You are suffering from something called intellectual indigestion.You are
struggling to unify fields the implications of which you have not grasped.
1. I start with the most ridiculous claim you make.You state that Oyibo has
unified both mythical and scientific accounts of creation.
How is that possible? If he claims to do that,is he doing
science? Mathematical physics,the field Oyibo is claiming expertise in,is
based on mathematical reasoning.Myth is based on narratives.Mathematical
physics tries to achieve mutual verifiability.Myth does not.
Lets see your argument for this unification of both fields:
"Oyibo GAGUT theorem UNIFIES the vexations disparities in the Hisotrical
Accounts of the Creation Story under the Wave-Quantum Theory"
"I'm referring to the 3 Popular accounts, Judae Christian, Scientific
Creationism and the African Khmetic : All 3 are united under the concept of
the Atum, the thermo nuclear explosion that must accompany such and the
release of turbulent cosmic waves released from the fusion and fission of
the original Hydrogen element as the UNIFIED ACCOUNT of CREATION. So, yes,
Oyibo's GAGUT is able to now mathematically express the so-called Myth
accounts of Creation now unravelled in it's scientific truth as propounded
in the Quantum Wave Theory".
On what terms are you describing any of theses creation stories in terms of
"the thermo nuclear explosion that must accompany such and the release of
turbulent cosmic waves released from the fusion and fission of the original
Hydrogen element"
Atum is an Egyptian god.On what terms is he equatable with a thermonuclear
explosion?
The best you can be said to be doing is interpreting myth in terms of
science.You must note,though,that your interpretation is conjectural.There
is no evidence that the creators of those myths had any knowledge of the
scientific concepts you are invoking to explain their stories.The fact that
you dont make that distinction shows that you might not understand the
fundamental difference between myth and science.
2.Your knowledge of those myths is itself suspect.
You speak of myth in terms of historical accounts of creation.They are
not historical because history involves recording of events.At creation
there were no observers and no records have been found.Mythic accounts
therefore are not history.History and myth are therefore fundamentally
different.I am almost flabbergastesd at your limitations in this
regard.There is something very wrong in the educational template you are
operating from.
Also,what aspects of thses mythologies are you equating with each other and
with science? Are you equating gods,creation processes or both? Note that
there is no intelligent agent posited in scientific accounts of creation so
your correlation of myth where creation is generated by gods like Atum
suggests ignorance of the character of scientific creation accounts.
As for correlating Atum with Judaeo-Christian creation myth,possibly with
Yaweh,have you taken note of similarities and differences in relation to
that?
I would have dismissed you at this point as having little or no scientific
bacground if not that I have encountered a member of Naijaitprofessionals
Yahoo group who thinks that my criticising Oyobo is delusional.So ignorance
about scientific princples might emerge among people with exposure to
science who suffer from the backward understanding of science.
3.You have done well to provide the Animalu review of Oyibo's books.I asked
for just one scientific analysis because I see that Oyibo's claims are not
discussed in scientific contexts.I have examined the Animalu review and he
does not state that Oyibo has achieved that theory he claims to have.
Will you attribute the deafening silence on Oyibo's work among the numerous
Black scientist to jealousy as you claim that the Western scientists are
being racist in ignoring him totally,a most preposterous claim emanating
from some dark ages of ignorance?
Oyibo claims he has presented his work at various scientific fora and that
it has been examined by famous members of the scientific community.I have
found no evidence that that is true.I get the impression we are dealing here
with complete and bare faced lies on his part.I continue to search,though.
Contact Oyibo and let him send you the articles that
1.Take him seriously enough to examine his claims.
2.Agree that he has achieved the theory he claims.
I doubt if you will find any of these.You might find item 1.If you can find
item 2 ,that would be wonderful but I am telling you that you will not find
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment