Alagba Bolaji:
Both pieces are terrific. I have three questions that bother me:
- As an urgent step, can we calculate the corruption elements in the petrol subsidy?
- Is the percentage of the "rich" consumers so high? By the "rich", I am assuming you are referring to members of the "middle class"?
- Do we, because of criminal elements in petrol subsidy and diesel market, punish millions of our poor people?
TF
Unquote
Thanks for your questions, and let me attempt to answer them briefly to the best of my ability.
I will take the Total Subsidy Paid as TSB
To Question 2: it is not the number of the Rich/Poor NOR/NOP here that matters, but the size of the Average Benefits ABR/ABP
TSB = NOR x ABR + NOP x ABP
So while NOP is much .GT. NOR, ABR much more than compensates such that the first product on the right is much .GT. the second product.
To Question 3: ignorance is more costly than education. What the poor get punished for as a result of this subsidy is loss of education, Health, security, infrastructure, life itself.
To Question 1: The corruption amount CA must be calculated as
CA = TSB - (Total Amount of Subsized Fuel Used in Liters x Cost per Liter of Subsidized Fuel)
CA = TSB - (TASF x CSF)
Where corruption enters as Ghost fuel GF used as well as padded cost PC
TASF = AASF + GF
CSF = ACSF + PC
Determing the accurate and corrupt elements of TASF and CSF is the challenge which many people including myself have taken up in earlier contributions stretching back decades.
Finally, we have argued and re-argued this Subsidy issue before - and yet its amount keeps escalating - from N245 billion in OBJ's time to N3 trillion in the current PMB time. This is not sustainable. Madness is what we are now experiencing.
Please see the thread:
https://groups.google.com/g/usaafricadialogue/c/nVU7wtbwcKE/m/xQPI8mOABwAJ
From the Archives: On the Matter of FG finally scrapping fuel subsidy and reducing (?) petrol price to N85/litre from Jan 1, 2016
December 26, 2015
(By Mobolaji Aluko, followed by comments by several members of the Nigerian and African cyberspace Commentatiat)
Quote
On the Matter of FG finally scrapping fuel subsidy and reducing (?) petrol price to N85/litre from Jan 1, 2016
19 views
Bolaji Aluko
12/26/15
to africanw...@googlegroups.com, Nebuka...@aol.com, naijaintellects, NigerianWorldForum, NaijaPolitics e-Group, Ra'ayi, AfricanW...@yahoogroups.com, niger...@yahoogroups.com, OmoOdua, USAAfrica Dialogue, ekiti ekitigroups, Yan Arewa
My People:
If the report of the FG finally scrapping fuel subsidy and reducing (?) petrol price to N85/litre from Jan 1, 2016 is correct, then Minister of State for Petroleum, Dr. Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu is moving in the right direction here, as he inspects more closely some of the arbitrariness in the Pricing Template that is used to determine the so-called "Fuel Subsidy" that we have been allegedly paying......
Unquote
One gets almost tired arguing the same thing over and over again.
Best wishes.
Bolaji Aluko
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Mobolaji Aluko <alukome@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 4:28 AM
To: USAAfrica Dialogue <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>, Naija Politics <NaijaPolitics@yahoogroups.com>, OmoOdua <OmoOdua@yahoogroups.com>, Naija World Forum <NIgerianWorldForum@yahgroups.com>, naijaintellects <naijaintellects@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - STAR ESSAY: ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฒ: ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐?
STAR ESSAY: ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ฒ: ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐?
๐ญ๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐
The country is in a bind. It must borrow three trillion if it chooses not to discontinue subsidising petrol. That's what the government has said. But, on the other hand, if it removes the subsidy on petrol, it could set itself aflame. Against the backdrop of a huge budget deficit and weak income streams, borrowing to consume is insane profligacy. But after Endsars, any provocation of the teetering masses could spell Armageddon. Are we then doomed?
We enacted the PIA to deregulate the petroleum sector and enhance private participation. Now, we must suspend the portion of that law that would have extinguished petrol subsidy by June 2022. We are scared. But if we keep the subsidy, the states will have nothing to collect monthly from Abuja. The CBN might organise a quiet printing of more money to give them some watery soup.
In the end, the naira will be beaten to stupor and might lie south of one thousand to a dollar. We must be careful. Head or tail, we might be in boiling soup.Last year, we borrowed about 1.4 trillion to service our sense of entitlement to cheap fuel. This year that figure might double.
The reason is simple: crude oil prices have risen. Our neighbours are importing at market rate and selling petrol above N400 per litre. If we insist on selling at 160 per litre, we would inevitably be inviting them to feed on our subsidy. So we would end up providing cheap fuel for the entire region.
Where we have borders, they are porous. Smugglers' boats leave for the Benin Republic every night, their bellies filled with our subsidised fuel. Trucks cross through thousands of desert roads in the north to service our brothers in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso etc. So we have no borders. And if we create proper borders, where will we find real Customs officers?
The House of Reps wants to investigate our petrol consumption rate. The House might as well plan to investigate the petrol consumption of West Africa. That is what it is. We have chosen to be the Santa Claus of the region. But the problem with subsidy won't even end with our stepping aside from our Santa duties by stopping petrol smuggling.
There is the other problem of crooks and fat cats exploiting the subsidy window to fatten themselves and impoverish the country. With the retention of the programme in a time of high crude prices, two things might happen.
The NNPC remains the dominant importer by its access to foreign exchange. Now with a privatised Molue with gas-guzzling, oil-spitting engines, the NNPC can't slough off inefficiencies overnight.
They once used to let cargo-laden vessels loiter, pay billions in demurrages, and put the cost on the country. With the NNPC, the love for inflated figures and their role as a cash cow for politicians, a big subsidy window will ruin the country.
On the other hand, if other players enter the game, there could be the other old trouble. In 2011, it was discovered that subsidy payments were claimed and collected for ghost cargoes carried by vessels that had been scrapped and buried before Shehu Shagari came to power. Some other folks simply forged papers, greased the palms of DPR and PPPRA officials with one million dollars per claim, and walked away with billions in awoof subsidy money.
Billions in subsidy payments for cargoes that were never imported. Deregulation is non-negotiable.But in a country where over a hundred million live below abject poverty, even the slightest tightening could be a back-breaker. The EndSars riots' scars are still fresh. Nobody in the government wants to risk a tsunami. But there is something else besides an Arab spring-type volcanic eruption.
The states have little or nothing to share even as crude prices soar. Petrol subsidy wipes out everything. If some states become insolvent, more people would be thrown into poverty and crime. Insurgencies and banditry have become our Achilles heel. Lucrative and therefore intractable; almost self-perpetuating.
Insurgences and banditry grow fat on ransoms. Fattened, they expand and trouble farmers. Farming becomes perilous, and hands become idle. Idle hands join those they can't beat, and the crime industry is diversified. With armed gangs everywhere, the military sucks up the already anaemic national budget.
We are somewhere between many devils and the deep blue ocean. Our parlous state is complicated by our leaky purse and lousy revenue gathering. In 2021, we lost about 3 billion dollars to crude oil thieves.
That is 1.4 trillion naira. This year that figure, on the back of rising crude prices, could be 6 billion dollars i.e. about 3 trillion naira. In other words, the very humongous sum we must borrow to keep the frayed tempers of the poor from flaming is the money we will inevitably lose to crude oil thieves in our midst. Inevitable, because that criminality has almost been normalised. Between 2009 and 2019, NEITTI reported that we lost 41.9 billion dollars to crude oil thieves.
If we had been sufficiently alarmed, we would have laid down our lives to stop the theft. But the thieves don't feel guilty. The reason crude oil theft has become a fixed feature of our national economy is that millions in the Niger delta do not subscribe to the idea that the oil wells belong to Nigeria rather than the locality. Illegal crude oil bunkering is so rampant one is tempted to believe that it is condoned by governments at different levels. Perhaps a way of getting some and letting trouble makers have some. Some sharing of national sovereignty.
That isn't to say that the Navy and other security agencies don't go after oil thieves. But this organised crime happens in the open. And the sheer size of stolen crude is so earth-shuddering that it shouldn't happen every year if we feel truly perturbed.
However, the crude oil theft problem is not helped by stories from Zamfara and other places, where folks, in league with scavenging foreign businessmen, mine diamonds and gold and keep the proceeds.
Forty-two billion dollars in ten years would have built all the rail tracks we are now proposing while kneeling plate-in-hand before the Chinese. Dangote's new 600,000 BPD refinery cost about 19 billion dollars. In 2009, it would have cost much less.
With 42 billion dollars, we could have built three of such refineries, and we would have been exporting only refined products and no crude oil. The NLC wants the government to resuscitate its moribund refineries before removing the petrol subsidy. The same refineries that have become the emblems of government inefficiency in business. The NLC must do what the NLC must do.
Yet while at it, it must know when to step away from idealism and vacuous sloganeering and offer feasible solutions.But leaving nail-bitting aside, a country in financial difficulty must shed flabbiness. If the ordinary people must take a hit, they would want to see government officials living lean lives.
Holes must be plugged. Belts must be tightened. Politicians can't go on collecting ungodly wages and allowances while the poor are forced to bleat to death in the name of patriotism. So the recourse isn't to China and loans.
We must do away with the subsidy program; it's totally fraud-prone. Dubious invoices and petrol smuggling. But the removal of the subsidy won't make sense if crude oil theft is still allowed.
The sacrifice from the poor won't make sense if the politicians are still engaged in exhibitionistic sybaritism. Nothing would make sense if the governments are run with a carnival mentality.
We are in a quandary. But it could be an opportunity for sober reflection and hard life-changing decisions.
Vanguard News Nigeria
------------------------
*ALUKO COMMENTARY*
Damned if you do, damned if you don't, but the oil subsidy regime must go, and the sooner, the better.
While it is true that all countries choose goods and services to subsidize for its citizens, it must be done with wisdom:
1. We cannot continue to subsidize both producer and user of the subsidized good: that leads to inefficiency of the former and wastage and outright fraud by the latter, like lighting a candle at both ends. You subsidize either the producer (so that he can sell at a lower price) or the buyer (so that he buys at a lower price) but not both, otherwise trying to contain it becomes a whack-a-mole enterprise.
2. We cannot subsidize those who can pay the unsubsidized price, ie there must be a Means Test. The money such people pay is invariably used for conspicuous consumption, and it amounts to a transfer of funds from the poor to the rich. The rich must be made to assist Government to truly subsidize the poor.
3. Most crucial: for budgeting purpose and for fiscal discipline, there must be a cap to the total amount of subsidy, above which the subsidizer won't pay, and the subsidized will have to pay the unsubsidized price. Otherwise, subsidy will invariably lead to runaway expenditure as we currently have with petroleum products. This is particularly necessary when the price of the subsidized good suffers international vagaries that the subsidizer has no control over.
When will the subsidy regime - and I daresay the accompanying appetite for debt - stop in Nigeria? When the marginal social cost of not stopping it exceeds the cost of stopping it. When that day is, I do not know, but we will as a country continue to stumble, wobble and weave along this rickety bridge to that fateful future day.
There you have it.
Bolaji Aluko
February 1, 2022
----------------------
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAORq2DB0VKJxs12HBn8OYNyqQpM_4-OAgVGCUd1radxRL8V-Jw%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DM4PR12MB5040B72DA80419D756928641F4269%40DM4PR12MB5040.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/HE1P193MB0076FF0AA10E226045A16846AE269%40HE1P193MB0076.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAORq2DDhCVMWWHT-XXjcGWGxTCoKG7LtK%2B6aNKr6yg%2BLROxPiA%40mail.gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment