army stormed in 1941, leaving more than 23 million dead in the Soviet Union.
Last December, Russia proposed a far-reaching security plan for Europe. This was dismissed, derided or suppressed in the Western media. Who read its step-by-step proposals? On Feb. 24, President Volodymyr Zelensky threatened to develop nuclear weapons unless America armed and protected Ukraine.
On the same day, Russia invaded — an unprovoked act of congenital infamy, according to the Western media. The history, the lies, the peace proposals, the solemn agreements on Donbass at Minsk counted for nothing.
On April 25, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin flew into Kiev and confirmed that America's aim was to destroy the Russian Federation — the word he used was "weaken." America had got the war it wanted, waged by an American bankrolled and armed proxy and expendable pawn.
Almost none of this was explained to Western audiences.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine is wanton and inexcusable. It is a crime to invade a sovereign country. There are no "buts" — except one.
When did the present war in Ukraine begin and who started it? According to the United Nations, between 2014 and this year, some 14,000 people have been killed in the Kiev regime's civil war on the Donbass. Many of the attacks were carried out by neo-Nazis.
Watch an ITV news report from May 2014, by the veteran reporter James Mates, who is shelled, along with civilians in the city of Mariupol, by Ukraine's Azov (neo-Nazi) battalion.
In the same month, dozens of Russian-speaking people were burned alive or suffocated in a trade union building in Odessa besieged by fascist thugs, the followers of the Nazi collaborator and anti-Semitic fanatic Stepan Bandera. The New York Times called the thugs "nationalists."
"The historic mission of our nation in this critical moment," said Andreiy Biletsky, founder of the Azov Battaltion, "is to lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival, a crusade against the Semite-led Untermenschen."
Since February, a campaign of self-appointed "news monitors" (mostly funded by the Americans and British with links to governments) have sought to maintain the absurdity that Ukraine's neo-Nazis don't exist.
Airbrushing, once associated with Stalin's purges, has become a tool of mainstream journalism.
In less than a decade, a "good" China has been airbrushed and a "bad" China has replaced it: from the world's workshop to a budding new Satan.
Much of this propaganda originates in the U.S., and is transmitted through proxies and "think-tanks," such as the notorious Australian Strategic Policy Institute, the voice of the arms industry, and by journalists such as Peter Hartcher of The Sydney Morning Herald, who has labeled those spreading Chinese influence as "rats, flies, mosquitoes and sparrows" and suggested these "pests" be "eradicated."
News about China in the West is almost entirely about the threat from Beijing. Airbrushed are the 400 American military bases that surround most of China, an armed necklace that reaches from Australia to the Pacific and south east Asia, Japan and Korea. The Japanese island of Okinawa and the Korean island of Jeju are like loaded guns aimed point blank at the industrial heart of China. A Pentagon official described this as a "noose."
Palestine has been misreported for as long as I can remember. To the BBC, there is the "conflict" of "two narratives." The longest, most brutal, lawless military occupation in modern times is unmentionable.
The stricken people of Yemen barely exist. They are media unpeople. While the Saudis rain down their American cluster bombs with British advisers working alongside the Saudi targeting officers, more than half a million children face starvation.
This brainwashing by omission is not new. The slaughter of the First World War was suppressed by reporters who were given knighthoods for their compliance. In 1917, the editor of The Manchester Guardian, C.P. Scott, confided to Prime Minister Lloyd George: "If people really knew [the truth], the war would be stopped tomorrow, but they don't know and can't know."
The refusal to see people and events as those in other countries see them is a media virus in the West, as debilitating as Covid. It is as if we see the world through a one-way mirror, in which "we" are moral and benign and "they" are not. It is a profoundly imperial view.
The history that is a living presence in China and Russia is rarely explained and rarely understood. Vladimir Putin is Adolf Hitler. Xi Jinping is Fu Man Chu. Epic achievements, such as the eradication of abject poverty in China, are barely known. How perverse and squalid this is.
When will we allow ourselves to understand? Training journalists factory style is not the answer. Neither is the wondrous digital tool, which is a means, not an end, like the one-finger typewriter and the linotype machine.
In recent years, some of the best journalists have been eased out of the mainstream. "Defenestrated" is the word used. The spaces once open to mavericks, to journalists who went against the grain, truth-tellers, have closed.
The case of Julian Assange is the most shocking. When Julian and WikiLeaks could win readers and prizes for The Guardian, The New York Times and other self-important "papers of record," he was celebrated.
When the dark state objected and demanded the destruction of hard drives and the assassination of Julian's character, he was made a public enemy. Vice President Joe Biden compared him to a "hi-tech terrorist." Hillary Clinton asked, "Can't we just drone this guy?"
The ensuing campaign of abuse and vilification against Julian Assange — the U.N. rapporteur on torture called it "mobbing" — brought the liberal press to its lowest ebb. We know who they are. I think of them as collaborators: as Vichy journalists.
When will real journalists stand up? An inspirational samizdat already exists on the internet: Consortium News, founded by the great reporter Robert Parry, Max Blumenthal's The Grayzone, Mint Press News, Media Lens, DeclassifiedUK, Alborada, Electronic Intifada, WSWS, ZNet, ICH, CounterPunch, Independent Australia, the work of Chris Hedges, Patrick Lawrence, Jonathan Cook, Diana Johnstone, Caitlin Johnstone and others who will forgive me for not mentioning them here.
And when will writers stand up, as they did against the rise of fascism in the 1930s? When will film-makers stand up, as they did against the Cold War in the 1940s? When will satirists stand up, as they did a generation ago?
Having soaked for 82 years in a deep bath of righteousness that is the official version of the last world war, isn't it time those who are meant to keep the record straight declared their independence and decoded the propaganda? The urgency is greater than ever.
_John Pilger has twice won Britain's highest award for journalism and has been International Reporter of the Year, News Reporter of the Year and Descriptive Writer of the Year. He has made 61 documentary films and has won an Emmy, a BAFTA and the Royal Television Society prize. His 'Cambodia Year Zero' is named as one of the ten most important films of the 20th century._
Sent from my iPhone
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue__;!!HXCxUKc!wNzUG-XrRpA_AIRndDEtFjIjKPsK_bYXsEYOi7JSbjRni2y4HxqVkYwcnkPONbFSVB-BjkxZjpm_N_Pv1By76baMCAU$
Early archives at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html__;!!HXCxUKc!wNzUG-XrRpA_AIRndDEtFjIjKPsK_bYXsEYOi7JSbjRni2y4HxqVkYwcnkPONbFSVB-BjkxZjpm_N_Pv1By7kjE9O6A$
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/685F6F7A-FD3E-4D8B-8479-A9F45EDBBEE1*40austin.utexas.edu__;JQ!!HXCxUKc!wNzUG-XrRpA_AIRndDEtFjIjKPsK_bYXsEYOi7JSbjRni2y4HxqVkYwcnkPONbFSVB-BjkxZjpm_N_Pv1By7g0OZfMU$ .
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB51914DCA8B28A7AEDCA71DEBDA499%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/26944ef7-41f1-4b23-92e9-842bad0f2880n%40googlegroups.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/2dfbca36-10a2-4d23-ad35-ebec96797f93n%40googlegroups.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment