USA Africa Dialogue Series - Correction:Excellent : Bola tinubu on Boy child education by Augustine Togonu Bickersteth London England 🇬🇧 may 25 2026

Dear President  Bola tinubu boy child programme of your administration  is one of the most remarkable things you have done  if not the most remarkable.  I think it's your  most remarkable  intervention.

Why? The child  is the father  of the man as one thinker put it.and as the Greek philosopher  protagoras puts it.man is the measure  of all  things and Aristotle  ssid: man is a political  animal. That animal  called  man according  to Baba  olusegun  obasanjo  with a book of the that : title: that  animal  called man.

Bandits  kidnappers  insurgents are largely men  from  being boys. Boys will  be boys.

So the  chairman code of conduct  bureau  Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) in Nigeria  Dr. Abdullahi Usman Bello. has called  for a ministry of boys.i would  also  call for a ministtty of girls .

And a resuscitation  of the boys scout movement .girl's  guide girl scout and Brownie the length  and breadth  of nigeria 

Signed Augustine Togonu Bickersteth London England 🇬🇧 may 25 2026

Boys need mentors, safe spaces to thrive, FG, stakeholders stress

By : Ene Oshaba

Date: 25 May 2026 1:01pm WAT

Share :

Follow Us on Google Discover

fast1489

Concerned by rising social pressures, emotional neglect and increasing cases of gender-based violence involving young people, the Federal Government and key development partners have called for deliberate investments in the Nigerian boy-child through mentorship, emotional support and value-driven leadership programmes.

The call was made in Abuja during the second edition of the Boy-Child Roundtable Mentorship Programme organised by the Federal Ministry of Youth Development to commemorate the International Day of the Boy Child.

The event, themed “Champions of Change: Growth, Grit and Global Impact,” brought together government officials, youth advocates, development partners, private sector leaders and students to discuss the future of Nigerian boys and the need for intentional guidance in shaping responsible men.

Speaking on behalf of the Minister of Youth Development, Comrade Ayodele Olawande, the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Dr. Maryam Ismaila, Keshinro, said Nigerian boys require “deliberate guidance, strong role models and safe spaces” to openly discuss their dreams, fears and aspirations.

She said the mentorship dialogue was designed to move beyond formal lectures and create “honest conversations where real learning can happen.”

“We recognise that in today’s rapidly changing world, our young boys need deliberate guidance, strong role models and safe spaces to talk about their futures, their challenges and their dreams,” she said.

Keshinro stressed that the initiative aligns with President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda on youth empowerment and social inclusion, noting that mentorship remained critical to raising emotionally intelligent and responsible young men.

In a message that resonated strongly with participants, she added: “Teach the boys that vulnerability is a strength, and that compassion is their greatest armour.”

Earlier, Director of Youth, Health, Mental and Psychosocial Affairs in the ministry, Emmanuel Okonkwo, said the government was intentionally creating platforms where boys could learn resilience, discipline and leadership.

According to him, the mentorship initiative was conceived to nurture “responsible, resilient and value-driven young boys” capable of contributing positively to their families and communities.

He said: “We recognise that young boys require positive role models and platforms where they can openly discuss their aspirations, challenges and responsibilities.”

Okonkwo also urged participants to listen closely to the experiences shared by mentors and remain focused on building positive values.

Development partners at the event warned that the neglect of boys in conversations around gender and social development could undermine efforts to build safer communities.

Speaking on behalf of Plan International Nigeria, the organisation’s Head of Social Development, Laban Bako, recounted the distress call of a young female intern allegedly forced out of her residence by a male partner, arguing that many harmful behaviours stem from a lack of mentorship and emotional guidance for boys.

“For us in Plan International, everything has largely been about the girl-child, but we must also ask ourselves, who are the perpetrators of violence against girls? They are boys who were never guided,” he said.

He stressed the need for balanced interventions that support both girls and boys, warning that empowering girls alone without addressing the behaviour and mindset of boys would produce limited results.

“We have empowered the girls, yes, but have we sat down one day to intentionally talk to boys? Have we deliberately created mentors they can look up to?” he queried.

Bako further disclosed that Plan International already operates “Male Champions” community engagement groups to mentor boys and address issues such as gender-based violence and mental health.

Similarly, the Chief Executive Officer of House of Destiny Global Services, Dr. Israel Olajumoke, said investing in boys was ultimately an investment in the stability of society.

“We believe that investing in the boy-child is an investment in the very fabric of our society,” he said.

Related News

FG reaffirms commitment to inclusive development, sustainable housing delivery

NYSC @ 53: FG lauded for sustaining scheme despite challenges

We certified over 200 constituency projects in one year, says FG

Olajumoke cited the success story of a participant from the maiden edition who went on to develop animation skills and establish a media hub in his school after receiving mentorship support.

“It proves that when you give a young man the right guidance and tools, his potential is limitless,” he added.

Also speaking, Programmes Officer of the Girls and Youth Reintegration Network (GYRIN), Chima Enesopoli, said building an equitable society required equal investment in boys and girls.

“We cannot build a balanced, safe and equitable society by leaving half of our youth behind,” he said.

According to him, resilience and emotional intelligence were essential qualities for boys navigating social and economic challenges.

Meanwhile Senior Special Assistant to the Honourable Minister of Youth on Gender Matters, Kehinde Charity Awujoola, gave argued that gender inclusion should not be reduced to advocacy for girls alone.

“Often when people hear the word gender, they think we are only talking about girls. But true gender mainstreaming means supporting our young women and also helping boys redefine masculinity through accountability, emotional intelligence and positive leadership,” she said.

Awujoola recalled the story of a participant from the previous edition who developed advanced digital storytelling skills and later established a student media hub to train his peers.

“He is the living definition of a champion of change,” she said.

The event also featured spoken word performances, mentorship conversations and interactive sessions between students and mentors drawn from the public and private sectors.

In one of the emotional moments of the programme, spoken word artist Ifeoluwa Daniel delivered a performance titled “The Voice of the Pressurised Nigerian Boy,” lamenting societal expectations that force boys to suppress emotions and “become men before leaving childhood behind.”

“I was told to be strong before I learned to stand up,” he recited. “Men don’t cry, so I buried my pain where it won’t survive.”

Participants also engaged mentors on issues ranging from education and entrepreneurship to self-confidence and gender equality.

Senior Special Assistant to the President on Citizenship and Leadership, Rinsola Abiola, while responding to a question on why society appears to prioritise girls’ education, explained that the emphasis was aimed at correcting longstanding inequalities that often deny girls access to schooling.

“There is no gender more important than the other,” she said. “The reason government and advocates emphasise girls’ education is because many families still prioritise boys when resources are limited.”

Chief Executive Officer of PressPayNg, Abiola Metilelu, urged the students to see themselves as solution providers rather than victims of circumstance.

“Your future is hidden in the problems you are able to solve,” he said.

Metilelu shared how financial difficulties once denied him university admission, an experience that later inspired him to establish an education financing platform helping thousands of African students access school funding.

“Failure is not the end. Failure is just a bend,” he told the students.

The mentorship programme also featured representatives of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Citizens Leadership Training Centre, civil society groups and youth-focused organisations.

download guardian mobile app

Tags:

Boys

FG

Safe Spaces

Share :

Join Our Channels

Telegram

Whatsappp

The Guardian Nigeria Logo

Rutam House, Plot 103/109, Apapa-Oshodi Express Way, Isolo, P.M.B 1217 Oshodi, Lagos, Nigeria.

guardian android app

guardian ios app

Enter your email

 Subscribe

Contributors

Aviation

Capital Market

Energy

Advocacy

Africa

Asia

Branded Content

Opinion

Europe

Beauty

Education

Cartoons

Columnists

Nigeria

Features

Fashion

Football

Industry

Insurance

Maritime

World

Travel & Tourism

Weekend

Interview

Fashion

Gadgets

Law

Change of name

About Us

Advertise With Us

Policies

Contact Us

© 2026 GUARDIAN Newspapers. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALh-GoU9MRW3oRiPrR3B0y5Bu1epLbMHU%2BGo%3DXqHi6-pZ_-4Uw%40mail.gmail.com.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Democracy at Auction Ahead of 2027

Democracy at Auction Ahead of 2027

 

As allegations of delegate inducement trail party primaries across Nigeria, urgent questions are emerging about political financing, incumbency power, democratic legitimacy, and whether the road to 2027 is already being shaped more by money than by ideas.

 

By John Onyeukwu | Policy and Reform Column, Business a.m. | Mon May 25- Sun May 31, 2026 | pullout attached

 

Last week’s political party primaries across Nigeria should concern every citizen who still believes democracy is meant to be a system of public trust rather than a marketplace of influence. Across multiple states and constituencies, videos circulated online showing alleged cash inducements, frantic delegate negotiations, and the open monetisation of candidate selection processes. Reports emerged of aspirants allegedly moving with large amounts of cash, political brokers openly discussing delegate prices, and party structures appearing increasingly driven by financial bargaining rather than ideological persuasion or policy engagement.

 

Particularly damaging were the growing social media narratives and reports surrounding the primaries of the ruling All Progressives Congress. Across online platforms, blogs, commentary spaces, and political discussions, several videos and claims emerged alleging inducement of delegates by political actors linked to the party’s contests in different states. In some instances, clips circulating online purportedly showed delegates discussing financial offers allegedly tied to voting preferences, while opposition commentators accused sections of the ruling party of institutionalising transactional politics.

 

Whether every allegation ultimately withstands legal scrutiny is not even the most immediate issue politically. The optics alone are damaging.

 

In politics, perception can become political reality long before courts establish legal proof. Once citizens begin to perceive political success as largely dependent on financial capacity rather than competence, vision, or integrity, democratic trust starts to erode. Democracies rarely collapse only through coups or constitutional breakdowns. Sometimes they decay gradually through public exhaustion, institutional cynicism, and ethical collapse.

 

The framers of Nigeria’s post-military constitutional order never intended democracy to evolve into a competitive cash-and-carry arrangement. Section 221 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) recognizes political parties as the legitimate democratic vehicles through which citizens organize politically for electoral participation. Section 223 further requires that the constitution and operations of political parties conform to democratic principles.

 

The spirit of those provisions is unmistakable. Political parties were expected to function as institutions of leadership recruitment, ideological development, policy competition, and national representation.

 

Instead, many party structures now increasingly resemble patronage ecosystems dominated by incumbents, financiers, governors, and elite coalitions whose influence often outweigh institutional procedures. Internal party democracy continues to weaken under the pressure of money, access, and political survival calculations. This week’s developments once again exposed that crisis.

 

The ruling APC faces a particularly delicate challenge because incumbency naturally attracts greater scrutiny. Citizens often interpret the enormous financial influence visible during ruling party contests through the lens of state power, access, and incumbency advantage. Fairly or unfairly, many Nigerians now associate the ruling party with the broader culture of political monetisation that increasingly defines the country’s electoral environment. That perception could carry profound implications for the 2027 general elections.

 

Political legitimacy is not sustained merely through electoral victory. It is sustained through perceived fairness. Once citizens begin to suspect that internal party contests are shaped less by democratic persuasion and more by financial negotiation, public faith in the broader electoral process inevitably weakens.

 

Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution directs the Nigerian state to “abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power.” That constitutional aspiration becomes difficult to defend when allegations of inducement repeatedly dominate internal democratic processes.

 

The issue becomes even more sensitive whenever public suspicion emerges that incumbency influence or networks connected to state power may indirectly shape political outcomes. The distinction between party, government, and state must remain sacred within every constitutional democracy. Public institutions belong to citizens, not to ruling parties or political office holders. That distinction is essential for democratic stability.

 

Once citizens begin to perceive incumbency as an unfair electoral weapon rather than a temporary public trust, democratic competition gradually loses moral legitimacy. This is why mature democracies continuously attempt to regulate political financing, campaign disclosures, and state-resource abuse, even if imperfectly.

 

In the United Kingdom, campaign spending and political donations remain subject to strict disclosure requirements and oversight by the Electoral Commission. In Germany, strong party institutionalization and partial public financing reduce overdependence on oligarchic political financing structures. In South Africa, reforms increasingly require disclosure of significant political donations under transparency laws designed to reduce opaque influence.

 

None of these democracies has eliminated the influence of money in politics. No democracy truly has. However, strong democratic systems continuously attempt to prevent excessive monetisation from overwhelming institutional credibility. Nigeria must eventually confront this challenge more honestly.

 

One of the most troubling dimensions of last week’s controversies was the apparent openness surrounding alleged cash movement during political contests. In an era where ordinary Nigerians face extensive scrutiny over routine banking transactions, reports suggesting large-scale political cash mobilisation naturally raise difficult questions about selective enforcement.

 

Banks aggressively implement anti-money laundering regulations. Businesses face compliance obligations. Financial institutions routinely flag suspicious transactions. Yet electoral periods frequently appear to operate within a separate moral and institutional universe where financial scrutiny weakens dramatically. That contradiction damages institutional trust.

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, and the Independent National Electoral Commission cannot afford to appear passive whenever public confidence in electoral integrity begins to weaken. Electoral corruption and financial crime are increasingly interconnected realities. One often fuels the other.

 

Former American President Barack Obama once observed that democracy requires strong institutions, not merely periodic elections. Nigeria’s challenge today is precisely that elections continue to occur within an environment where institutions often appear weaker than political interests and financial influence. That imbalance is dangerous for the future of democratic stability.’

 

The implications for 2027 extend beyond party politics alone. Nigeria is currently battling inflationary pressures, economic anxiety, rising public frustration, and declining trust in governance institutions. Younger citizens, in particular, already display growing cynicism toward the political class. Many increasingly view politics as an elite financial arrangement disconnected from ordinary social realities. Every heavily monetised electoral cycle deepens that alienation.

 

Citizens who lose faith in democratic fairness become vulnerable to political apathy, populist extremism, or anti-system sentiments. Democracies weaken when citizens stop believing participation can produce meaningful change.

 

There is also an uncomfortable socioeconomic dimension to the delegate system itself. Many delegates allegedly receiving inducements are themselves products of economic hardship, unemployment, and declining purchasing power. Political seasons become temporary survival opportunities within a struggling economy. This does not excuse inducement culture. But it explains why it persists so stubbornly.

 

A society battling widespread economic precarity will inevitably struggle to sustain high democratic ethics. Poverty weakens resistance to corruption because survival pressures distort civic judgment. Political actors understand this reality and often exploit it ruthlessly.

 

Yet the long-term consequences remain devastating. Every election cycle dominated by financial influence further weakens merit-based leadership emergence. Competence gradually loses ground to liquidity. Public office increasingly becomes inaccessible to capable but financially constrained citizens. Politics becomes concentrated within elite economic circles while ordinary citizens become spectators in a democracy supposedly designed to empower them. That is not democratic deepening but narrowing.

 

The opposition also faces its own credibility problem. Many of the practices currently criticized within the APC are hardly exclusive to one party alone. Nigeria’s political financing crisis is systemic rather than purely partisan. However, ruling parties naturally carry greater responsibility because they symbolize the national democratic environment and control institutional authority. That distinction matters morally and politically.

 

As Nigeria approaches 2027, the country faces a defining democratic question: can electoral competition remain credible if citizens increasingly perceive political outcomes as financially predetermined? The answer will shape not only elections but national cohesion itself.

 

Political parties must return to ideology, leadership cultivation, and policy engagement. Anti-corruption agencies must treat electoral corruption with the seriousness it deserves. Civil society and the media must continue scrutinizing political financing aggressively. Most importantly, public office holders must resist every temptation to blur the line between state resources and personal political aspirations. The Nigerian state belongs to citizens, not to parties, incumbents, or political coalitions.

 

Ultimately, the controversy surrounding these primaries is bigger than one political party or one election cycle. It speaks directly to the future credibility of Nigeria’s democracy itself. Because when politics becomes excessively transactional, governance eventually becomes extractive.

 

And when governance becomes extractive, democracy slowly stops functioning as a republic of citizens and begins operating as a marketplace of power disguised as constitutional government.

--

John Onyeukwu
http://www.policy.hu/onyeukwu/

 http://about.me/onyeukwu
“Let us move forward to fight poverty, to establish equity, and assure peace for the next generation.”
-- James D. Wolfensohn
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CABsbg_%2BjxPzkSLmPfPpNd3YZfZMVq-XnnEayta6PxNaKQBLV%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Leaked Documents Reveal Russian "Cognitive Strikes" Against The West, Including Islamophobic "Pig Head" Attacks In Paris

https://updatesonnews.substack.com/p/report-leaked-documents-reveal-russian

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALfyqEGH10mVB5p_-%2B0OmE5YGvhAwXte36MbTGWwwgP2K8jZGg%40mail.gmail.com.