RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Poor, Living Large: By Okey Ndibe

On the contrary,  I believe comparative referencing is quite helpful.

GE

 

 

From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com [mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Moses Ebe Ochonu
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 11:14 AM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Poor, Living Large: By Okey Ndibe

 

Ken,

 

I don't mean to be pedantic but could you enlighten us about the parallel you are drawing between the conspicuous consumption of the super rich on NY's upper east side and the profligacy of Africa's diplomatic and political visitors to the UN? Where is the equivalence? Are the American super rich you referenced government officials or government financed? No matter what you think of their wealth and the ethics of their business practices, are they financing their vulgar lifestyle with government money, understood in the narrow sense of being in the employ of government?

 

Ken, no disrespect is intended, but you should try not to always "globalize" the familiar foibles of the African ruling class. There are many peculiar features of African political dysfunction that can only be appreciated as stand-alones, not as appendages or outgrowths of global structures of inequality, however valid that analysis may be. Tying the corruption and mindless waste of Africa's rulers to the capitalist excess in America dilutes the egregiousness of the crimes of the former. 

 

I know why you ALWAYS feel a need to provide a global context for Africa's multilayered dysfunction, but to tell you the truth it is not always necessary, and there are African political vices that no invocation of global structural hegemonies can explain. Insisting on this sort of broad explanation can obscure the issue and provide undeserved comfort to the African political and bureaucratic crooks fleecing their countries. 

 

White liberals always worry about being seen to over-dramatize or isolate Africa's vices in contrast to Western righteous (and hypocritical) indignation, a perception that may result in charges of racism and Othering. But with you, and in the context of this forum, you need to not allow such anxieties to color your commentary on Africa. We know you love and RESPECT Africa and Africans and do not see African alterity as a function of degeneration or destiny. We know and regard you as one of us. In fact you care about Africa more than some self-confessed pan-AfriKanists, so there is really no need for unnecessary, unconvincing, and out-of-place analogies and caveats when African political buffoons are called out on their excesses. I have never seen any hint of white liberal Othering of Africa in your posts, so calling things the way they are in Africa will not attract any charges to you along those lines. What I see often, which troubles me, is a tendency on your part to relativize all of Africa's destructive political evils or to equate it to some Western vice or reality. It's very unsettling. What we Africans want is not to be patronized, condescended to, or cuddled. We want our foreign friends to hold our politicians and intellectuals to the standards that they hold their own to. We want them to comment on African affairs without summoning irritating and forced analogies with unrelated Western realities. 

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, kenneth harrow <harrow@msu.edu> wrote:

thank you funmi for passing on okey's sharp words.
i looked up the mandarin oriental on google: rooms begin at $995.

one thought on this: the wealthy in nigeria, or swaziland, or cameroun, don't need to go to new york to indulge in a lifestyle that accentuates the gap between rich and poor. it is right there at home, in the mansions, servants, cars, clothes, food, you name it.
and you don't have to go to africa to find this disgusting injustice. it is right there between people living south of 125th street in new york and north of it; people north of 110th on the east side versus south of it; people in soho and in bed stuy.
cheek to jowl, wealth lives next to, and off of, poverty. the doorman is down on the street; the millionaire in the penthouse.
in between, the tip, the smile, the "tankeymassa."
ken

 

On 10/1/12 8:26 PM, Funmi Tofowomo Okelola wrote:

http://saharareporters.com/column/poor-living-large-okey-ndibe

 

 

Poor, Living Large By Okey Ndibe

Posted: October 1, 2012 - 22:02

 

Okey Ndibe

Columnist: 

 Okey Ndibe

I don’t know of a single African head of state who made a memorable speech during last week’s United Nations General Assembly. No African leader – and certainly not President Goodluck Jonathan – outlined a bold program for tackling the menace of poverty, or the rampant violence that is, in part, a by-product of deepening destitution. Yet, African delegates to the annual UN talkfest distinguished themselves in one department: living large.

A New York affiliate of NBC, one of America’s three major networks, highlighted the shame of African delegates living it up in New York City even as most of their citizens groan under the weight of poverty. Rather than sum up or paraphrase, I reproduce below the text of the report.

As diplomats congregate for the United Nations General Assembly, delegations from some of the poorest countries in the world are spending extravagantly in New York City while their homelands struggle, NBC 4 New York's I-Team has discovered.

“The lavish spending is just endemic of autocratic politics as a whole,” said Alastair Smith, a politics professor from New York University and co-author of “The Diplomat’s Handbook.”
He believes the U.N.’s Manhattan address has become a distraction from the intended work of the General Assembly.

“They are here for the shopping, the food the wine, the dining. If it was in a less attractive place, I'm sure fewer people would want to come as hangers-on,” said Smith.

On Monday, I-Team cameras found several visitors with the U.N. delegation from Swaziland walking out of high-end retailer Bergdorf Goodman. The women had Bergdorf Goodman shopping bags, though they said the items inside were just gifts.

According to U.N. data, nearly 70 percent of Swazi people survive on less than $2 a day. The nation has one of the highest AIDS rates: 18 percent of the population is HIV positive.
Despite those struggles back home, numerous members of the Swaziland U.N. entourage are staying at the luxury Mandarin Oriental Hotel, the I-Team has learned.

Also staying at the Mandarin Oriental were members of the delegation from Togo. According to one U.N. report, 2.4 million Togolese citizens live on less than $1.25 a day.
Diplomats from Gabon were staying at the Plaza Hotel, where rooms go for a $1,000 to $15,000 a night.

Nigeria’s delegation is keeping five vehicles parked outside the Pierre Hotel where the cheapest room is about $800 a night – or roughly what most Nigerians earn in two years.

At the Waldorf-Astoria, where rooms are between $800 and $9,000 a night, the I-Team found the delegation from Mali, a country where 4.6 million people are battling starvation. A recent U.N. report found Mali is the third poorest nation in the world with a poverty rate near 87 percent.

To be fair, not every poor nation spent so much for hotel accommodations: Members of the Tanzania delegation were found staying at a DoubleTree hotel in Midtown.

Although it may be unseemly for diplomats from poor countries to live ostentatiously during their stays in Manhattan, advocates for business point out there is an undeniable upside to much of the diplomatic extravagance – the boon for New York City’s local economy.

"I don't think it is really up to us to moderate the type of spending that comes from other countries. That's their business,” said Nancy Ploeger, president of the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce. “What I'm concerned with is the economic impact on this city. I like the money. I want the money!"
None of the permanent missions to the UN from Togo, Swaziland, Gabon, Mali or Nigeria returned calls or emails relating to this story.

Nonprofits that monitor developing nations are also becoming increasingly sensitive to the issue of third world rulers spending lavishly abroad.

The group “100 Reporters” is actually holding a contest asking New Yorkers to snap photos of UN diplomats spending ostentatiously.

By one estimate, the ruling classes of third-world nations divert as much as $1 trillion from their developing economies to spend and invest the funds in the U.S. and other Western nations.
“The real underlying motivation for the movement of so much money out of developing countries is the hidden accumulation of wealth,” said Raymond Baker, executive director of Global Financial Integrity, a nonprofit watchdog that monitors capital flows into and out of impoverished countries.

“This is about getting rich secretly and not having to distribute those funds locally,” Baker said.

The report simply underscores why Nigeria and most of Africa’s 54 countries are in wretched shape. And why it’s so easy for American, Asian and European economies to exploit Africans. Notice the tone of indifference and naked self-interest in the statement by Ms. Ploeger of the New York Chamber of Commerce. The woman knows what’s good for her city; she doesn’t give a hoot if contemptible fools from Africa steal food from the lips of their disease-ravaged, impoverished masses to live like emperors in her city. She’s not ashamed to sing, “Come, wretched fools, to my glitzy city – and be parted from your cash!”

When Nigerian workers ask for modest increases in minimum wage, their president, governors and legislators intone that Nigeria is a poor country. When we ask that fuel subsidies be retained, World Bank-accredited government officials warn that we’re virtually broke. If we ask for improvements in infrastructure, we are told that the funds are not there.

But the same excuse-making officials must have presidential jets. They must fly first class to every corner of the globe to attend every conference, consequential or not. We must not tamper with their access to security votes and constituency allowance. If we catch them laundering money, we must never shout thief, thief; we must never interrupt their embezzling activities because the constitution grants them immunity from prosecution.

And so goes the charade. Whether at home or traveling abroad, many members of Africa’s ruling elite come across as tragic figures. I believe it was the late Ken Saro-Wiwa who once berated his fellows as conspicuous consumers of other people’s ideas and products.

In the late 1990s, a senior Nigerian bureaucrat visiting the US was proud to boast that, by looking at the headlights of any Mercedes Benz car, he was able to tell the car’s year and model. He revealed this great prowess of his to a company that included two Caucasian American academics, their Nigerian colleague, and me. In unison, the two Americans said, “Amazing!” The visiting fool thought he had impressed the heck out of them – and so he spent time elaborating on his extraordinary knowledge of Benzes. The rest of us from Nigeria felt ashamed. After the bureaucrat had left, one of the American professors turned to us. A derisive expression on his face, he exclaimed, “What a guy! He knows everything about a German-designed luxury car!”

It all boils down to a deep inferiority complex. When the privileged classes from Africa are let loose on the world’s big cities – whether it’s Paris, London, New York, Toronto, Tokyo, Hong Kong, or Frankfurt – they light up with child-like excitement. They have arrived, they think. They feel themselves set apart from their fellow citizens’ grim experience. They want to stay in the priciest hotels and eat at the most expensive restaurants. They go on a shopping binge, hitting the most exclusive shops.

In all that infantile glee, they forget – these sorry characters – that the cities whose flamboyance, dazzle or fashionable air they relish were conceived, designed and built by men and women like themselves. Incapable of dreaming beyond their greed, hampered by their mental enslavement, they are content to shop as if there would be no tomorrow. They never pause for a moment to consider that their shopping is often underwritten by massive looting. And that the resources they loot and transfer to Europe, America and Asia account for the poverty that crushes millions of their fellow citizens.

The wife of Nigeria’s president is in a hospital in Germany recovering from we know not what. Yet, has it occurred to Mr. Jonathan that the late Ghanaian president, John Atta Mills, was not flown abroad for treatment? Has his wife’s illness instructed Mr. Jonathan to set out a plan to revamp healthcare in Nigeria – to offer other ailing Nigerians access to meaningful care? That remains to be seen.

There are many Malians, Swazis, Togolese and Nigerians living in New York City. Why didn’t they come out to protest the senseless profligacy of their diplomats? Why must it take an American television network to expose the folly of our “leaders” who waste the continent’s scarce funds to live it up?

In the words of the Ghanaian novelist Ayi Kwei Armah, why are we so blest?

Please follow me on twitter @ okeyndibe

(okeyndibe@gmail.com)                              

Funmi Tofowomo 
--The art of living and impermanence. 

 

 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
 

-- 

kenneth w. harrow 

distinguished professor of english

michigan state university

department of english

619 red cedar road

room C-614 wells hall

east lansing, mi 48824

ph. 517 803 8839

harrow@msu.edu

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
 

 

--
There is enough in the world for everyone's need but not for everyone's greed.


---Mohandas Gandhi

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com