Information from Washington Post and Russian News
Published: 25 April, 2011, 16:44
A rebel fighter stands guard behind a Kingdom of Libya flag at Dehiba, at the border crossing between southern Libya and Tunisia April 23, 2011 (AFP Photo / Joseph Eid)
Moscow has harshly rebuked the latest NATO attack against forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, saying that the Western military bloc has given the militant opposition "dangerous ideas," while stoking the flames of unrest elsewhere.
NATO forces have unleashed a powerful missile attack on Tripoli, the Libyan capital, in the latest sign that the coalition has ignored its UN mandate to "protect civilians" and has chosen instead to take sides in the revolt.
As recent actions would indicate, NATO forces have opted not to side with Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi.
Early reports on Monday said at least two cruise missiles had slammed into Gaddafi's sprawling Bab al-Azizia compound, which seems to be the same location where the Libyan leader recently hosted an African Union peace mission.
Libyan media reports say the compound did not have a military component, nor was it in any way endangering civilians, thus NATO violated its UN mandate, which was specifically designed to limit the number of civilian casualties.
The early-morning attacks came as pro-Gaddafi forces were retreating from Misrata, a rebel stronghold in western Libya that has been the scene of fierce fighting between the rebels and pro-Gaddafi forces.
According to eyewitness reports out of Libya, the rebels received heavy back-up assistance from NATO fighter jets, as well as the United States, which carried out its first Predator drone airstrikes Saturday afternoon, Pentagon spokesman, Navy Captain Darryn James, said.
The UN resolution, which enforces a no-fly zone, does not imply air raids, including strikes on civilian sites. "Yet there have been reports to that effect," the foreign minister observed.
The Pentagon, meanwhile, invoking its claim to military secrecy, offered no other information on the aerial attacks.
Meanwhile, the ragtag rebels received a cash pledge on Sunday from the government of Kuwait for the creation of so-called Transitional National Council to the tune of some $180 million.
Russian rebuke
Moscow has harshly criticized the actions of the Western coalition and their partners, arguing that NATO is abusing its UN mandate while hardening the resolve of the rebel opposition, of which dangerously little is known.
"We suspect that their [insurgents'] irreconcilability is rooted in the fact that Western and NATO countries, which volunteered to fulfill Resolution 1973, have taken the side of the insurgents," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told a press conference on Monday in Tskhinval, South Ossetia.
Lavrov said that NATO's actions were causing the insurgents to become overly dependent upon "foreign help," which they might translate into their ability of overthrowing the regime and taking power.
"These are very dangerous ideas," the foreign minister said.
Just last month it was reported that Al-Qaeda militants had infiltrated the ranks of the Libyan opposition for advancing their own agenda. Moscow promptly warned that any assistance to the government opposition could unwittingly become synonymous with assisting terrorist organizations.
Lavrov said that NATO's rush to assist rebel leaders may give a dangerous message, and actually help foment civil war in other parts of the world.
"Alas, [the message] may be contagious, because it is expressed in other regional countries with the hope that the international community will come to their assistance if the situation exacerbates."
"In fact, this is an invitation to a series of civil wars," he said.
Along these lines, Lavrov stressed that it was counteractive for "external players" to take a particular side in any political altercations, which the opposition may use to their advantage.
"External players must not interfere, suggest recipes or take somebody's side in international political altercations," he said. "It is irresponsible to use force against one's own citizens…it is responsible of the opposition to provoke the use of force by external forces."
"I hope that the trend of rejecting negotiations will be actively put to an end by anyone capable of influencing either side to the conflict," he said.
"We will insist on the prevention of [bringing the hostilities] to a dangerous phase," Lavrov concluded. "It is important to ensure strict compliance with the UN Security resolution on Libya, whose mandate does not imply a lot of things, which are being done in the air [raids]."
The mass uprising against Colonel Gaddafi began in February, triggered by a wave of uprisings throughout the Arab world.
From Washington Post: Monday April, 25, 2011
NATO bombards Gaddafi government complex
TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO sent at least two large guided bombs into the sprawling office, residential and military complex where Moammar Gaddafi lives in the heart of Tripoli early Monday, destroying offices and a library used by the Libyan leader, but apparently causing no significant injuries.
In a statement, the alliance described the attack as "precision strike" on a communications headquarters "that was used to coordinate attacks against civilians." Libyan officials said it was an attempt to assassinate their leader.
About 130 miles east of the capital, the rebel-held port city of Misurata came under heavy shelling Monday for the third day in a row from Gaddafi loyalist forces camped out on the southern and southwestern outskirts, said Mohamed Ali, a rebel spokesman. By 5 p.m. local time, he said, at least 12 people had been killed and more than 22 injured in the latest barrages, which began overnight.
Gaddafi's forces have intensified their shelling and rocketing of Misurata in the three days since the government said it was lifting the siege. As a result, the death toll has been climbing at one of its highest rates since the battle for Misurata began two months ago.
The NATO attack in Tripoli was the second against the sprawling Bab al-Aziziyah complex since Western powers began a campaign of airstrikes last month. It came hours after Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said NATO should "cut the head of the snake off" and that Gaddafi and his entourage should wake up every day "wondering 'will this be my last?' "
Part residence for Gaddafi, part government offices and part military base, the complex is also the scene of nightly celebrations by hundreds of civilians offering themselves as human shields to protect Gaddafi against NATO. Officials at the scene said no one had been badly hurt, although state television later reported that 45 people had been injured.
A senior Libyan official said the attack appeared to have targeted the Libyan leader. "It was very close," he said, adding that the conflict was "getting worse and worse."
Gaddafi's son, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, said the Libyan government would not be cowed.
"The bombing which targeted Moammar Gaddafi's office today . . . will only scare children. It's impossible that it will make us afraid or give up or raise the white flag," he was quoted as saying by the state-run JANA news agency.
"You, NATO, are waging a losing battle because you are backed by traitors and spies," he said. "History has proved that no state can rely on them to win."
Reporters in Tripoli first heard two huge explosions and saw a red flash from the direction of Gaddafi's compound. There was also a third, smaller explosion, which officials said was an attack on a state television broadcasting facility in Tripoli, after which the signal from all three channels went down briefly.
Later, reporters were taken to see the scene of the main attack and shown a destroyed building that officials said contained offices and a library used by Gaddafi. Its roof was caved in, many of its walls had collapsed, and shattered masonry, twisted metal and other debris was strewn over a large area.
No comments:
Post a Comment