it is necessary that ASUU hears, embraces, and even programatically utilizes dissent from within, but also, and very importantly, criticisms from without. Nobody else can point out your weaknesses better than those, who in relation to you, are outsiders, enemies, competitors or consider themselves victims of your actions, inactions and mis-actions. It is impossible to improve on anything without bringing our present best achievements under scrutiny to see where improvements can still be made. We speak different languages and speak those languages differently. A competent and progressive organization will be able to untangle the significant points conveyed whatever language or style used by the critic.
It cannot be wrong to ask ASUU to recast its recurrent strategy and tactics. that does not deny the usefulness and successes it had achieved in the past. it places those successes in the light of the present and shows that the best of yesterday often needs to be improved upon to meet the changing needs of today.
it is counterproductive on the part of ASUU or any of us its supporters to only work with a conception that only seems to always pit that body against the government as its opposition at every instance of disagreement. It makes for too much inflexibility in dealing with important ad urgent issues. There is much to gain with complementary or alternative methods from time to time in which ASUU positions itself as partner with government. It is necessary most time, especially given the terrible state of our education, and, for instance, given the complexity of the various interests at stake during a strike, that ASUU complements its strategy with three-way and even four way approach that effectually includes the student body and NATION as autonomous interested parties in the issues of higher education reform and management. Such binary ASUU vs government focus in current use tramples on the interests and wellbeing of the large majority of other constituencies within the nation that ASUU believes its actions are meant to serve, who however perceive their interests differently than ASUU.
where dissent is muzzled and different thinking and variety are stifled, stagnation will set in. full accountability almost always includes external vetting - by knowledgeable people who at arms length are less likely to be compromised and are better able to include interests and perspectives to which self-interest would otherwise have been partial or blind. This is the service that the likes of Ikhide and Moses are performing here.
Those among us who have had the opportunity to experience different educational systems, having worked or taught in the Nigerian university system in the recent past and in university systems elsewhere outside Nigeria cannot deny the fact of many of Ikhide's and Moses' points. They know without any doubt that Nigerian university administration, staff and faculty need to embrace and implement as much change within and among themselves as they justifiably demand of the government.
I salute the Ikhides and Moses and others who continue to forcefully face us with the reality that our best has faded and needs re-polishing. They are doing us a great service. May their tribes increase and live forever. However, its needless to say that they too should be willing to take as much as they give. Those who have issues with the language of the criticism, even if the critic feels that such particular style is required to get his/her point across, also have a point and it cannot be take that away from them. If it is justifiable to critique others, it is equally justifiable that the critic and his or her critique be subject to critique.
femi kolapo
To: "Toyin Falola" <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:41:28 PM
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Further on the ASUU fiasco
I want to thank everyone (seriously) who took time out to respond to my rant on ASUU. Some of the responses were insightful and engaging, but the vast majority were highly predictable and highly amusing. This is all we do, react to stuff, we are hardly ever proactive. When pushed we offer half-assed anemic solutions to issues. There is something wrong with us. You are men, African men, you were born and raised to give lectures, to walk around the place giving bs directives, God help anyone who tries to hold you accountable. I am not coming back to Africa, "to give back", whatever the hell that means. I have nothing to "give back" but my verbal rocks and stones for the criminal acts you perpetuate against children daily whose crime is that they are not your children. If your child is too good to be in your classroom, then you are a hypocrite. I don't much care for legislated relationships but when the courts in America legislated forced integration in the classrooms, the more affluent whites were forced to look at classrooms and make them fit for use by all - white and black kids. A community's progress springs from enlightened self-interest. I work for a school system, all my kids have attended or are attending the public schools. It is the expectation here that leaders must walk the talk. Do not give me sermons if your child is not in these hovels called universities.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment