Dear friends,
What is the objective of this write up? Is the author preparing the ground for a military take over and trying to gauge the temperature whether Nigerians will tolerate a military take over?
Many junta take overs have also led to ruination of countries and the chief example is NIGERIA. The military intervention in governance on 15 January 1966 brought Nigeria to this sad position.
Democracy is not a guarantee of rapid immediate development, but on the long run, it will lead to the least contentious way to resolve political conflicts. If the military strikes in Nigeria it will install a dictator and that dictator can only be removed by a military coup d'etat which will lead to coups and counter coups and the eventual disintegration of NIGERIA.
That road is a no go road. Let us make this democracy to work and let PDP be removed in a free and fair election in February 2015.
Cheers.
IBK
On 7 December 2014 at 07:46, ZALANGA SAMUEL <szalanga7994@msn.com> wrote:
--Nigeria's Second National Development Plan had the following as objectives of National Development, i.e., creating or achieving:a) a united, strong and self-reliant nation.b) a great and dynamic economy.c) a just and egalitarian society.d) a land of bright and full opportunities for all citizens.e) a free and democratic society.I surely commend the older generation of Nigerians who thought all Nigerians deserve such a nation. But where did that generation go? When did they change their mind, or was this all a gimmick in the first place. Let the reader check the salary comparisons of legislators across several countries of the world and see how Nigeria is a serious embarrassment. Here is the link for the salary comparison:One important lesson from this is that those who think that democracy is necessary for development need to think twice. It is a very simplistic claim. Japan laid the foundation for modern development after the Meiji Restoration, which was authoritarian. Singapore is authoritarian; South Korea and Taiwan laid the foundation of their countries under authoritarian regimes just like the United States after the Civil War. Ony authoritarian governments would operate the kind of Jim Crow system that existed in many parts of the U.S. especially the South. It is not true that to for a country to be successful capitalistically it needs to be a liberal democracy. Of course we know that the issue is not just democracy or authoritarianism per se. There is not short cut around good governance and effective institutions, and the issue here is that sometimes and under certain conditions, authoritarian regimes may govern better and create more effective institutions that set a better context for economic development. But as it is, democracy is not a panacea, I am sorry to say.Most of all, China has made great progress in reducing or getting people out of poverty even though it is not a liberal democracy in the way that people want to think of that term. China has guided liberalized economy while the political system is authoritarian i.e., the Beijing Consensus. As Professor Niall Ferguson said, when he visited the country after the 2008 Great Recession, many Chinese people say in relation to the WEstern claim of the monopoly of all wisdom to bring about prosperity, "physician, heal thyself." The very things that made the Western capitalist system a model plunged the world into an economic catastrophe and after the 2008 Great Recession, economic power started tilting to Asia. Ferguson would later express his frustration with the West in his book on The Greatest Degeneration. Nigeria too is an example of such degeneration given how relatively more effective the institutions function when I was a boy.Democracy as it is, is terrible for Nigeria. Nigeria would do better under an authoritarian system that has more determination, commitment, vision and discipline to create conditions and environment that will enable all people to pursue their legitimate aspirations. If democracy means this kind of expenses as in the table of comparison with no accountability and effective solutions to the national problems of the country, then democracy is too expensive for Nigeria and maybe many other African countries as well. I do not care whether the proponent of such a democracy is ALexis de Tocqueville, Locke, or Lincoln. Thomas Hobbes is more relevant for Nigeria in terms of empirical reality. There are certain conditions for civilization or economic prosperity. Currently they do not exist for everyone in Nigeria or even the great majority.I am not against democracy per se, but I want to see results and the data in this comparison suggest that for the ordinary Nigerian, democracy is just another added burden without any dividend or payoff. It is time not to make case for democracy just in theory but to show through empirical results.This reminds me of Amy Chua's Battle Cry for the Tiger Mom. It turns out that authoritarian mothers who have clear vision and mission are more likely to help their children to succeed even when on the surface it may appear that the mothers are mean. Laissez Faire mothers may appear humane on the surface, but end up producing lousy results. Nigeria, if she was a mother, is a very LAISSEZ FAIRE MOM. And she is seeing the results of her mothering strategy -- WOEFUL FAILURE. She helps in producing many children that have no moral conscience when it comes to how they treat their fellow brothers and sisters. As for the father or fathers of the nation, we do not know even where they are. If the fathers exists and were serious, they will mobilize some of the committed children to support the Tiger Moms and embark on a campaign to salvage the nation. On the contrary when you try to make a case for Nigeria, if you mention one thing you want to do to make a difference, you are told ten reasons why it is a waste of time. That is why sometimes I just start my conversation about Nigeria by saying Nigeria is at the end of history, i.e., there is nothing new under the sun that would emerge except the escalation of what we see today. Maybe that would provoke some Nigerians to have some hope, as they would be force to disagree with the pessimism.Samuel
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment