Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Story recommendation...

Professor Harrow,

Sometimes he's blowing hot about "the Bushler"
other times he's still out cold – cold as he can be
like a brainless slab of meat in the million man morgue

"When my soul was in the lost and found
You came along, to claim it
I didn't know just what was wrong with me
'Til your kiss helped me name it " (Aretha)

https://www.google.com/search?q=Wesley+Clark+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

At least, unlike some of us, retired General Wesley Clark graduated as
valedictorian of the class of 1966 at West Point, after which he
obtained a degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the
University of Oxford; so we are to assume that at least he knows what
he's talking about and saying so clearly, here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY96Z5Mqn40&feature=youtu.be

We ought to pay some attention to what Retired General Wesley Clark is
saying and leave idiocy to the lunatics, saith I

http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/




On Feb 25, 5:46 pm, kenneth harrow <har...@msu.edu> wrote:
> maybe obama would have had more money to generate a more generous
> medical relief program in africa is bush had not destroyed the tax
> system and the economy with his wars and borrowing.
> maybe bush was so generous because he inherited the budget surplus from
> clinton.
> maybe bush should also have credited to his account the millions who
> died in his stupid wars
>
> ken
> On 2/24/13 11:03 PM, Assensoh, Akwasi B. wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > *An overlooked legacy: humanitarian*:
>
> >     George W. Bush deserves credit for saving millions of African lives
>
> > *Published:* February 24, 2013 12:00AM, Today
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > By Christian Caryl
>
> > Foreign Policy magazine
>
> > Which American will go down in history as the greatest humanitarian to
> > have served as U.S. president?
>
> > Republican Herbert Hoover often is known as the Great Humanitarian for
> > his work leading famine relief in post-World War I Europe (and
> > Bolshevik Russia) in the 1920s � but he did all that before he
> > actually became president.
>
> > Others might make the case for Franklin Roosevelt, the Democrat who
> > succeeded Hoover in the White House and whose New Deal initiatives
> > relieved poverty and sickness on a grand scale within the United States.
>
> > But there�s one president whose contribution dwarfs all the others.
> > Unlike Hoover, he launched his program while he was in office, and
> > unlike FDR, he received virtually no votes in return, since most of
> > the people who have benefited aren�t U.S. citizens. In fact, few
> > Americans associate him with his achievement.
>
> > Who�s this great humanitarian?
>
> > The name might surprise you: it�s George W. Bush.
>
> > I do not belong to the former president�s political camp. I strongly
> > disapproved of many of his policies. At the same time, I think it�s a
> > tragedy that the foreign policy shortcomings of the Bush
> > administration have conspired to obscure his most positive legacy �
> > not least because it saved so many lives, but because there�s so much
> > that Americans and the rest of the world can learn from it.
>
> > Both his detractors and supporters tend to view Bush�s time in office
> > through the lens of the �war on terror� and the policies that grew out
> > of it. By contrast, only a few Americans have ever heard of PEPFAR,
> > the U.S. President�s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which Bush
> > announced in his State of the Union address in 2003.
>
> > Fast forward a decade later, and in his own State of the Union address
> > on Feb. 12, President Obama only briefly mentioned the goal of
> > �realizing the promise of an AIDS-free generation� � an allusion to
> > the long-term aim of PEPFAR. Yet Obama�s most recent budget proposals
> > actually propose to cut spending on the program.
>
> > That�s a pity. It might have been a good moment to celebrate 10 years
> > of an unprecedented American success in fighting one of the world�s
> > most pernicious and destructive diseases.
>
> > In his 2003 speech, Bush called upon Congress to sponsor an ambitious
> > program to supply antiretroviral drugs and other treatments to HIV
> > sufferers in Africa. Since then, the U.S. government has spent some
> > $44 billion on the project (a figure that includes $7 billion
> > contributed to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
> > Malaria, a multilateral organization).
>
> > By way of comparison, America�s most recent aircraft carrier � which
> > will join the 10 we currently have in service � is set to cost $26.8
> > billion. One medical expert calls PEPFAR the �largest financial
> > commitment of any country to global health and to treatment of any
> > specific disease worldwide.�
>
> > It�s impossible to tell exactly how many lives the program has saved,
> > although Secretary of State John Kerry recently claimed that 5 million
> > people are alive today because of it. That�s probably as good an
> > estimate as any.
>
> > Just to give you an idea of the scale, here are some headline figures
> > from a recent op-ed piece from U.S. Global AIDS coordinator Eric Goolsby:
>
> > �In 2012 alone, PEPFAR directly supported nearly 5.1 million people on
> > antiretroviral treatment � a threefold increase in only four years;
> > provided antiretroviral drugs to prevent mother-to-child transmission
> > of HIV to nearly 750,000 pregnant women living with the disease (which
> > allowed approximately 230,000 infants to be born without HIV); and
> > enabled more than 46.5 million people to receive testing and counseling.�
>
> > So it�s safe to say this one program has been a titanic force for good
> > over the past decade. The number of deaths from AIDS has been
> > declining steadily over the past few years, and PEPFAR certainly has
> > been a big help.
>
> > But ask an American � or a Western European � if they�ve ever heard of
> > the program and they�re almost certainly to draw a blank. That�s
> > partly because the United States has done very little to publicize the
> > success of PEPFAR, and partly because the Bush presidency was
> > overshadowed by much more high-profile aspects of his foreign policy,
> > such as the invasion of Iraq.
>
> > Indeed, Bush still enjoys high popularity ratings in Africa, where
> > he�s widely regarded as one of the continent�s great benefactors.
> > (Meanwhile, the Obama administration�s proposed PEPFAR cuts have
> > triggered protests around Africa � even in Kenya, where the
> > president�s family ties have ensured him plenty of favorable coverage.)
>
> > �Bush did more to stop AIDS and more to help Africa than any president
> > before or since,� says New York Times correspondent Peter Baker, who�s
> > writing a history of the Bush-Cheney White House that�s due to appear
> > in October. �He took on one of the world�s biggest problems in a big,
> > bold way and it changed the course of a continent.
>
> > �If it weren�t for Iraq, it would be one of the main things history
> > would remember about Bush, and it still should be part of any
> > accounting of his presidency.�
>
> > And yet no good turn goes unpunished. PEPFAR also has come in for
> > criticism due to certain stipulations imposed on the program by
> > conservative members of the U.S. Congress, who have pressured its
> > administrators to promote abstinence and exclude prostitutes from
> > treatment. But sources close to PEPFAR tell me that those restrictions
> > have proven little hindrance on the ground.
>
> > In some ways, indeed, such complaints obscure the larger point. In an
> > age of continuing partisan gridlock in Washington, what�s really
> > astonishing about PEPFAR is the way that it has continued to enjoy
> > broad-based support from both Republicans and Democrats.
>
> > Jack Chow, who served as special representative of U.S. Secretary of
> > State Colin Powell on Global HIV/AIDS, notes that the idea of placing
> > the United States at the forefront of the global war on AIDS was one
> > area where both religious conservatives and socially active liberals
> > managed to find common ground.
>
> > �Bush wanted to do the right thing by fulfilling this humanitarian
> > impulse,� Chow says. �He didn�t really do it for political purposes,
> > in my opinion.
>
> > �I think he genuinely felt that the American response was slipping
> > behind what was needed.�
>
> > In so doing, Chow contends, Bush paved the way for an era in which
> > global health assistance has become a prominent new instrument of U.S.
> > statecraft. After all, spending so much money hasn�t just boosted
> > America�s image among Africans; rolling back the widespread scourge of
> > AIDS has protected social institutions in these countries from
> > degradation and collapse, thus contributing to security and effective
> > governance.
>
> > Surely this is the sort of business that America should be in. Yet the
> > Obama administration is aiming to slash our commitment to this most
> > potent form of smart diplomacy just at the moment when the possibility
> > of wiping out this horrific disease is finally in sight. This is not
> > the time to retreat.
>
> >     �Bush did more to stop AIDS and more to help Africa than any
> >     president before or since.�
>
> >     � Peter baker, New York Times correspondent
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >           Comments
>
> > *The Register-Guard Newspaper of Eugene, Oregon *doesn't necessarily
> > condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
>
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> > *Subject:* Story recommendation...
>
> >http://www.registerguard.com/web/news/sevendays/29472880-47/bush-aids...
> > An overlooked legacy:   humanitarian | George W. Bush deserves credit
> > for saving millions of African lives
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of
> > Texas at Austin.
> > For current archives, visit
> >http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> > For previous archives, visit
> >http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> > To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> > unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.