..
Prof Alinah Segobye,
I'm enjoying your musing and long may it continue! Hahahahaha!
Now, let me first say this: If you look at my profile picture on Facebook, you will see the picture of Steve Biko. I put it there on 16 June 1976 in commemoration of the Soweto Uprising and then wrote the following by way of explanation:
…….
Today is the 40th Anniversary of the Soweto Uprising, which was a popular students' response to the Apartheid educational policy of making Afrikaans the language of instruction in black South African schools. The Uprising, which started peacefully as a march on Wednesday, 16 June 1976 was met with police brutality that lasted several months up till the end of the year in several other protests nationally. Yes, the immediate cause of the Soweto Uprising was this educational policy, but it is indeed representative of Black resistance against Apartheid in all its expressions. Though official records normally say only 176 students were killed, credible estimates of up to 700 have been made. The Soweto Uprising is indeed one of the most decisive moments in the beginning of the death of Apartheid.
The man you see in my profile picture is Steve Biko, the leader of the Black Consciousness Movement and one of the men behind the Soweto Uprising. Biko was killed later by Apartheid police on Monday, 12 September 1977 at the age of 30. Steve Biko is a famous name in Pan-Africanism and in freedom movements all over the world.
"At the heart of Back Consciousness is the realisation by blacks that the most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed. If one is free at heart, no man-made chains can bind one to servitude, but if one's mind is so manipulated and controlled by the oppressor then there will be nothing the oppressed can do to scare his powerful matters" - Steve Biko, I Write What I Like
Amandla!
…
I bring this to your attention here to assure you that you are not the only one thinking about how South Africa is addressing the challenge of racism 40 years after June 16, 1976. For any conscious African, what happens in South Africa would help define what happens with the rest of Africa, because of the special place of the nation in our racial and continental awakening.
So, yes, the questions you are raising are crucial today as they are for tomorrow. How the postcolonial African views his relationship with the erstwhile metropole, including how he manages it, is at the heart of the debate today on several levels, be it at the political, economic, social or cultural level. And at every turn, it revolves around how the postcolonial African is treated at home by his erstwhile 'colonial masters' and their political successors (indigenous and foreign) and how he is treated in the metropole as an immigrant or even as a citizen of ethnic minority origin.
In fact, I must say you are well-positioned in Bradford to see the relationship up close, even though that would be more from the Asian-British perspective. But it's still the same impulses governing the relationships from both sides. The constant feature is the empire striking back and the political forces of the metropole struggling to define their response in such a way as not to be seen as outright moral reprobates, while their hypocrisy is really quite obvious to the informed. For instance, if you've been following the news recently, you would have read about how Mr Cameron went to Buckingham Palace and declared in company of the Queen and some top members of his party on a visit to the monarch that they were about to host some "fantastically corrupt" countries at an Anti-Corruption Summit in London. Though he mentioned Afghanistan and Nigeria, it was his mention of Nigeria that got everyone thoroughly exercised.
While Nigerian citizens at home and diaspora and its civil society organisations took umbrage at such evidently callous talk from the Prime Minister and while the latter was looking for a face-saving escape route, the Nigerian leader, President Muhammadu Buhari, without understanding the full implication of his actions (and certainly with poor advice to boot) supported the comment and in a populist display (egged on by Mo Mohammed, the Sudanese billionaire who seemed on hand to save him from himself) declared all he wants is not an apology, but a return of assets (stolen funds supposedly recovered or recoverable in the west) to Nigeria from the west.
Now, without going into a full analysis of why such a call was meaningless at such a forum (as was eventually proven) and how I think President Buhari should have handled it, the point I wish to make in relation to the issue here is that we still respond to Western impulses from the position and with the mentality of the oppressed with all its psychological burdens. Our leaderships respond as subordinates and people who seem not capable of thinking for themselves once it concerns the relationship with the west. Their multinationals steal our natural resources and mindlessly destroy our environment in the name of free trade, while our governments are paid pittances as royalties that the thieving elites share amongst themselves as rent, while they unleash their state instruments of coercion and violence to hold the people down once they complain. Our leadership cannot make any economic or political decision without having to be dictated to by their erstwhile colonial masters and the Bretton Woods institutions. This has been our story from the moment they granted us flag independence. Of course, I'm speaking generally here for convenience, because despite the subtle differences between say, Nigeria and South Africa due to Apartheid and the special history of the latter, it all still boils down to the same thing, even if we get stuck arguing about degrees. Truly, the fangs of neocolonialism are fully bared.
Having said all the above, let me point out something, Prof. I am not saying this because you and other Afrocentric academics are here and I'm not saying it to make you feel good. I'm saying it as a matter of fact and if it helps in any way to encourage you and others in your field of study, the better. You see, despite the failures of our leaderships, African postcolonial scholars and academics, like you have been the ones who've made it possible for us to keep a semblance of respect in this relationship so far. You have been the ones who have managed to speak truth to power, you have been the ones exposing the unfairness of the relationship and you have been the ones doing all these things from the position of academic equality with their best brains, rather than from the position of subservience. Think about it, there has been no western policy change in Africa that tilts in the African's favour that did not start with the academic work of the postcolonial African scholar. You will almost always notice that by the time African and international civil society organisations begin to make an issue of it to influence changes in policy in the corridors of Whitehall, Department for International Development (DfID) and Downing Street, the African postcolonial scholar would have already studied it and defined the problem first. So, when you tell us here about your musing and how all this will ultimately impact your research, know that there is a long queue waiting to see the outcome of that. Whether the outcome is in the form of a book or essay or anything of the sort, Prof, do not forget me. I'm already in the queue, I'm fully interested! Hehe!
So, back to the substantive issue here and your confession of not being able to make sense of the current debate surrounding the Brexit, I would say it's par the course. Yes, it's par the course that our continent's recent past keeps butting into the picture because it simply cannot go away! It's a real historical and contemporary experience involving people and relationships. The empire will always, always strike back! For instance, if you have been following the Brexit debate, you will note that one of the arguments the Leave Campaign is making in order to appeal to non-European ethnic minorities is to say their campaign to leave Europe is based on addressing the injustice of Europeans having higher immigration rights than others who are not Europeans on the basis of Britain's membership of the EU. But that is only as far as they'd go. There are no policy proposals, for instance, about giving Commonwealth members better immigration status after Britain leaves the EU or a fairer trade policy or any kind of support in addressing the multifaceted problems facing Africans in our relationship with them. Instead, they have proposed an Australian points system that boils down to them taking from us the best brains as they continue with the current policy of fleecing Africa of its natural resources and raw materials, while still making it difficult for us to access western markets.
When you see the deaths piling up with the Atlantic and Mediterranean crossings, how can you take seriously people who totally refuse to address that problem when you know they are in a position to do so? How can you take seriously people who attack the German Chancellor Angela Merkel for opening up her country in a rare show of humanness? Of course, we know the immigration issue is highly politicised, but we know that the pressure has always come from the right and far-right of western politics! Take Britain, for instance. When Tony Blair came in, under the new air of freedom and internationalism the new government tried to encourage a real multicultural society by making immigration less stressful for people from the 'Third World' and refugees under the Geneva Convention. A lot of money was poured into a reformed immigration legal aid system to give applicants better hope before the law by having their cases argued competently before the courts. There were less whimsical changes to the immigration rules and deportations were rare, because the filtering process was generally effective.
But the opposition on the right kept insisting immigration was a problem, even though studies after studies come up with the net benefits of immigration. They sold the fear in every nook and cranny of the UK and encouraged local communities to reject any government plan to settle refugees or asylum-seekers even temporarily in certain places. They cut the legal aid budget for immigration to the bare bones to make it unattractive to legal-aid dependent immigration professionals as a means of stopping immigration. They began to churn out new immigration rules and directives so fast that practitioners could hardly keep up. This became the fillip for the formation and rise of anti-immigration hard right parties like UKIP. Even at some point, the BNP made political hay from it all! This coalition of the right and far-right began to propose clearly harebrained solutions to the contrived 'immigration problem' and soon the government began to be framed as clueless. Immigration was one of the main reasons Labour lost the election under Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband and the key reason the Remain Campaign will lose this EU referendum if they do. The demonisation of 'the other' is in full flow. That is the Britain of today.
So, you see, my worry is not about Britain leaving the EU per se, but the character of the leadership that is in place now and that would likely be in place after to negotiate the exit and reshape the communal relationships within Britain if this happens. For instance, the immediate beneficiaries of a British exit from Europe politically will be the hard right of the Tory Party as we know it today. That section of the party is today in alliance with the extreme right as publicly represented by UKIP and Nigel Farage and they are the arrowheads of the Leave Campaign. Now, think what will happen. David Cameron loses the referendum and he and Chancellor George Osborne are immediately swept out of power. That is certainly what will happen if he loses because that is the 'big picture' people like Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Iain Duncan Smith and their followers within the Tory Party are looking at. Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour Party leader recognises that the impulses driving the Brexit debate are the rebellious ferments within the Conservative Party, but his lukewarm response to the Brexit has only energised a more vicious section of the Tory Party, which has stolen a march on the Remain Campaign, because of what they see as division in the ranks of the Leave Campaign due to the lukewarm attitude of Mr Corbyn. In fact, that is why the pro-Remain campaign of such individual Labour MPs as Jo Cox caught the attention of the Leave Campaign and why she was specially targeted on Facebook and so on by their activists. The SNP, which has punched above its weight in its support of the Remain Campaign is what it is - a Scottish interest party, and, in the end, if the Leave Campaign wins, this will only have its own position strengthened in terms of an agitation for Scottish independence. In other words, a Leave win will simply return Scottish nationalism to the forefront of UK politics and the Scottish pro-independent forces would win hands down, because the prospect of joining the EU as a sovereign nation on their own would trump any argument any No Campaigner can bring up now! After all, what is sauce for the goose is cause for the gander! The argument would be if Britain can leave Europe on the strength of the sovereignty argument, why can't Scotland leave the Union on the strength of the same argument?
I believe in such a situation, whether we realise the intended consequence or not, the biggest and only political beneficiaries of the exit would be the hard right and the far-right. You only have to observe the rise of these parties throughout Europe and the campaign of a man like Donald Trump in America to realise that leaving Europe cannot be good for the European integration project, both on the national and citizens' levels and it certainly cannot be good for any ethnic minority, be they just visitors like you or citizens like me and my family. Of course, I'm not proposing this view as an incontrovertible truth, but only as a view based on who I am and how I'm reading the whole situation.
CHEERS!
….
With grey skies hanging on what was meant to be a sunshiny warm midsummer day in Bradford I am confined to my desk reading this post and many other interesting posts of this wonderful platform and getting greatly inspired (for my research) to ponder further on the subject of how we as African in Africa and the Diaspora engage with/relate to and articulate with this Thing called the West (or North and East for that matter). Cornelius pricked my conscience having been rudely awakened yesterday to a post of a #racistrant from South Africa. Indeed my empathy for the late Cox as a woman leader, mom of young children, supporter of causes did take my mind of other concerns crowding my mind including the big question of how does South Africa address the challenge of racism 40 years after June 16 1976 as one just marker of our timeline of state brutality?I was an ambivalent partaker (via radio) of weeks of celebrating the Queen's 90 birthday including a recitation of a prayer http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2016/04/18/bishops-ask-catholics-to-pray-for-the-queen-to-mark-90th-birthday/ which among other things extolled us to pray for the 'Preservation of the Queen from all that is harmful and evil'. I found myself ambivalent and unable to eloquently complete an essay on African feminism and decoloniality which among other things needed me to interrogate the 'evils' of colonialism and empire'. I thought of my mother just shy of 89 years of age who unlike the Queen's - has memories of want and servitude in a Protectorate and now independent state which still struggles to to provide for her basic needs. In another time, the Queen as an 'older sister' might have been obliged to 'carry' her young sister on her back but i doubt this is on the Queen's To Do list this moment.So whether one is sitting under a baobab tree in the motherland or some office/park or similar quaint space in the 'northern' hemisphere ambivalence and perhaps self-contradiction is bound to be part of out-loud thoughts and or private musings as we navigate our relations with the continent (Africa) and our other adopted (adopting?) lands. As a very temporary visitor to West Yorkshire I can only hope that the lessons I learn daily from this platform and the Radio continue to enrich my thoughts and hopefully research on my entanglements of with this Island (former Empire?) as its Brexit angst. I suspect tomorrow Mass will extol us to think deeper of our decisions concerning the Vote but as a non-voting visitor I do not worry about that task. I muse curiously though how History changes... a 'kingdom' and continent that had such appetite for far away lands and held on to them to the bitter end are on a precipice concerning Brexit or not to...? As a student of the African past (Archaeology & History) I have scrambled for my copious notes and sources and still cannot make sense of the current debates as my continent's recent past keeps butting in to this picture and I cannot focus properly... A fractured continent struggling to integrate but sorely divided along lines of language, allegiance and other inconvenient things is waiting with abetted breath for the outcome of the referendum.Meanwhile as a human(e) being I wish Ms Cox RIP. May peace prevail ahead of Brits pronouncing their In-ness or Out-ness. Whichever way they pronounce, I we who adore #allthingsbrit should perhaps be asking ourselves when our referendum(s) will come to un-love the 'kingdom'... perhaps a name change (the Island formerly known as...).AKS--On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:--
I understand that from the brothers that I've talked to so far, France is the favourite nation to win the European football championship -
the reason being that Négritude or no Négritude , there are at least seven Africans in France's national football squad . France does
not discriminate when it comes to national prestige in football or language proficiency….
I have mostly been gleaning valuable insights from Bernard Porter's blog in which he (a venerable English man and an anti-imperialist too)
has been deliberating on some of the issues under our purview here. He is currently in the UK...
It' doesn't look like Shaykh Dr. Abdalqadir as-Sufi ( a Scot) is going to be weighing in on this referendum - as he did on the Scottish referendum.
The savage murder of Jo Cox is vividly reminiscent of the butchering of Anna Lindh on the 11th of September, 2003. I wailed like a new born blues
baby when I first heard the news. In spite of sympathy votes for the side of the referendum that she was canvassing for , they did not win.
I should hate to make a decision as to what is in the best interests of the UK, based on faulty premises. Briefly : Re- Kennedy Emetulu's plea:
Even for a self-righteous, self-appointed minority spokesperson, it's a pitiful display of either abject ignorance or falsification of reality and bigotry
to reduce the Brexit referendum to being a contest between good and evil, between what he calls the racists' camp composed of mostly those -
from his point of view, evil Brits who like former Mayor of London Boris Johnson want to leave the sinking EU ship and those who want to stay,
the good guys comprising the angelic likes of Prime Minister David Cameron and good Muslims such as Sadiq Khan the new Lord Mayor of London
and his greater multi-culti flock, including good Nigerians such as the Kennedy Emetulu, or so he would like us to believe.
Curiously enough Emetulu's exhortation is that "Nigerians and all other ethnic minorities in the UK, including all progressive and peace-loving citizens
of the country, vote to make Britain greater in Europe!" - a weak voice and a weak echo, sounding off like Donald Trump only that this one's melody is
simultaneously Sweet Mother and God save the Queen and please Make Great Britain Great Again in the EU - and no to any Britannia Rules the Waves !
Not British to the bootstraps , how is it to be expected that Johnny just come should be harbouring any nostalgic sentiments about former glory or future
victory? As far as he may be concerned the more Nigerians that immigrate into Great Britain, the merrier and the Greater will Great Britain Be! Thanks to
Lord Lugard, doesn't Nigeria already rule / control Peckham now known as " Little Lagos" ?
As Boris Johnson said (and I think that this was slightly under the belt) the EU aims at accomplishing what Hitler failed to do :
Emetulu may still be a Nigerian at heart and in his soul, but doesn't he know that only British citizens are eligible to vote in this referendum?
This morning when asked his name, Tommy Mair (alliterates with Tony Blair) the man charged with the murder of Jo Cox , said
: " My Name Is death to traitors and freedom for Britain"
But the sins of one man should not be sufficient reason to crucify a whole nation?
Okay,
"They say that patriotism is the last refuge
To which a scoundrel clings
Steal a little and they throw you in jail
Steal a lot and they make you king
There's only one step down from here, baby...( What's a sweetheart like you doin' in a dump like this?"
As Grucho Marx put it, "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others."
R.S.V.P.
I'm ready
Cornelius
On Friday, 17 June 2016 19:07:50 UTC+2, Kennedy Emetulu wrote:The death of Jo Cox, the 41-year old Labour MP murdered while going about her duty in her constituency in Birstall, UK is sending shockwaves around the world. Here was an excellent MP who was celebrated by her constituents and colleagues for her vision, warmth, industry and open-door policy gunned and hacked down in broad daylight by a 52-year old Mr Tommy Mair. This man, a fellow Yorkshire resident described as a loner was reported to have shouted "Britain first!" as he hacked her down. So, while this brutal killing has pushed to the fore the debate about security of MPs, the more telling impact is that it has brought the BREXIT campaign closer to the consciousness of the people because Jo Cox was a passionate campaigner for the Remain Campaign.Okay, the investigations are still ongoing and it may well turn out that Mr Mair has mental health issues. In fact, there are unconfirmed reports that he was a patient at the Mirfield-based Pathways Day Centre for adults with mental illness before 2010. But whether or not he has mental health issues, with the BREXIT referendum just a few days away no one is pretending that people are not looking at this incident as a possible determinant of where their vote will go. To me, whether or not the fellow is sane, he could not have felt that strongly about the issue to the extent of killing the MP if there was no prior talk with others. There are also reports that he's a white supremacist with clear links to white extremist groups. For instance, he is said to have been a long-time subscriber to a pro-Apartheid extremist magazine, "S. A. Patriot" up till 2006. The UK-based publication, which campaigns against "the fall of civilised rule" in South Africa, was edited by former National Front member Alan Harvey.Now, I'm not saying any group of people set him up to do this, but they may have created the condition that influenced his troubled mind (if indeed, troubled) to push him to go out there and kill an MP that has been a staunch campaigner for Britain to remain in Europe and one of the more progressive politicians on the immigration front with her work with refugees all over the world and her serious activism over Dafur, Syria and Palestine. I mean, since the Leave Campaign has focused its main case against remaining in the EU on immigration, it is not out of place to imagine that unstable supporters would do what this fellow has done, especially with the neo-racialist tone of the Leave Campaign when discussing immigration and immigrants. Here is a man said to have lived in the Birstall area for more than thirty years and who, despite being a loner has not been known to be violent before now. The only thing they know him for is that he's the one that does the gardening for the locals for a living. What could have triggered his mind except the viciousness of this campaign?I know that the politicians are being cautious now, so that no one accuses them of playing politics with this death, but it's worth observing that Neil Coyle, the Labour MP for Bermondsey and Old Southwark has, while paying tribute to Jo Cox, broken ranks already by saying clearly that the Leave Campaign "risks inspiring extremist elements". While Mr Coyle is being rounded on for playing politics with this, it is important that the rest of us, especially those of us who are ethnic minorities, look closely at those the Leave Campaign and its leading promoters are empowering with their rhetoric. I say this, because whatever the reason the killer did this and whatever the ultimate outcome of police investigation, as an ethnic minority in the UK, the whole tone of the debate and this killing worry me. In fact, if I was thinking of voting Leave, at this point I would be doing a rethink because a Britain out of Europe I see is a very dark place. With Nigel Farage strutting around with a sick smirk on his face and Boris Johnson seeking frantically the keys to No 10, I see a Britain where the far-right rules and where the civil liberties and freedoms won over the years will be eroded in pursuit of the false objective of making "Britain first!" As Samuel Johnson once famously said, patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel and I see a lot of them now wrapping themselves around the Union Jack.Honestly, Jo Cox's death has left me really sad and I just cannot muster the strength for now to make a proper analysis of this future I see if we leave Europe, but suffice it to say when you read the statement by Brendan Cox, Jo's husband and his insistence that we must defeat hate, you get the idea that he has an idea where this whole hate is coming from, especially when we consider that he himself is a staunch supporter of the Remain Campaign who had consistently complained about the hate coming from the Leave camp before this incident.So, yes, this hate is not coming from Muslims or immigrants; it's coming from people who think they have an entitlement to Britain by virtue of their white skin and their supposed indigenousness. It is coming from people who have been brainwashed into thinking that immigrants are the devils coming to take over their land and their jobs and that they are left no choice but to use violence to stop them. They are the people who people the white extremist groups and even though there are many decent people who want Britain out of Europe for other reasons, these extremists are today hiding under the sovereignty argument to push the idea of Britain leaving the EU as mainstream. But in truth, this is just primed to be the first step in their mission to return Britain to the rulership of the far-right.Well, the Britain these far-right people want is not the Britain my family and I want. The Britain we want is the one showed in Birstall where an unnamed 77-year old Pakistani man tackled the killer of Jo Cox in an attempt to stop him and got injured for his troubles. Despite this tragedy, that man is a hero. It is quite significant that he, an ethnic minority, a Muslim, an old frail man, was the one who tackled this fellow in defence of his MP. The Britain I want is the one one being showcased in Birstall today as Britons of all religions, all faiths and all races are coming together in unity to mourn an outstanding British politician.As an ethnic minority with a stake in Britain and the wider world, I will urge my fellow Britons to vote to stay in Europe, to vote to stay connected with the world. With the rise of far-right parties all over Europe now on the back of the misdirected angst against immigration, do not blindly sign your own death warrant. You've got to know that there's nothing by way of a viable solution to the immigration problem being offered by the Leave Campaign. All they're doing is selling fear - fear of small Britain being swarmed by Barbarians. The Little Englander in Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Nigel Farage is just being ballooned by the foul air of overambition! Even their attempt to link the immigration with an economic argument is cloaked in evil lies and fear-mongering! I mean, what is more embarrassing than Alex Salmon catching out Boris Johnson misquoting the Bank of England report he has not read and typically being bullish in his topped-up ignorance? It is typical of the tissues of lies being bandied about by the Leave Campaign to hear Johnson say that a Bank of England study showed that for every 10 percent increase in immigration there was a two percent reduction in wages when in fact what the study says is that a 10 percent rise in immigration would result in a one-third of one pence diminution in average wages. Since when did one-third of one pence become two percent reduction in wages? But these are the type of bloodcurdling lies they bandy about in their bid to get Britain out of Europe.Obviously, the campaigns have been suspended for now in tribute to Jo, but the vote is still coming up next Thursday, 23 June 2016. So, Nigerians and all other ethnic minorities in the UK, including all progressive and peace-loving citizens of the country, vote to make Britain greater in Europe! There will be no better tribute to Jo Cox, a true internationalist and lover of humanity, than ensuring that the bigots do not take over!…..The picture is of Jo Cox and family joining the #floatilla campaign on the River Thames as part of the IN (Remain) Campaign. The picture was posted on June 15, at the time of the event, by Brendan Cox, the husband of Jo with the following comment: "So this is the moment the #VoteLeave lot started hosing my kids with river water. Nice friendly lot #floatilla."…
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment