Ken.
After what we have said over the years in this forum, there are still those who prefer to pluck Christianity and Islam out of the legitimate contexts of their origins and the interlapping origins of their scriptural texts and subtexts and want thereby to be regarded as ( political?) scholars waxing serious in their views.
We have noted both principal figures themselves Jesus and Prophet Muhamned were considered illiterate yet stood at the cusp of the people of the Book.
We have drawn attention to the dovetailed events of the book by order of antecedent copying of one another and gratuitous interpretations.
We have noted the importance of geographical contiguity and the borrowing of stock themes which should be of interest to genuine literary scholars to alert them to the unlikelihood of the pristine nature of each religions.
We have drawn attention to the sojourn of the eponym of Christianity in Egypt and the influence of the the Egyptian polytheistic concept of the Trinity on the cardinal eschatology of Christianity when the Bible was eventually written as a homogenous text circa 4 CE.
Yet people want us to believe entirely different concepts of religions have been presented in the leading monotheisms.
OAA
Let those who believe in majority rule ensure its practice at the centre in Nigeria come 2023.
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------
From: "Harrow, Kenneth" <harrow@msu.edu>
Date: 22/08/2021 18:36 (GMT+00:00)
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Violence is more common in the Biblethan the Quran text analysis reveals
This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (harrow@msu.edu) toyin,
there is a literal reading of the scriptures which is often the way it is presented to children.
if we are able to perform acts of interpretation--which is what all commentary does--then we can make useful readings of the texts. otherwise, i suggest they remain nice coffee table books, chosen for their decor, and not the contents.
i can't think of anything less useful, intellectually, than to take the biblical or qur'anic accounts literally. i mean, ...
ok, one trivial example. it is not unreasonable to take the sacrifice of isaac as the central account for all three religions.
in judaism it is called the akedah, the binding of isaac, and it will be read and commented on in synagogues around the world in a couple of weeks.
to remind you all, it is the story of abraham's sacrifice of isaac., i recommend everyone go and google the rembrandt painting, or etching, of it. really striking.
how could anyone take seriously this notion of a father killing his son, the son he loves, the son whose progeny were supposed to carry on the generations as numerous as the stars etc etc.
anyway, kierkegaard wrote a whole book on faith and its contradictions, so it must be more complicated that a simple story of a father deciding to kill his son as a sacrifice to his god.
i would wish to argue that if we wanted to found judaism on that act, literally, the religion should be left aside as an interesting artifact of history, not as anything to be taken seriously.
a few years after this, we have another father deciding to sacrifice his son. same story: the son will be left to suffer and die, and then go to heaven, and take with him the sins of ordinary people. that's it. he cried out, my father, why have you abandoned me, and afterwards will have made it possible for sinful people to be saved by believing in him.
do you really want to take that story literally? isn't it possible to give a transcendental reading that gets us beyond the immediate physicality of crucifixion, death, resurrection? is this the best we can do to found christian values, or can we not get to love and care by a more compelling way of reading that story?
children want angels to fly; we are adults in the room, and need to read more deeply.
wait a couple more days. now the father is back, ready to sacrifice his son, who this time has changed his name to that of the older boy, ishmael. again the knife, again the terror, again the sheep in substitution of the boy. seem familiar? seem again to invite readings of all these elements, the person of the father, the person of the son, the person of the ram, the role of the angel, the repetition of the acts every year, bringing the ram under the knife, the memory of the ritual and salvation it enables? can't we actually read this as more than simply some abhorrent act of violence?
on the level of reading that we must, all, insist upon, it is not violence as in the commonly used meaning of the word. It entails a transcendence of the physical realm in every case, the intervention of a magical moment that takes the act outside the realm of the normal or ordinary. for kierkegaard we cannot understand it, so it becomes foundational for faith.
for those who insist upon taking it literally--the fundamentalists of all these religions--the violence has no meaning beyond the bodies, and they would take a sword or hammer or gun, and say, take this religion my way or the highway. but for every act of commentary--which forms the true core of the religion--it is necessary to read the accounts hermeneutically, for meaning, not for reportage.
that is all the world of difference between a study that counts acts like these as violence and one that claims we are not talking about violence in any ordinary sense of the word at all, but something that transcends it. you don't have to believe it, but you do have to think.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
517 803-8839
harrow@msu.edu
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Oluwatoyin Adepoju <ovdepoju@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 4:30 AM
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Violence is more common in the Bible than the Quran text analysis reveals
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 4:30 AM
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Violence is more common in the Bible than the Quran text analysis reveals
Thanks.
Which of the two religions is associated with violence and terrorism today?
What is the reason for the answer to that question, an answer we all know?
A question vital for Muslims, Christians and everyone.
Thanks
Toyin
Thanks
Toyin
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021, 04:10 Gloria Emeagwali <gloria.emeagwali@gmail.com> wrote:
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/007796FA-0149-41AC-A824-EB6C5BDE65C4%40gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfP%2BxydV_qBYLXqHMrkNepbNh%3DYXRgdYcSpBZWfV17RPUA%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB5191A4A717A9C0F97192D4E6DAC39%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment