If I were to argue on this topic, I would be explaining to Nigerians why we should introduce this at this time. I would be assuring them that even though it is called Islamic bank, it will not receive preferential treatment as to eventually overshadow the conventional banks in the country, that it is only a bank and that it is not an attempt to project islam at the expense of other religious cultures in Nigeria, that even though Boko Haram is asking to turn everything in Nigeria into islam, the bank shall distance itself from such extreme views, that even though a governor just wanted to ban women from wearing trousers, the bank will not espouse such intolerance. That's what you need to be saying to calm down the anxiety of the nation on this subject.--Attorney Emeka Ugwuonye
Emeka:
I am glad you agreed with the main thrust of my argument not withstanding
some of your reservations which I will address later in this submission.
The CBN will be better off having legal minds of your caliber on their payroll.
This time I will advise that you ask for a retainer upfront--knowing from your personal
experience how hard it is to collect from Nigerian government officials unless you're prepared
to play by their rules.
Now I wish to address your reservations on my take on the Islamic Banking issue and others:
a) you objected along with my esteemed brother Pius Adesannmi about my use
of the word 'educated' to describe Prof. Salisu Mustafa,(aka Mallam Wayne) former VC,
Bayero University, Kano.)
Who am I to describe Mallam Wayne, a Nigerian Professor,
a member of the Nigerian Academy of Science
and a former Vice Chancellor of a prominent Nigerian University as uneducated?
Let us face the facts, He is educated --paper wise or degree wise.
What he has not demonstrated is 'enlightenment' on this issue and many others.
I have never met or spoken to Mallam Wayne. But I have met and worked successfully with
Dr Chima Ahanotu, who is also a Professor on many occasions.
Chima is a fellow NIDOite and current board member of NIDO A. He also believes that women
should not wear trousers. I wouldn't be true to myself if I choose to describe Chima as uneducated
just because we disagree on the issue of what is appropriate attire for a woman.
I would only describe Chima's views on this issue as being unenlightened, notwithstanding
his claim that his beliefs on thie matter are derived from some passages in the Holy
Bible.
b) I disagree with your opinion that the adoption of Sharia Law in some northern Nigerian
states has elevated the Sharia Law and its tenets over and above the Constitution of
Nigeria. It has not. Sharia Law would have been struck off the books by the Supremo
Court if any entity had protested its adoption to its level if it was deemed to be above the Nigerian
constitution. But no one did--at least to my
knowledge or that I can remember.
I know my limits as a layman on legal matters. I believe that what the proponents
of the Sharia Law did was to successfully maneuver the issue through some loopholes
in the current Constitution of Nigeria (1999). I do not agree that the Sharia Law should
apply to every citizen in any state that has declared Sharia Law. Based on my limited knowledge,
I cannot say for sure whether or not the Sharia Law in place in some states in northern Nigeria
applies to every resident, Muslims and non Muslims alike without a non-Muslim accused being given
the option to be tried by a regular criminal court. A guilty verdict of Murder punishable by death through
stoning rendered by a Sharia Court cannot to my knowledge be executed without recourse initially to the Appeals Court
and ultimately to the Supreme Court of Nigeria. If this is true, the idea that the Sharia Law is above the constitution
remains a false interpretation of the law. I will leave the rest of the matter to legal minds like yourself!
I do not deliberately choose to be in the middle of any issue. My professional practice requires that
before making a decision on any case (e.g. render a diagnosis) in what could be a life and death
matter--for example designating a tumor as either benign (indolent) or malignant (cancerous) that
I explore fully the reasons for either side of the equation, in an unemotional manner while exploring
current medical knowledge. This is what we refer to in Medicine as
rendering a differential diagnosis. Even after rendering a differential diagnosis--an astute physician
who knows his/her onions
must still make a decision one way or the other or refer the patient or tissue slide to another physician with more expertise
in the specific area.
I always endeavor even after my somewhat lengthy examination of the pros and cons of any issue end up with a firm
decision. I do not waiver on such decisions once they are made unless I come across a more compelling evidence or argument
to the contrary!:
Some recent examples
a) --I support Islamic Banking on the principle that all Nigerians deserve to be served in a manner
they prefer as long as it is legal and does not impinge on the rights of other Nigerians, even though
I am unlikely ever to patronize such banks.
b) I do not like Sharia Law--because I consider some of its tenets and prescribed punishments primitive
but I would recognize the rights of any jurisdiction in Nigeria instituting such laws as long as they are
in keeping with the Nigerian constitution and non-Muslims are not compelled to live under these laws
and when arrested they are given the option to be tried in a regular court. As I hve written before I would
never live under Sharia Law!This is the reason why I ininitially opposed the institution of Sharia Law
by Gov. Ahmad Sherima of Zamfara state. However, after many months of studying the constitutionality
of the issue, I had no choice but to accept what I would ordinarily wish had not been adopted.
Bye,
Ola
I am glad you agreed with the main thrust of my argument not withstanding
some of your reservations which I will address later in this submission.
The CBN will be better off having legal minds of your caliber on their payroll.
This time I will advise that you ask for a retainer upfront--knowing from your personal
experience how hard it is to collect from Nigerian government officials unless you're prepared
to play by their rules.
Now I wish to address your reservations on my take on the Islamic Banking issue and others:
a) you objected along with my esteemed brother Pius Adesannmi about my use
of the word 'educated' to describe Prof. Salisu Mustafa,(aka Mallam Wayne) former VC,
Bayero University, Kano.)
Who am I to describe Mallam Wayne, a Nigerian Professor,
a member of the Nigerian Academy of Science
and a former Vice Chancellor of a prominent Nigerian University as uneducated?
Let us face the facts, He is educated --paper wise or degree wise.
What he has not demonstrated is 'enlightenment' on this issue and many others.
I have never met or spoken to Mallam Wayne. But I have met and worked successfully with
Dr Chima Ahanotu, who is also a Professor on many occasions.
Chima is a fellow NIDOite and current board member of NIDO A. He also believes that women
should not wear trousers. I wouldn't be true to myself if I choose to describe Chima as uneducated
just because we disagree on the issue of what is appropriate attire for a woman.
I would only describe Chima's views on this issue as being unenlightened, notwithstanding
his claim that his beliefs on thie matter are derived from some passages in the Holy
Bible.
b) I disagree with your opinion that the adoption of Sharia Law in some northern Nigerian
states has elevated the Sharia Law and its tenets over and above the Constitution of
Nigeria. It has not. Sharia Law would have been struck off the books by the Supremo
Court if any entity had protested its adoption to its level if it was deemed to be above the Nigerian
constitution. But no one did--at least to my
knowledge or that I can remember.
I know my limits as a layman on legal matters. I believe that what the proponents
of the Sharia Law did was to successfully maneuver the issue through some loopholes
in the current Constitution of Nigeria (1999). I do not agree that the Sharia Law should
apply to every citizen in any state that has declared Sharia Law. Based on my limited knowledge,
I cannot say for sure whether or not the Sharia Law in place in some states in northern Nigeria
applies to every resident, Muslims and non Muslims alike without a non-Muslim accused being given
the option to be tried by a regular criminal court. A guilty verdict of Murder punishable by death through
stoning rendered by a Sharia Court cannot to my knowledge be executed without recourse initially to the Appeals Court
and ultimately to the Supreme Court of Nigeria. If this is true, the idea that the Sharia Law is above the constitution
remains a false interpretation of the law. I will leave the rest of the matter to legal minds like yourself!
I do not deliberately choose to be in the middle of any issue. My professional practice requires that
before making a decision on any case (e.g. render a diagnosis) in what could be a life and death
matter--for example designating a tumor as either benign (indolent) or malignant (cancerous) that
I explore fully the reasons for either side of the equation, in an unemotional manner while exploring
current medical knowledge. This is what we refer to in Medicine as
rendering a differential diagnosis. Even after rendering a differential diagnosis--an astute physician
who knows his/her onions
must still make a decision one way or the other or refer the patient or tissue slide to another physician with more expertise
in the specific area.
I always endeavor even after my somewhat lengthy examination of the pros and cons of any issue end up with a firm
decision. I do not waiver on such decisions once they are made unless I come across a more compelling evidence or argument
to the contrary!:
Some recent examples
a) --I support Islamic Banking on the principle that all Nigerians deserve to be served in a manner
they prefer as long as it is legal and does not impinge on the rights of other Nigerians, even though
I am unlikely ever to patronize such banks.
b) I do not like Sharia Law--because I consider some of its tenets and prescribed punishments primitive
but I would recognize the rights of any jurisdiction in Nigeria instituting such laws as long as they are
in keeping with the Nigerian constitution and non-Muslims are not compelled to live under these laws
and when arrested they are given the option to be tried in a regular court. As I hve written before I would
never live under Sharia Law!This is the reason why I ininitially opposed the institution of Sharia Law
by Gov. Ahmad Sherima of Zamfara state. However, after many months of studying the constitutionality
of the issue, I had no choice but to accept what I would ordinarily wish had not been adopted.
Bye,
Ola
-----Original Message-----
From: Emekaugwuonye@aol.com
To: OlaKassimMD@aol.com; NigerianID@yahoogroups.com; lawoffice@rogers.com; nyedik2000@yahoo.com; NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com; omoodua@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: NigerianID | Islamic Banks in Nigeria--Seprating the Myths from the Facts
-- From: Emekaugwuonye@aol.com
To: OlaKassimMD@aol.com; NigerianID@yahoogroups.com; lawoffice@rogers.com; nyedik2000@yahoo.com; NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com; omoodua@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com; NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 31, 2011 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: NigerianID | Islamic Banks in Nigeria--Seprating the Myths from the Facts
Dear Ola,
I have stayed away from the debate on the Islamic Banking topic, which I agree have been largely misinformed. But even your own comments attempting to tow a reconcilliatory middle line seem to be hugely off the mark both on facts and analysis. Let's try to focus on the core implications or tendencies of the introduction of islamic banking in Nigeria AT THIS PERIOD. Everybody knows that the quarrel is not just on the name, 'islamic bank'. Everybody knows that it is not the same as 'interest free bank' or 'sango bank', etc. The fact is that the CBN Governor does not worship Sango and does not hold his highest educational qualification on Sango Studies obtained from Egypt. So, we cannot fear that he might be biased in favor of Sango Bank applicants.
Also, Ola, your other comments that Sharia Law has been part of our legal system, though true, only begs all the questions. That's never the issue. Our customary laws have also been part of our legal system, actually on the same jurisprudential hierarchy as the Sharia law. But never ever did a chief or traditional ruler or a governor in Imo State, for example, gone about trying to force everybody in Imo State under the customary law practices of that state. Never has anybody in Nigeria attempted to elevate customary law above the Constitution. Indeed, the legal validity test for the customary law remains captured within the phrase, "valid only to the extent of consistency with the Constitution and laws made by the federal and state legislatures". Would you apply such validity test to the Sharia law today?
So, my friend, either you don't really understand this topic, or you are bending over to please everybody or you are desperate for an appointment in the Nigerian government, none of which is bad anyway.
If I were to argue on this topic, I would be explaining to Nigerians why we should introduce this at this time. I would be assuring them that even though it is called Islamic bank, it will not receive preferential treatment as to eventually overshadow the conventional banks in the country, that it is only a bank and that it is not an attempt to project islam at the expense of other religious cultures in Nigeria, that even though Boko Haram is asking to turn everything in Nigeria into islam, the bank shall distance itself from such extreme views, that even though a governor just wanted to ban women from wearing trousers, the bank will not espouse such intolerance. That's what you need to be saying to calm down the anxiety of the nation on this subject. Misstating the case to deny it's urgency or referring to the silly Governor Waine (or whatever you call him) as educated actually undermines you sincerity and credibility. That's just my own uninformed view, not on the subject, but only on your comments. Thank you, my brother, and keep up the good work.
I have stayed away from the debate on the Islamic Banking topic, which I agree have been largely misinformed. But even your own comments attempting to tow a reconcilliatory middle line seem to be hugely off the mark both on facts and analysis. Let's try to focus on the core implications or tendencies of the introduction of islamic banking in Nigeria AT THIS PERIOD. Everybody knows that the quarrel is not just on the name, 'islamic bank'. Everybody knows that it is not the same as 'interest free bank' or 'sango bank', etc. The fact is that the CBN Governor does not worship Sango and does not hold his highest educational qualification on Sango Studies obtained from Egypt. So, we cannot fear that he might be biased in favor of Sango Bank applicants.
Also, Ola, your other comments that Sharia Law has been part of our legal system, though true, only begs all the questions. That's never the issue. Our customary laws have also been part of our legal system, actually on the same jurisprudential hierarchy as the Sharia law. But never ever did a chief or traditional ruler or a governor in Imo State, for example, gone about trying to force everybody in Imo State under the customary law practices of that state. Never has anybody in Nigeria attempted to elevate customary law above the Constitution. Indeed, the legal validity test for the customary law remains captured within the phrase, "valid only to the extent of consistency with the Constitution and laws made by the federal and state legislatures". Would you apply such validity test to the Sharia law today?
So, my friend, either you don't really understand this topic, or you are bending over to please everybody or you are desperate for an appointment in the Nigerian government, none of which is bad anyway.
If I were to argue on this topic, I would be explaining to Nigerians why we should introduce this at this time. I would be assuring them that even though it is called Islamic bank, it will not receive preferential treatment as to eventually overshadow the conventional banks in the country, that it is only a bank and that it is not an attempt to project islam at the expense of other religious cultures in Nigeria, that even though Boko Haram is asking to turn everything in Nigeria into islam, the bank shall distance itself from such extreme views, that even though a governor just wanted to ban women from wearing trousers, the bank will not espouse such intolerance. That's what you need to be saying to calm down the anxiety of the nation on this subject. Misstating the case to deny it's urgency or referring to the silly Governor Waine (or whatever you call him) as educated actually undermines you sincerity and credibility. That's just my own uninformed view, not on the subject, but only on your comments. Thank you, my brother, and keep up the good work.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From: OlaKassimMD@aol.com
Sender: NigerianID@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:19:20 -0400
To: <lawoffice@rogers.com>; <nyedik2000@yahoo.com>; <NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com>; <nigerianid@yahoogroups.com>; <omoodua@yahoogroups.com>; <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>; <NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com>; <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: NigerianID | Islamic Banks in Nigeria--Seprating the Myths from the Facts
Dear Brothers Dike and Oyenubi et al:
I am delighted that Attorney Oyenubi has weighed on this matter by providing
some legal opinion gratis on this important issue of Islamic Banking in Nigeria.
I believe what we are dealing with here is a matter of perception. Whether a perception
is true or false does not usually matter considering it is almost always considered
as close to 99.99% of the truth.
Unfortunately, an antagonistic stand against Islamic Banking, which started as a knee jerk reaction
by some Christian leaders in Nigeria led by Rev. Ayo Orietjiafor President CAN) has now percolated
into the mainstream where it continues to feed on ignorance rather than knowledge
and on emotions rather than rational thought.
The matter was unfortunately further muddled by a poor description of Islamic Banking as the
only form of 'Interest free' banking that is allowable in Nigeria as was presented in the initial
draft of Guidelines for Islamic Banking.
If Islamic Banking had been called simply "Interest Free Banking" or by any other name other
than Islamic I doubt if there would have been so much 'noise' and confusion of the matter.
If let's say it had been presented as Ahmadiyya, Ansarudeen or Arab banking it would
probably not have provoked as much angst amongst some Nigerian Christians.
A lot of falsehoods and misinformation continue to be spread on this matter even
by otherwise well educated Nigerians who are normally well informed and are
enlightened on other matters.
These same people find the combination of Islamic Banking and Sharia Law
too scary to fathom. But are they?
Facts:
**8haria Law has always been a component of Nigeria's judicial system; it was in place
before amalgamation in 1914 and transcended into the Nigerian constitution at independence
and was retained in the 1999 Constitution. The maintenance of Sharia Law was guaranteed
to the Sultans and Emirs of northern Nigeria just as other forms of Common Law were
guaranteed to the traditional rulers
of the colonized regions of southern Nigeria (the Southern Protectorate).
Thus Sharia and other forms of Common Law have always
existed side by side with the basic Nigerian jurisprudence which was derived from Westminster.
Laws of Great Britain.
The only difference between then and now is that the traditional rulers and political leaders
of northern Nigeria originally limited Sharia Law to civil matters even though they
had reserved the rights to also introduce Sharia into criminal matters whenever they wanted to do so.
**Islamic Banking is only one form of Interest Free Banking. There is nothing under current
Nigerian laws that forbids Christian organizations and representatives of our native religions
e..g. Sango, Ayelalala, Oro, Ogboni, Okija etc, from applying to set up their own forms of interest
free banking in the country. Once the Governor of the CBN receives such applications he would be
expected as part of his fiduciary duties to ensure that the proposed entities are legal and that
they are acceptable under the rules governing banking in Nigeria. Once deemed acceptable
the governor of the CBN would then set up guidelines and procedures for setting up such banks.
**The process of introducing Islamic Banking started during the tenure of Prof. Soludo and long
before Mallam Sanusi took over as governor of CBN. It was Prof. Soludo who approved the setting
up of Islamic Banking and it was under his tenure that the initial draft of the guidelines was prepared.
**Prof Soludo still supports the concept of Islamic Banking; Dr Mrs Okonjo Iweala our current
Minister of Finance also supports Islamic Banking, just as her predecessor Mr Aganga.
The aforementioned individuals are Christians with vast knowledge in the financial field than
most of us.
**The idea that Mr Sanusi is using state funds to promote Islamic Banking is false.
Mr Sanusi is not promoting Islamic Banking. He is presenting Islamic Banking, its underlying
principles and the proposed guidelines he is about to put in place for such entities
to Nigerian political leaders and through them to all Nigerians.He is doing the job
we ordinary Nigerians are paying him to do.
**Some have suggested that since Islamic Banking was legal under Nigerian laws
that Mr Sanusi should just simply approve them and allow them to start doing business in Nigeria,
considering that he does not need legislative approval to do so. I disagree.
I believe that Mr Sanusi has acted wisely as he would have been in hot water if he had discreetly
sanctioned Islamic Banks without first increasing public awareness about such financial institutions.
Prof Soludo, former governor of the CBN was chastised for attempting to re denominate the Naira by the Yar'adua
government even though the Banking Act gave him the power to do without resorting to
the Presidency or the Legislative Assemblies/
**No Nigerian citizen would be forced to patronize the Islamic Banks against their will.
**Islamic Banking is just an alternative form of banking that is guided by different rules
and principles in the same manner that rules governing traditional banks are different
from those governing Credit Unions.
We must learn as Nigerians to live and let live. It is unlikely that a financial institution which
operates as an Islamic Bank would open a branch in a jurisdiction where it is unlikely
to attract customers, business and deposits.Thus the fear that islamic Banks could be used
as a ruse to Islamize Nigeria is unfounded. Nigeria can not be Islamized any more than she
can be Christianized. The secular status of Nigeria was never compromised by over a century
of Christian Missionary Schools which were later followed the establishment of schools by
denominations of the Islamic religion.
Bye,
Ola
I am delighted that Attorney Oyenubi has weighed on this matter by providing
some legal opinion gratis on this important issue of Islamic Banking in Nigeria.
I believe what we are dealing with here is a matter of perception. Whether a perception
is true or false does not usually matter considering it is almost always considered
as close to 99.99% of the truth.
Unfortunately, an antagonistic stand against Islamic Banking, which started as a knee jerk reaction
by some Christian leaders in Nigeria led by Rev. Ayo Orietjiafor President CAN) has now percolated
into the mainstream where it continues to feed on ignorance rather than knowledge
and on emotions rather than rational thought.
The matter was unfortunately further muddled by a poor description of Islamic Banking as the
only form of 'Interest free' banking that is allowable in Nigeria as was presented in the initial
draft of Guidelines for Islamic Banking.
If Islamic Banking had been called simply "Interest Free Banking" or by any other name other
than Islamic I doubt if there would have been so much 'noise' and confusion of the matter.
If let's say it had been presented as Ahmadiyya, Ansarudeen or Arab banking it would
probably not have provoked as much angst amongst some Nigerian Christians.
A lot of falsehoods and misinformation continue to be spread on this matter even
by otherwise well educated Nigerians who are normally well informed and are
enlightened on other matters.
These same people find the combination of Islamic Banking and Sharia Law
too scary to fathom. But are they?
Facts:
**8haria Law has always been a component of Nigeria's judicial system; it was in place
before amalgamation in 1914 and transcended into the Nigerian constitution at independence
and was retained in the 1999 Constitution. The maintenance of Sharia Law was guaranteed
to the Sultans and Emirs of northern Nigeria just as other forms of Common Law were
guaranteed to the traditional rulers
of the colonized regions of southern Nigeria (the Southern Protectorate).
Thus Sharia and other forms of Common Law have always
existed side by side with the basic Nigerian jurisprudence which was derived from Westminster.
Laws of Great Britain.
The only difference between then and now is that the traditional rulers and political leaders
of northern Nigeria originally limited Sharia Law to civil matters even though they
had reserved the rights to also introduce Sharia into criminal matters whenever they wanted to do so.
**Islamic Banking is only one form of Interest Free Banking. There is nothing under current
Nigerian laws that forbids Christian organizations and representatives of our native religions
e..g. Sango, Ayelalala, Oro, Ogboni, Okija etc, from applying to set up their own forms of interest
free banking in the country. Once the Governor of the CBN receives such applications he would be
expected as part of his fiduciary duties to ensure that the proposed entities are legal and that
they are acceptable under the rules governing banking in Nigeria. Once deemed acceptable
the governor of the CBN would then set up guidelines and procedures for setting up such banks.
**The process of introducing Islamic Banking started during the tenure of Prof. Soludo and long
before Mallam Sanusi took over as governor of CBN. It was Prof. Soludo who approved the setting
up of Islamic Banking and it was under his tenure that the initial draft of the guidelines was prepared.
**Prof Soludo still supports the concept of Islamic Banking; Dr Mrs Okonjo Iweala our current
Minister of Finance also supports Islamic Banking, just as her predecessor Mr Aganga.
The aforementioned individuals are Christians with vast knowledge in the financial field than
most of us.
**The idea that Mr Sanusi is using state funds to promote Islamic Banking is false.
Mr Sanusi is not promoting Islamic Banking. He is presenting Islamic Banking, its underlying
principles and the proposed guidelines he is about to put in place for such entities
to Nigerian political leaders and through them to all Nigerians.He is doing the job
we ordinary Nigerians are paying him to do.
**Some have suggested that since Islamic Banking was legal under Nigerian laws
that Mr Sanusi should just simply approve them and allow them to start doing business in Nigeria,
considering that he does not need legislative approval to do so. I disagree.
I believe that Mr Sanusi has acted wisely as he would have been in hot water if he had discreetly
sanctioned Islamic Banks without first increasing public awareness about such financial institutions.
Prof Soludo, former governor of the CBN was chastised for attempting to re denominate the Naira by the Yar'adua
government even though the Banking Act gave him the power to do without resorting to
the Presidency or the Legislative Assemblies/
**No Nigerian citizen would be forced to patronize the Islamic Banks against their will.
**Islamic Banking is just an alternative form of banking that is guided by different rules
and principles in the same manner that rules governing traditional banks are different
from those governing Credit Unions.
We must learn as Nigerians to live and let live. It is unlikely that a financial institution which
operates as an Islamic Bank would open a branch in a jurisdiction where it is unlikely
to attract customers, business and deposits.Thus the fear that islamic Banks could be used
as a ruse to Islamize Nigeria is unfounded. Nigeria can not be Islamized any more than she
can be Christianized. The secular status of Nigeria was never compromised by over a century
of Christian Missionary Schools which were later followed the establishment of schools by
denominations of the Islamic religion.
Bye,
Ola
-----Original Message-----
From: A.O. Oyenubi <lawoffice@rogers.com>
To: nyerere dike <nyedik2000@yahoo.com>; NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 31, 2011 9:05 am
Subject: Re: Re: NIDOCanada | Islamic banks in Canada?
From: A.O. Oyenubi <lawoffice@rogers.com>
To: nyerere dike <nyedik2000@yahoo.com>; NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Jul 31, 2011 9:05 am
Subject: Re: Re: NIDOCanada | Islamic banks in Canada?
NOISE! NOISE!! NOISE!!! The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria makes provision for Sharia law(try changing that if you can) and the Sharia Council/Expert/Board is supposedly made up of persons versed in Islamic law, finance the Quran (try getting the Christian et al committed knowledgeable in this area too before making so much noise). Common law is still applicable in Nigeria, just like in Canada UK. You can always avail yourself of the common law system if its your preference. A contract is still a contract, anywhere on the face of the earth. Sharia Banking is not being forced down anybody's throat. There is no compulsion here, my friend!. If the Constitution allows it, why can't the CBN spend state money to promote it?...for crying out loud!!!
A.O. Oyenubi
A.O. Oyenubi
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
From: nyerere dike <nyedik2000@yahoo.com>
Sender: NIDOCANADA@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Fw: Re: NIDOCanada | Islamic banks in Canada?
|
__._,_.___
"No part of any discussion on NigerianID may be used, quoted, or referred to, without the express permission of the individual author, or the Chief moderator All discussions on NigerianID are the express property of the author and NigerianID." Copyright 2006-2011. NigerianID. All Rights Reserved.
Nigerians In Diaspora Organization. Our mission is to promote the spirit of patriotism, networking, and cooperation among Nigerians in Diaspora....
JOIN the PUSH TO RESTORE PRIDE IN NIGERIA at http://www.ProudNigerians.Org
Need a home based business? Check out this new business that I just joined at http://OneX.me/KingWaleAde , It a great way to make money for yourself and the up front money in nothing.
Nigerians In Diaspora Organization. Our mission is to promote the spirit of patriotism, networking, and cooperation among Nigerians in Diaspora....
JOIN the PUSH TO RESTORE PRIDE IN NIGERIA at http://www.ProudNigerians.Org
Need a home based business? Check out this new business that I just joined at http://OneX.me/KingWaleAde , It a great way to make money for yourself and the up front money in nothing.
.
__,_._,___
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment