What you have just posted corroborates my thesis.
You quoted my summation-
"It is difficult to point to any of (Soyinka's) children because he is not a family man of the Achebe mould."
The parenting style of the great man as described by his son demonstrates my point clearly.
Perhaps the sentence should read " information on Soyinka's children and family life is less readily available than on Achebe because he is not a family man of the Achebe mould."
Public Visibility and Association
First, Soyinka's family life does not feature significantly in his public profile.
That of Achebe does, to a degree.
Soyinka's son's interview makes that clear.
I have comes across information about Soyinka's children from time to time, but if not for the fact that someone takes the pains to point it that these individuals are Soyinka's children, such identification might not come readily. For example, Kayode Soyinka, a bureau chief of Newswatch, was with Dele Giwa on the fateful day the letter bomb was delivered to him. I was keen to know if there is any relationship between him and Wole Soyinka. I learnt there was none.
I have seen only one picture of Soyinka with his children, and it was a staged picture, not a picture taken in an everyday setting.
On the other hand, I remember a picture of Achebe's son wheeling him some years ago. I also remember an interview with Achebe's wife whose book on the Igbo version of abiku I have in my library in Nigeria. I was particularly struck by the fact that Achebe's wife had published a book.
I know of Achebe's daughter who is an academic in the US. I even have a rough idea what she looks like, like I still remember my immediate impression of Achebe's son who was wheeling him.
I have this information, not because I looked out for it, but because I stumbled on it in the general run of things.
I am suggesting the idea that one is less likely to stumble upon information on Soyinka's family life than that of Achebe.
Physical Rootedness vs Physical Mobility
Secondly, Soyinka's son describes what is Soyinka's peripatetic lifestyle for much of his adult life. That kind of life is quite challenging to the routines conducive to raising a family.
Soyinka began at UI, which he left in his second year to go to Leeds. From Leeds he was at the Royal Court Theatre in London. From there he was in Nigeria on a fellowship to study African drama. After this perhaps followed his years at the University of Ife. He later left Ife bcs he was unhappy with the educational system, and perhaps founded his own theatre troupe. He was also out of Nigeria when he was editor of Transition, if I remember well. He spent two years in prison, in unenviable conditions. Some of his most important works were either gestated or written out of Nigeria, as he describes in the accounts of those works. A good part of Myth, Literature and the African World perhaps and almost certainly Death and the King's Horseman in Cambridge, if I remember well. After his release from prison, he left for a friend's farm in France where he wrote The Man Died. He has also worked as director of the International African Institute outside Nigeria. He fled into exile from Abacha and stated that even in exile, the dictator's squad was still after him to kill him. He has taken up appointments with various universities in the West, at different times.
Compare this history to that of Achebe, before and after his accident.
Achebe began and ended his academic studies at UI. Does Achebe have the same or even near equal level of global activity after his BA? Achebe was ensconced in Biafra, not in prison, during the war. As a member of the Biafran elite, his family would have been protected and readily accessible to him. He would have traveled abroad as ambassador to Biafra but he would return home to his family. Or was the family abroad?
What did Achebe do after the war?
To the best of my knowledge, he was at Nsukka, where he founded Okike. He did not edit a journal abroad, like Soyinka. Which of his works was gestated or written abroad? Note, too that he was founding editor of the African Writers Series, a job to which presence on the continent and in Nigeria would have proved vital. Note that Soyinka never published in that series. Their styles of professional development and positioning are so different.
Parenting Style : Locational Consistency vs Dynamic Focus
Note the description by Soyinka's son of his father's efforts to forge a bond with him as the young man grew older. Soyinka, understanding his lifestyle and its implications for his role as a father, made sure that he gave his son attention in between his trips. His son also describes his father's intermittent presence during his formative years along with his tendency to withdraw into contemplation. The picture suggests that as father and son matured, the father took his time to create special moments to spend with his son in between his various trips around the world.
Domestic Centring
Now, imagine the challenges facing Soyinka, his children and their mothers.
First, he had a child whom his wife cared for, his first son.
In the midst of this delicate situation, he spent two years in prison. After that, he is off to France to write about the prison experience.
Further down the line, his wife is deeply unhappy and gives an interview to a Nigerian gossip mag about a lifestyle of martial infidelity she ascribes to him.
Can you imagine the potential of these developments for a man who is living a physically mercurial lifestyle, in a context where bonding with children and nurturing them is difficult enough even if one were doping a 9-5 job for all the years of the children's growth?
Availability of Details of Family Life
How much information is readily available on Soyinka's first wife?
I am describing his wives through conjecture from an interview with his son linked below.
How much info is available on his second wife, whom I expect is Laide?
Beyond his dedication of The Man Died to her, how much can one readily point to?
How much information is readily available on his third wife?
Does he have any children from his third marriage?
Who is the name of the mother of his first child?
I am not about to Google all these questions because I am not really interested in them.
I ask them to suggest what I think is one fact- that most people reading this post cant answer these questions because the information is not readily available.
These are questions is likely to elicit blank spaces in people's minds.
Even if I were to search for the info, I expect that with Achebe, I would answer the relevant questions on page 1 of a Google search. I wonder how many pages one might look through in Soyinka's case.
Test : Wikipedia Pages on Soyinka and Achebe
I invite anyone to test everything I have written through in the Wikipedia entry on Achebe and Soyinka.
I'm sorry to spoil the satisfaction of discovery but the following is evident
1. I have underestimated the scope of Soyinka's engagements outside Nigeria, particularly in terms of highly prestigious appointments in the West.
2. Compared to Soyinka, Achebe's mobility outside Nigeria is almost provincial.
3. There is no reference to Soyinka's adult private life. No mother of children, no wife, no children, no family history.
4. The Achebe essay has an entire subsection titled "Marriage and Family" where we learn of
A. How and where he met his wife.
B. Where and when they married
C. The development of their marriage, with a link to an article to back this up.
D. The names of all their children, in the order in which they were born, stating when they were born.
E. The names of their grandchildren.
F. The relationship between the Achebe's vision of child rearing and the writing of the maestro's children's books in relation to the rest of his oeuvre.
G. A summative statement by Achebe of his vision of family, supported by
H. Links to Achebe's last daughter's faculty profile at Michigan Sate University and to her book publications
Two Reason for Wikipedia Information Discrepancy on the Family Lives of Achebe and Soyinka
One reason for the discrepancy of information between the Wikipedia info Soyinka and Achebe's marital life is that much of the info for Achebe comes from Ezenwa-Ohaeto's prize winning Achebe book while Ohaeto passed away before he could complete his Soyinka biography which I remember he once got a fellowship to work on at Harvard. Perhaps when a comprehensive Soyinka biography is competed, we shall have the relevant info.
Another is that similar but not as comprehensive info on Soyinka is available online but is not in his Wikipedia essay.
It is at
First Wife, Laide Speak On Romance With Wole Soyinka
Why ladies mill round Wole Soyinka —Son
I hope that will be updated.
I also hope a comprehensive Soyinka biography will come out soon as he is still with us.
How do they say it in mathematics?
Quid Erat Demonstratum. - please forgive any mistake in the Latin.
thanks
toyin
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Mobolaji Aluko <alukome@gmail.com> wrote:
Adepoju:I now hope that you have read Dr. Ola Soyinka, Ogun State Commissioner of Health's account about his "Private Family Life" with his famous father in :or in
You must learn to sometimes hedge your ignorance with a measure of humility. As one famous American Senator was said, it is not what you don't know that bothers, but it is what you seem to know so well that just ain't so.And there you have it.Bolaji AlukoPS: Besides Olaokun, another daughter of Prof. Soyinka (Mrs. Moremi Soyinka-Onijala) has served in the federal government as Special Adviser on Migration and Humanitarian Affairs. So it is flat out false that "It is difficult to point to any of (Soyinka's) children because he is not a family man of the Achebe mould."On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, OLUWATOYIN ADEPOJU <tvade3@gmail.com> wrote:Why We Should Weigh Achebe and Soyinka With Each Other
I think it is helpful to weigh Achebe and Soyinka with each other.
They both represent types of greatness and weighing them in relation to each other can help us better understand types of human achievement.
The Value of the Tola Adeniyi Essay and Reactions to it in Comparing Soyinka and Achebe
The Tola Adenity essay and the reactions to it help us in this.
These reactions rightly point out that he evokes Soyinka in negative terms without mentioning him, an absence all the more telling for projecting those qualities in lifestyle and art that Soyinka is associated with.
His essay achieves greater potency by its style of evocation without mentioning. It belongs in the canon of Soyinka and Achebe criticism.
I will never forget "For [ Achebe] , you do not need to grow a bush on your head or grow rodents in your hair to impress on the world that you are an artist or a writer", vividly evoking the Soyinkaesque cultivation of a white crown of hair and of chin, itself suggesting Soyinka's poem 'to My First White Hairs' which Chinwezu lambasted as obscurantist pretension in his famous critique of the Soyinka style of writing in African literature.
Adeniyi also does well to evoke, by indirection , Soyinka's quietly notorious sexual escapades, both actual and speculative, contrasting that with Achebe's prosaic personal erotic life.
My only problem with his essay is that he does not compare and contrast Soyinka and Achebe's lifelong styles of engagement with the Nigerian question.
Even though Adeniyi is all pro-Achebe and anti-Soyinka, and his trying to describe the greatest African writing without mentioning Soyinka is almost laughable, he helps to break the spell of silence about Soyinka's private life, a subject that needs to be discussed to help contextualize, place in perspective the persona and life of the great man, a greatness highlighted by his flaws,
Public and Private Achievement of Soyinka and Achebe
Achebe is a great writer but he is not in Soyinka's class in terms of both quality and volume.
Soyinka is a much more achieved public figure as writer, scholar and public intellectual than Achebe.
Achebe, on the other hand, is a much more successful family man.
Public Life
Achebe was not significantly engaged in participation in public social affairs beyond the Nigerian Civil War and his embassy with Soyinka and Clark to plead for an end to the cycle of bloodletting represented by executing coup plotters in the Vatsa case.
Soyinka, on the other hand, has played a central and controversial roles in Nigerian politics before and during the civil war and after and has paid a price for it, the most striking being his almost two year imprisonment during the war.
He was controversially involved in Babangida's govt, a move I see as flawed in legitimizing an illegal govt and as evoking the shortsightedness which Nigerians have suffered in relation to military govts but also as demonstrating the reinterpretation of his positions by a person who wants to respond to issues from a creative rather than stagnant position.
After that, Soyinka has been consistent as an insightful and courageous a critic of various govts as well as taking active part in various pro-democracy movements, the highlight of that being during the deadly days of the Abacha era that led him to flee the country under thereat of assassination, as he states.
Achebe, on the other hand, has chosen to play his role in Nigeria from a distance, by making comments from the US.That gave him some gravitas but his closing intervention that suggested an Igbo centered vision at the expense of Nigeria diluted that gravitas for many.
Soyinka is a much more achieved public figure as writer, scholar and public intellectual than Achebe.
Private, Family Life
Achebe, on the other hand, is a much more successful family man. His wife of many years is easily known. His two sons are also easily known, one having studied medicine at Cambridge and his wife publishing a book on the concept of children born and dying recurrently in repeated life cycles in Igbo culture, the equivalent of abiku in Yoruba culture.
Soyinka, on the other hand is known for a marital life that is less than enviable. His first wife, some decades ago, gave a bitter and poignant interview to a Nigerian gossip magazine, detailing accounts of Soyinka's extra-marital betrayals even with his own students of his daughter's ages. I did not see any response from Soyinka or any one else to that painfully graphic interview.
After his Nobel prize he married a much younger woman and none of his marriages has ever played a public role in his life. That is his character. It is difficult to point to any of his children because he is not a family man of the Achebe mould.
Literary and Scholarly Achievement
Appreciating Soyinka's works does not often proceed in the same way as that of Achebe.
For those who want immediate understanding when reading, they may see the Soyinka of the plays The Jero Plays; The Swamp Dwellers and The Strong Breed; the autobiographies A Voyage Around Essay; Ibadan: The Penkelemese Years and Ake : The Years of Childhood and some of his public speeches and a poem he composed for a company calender some years ago.
Those who want a bridge between the easier and yet powerful and the conceptually dense and ideationally stratospheric Soyinka can read his essay and poem The Credo of Being and Nothingness and his play Death and the King's Horseman. These works are readily accessible and embody an aspect of the ideational and stylistic unforgettableness of the master.
Those who want to penetrate into the arcana of the uncompromising Soyinka who may be compared with the greatest writing in human history, the Soyinka who breathes the same air as those works in which humans have shaped their most profound understanding of existence, from the ancient Egyptian Book of Coming Forth by Day, also known as the Egyptian Book of the Dead, to the Hindu Upanishads to the Bible, to the Jewish Zohar, to the Koran and Islamic mystical masterpieces of Ibn Arabi and Jalal ud din Rumi, down to the most modern masters in all cultures, from the ancient European masters Homer and Aeschylus, to the medieval achievement of Dante, to the Russian masters Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy, to the more recent achievements of T.S. Eliot and Italo Calvino, to the vast scope of the various genres of literature from the Middle East, to South and North America, from Nahguib Mahfouz to Jorge Luis Borges, could read Soyinka's Myth, Literature and the African World, The Man Died, and A Shuttle in the Crypt, perhaps his three greatest works, covering essay, autobiography and poetry and move on to his various other writings in drama, poetry, prose and the novel.
I am not arguing that Soyinka is equal to all these writers. He does not have the sheer celestial bulk and scope of an Ibn Arabi, a Jalal ud din Rumi or a Dante. The Bible, the Koran, the Upanishads and the Zohar are in a different class altogether from all other literature, except the Hindu Mahabharata which is more a library than single book.
I see Soyinka as breathing the air the greatest writers breathe more often than Achebe. Having read almost all the works by both writers, I see Achebe as striking his most powerful notes principally in two works- Arrow of God and "The Madman" and to a lesser but very significant degree in some of his essays, such as "Language and the Destiny of Man", "The Igbo World and its Art" and "Chi in Igbo Cosmology" and his Okigbo essay "Dont Let Him Die".
Soyinka, on the other hand, is able to strike his most powerful notes again and again, with a scope and frequency that goes far beyond Achebe's. He also demonstrates a much greater scope of writing in terms of the number of genres he has been active in and even the number of his works.
In every genre except prose fiction, he has a number of works amongst the world's greatest-poetry, drama, autobiography, the essay, and even his prose work, The Interpreters has a strategic place in African literature.
Achebe, opn the other hand, has a much slimmer body of greatest works that belong in the stratospheric heights of literature.
Those who want to better understand Soyinka could follow my blog Wole Soyinka Dancing. I will be posting woks that adopt a fresh approach to Soyinka, showing why he so is much enjoyable, ideationally powerful and mentally expanding, using both verbal exposition and powerful visual illustrations.
thanks
toyinOn Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:33 AM, elombah daniel <elsdaniel@yahoo.com> wrote:
My brothers,
Chief Tola Adeniyi saw the truth, spoke the truth and wrote absolutely nothing but the truth...
Yes, Wole Soyinka, we all love him, but somehow in our quiet moments, deep in our hearts, we just look at the man, his works, his attitude, his grandstanding, his writings and quietly wonder......
I read Chinua Achebe as a primary school pupil.....but as a secondary school student, I only managed to finish 'The Man Died', mainly because of it's historical narrative.As for the rest of Soyinka's works....For all my love for Literature, (I chose Literature as an option both in Secondary and Tertiary) I had to force myself to read them as an undergraduate, just because they were written by the great Wole Soyinka.
As for Soyinka's politics - wining and dining with all our former corrupt president's at night and pretending in the daytime to side with the masses, we also saw them, but still feel that his good sides outweigh his bad sides....after-all this is Nigeria, our Nigeria.....and yes we still respect Soyinka as Nigeria's worthy ambassador.....
Soyinka is great, no doubt, but Achebe is a colossus!.....and if you Bolaji Aluko wrote, just last night that there is nothing wrong for some disgusting and animalistic low-lifes on this forum to lie and speak ill of the distinguished and honourable Achebe in death, (You last night urged "dear all" to speak the good the bad the ugly about Achebe) it is rampaging hypocrisy for you for you to disparage Chief Tola Adeniyi for saying the truth as he saw them.Daniel Elombah+44-7435469430Every Nigerian that has something important to say, says it on www.elombah.com
From: Mobolaji Aluko <alukome@gmail.com>
To: OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com" <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>; naijaintellects <naijaintellects@googlegroups.com>; "nigerianid@yahoogroups.com" <nigerianID@yahoogroups.com>; Ra'ayi <Raayiriga@yahoogroups.com>; USAAfrica Dialogue <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>; Yan Arewa <YanArewa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:02 AM
Subject: NigerianID | Re: TOLA ADENIYI ON ACHEBE!!!
Dear All:Chief Tola Adeniyi is weirdly and apparently ATTACKING the only man whose name is missing in this tribute below, but he (Adeniyi) appears just too frightened to mention by name.This is the reverse of the Yoruba adage where you are all but mentioned but for name, but out of cowardice, you say "No it is not I" for lack of a will to fight the abuser, in this case Adeniyi, who should name the abused and let the devil be ashamed.One wonders why...and I am surprised, not at his commentary - to which he has a right - but at his cowardice as well as timing.And there you have it.Bolaji AlukoShaking his headAnd Scratching it....On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Adebayo Adejuwon <adeadejuwon@yahoo.com> wrote:
Gbosaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!Thank God for you a jare my brother.That Chief Tola Adeniyi is a brown envelope journalist is well known by all and sundry. That he was an apologist to OGD is no news. That he is still doing boy boy to OGD at his old age is not something people are not unaware of. This same Tola Adeniyi who used the his Till Death Do us part column in the Nigerian Tribune to deceive Nigerians only to become errand boy for IBB in the movement to Abuja scandal, and later Abacha is not lost on Nigerians.One would have thought that people like Chief Tola Adeniyi aka Deto Deni would have gained some wisdom now that he is above seventy years.
From: Iyke Ajitona <ajitonaiyke@yahoo.com>
To: "OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com" <OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com>; NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com; NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "adeadejuwon@yahoo.com" <adeadejuwon@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:10:16 AM
Subject: [NIgerianWorldForum] Re: [OmoOdua] TOLA ADENIYI ON ACHEBE!!!
Alagba,Oh, yes, atanpako in ju'we ookan; we sure know the disguised object of Adeniyi's vitriol, bushy hair, and all. But Adeniyi represents to me the character in one Hausa adage that goes: "He who calls his wife a prostitute must not be surprised when his children are called bastards." Adeniyi, himself a "brown envelope" journalist characteristic of his current employer, has by this stupid comments done more damage to Achebe's memory, grouping him with the likes of Rotimi, Okigbo, Osofisan and excluding the most prominent of these literary giants; what does that say of his logic? Should he, a coward, be brave enough, he should mention the suspected name and face the invocation of thunderous and fiery response. Enough on the lousy "egunje" journalist, he should henceforth be disregarded. The one with the "bushy hair" will remain our icon and hero.Iyke AjitonaSent from my IPadWho exactly is Tola Adeniyi attacking in the name of writing a tribute? What would have passed for a good tribute in the memory of Late Prof.Chinua Achebe, in my opionon sounds like a direct attack on somebody Tola Adeniyi cannot confront directly.Read and form your opinion.
Chinua Achebe: The uncrowned nobel laureate
By TOLA ADENIYI
The motto of Obafemi Awolowo University is 'For Learning and Culture'. No one academic in Nigeria reflects and personifies that maxim more than Professor Chinua Achebe. The grandfather of modern English literature in Africa was both a colossus in learning, as he was a thoroughbred and highly cultivated individual in manners and character. Chinua Achebe's transition last week took the world by storm and he was genuinely mourned by all those who appreciated the worth, both of his writings and his character. His passing on into eternity was a personal loss to this writer. It was in July 1965 that Uncle Segun Olusola took me to Chinua Achebe, somewhere on Broad Street, Lagos, to seek his permission for me to adapt his most celebrated classic, Things Fall Apart, published in 1958 into a play.
I had seen the dramatic elements in the novel and decided to make a drama out of it. Achebe asked me a few questions and satisfied with my answers, approved my proposal to adapt the novel for both stage and television. Ambali Sanni's Muslim College, Ijebu Ode, provided the funds while the students made up the cast. The production was taken round the whole Western region, including Lagos (minus the colony) and was given loud applause by the likes of Derek Bullock and Dapo Adelugba. That was the beginning of the romance with this giant of letters, who, seven years later, hosted me and my wife on our honeymoon to his official residence at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, in 1972. Achebe gave pride to African writing and to Africans. For the first time, he provided a lens into Africa and presented Africa from the African perspective.
His writings were African-based but with monumental universal appeal. Hence his maiden novel Things Fall Apart got translated into well over 50 languages and sold over 12 million copies. Apart from being the greatest writer of prose to emerge from African continent, Achebe wrote for the masses. Achebe spoke so that he could be understood. The beauty of his writings was that he was a most excellent communicator, believing that the over all purpose of any work of art is communication. Your work, be it dance, song, speech, drama, gesture, painting must convey a message and that message must be comprehended by your listener, your viewer or your audience. Anything short of that is intellectual garbage. In fact, Achebe could easily pass for a playwright of immense stature.
There is so much drama in all of his novels. And this was the reason I started work on The Theatre in Achebe's novels. All the characters in his writings are alive and touchable. The trees, the mountains, the rivers and valleys in his novels speak. Chinua Achebe gave dignity and personality to art. For him, you do not need to grow a bush on your head or grow rodents in your hair to impress on the world that you are an artist or a writer. Achebe was a man of character. He taught for many years at Nsukka and no one ever heard that he drove his female students nuts, nor was he ever accused of befriending or marrying his students. Achebe taught us what a great mind should be. Achebe never went round state governors with beggar's bowl, soliciting for money or gratification nor was he ever accused of sleeping with his friends' widows.
Twice Achebe was offered national honours. Twice he rejected them, arguing that he was not one that would pose as holy in the day time and be in cosy alliance in the night with people he accuses in the day time. The millions, who have continued to mourn Achebe since his transition, do so in deep sorrow and in sincerity, having discovered in the literary colossus a most genuine and sincere human being. Achebe identified with his Igbo nation. He shared the pains and sufferings of his people. And never for once did he treat them with condescension that he was in any way superior to his clan. Achebe was mature. He showed maturity in all his dealings. He did not exhibit childishness. He was never petty or small-minded. All those who had anything to do with him ended up respecting him because he commanded respect.
Even when he was in his thirties, he displayed unusual maturity and mastery of human relations. As far as Achebe was concerned, a writer or any artist for that matter was first and foremost a human person with deep human feelings and ethos. Chinua Achebe eminently qualified for a Nobel Prize before that hitherto prestigious prize got politicised and became not a reward for distinction but a reward for those, who had mastered the art and science of boardroom politics or global arm-twisting. Although Achebe mentioned lizard in almost all his works, the honourable man of letters never learnt the art of lizarding. Prose writer Chinua Achebe shared the distinction of being the best in their arts with John Pepper Clark and Christopher Okigbo, who, up till today, are the best writers of poetry, with Professor Ola Rotimi, the best in playwriting and play production, with Ene Henshaw, Wale Ogunyemi and Professor Femi Osofisan as playwrights with greatest relevance and profundity.
This explains why, to me, Achebe remains the uncrowned Nobel Prize winner with most authentic claim to that crown. The Federal Government of Nigeria must immediately commence the process of creating a national monument to immortalise this rare genius of both learning and character. Chinua Achebe was not just a writer; he was a distinguished writer with the best and noblest of human virtues. A non hypocrite. A non bully. Achebe was both a great ambassador of Africa and a true and respectable specimen of the finest humanity. •Do not submit your happiness to the whims and caprices of others…
--
CompcrosComparative Cognitive Processes and Systems"Exploring Every Corner of the Cosmos in Search of Knowledge"--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (4) .![]()
__,_._,___
--
Compcros
Comparative Cognitive Processes and Systems
"Exploring Every Corner of the Cosmos in Search of Knowledge"
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment