INGENIOUS! Nigerians Use Bank Transfers, Other means to Demand INEC Chairman—Amupitan’s Resignation
https://thisdawn.com/nigerians-use-bank-transfers-other-means-to-demand-inec-chairman-amupitans-resignation/
KINDLY SHARE THIS PUBLICATION 🔁
Follow This Dawn channel:
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb72wDP5EjxwI0tat30f
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/eaa135a0-5673-4369-bd16-e75d4901f077n%40googlegroups.com.
Tuesday, April 14, 2026
USA Africa Dialogue Series - Nigeria's 63% warning: Stabilising economy, impoverishing the people?
Nigeria's 63% warning: Stabilising economy, impoverishing the people?
As reforms tame macroeconomic instability, a harsher reality emerges: rising poverty, falling real incomes, and a widening gap between policy success and public experience.
By John Onyeukwu | Policy and Reform Column, Business a.m. | Mon April 13, 2026 | pullout attached.
The latest poverty figures should unsettle even the most optimistic reformer. In its Nigeria Development Update released on April 7, 2026, the World Bank confirms a troubling trajectory: the share of Nigerians living below the poverty line has climbed from 56 per cent in 2023 to 61 per cent in 2024, and now to approximately 63 per cent in 2025, representing well over 140 million people.
The report is direct in its assessment: “Despite ongoing macroeconomic reforms, poverty remains widespread and has increased due to rising inflation and declining real incomes.”
The Nigeria Development Update (April 2026 edition) has since been removed from the World Bank website. While no official explanation has been provided, its core findings, particularly on rising poverty and declining real incomes, remain central to understanding Nigeria’s current economic trajectory. The Bank did not take down the statement of April 9, 2026, on the report.
This is not merely a statistical update. It is a structural warning, one that goes to the heart of Nigeria’s current reform model. Because at precisely the moment macroeconomic indicators are beginning to stabilise, household welfare is deteriorating.
On one hand, policymakers at the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Federal Ministry of Finance point to emerging signs of progress. Exchange rate volatility has moderated compared to the immediate post-liberalisation shocks. Fiscal pressures have eased following the removal of fuel subsidies. Inflation, while still elevated, is showing tentative signs of deceleration.
What is less clear, however, is how these gains are being redistributed, or whether they are reaching households at all. There is no doubt that fiscal consolidation without visible welfare transmission risks appearing extractive rather than corrective, especially to those bearing the immediate costs.
On the other hand, for the majority of Nigerians, the lived experience is one of deepening hardship. This is the contradiction that defines Nigeria’s current economic moment: stabilisation at the macro level, deterioration at the micro level.
There is a persistent tendency within policy discourse to equate slowing inflation with relief. But inflation measures the rate of increase in prices, not the level at which those prices stabilise. A slowdown in inflation simply means that prices are rising more slowly, not that they are falling. For households already pushed to the edge by successive shocks, that distinction is largely irrelevant.
Nowhere is this more evident than in food prices. The World Bank notes that food inflation remains the dominant driver of welfare decline, with food accounting for over 60 per cent of consumption among low-income households. Even marginal price increases therefore translate into significant reductions in real purchasing power.
According to the report, macroeconomic improvements have yet to translate into meaningful welfare gains for most Nigerians.” What citizens are experiencing is not recovery, but a deceleration of hardship.
At the centre of this paradox lies the sequencing, and social buffering, of reform. The removal of fuel subsidies and the unification of the foreign exchange regime were, by broad consensus, necessary. They addressed structural inefficiencies, reduced fiscal leakages, and signalled a shift toward a more transparent and market-aligned economic framework. But necessity does not eliminate consequence.
The World Bank’s April 2026 update underscores this clearly the immediate effects of subsidy removal and exchange rate adjustments have been a significant increase in the cost of living, disproportionately affecting poor and vulnerable households.
These reforms are inherently asymmetric in timing. The costs are immediate and visible; the benefits are gradual and uncertain. Fuel subsidy removal increased transportation and logistics costs across the economy. Exchange rate liberalisation triggered currency depreciation, raising the cost of imports and feeding into inflation. These effects cascaded rapidly, amplifying the cost-of-living crisis.
In effect, the adjustment has operated like a regressive shock, one in which lower-income households bear a larger relative burden, even as the fiscal benefits accrue at the aggregate level.
By contrast, the expected gains, improved investment flows, productivity gains, and fiscal space, are slower to materialise. This creates a widening gap between policy intent and public experience. It is within this gap that poverty expands.
Nigeria’s poverty dynamics also reflect a deeper structural constraint: the weak transmission of economic growth into broad-based income gains. Even when growth occurs, it is concentrated in sectors that are capital-intensive and low in labour absorption. The oil sector, while dominant in export earnings, employs only a small fraction of the workforce. Similarly, finance and telecommunications contribute significantly to GDP but generate limited employment relative to their output.
The World Bank reiterates this structural challenge when it pointed out that economic growth in Nigeria has not been sufficiently inclusive to significantly reduce poverty. The result is a familiar but dangerous pattern, growth without inclusion.
This stands in sharp contrast to reform trajectories in countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia, where macroeconomic adjustments were deliberately paired with employment expansion and social protection. In Vietnam, export-led industrialisation absorbed labour at scale. In Indonesia, targeted subsidies and cash transfers cushioned reform shocks while rural development programmes sustained incomes.
Nigeria’s experience has been different. Reform has occurred, but without the institutional coordination required to translate macroeconomic gains into household welfare.
To fully understand the present moment, it is important to recognise what Nigeria is transitioning from. For years, the economy operated within a system that, while inefficient, provided implicit social cushioning. Fuel subsidies kept transportation and energy costs artificially low. Multiple exchange rate windows redistributed resources across sectors. Informal economic networks absorbed shocks and sustained livelihoods.
This system was fiscally unsustainable, but it was socially stabilising. What has replaced it is a more market-driven framework in which prices reflect underlying economic realities and state intervention is reduced. This transition is economically rational, but socially demanding.
The problem is not that distortions have been removed. It is that they have been removed faster than alternative support systems have been built. The most critical of these missing systems is robust and scalable social protection architecture. The World Bank is unequivocal: “Nigeria’s social protection system remains fragmented, with limited coverage and insufficient capacity to respond to shocks at scale.”
In other reforming economies, governments deploy targeted safety nets, cash transfers, food assistance, and income support, to cushion the most vulnerable during periods of adjustment. In Nigeria, such interventions remain limited in reach and effectiveness. As a result, the burden of reform has been disproportionately transferred to households least able to absorb it.
Beyond social protection lies a more fundamental constraint: income stagnation. The core economic challenge facing Nigerians today is not simply rising prices, but falling real incomes. Wage growth has lagged inflation. Informal sector earnings are unstable. Employment generation continues to fall short of population growth.
The implication is clear: even if inflation moderates, poverty will persist unless incomes rise. What is emerging, therefore, is not just an economic adjustment, but a reconfiguration of risk, from the state to the citizen. Nigerians are being asked to operate within a more market-driven system without the institutional support required to navigate its volatility.
This is where the reform process becomes fragile. Markets, in themselves, do not guarantee equitable outcomes. They allocate efficiently, but not necessarily fairly. Without deliberate policy intervention, stabilisation can entrench inequality rather than reduce it.
There is also a generational dimension to this crisis. A country in which over 60 per cent of the population lives in poverty is not only managing a present challenge, it is compromising its future. The World Bank warns that “high and persistent poverty levels threaten human capital development and long-term growth.”
This has implications for education, health outcomes, labour productivity, and social cohesion.
In this sense, the current trajectory is not only economically unsustainable, it is politically and socially combustible.
Economic reform ultimately operates within a framework of public trust. Citizens are more likely to endure short-term hardship if they believe that sacrifices are shared and that benefits will follow. But when reforms coincide with rising poverty and declining purchasing power, that trust begins to erode.
There is no doubt that Nigeria risks entering a cycle in which technically sound policies lose legitimacy because their social consequences are too severe or too prolonged. Such conditions historically create pressure for policy reversals, undermining reform gains.
The current moment therefore demands recalibration. Stabilisation, while necessary, is not sufficient. It must be complemented by policies that directly address welfare and income.
This includes scaling up social protection in a targeted and credible manner, prioritising sectors capable of generating employment at scale, particularly agriculture and manufacturing, and ensuring that future reforms are sequenced alongside protective buffers.
It also requires a shift in policy framing. Reform should not be assessed solely through macroeconomic indicators, but through its impact on citizens.
The 63 per cent poverty figure is therefore more than a data point. It is a stress test of Nigeria’s reform model. It raises a fundamental question: what is the purpose of economic policy?
If the answer is efficiency alone, then the current trajectory may appear defensible. But if the purpose of policy is to improve the welfare of citizens, then the rising poverty figures suggest a gap that must be urgently addressed.
As the World Bank’s April 2026 update makes clear, Nigeria is making progress, but not yet in ways that are felt by most Nigerians. This is the contradiction policymakers must confront.
An economy that becomes more stable while its people become poorer is not a success. It is a warning. And if that warning is not heeded, Nigeria risks achieving a deeply paradoxical outcome: macroeconomic stability built on a foundation of widespread economic vulnerability.
John Onyeukwu
http://www.policy.hu/onyeukwu/
http://www.policy.hu/onyeukwu/
http://about.me/onyeukwu
“Let us move forward to fight poverty, to establish equity, and assure peace for the next generation.”
-- James D. Wolfensohn
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.
“Let us move forward to fight poverty, to establish equity, and assure peace for the next generation.”
-- James D. Wolfensohn
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CABsbg_%2BxszjOxe8XQCEYGtmw6sL%2BvjWyN7xERY%3DkcKdNsctT7Q%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: 100 Years of Non-Violence
Sir ,
That was our own Omowale, also popularly recognised as the venerable El-Hajj Malik al-Shabazz .The quotation is from his 1963 “Message to the Grass Roots” in which he was addressing the exigencies of the situation.
Nyboma: Malcolm X
There’s the universal question,” Why is there so much suffering in the world ?”
Buddhism labels the malady “ dukka” - and as we all know, wherever there is oppression, there is suffering - not only in hell, even in Nigeria there is suffering and instead of Shuffering and Shmiling as a result of political, economic and military oppression, I’m sure that you too would have nothing against the idea of liberation, or have anything against the idea that there’s nothing in the Holy Quran that says Muslims must continue to suffer peacefully in Gaza, for instance, and in the West Bank.
Malcolm said all that he said, long before Trump's early Republican presidential predecessor Ronald Reagan (“ Re-gun”) as the then governor of California, gave the order to disarm a self-defence outfit known as The Black Panthers.
Sometimes it is the exigency of a situation that results in the formation of e.g.
Islam : To resist oppression
With regard to the kinds of insanity currently bedevilling this world, Pope Leo XIV
is the loudest voice now crying for peace
On Monday, 13 April 2026 at 16:46:23 UTC+2 Toyin Falola wrote:
Dear sir:Whose quotation is this?The language is both barbaric and unfit. The idea is misleading as well. The person has not had about quietism and Isla;, about Ahmad Bamba, etc.
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, April 13, 2026 at 7:19 AM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: 100 Years of Non-Violence
"There’s nothing in our book, the Koran, that teaches us to suffer peacefully. Our religion teaches us to be intelligent. Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery. That’s a good religion. In fact, that’s that old-time religion. That’s the one that Ma and Pa used to talk about: an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, and a head for a head, and a life for a life: That’s a good religion. And nobody resents that kind of religion being taught but a wolf, who intends to make you his meal.!"
On Sunday, 12 April 2026 at 05:39:15 UTC+2 Dr. Oohay wrote:What the “hell” does the United Nations mean historically and even NOW!?
Oohay
On Saturday, April 11, 2026, 5:33 PM, 'Biko Agozino' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Oga Rabbi,
I hyper-linked the 'Unfiorgiveable' text by Derrida in my earlier reply to you. He anticipated many of your questions. Read it first.
Biko
On Saturday, 11 April 2026 at 15:35:25 GMT-4, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:
Biko,
You know this song , “Strange Fruit”
I’m sure that you don’t want to remind me of these lines by The Last Poets:
Niggers are players, niggers are players, are players
Niggers play football, baseball, and basketball
While the white man is cutting off their balls
In Gerontion, T.S. Eliot the poet asks,
"After such knowledge, what forgiveness?"
You on the other hand are distinctly appealing for that extraordinary miracle known as the impossible, already a veritable contradiction in terms : ”to forgive the unforgivable”
How do you do that? Theoretically, humanly possible?
The so-called New Testament said to be the inspired word of God testifies to one such impossibility : blaspheming the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven…
Whatever next !
Should the Holocaust survivors forgive all the perpetrators of the Holocaust?
Should the judgements passed at the Nuremberg trials be rescinded ?
Should Simon Wiesenthal’s good works have all been in vain and the Nazi villains just needed to say a few Hail Marys and toss a few dollars into the collection box for forgiveness, the caveat being that Jesus has already died for their sins?
At the very least, I was expecting some celebratory thunder and lightning from you, concerning Ghana's John Mahama getting the UN General Assembly to adopt the resolution declaring the trafficking and chattel enslavement of Africans "the gravest crime against humanity" - and demanding reparations!
We ( you and I) can’t shake hands over lumping together disparate religions such as Judaism, Christianism and Islam under the same umbrella because of an alleged common legendary ancestor and call them “Abrahamic religions”
To begin with, there are the genocidal passages in the Hebrew Bible - which to this day are not so easily abrogated, never mind this kind of saucy revisionism, and as you know, there’s a lot of holy war and Jihad in the history of al-Islam. There’s certainly these kinds of contemporary manifestations lodged in these archives dubiously dubbed “the religion of peace” ( https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/) and very little of Jesus’ pacifistic teachings about turning the other cheek and loving your enemies, in the praxis of the Nazis .
In Islam there’s also the concept of loving and hating for the sake of Allah
At the risk of not overemphasising Ubuntu, there is Wole Soyinka’s seminal, practical, down to earth, less mythically cluttered The burden of memory, the muse of forgiveness and from an earlier time , Dag Hammarskjöld and much of his written legacy, such as “To speak for the world
On Saturday, 11 April 2026 at 16:50:48 UTC+2 Biko Agozino wrote:Cornel,
The Abrahamic religions of the Book may claim to be the genesis of non-violence and forgiveness, but Derrida demonstrated that each of them also made exceptions for that which is unforgivable. Only the African tradition, according to him, tends to forgive the unforgivable. Tutu and Tutu retorted that there is no such thing as the unforgivable under Ubuntu.
You are right that Ubuntu can go by different names in the Africana tradition. The Igbo symbolize it with Mbari ritual architecture, according to Achebe, Martin Luther King Jr analogized it with the Great World House, Rasta dub it One Love, and Rwanda calls it Gacaca. Gandhi admitted that he learned the experiments with truth from the warlike Zulu who taught him about non-violent resistance.
Biko
I agree that we can add to the list of patron saints of peace.
Biko
On Saturday, 11 April 2026 at 09:51:00 GMT-4, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:
Keeping it short:
Not much unlike One Hundred Years of Solitude, Biko’s is quite a tantalizing piece, in the ideal world, a mesmerising dream with a more mundane, radical, political trinity featuring angel-saints from the Pan-African pantheon encompassing all Africa and Diaspora, same spirit, 1+1+1=3 : Patrice Lumumba ( Congo) Frantz Fanon ( Martinique) and Malcolm X ( The United States ) - a United States which cowboy angel, genocidal warmonger, sicko wannabe imperial majesty emperor Donald J Trump would like to make great “again”
If he liked, the author - Biko, himself a saint, could have added Marcus Garvey ( I never heard anything about him advocating violence) and for good measure he could have added Martin Luther King Jr. and “ I am prepared to die” Madiba Nelson Mandela to that heavenly constellation of African Martyrs presently breaking bread with the ancestors.
Baba Kadiri says that he “feels disgusted when known professional harlots in Nigeria's politics brazenly present themselves to Nigerians as virgins.” I feel a little uncomfortable with the idea that Ubuntu philosophy is at the root of some of these stalwarts' inspiration when we know full well that it’s their Bible and Quran that are regarded as their wellsprings of inspiration and the main sources of their moral guidance with regard to the use and misuse of what is believed to be divinely sanctioned violence (Joshua) and non-violence ( Jesus)
The perennial question is, how do we resist the violence of the violent ?
There’s the extreme cruelty and barbarity some of them call war. Here’s US warhorse Pete Hegseth boasting with this long list of Iran’s top echelons that his military has murdered
Last week I had the good fortune to meet an Indian military historian at a dinner party and after he delivered a brief discourse on Malcolm X - and I was only coyly praising AHIMSA - one of the most attractive aspects of Jainism and Hinduism, when he assured me that yes, the late great Mahatma Gandhi is most wisely associated with Satyagraha but that he himself said that if pushed to the wall and he had no other alternative then he would, of course, have to fight back.
Jimmy Cliff : Stand Up and Fight Back
We should always bear in mind that the Bhagavad Gita begins at the battlefield of Kurukshetra
Whatever our background, the context is always now ,the most recent and the most current reality, saturating both conscience and consciousness. Within that 100 years framework, some of us post-war children (post WW2) have been inordinately influenced by The War Poets since middle school days and developed an aversion to all kinds of violence during all of our lifetime, to date, whether it was the Algerian War of Independence heroically fought by the Algerians, or the stellar Haitian Revolution of which every African in spirit is so proud, or the bloody January 15, 1966 coup in Nigeria, or the death penalty, or the Vietnam War - which produced flower power and many a Dave Dellinger , or the Yom Kippur War of 1973 or the assassination of Olof Palme and all the wars, including liberation wars in Africa and elsewhere, since 1973….
On Friday, 10 April 2026 at 13:16:15 UTC+2 Biko Agozino wrote:
Biko
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/338099d8-ee6c-4653-9b7c-d6ea58ce39a9n%40googlegroups.com.--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/b3b8b6e5-8a4d-4c8e-af35-bee3ec67ade6n%40googlegroups.com.--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/86749701.1791600.1775942916093%40mail.yahoo.com.--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/e47a6679-557b-42fc-85d3-d9e3a54ff62an%40googlegroups.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/43aec4d5-c517-4246-abba-aa608989c9d1n%40googlegroups.com.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)