Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Fwd: Nigeria : Is There a Country?

A major factor in the unworkability of Nigeria is the amalgamation of the Muslim North and the South, one of the great destructive factors  of Nigerian history.

The Jihad of Uthman Dan Fodio, a central mission of which was to create a puristic Islam, seems to have  created a fanatical form of Islam in the North, manifest in recurrent pogroms agst non-Muslims, individual and mass murders in the name of religion or ethnic and political affiliation, and the culture of invocation of violence among politicians- civilian and military, from that region, along with ambivalence about the direction of their society-as demonstrated in the prevalence of attitudes that are known as barbaric or backward in other parts of Nigeria- child marriage and its health horrors, low level of modern education even as educational criteria are brutally skewed in favour of the region, and contributing to the nonsense in the Nigerian constitution about a primary school certificate with work experience and in service courses being the minimum educational qualification to run for the Presidency of Nigeria, the fact of an insular society which defends its own people agst  national interests, which will not vote for contenders for office if those contenders are competing with its own people,  the threat or use of violence as a primary tool of achieving the goals of those who see themselves as representing the region.

This situation leaves other regions scrambling to appease this bloc by agreeing to demands agst the interests of the nation bcs those demands belong to this culture that has little value beyond its borders and the price for such appeasement is played by Nigerian underdevelopment.

The issue here is about the dominant attitudes of a region, the most influential attitudes, not the uncharacteristic social beauties the region shares with other civilizations.

I expect that as long as this forced unity endures, the political equation of Nigeria will not achieve balance bcs you cant have religious fundamentalists and others of a more secular and rationalistic bent equitably sharing the same social space for a long period of time.

It does not work.

The current situation is that the possibility of progress has been frozen by this underlying conflict.

This conflict exacerbates others at play in Nigeria.

I expect that as long as  all ethnicities  composing Nigeria do not, by themselves, review their union and choose to remain or leave,  we shall have this sub-standard  existence.

toyin



On 2 March 2016 at 06:54, Oluwatoyin Adepoju <oluwasrividya@gmail.com> wrote:
Great thanks Obadiah Mailafia,

You are clearly better informed on this horror than myself and have done us the honour of sharing your knowledge and making a wise suggestion about what the communities facing extermination should do anidst the Nigerian govt's complicity by  omission.

As for your argument about Nigeria  in comparison with the US, I think you have a problem there.

The US is the outcome of the colonizing will of the Caucasian majority who share particular values and who are dedicated to the nation they created.

They fought for the nation  agst the British after stealing the land from the Native Americans and unified the country  through the victory of the American Civil War..

Whose will does Nigeria represent?

The will of colonizers who have long left.

Trading and other relationships that emerged among  Africans before colonialism are not equivalent to nationhood or represent  the harbinger of a united nation hood.

The same goes for contemporary  interpersonal relations.

A  better example  might be  the European Union which exists as an expression of the recognition of correlations in European culture, history and economic development.

That does not mean,however, that the various countries  of the EU will be collapsed into one another and even within the EU the UK has kept its own currency amidst  current rumblings about why the UK should leave the EU, and is not bound by EU law in all instances.

You can live in Berlin and work in London, as someone I met does, but there is a world of difference between Germany and England and these countries are keeping their differences as central to their individual identities  amidst their overarching unity.

That looks to me like a better model for Nigeria than the current behemoth that belongs to no one.


thanks

toyin



On 2 March 2016 at 05:39, Obadiah Mailafia <obmailafia@gmail.com> wrote:
Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju,

Thanks for your own contributions to the national debate. Yes, I believe THERE IS A COUNTRY. The fact that  we face enormous political and developmental challenges does not negate that fact. The United States of America -- on the authority of Alexis de Tocqueville -- was a wild collection of unruly communities. The 'Wild West' was a historic fact. War, conflict, slavery, violence -- these were the realities of the living experience of most Americans. And yet, out of that bedlam, there emerged a nation. Nationhood is a process, not a finite equilibrium solid state.

One of the greatest myths that our latter-day irredentists harp upon is the false notion that Nigerian nationhood was a historic 'mistake' committed by the British in 1914. This presumes that the various fissiparous collectivities that constitute modern Nigeria were somehow artificially put together by the logic of colonial administrative fiat. The truth is much more complex. The various groups that made up modern Nigeria were already in close interaction (the effusive and ebullient Emmanuel Ayandele would say 'intercourse')  with each other for the better part of a millennium. Recall the recent family quarrel between Ife and Bini, all of them undisputed legatees of Oduduwa. The Yoruba are spread as far afield as Ilorin and Okun in Kogi State. The Ebira are intermingled among the farming communities of Ondo and Ekiti. The Onitsha royal clan trace their origins to Benin. The Igbo sacred 'inri' heritage hails for Igala land in the Middle Belt. The Igala themselves are spread as far afield as Onitsha and Nsukka. The Kanuri and Yoruba share the same racial origins in being a Nilotic people. The Nupe of the Middle Belt have strong links with Yoruba and Bini civilisations. Whatever the Yoruba and Bini pride themselves is an offspring of the great Nok civilization of the Middle Belt which has very strong links with ancient Egypt. I believe that most historians are agreed that the flow of demographic migrations were from the north to down south and not the other way around. The so-called Hausa-Fulani are an amalgam of two distinct groups that became fused together. They are also intermingled with the Yoruba in Kwara, right down to Ibadan and the rest of it.

"Par la force de destin", lots of Nigerians are gradually acquiring a genuine national consciousness. Consider a man like General Ike Nwachukwu. He is a gallant retired Igbo general whose mother happens to be a Fulani princess, being the younger sister of late Sir Usman Nagogo, illustrious Emir of Katsina. His wife is Yoruba. His son, who is "Yorigbo", is married to a beautiful Yoruba young woman. What would you call the offsprings of people with such a pedigree? If we break up Nigeria, where will they go? And these are no longer isolated cases. I have met many young Nigerians with that sort of background.

Speaking for myself, I feel, if truth be told, a Nigerian at heart. Ethnicity means very little to me. Neither does religious affinity. I relate to people first and foremost as Nigerians and not like Bini, Esan, Idoma, Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba or Ndigbo. People are people and we must begin to see ourselves as Nigerians, no matter what.

Having said this, I also that Oluwatoyin for his expression of moral outrage regarding the recent horrendous massacres among the Agatu. This thing has been going on for years, but our Hausa-Fulani brethren refuse to take moral responsibility. In my own local government area of Sanga, the so-called 'Fulani herdsmen' descended one dawn with sophisticated weapons. By early morning, 900 lay dead -- women, children, the elderly, the infirm -- it was an indiscriminate feast of death. The same sort of thing has been going on in Plateau villages for years. And also Adamawa, Taraba, Benue, Southern Kaduna and Kogi. It is an undeclared Jihad. The purpose appears to be to decimate and demoralize the local communities of the Middle Belt and achieve what the Fulani Jihad failed to achieve in the nineteenth century. We must call evil by its name. This thing is worst than Boko Haram. The silence of the authorities speaks so loud that we can safely ignore their hypocritical pieties. There is an ancient Arab military doctrine known as "fitna". You keep pounding communities and continuously hound them until they surrender and leave the land to you. This is the scenario that has ben unfolding. Sadly, many of these mysterious so-called marauding 'herdsmen' are foreigners. For those of us who speak Hausa, whenever anyone opens his mouth, you know exactly where they come from. Hausan Kano has its own distinctive cosmopolitan panache. Hausan Sakwatto has its own seductive sonority. Hausan Jos has flair and sophistication while Hausan Zazzau has a mix of cosmopolitanism mixed with a touch of learning and prosody. Hausan Niger and Chad and Cameroon sound a bit wild to some of us. A lot of the killers speak that kind of Hausa. Truth is there are probably millions of people from neighbouring countries who cross the border and become automatic "Nigerians". In the North they would have more rights than Christian northerners and Yoruba, Igbo and others who dwell in the North. It is these aliens who are the vanguard of the undeclared genocide in the Middle Belt.

The solution: People should stop whining. When I hear Idoma leaders bleating like lambs, pleading for the authorities to "come and save us before they finish us of", I get angry. The leaders of the affected communities should take steps to defend their communities. This is a socrasanct principle of international law since John Locke and Hugo Grotius. It is an established jurisprudential principle of the Law of Nations that communities who face an existential threat have a right to resort to self-help if the state is unwilling and/or unable to defend them. Churchill famously said you don't negotiate borders; you defend them. Communities that have been persecuted and traumatized must take bold action to defend themselves if there is no one that is able to come to their help. I was nurtured on the nonviolent principles of MLK and Mahatma Gandhi, but I am also a believer in the teachings of the theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer. If a madman is driving a truck against the traffic on the highway in total disregard of the laws, it shall be our duty to stop him.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Oluwatoyin Adepoju <oluwasrividya@gmail.com> wrote:



I increasingly think this object Nigerians call a country is a waste of time.

It is akin to pouring water into a leaking basket.

We could build all the fine houses we like, engage in as much politiking as we like, we don't have a nation.

What we have is a jungle.

A no-mans-land where wild animals roam and among whom some humans insist they want to dwell.

The problem is not the strange 2016 budget in which millions were allocated to pay rent on the official residency of the national ruler.

The problem is not the allocation of millions for books for the office of the Vice-President, or the massive amounts allocated for food in the ruler's residence, along with other silly allocations in mind staggering amounts.

The problem is not the current chasing of political opponents in the name of fighting corruption while ignoring members of the national ruler's team who have spent millions in building a personal website or in hosting a birthday, among other inanities.

The problem is not with the years long consistent  murders, rapes and pogroms by Fulani herdsmen/militia, reaching a climax in the ongoing Agatu massacre in which which whole communities  have been rendered full of corpses and razed to the ground as the Fulani  move in with their cows to occupy the land while the government presided over by a Fulani man surrounded by his cronies  maintains silence or pretends what is happening is a quarrel between neighbours.

All these are expressions of the fact that the social space and geographical entity where all this is taking place is not fit for human habitation, no matter how much people pretend about it.

It is simply  a space where brigands are in control and those who have an understanding  with  these brigands can do anything they like.

Form new political  parties, debate endlessly about one issue or another, ultimately anything different from close collective examination of the social space called Nigeria, allowing those who want to leave the forced union to do so  and those who wish to remain to do so,  while establishing the terms for either choice,  is a waste of time.

Anything else can only benefit those who are happy with life in the jungle.

thanks

Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju



--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha