Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - TWO NIGERIANS, TIM EJINDU AND GODFREY NWOGENE, ALLEGEDLY IN FRAUDULENT BILLIING OF $MILLIONS IN CALIFORNIA’S HEALTH SYSTEM

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Nigeria: Boko Haram, poverty, Jonathan and the game of musical chairs

Chronology? 
Yes or lexicographical ordering if you will.  It would have been clearer if you had stated that Ken had expressed those ideas before Chomsky's book you cited. I am happy you have done so now. I have no problem with it again. Besides,  Ken has even cleared the air and made a step further for me to read. 
You know Chomsky is an interesting guy. 
Segun Ogungbemi. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 1, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi,

 

I'll never let you go.

 

Last take.

 

Re - "Chomsky cannot agree with Harrow because he wrote the work you cited before Harrow made his contribution recently." Well, I also cited other works and especially that one.

 

Chronology?

 

The Harrow I know has consistently made those positions clear in this forum, at least since I've been here and I'm sure, even earlier than Chomsky's "What we say goes!" in which Chomsky again passes judgement on US foreign policy actions going back to even Vietnam and Korea; but you can be the judge of the truths or untruths, the justice or injustice about which we may or may not agree either here or in eternity (smile) Like East & West. Like the Igbo and the Yoruba – till eternity. Or till death do us part.

 

About that, I should think that we are still in essential agreement and hopefully hold this truth in common too, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

 

And about this who said what and when business:

 

"Half of the people can be part right all of the time
Some of the people can be all right part of the time
But all of the people can't be all right all of the time
I think Abraham Lincoln said that
"I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours"
I said that "

Copyright © 1963, 1966 by Warner Bros. Inc.; renewed 1991, 1994 by Special Rider Music


Transformational Grammar? Chomsky said that before he threw it out the window...

Yours eternally,

We Sweden


 
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:29:05 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
Dear Cornelius,
I simply addressed the issue based on the source you cited from Chomsky. I studied Chomsky as a Ph.D student at University of Texas at Dallas in the early 80s. I have some collections of his work in my library and each time I go to the US, I buy some of his books. 
As I have said Chomsky cannot agree with Harrow because he wrote the work you cited before Harrow made his contribution recently.  Harrow can be said to be speaking in similar vein with Chomsky. 
There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that both Chomsky and Harrow share a common view on nationalism as shown in American national policy. 
So I am not in doubt.  I, however thank you for your advice. 
Segun Ogungbemi. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Professor Segun Ogungbemi. 

 

I hope that I'm reading you right.

 

I have read much of Chomsky over the years, am so familiar with him and all that Z-net that I can often anticipate eaxcatly what he's going to say. Whether it's 2007 or 2013 or futuristically or prophetically speaking you leave me no choice but to mildly insist that there are many areas of overlap and complete agreement between Chomsky and Harrow on this one.

 

 If in doubt, ask them.

 

Synchronicity

WE SWEDEN


 
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 10:59:09 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
May I say that it is very unlikely for Chomsky to agree with Harrow from what you said and I quote "In so many words Professor Chomsky agrees with Professor Harrow, especially in his "What we say goes!"
Chomsky wrote the book in 2007 and Harrow contributed to this debate in 2013. I am yet to see the definition you said in the book.
 What Chomsky talks about is secular nationalism and how the policy of the US of national interest which Reinhold Niebuhr had addressed before is more important than individual or social morality. 
Secondly,  as rightly noted by Chomsky, Christianity was far more a violent religion at the time Huntington wrote on clash civilizations. Chomsky agrees with Huntington that Christianity was one of the most savage civilizations in human history. That was in the Medieval period.  
The US is believed to be predominantly a Christian country whose foreign policy is as violent as Christianity of the Middle Ages, if not worse. 
No one will dispute this and reading Chomsky and others will convince an honest researcher on this. 
The question that lingers on then is:  Can we say that America is more violent than Islamic fundamentalism and Islamic secular nationalism? 
It depends on where one has his bias. Perhaps, verifiable facts and figures will be our guide if we are to make an unbiased judgement. 
Segun Ogungbemi. 
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Still thinking about Professor Harrow's definitions of" the religion called nationalism". In so many words Professor Chomsky agrees with Professor Harrow, especially in his "What we say goes!"

Chomsky now wants Europe to lend a helping hand.

"They say that patriotism is the last refuge
To which a scoundrel clings
Steal a little and they throw you in jail
Steal a lot and they make you king"

A short discussion about the State-ism

Can you?

Ideology, much of which is found in Islam, is known as Islamism, and Islamism has on several occasions during the past century, been an essential component in Pan-Arab nationalism. It looks like where you find oil, there too you find Islam. Nowadays, moving south faster than the Sahara desert,  Islam has moved steadfastly from the North of Nigeria and made great inroads in the South- East of the country, where we find a major Islamic leader in the person of honourable Kalabari man Alhaji Mujahid Dokubo-Asari with his own fiery admixture of fiery, national ideology. (Think: fire and petrol don't mix without spontaneous, explosive combustion)

Marxism and Maoism are also highly developed ideologies that have certain features in common with Islamism. Hitler's avowed ideology was National Socialism, was it not?

When a state becomes an object of worship, it's called idolatry. We often see this happening in sports, especially football. We are usually united then, experiencing collective victory or ignominious defeat.

We Sweden


On Saturday, 27 July 2013 13:04:18 UTC+2, Kenneth Harrow wrote:
the religion called nationalism, acting in the name of national interest; the religion called hegemony, dissembling its actions under the name of international peace-making; the religion called america first, acting in the name of god and country...
add up the numbers killed, maimed, and dominated, and we win hands down
and if you don't think the latter is a religion, you ain't a true believer
ken

On 7/27/13 3:59 AM, Segun Ogungbemi wrote:
It is not all Muslims who committed the global violence including 9/11 but those who did it were Muslims. Name any religious organizations in the world that have used violence of the magnitude the world has witnessed in the last two decades.�
Let us leave deductive and inductive methods of reasoning out of this and face the reality of morals confronting us.�
You have not examined what I have said and come out with concrete counter moral arguments. This is not about logic. It is about moral reasoning.�
See what Boko Haram sect has done in the last few years to their fellow Nigerians. Can all these killings and destruction of property be morally justified? To me that is the issue.�
Let us leave religious bigotry apart and face a common moral denominator. Human life is sacred. Early this year, a friend of mine living in Kano lost one of his sons who was planning to come home the following day and a group of Muslims saw him and short him dead at a close range very close to the gate of their house. Recently, about 10 Yoruba women traders went to Maiduguri in Brono State to buy foodstuff and they were killed by Boko Haram sect. Defenseless innocent women! �Forty two secondary students were gruesomely murdered by the same Muslim zealots.
�Human lives were destroyed just like that and you are talking about logic? Use moral logic not inductive or deductive logic Adeshina.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:52 PM, shina7...@yahoo.com wrote:

"Buhari as a person is a pleasant person but being a Muslim: can he be trusted? See what Muslims have turned the world to around the globe. Must Muslims be violent to able to correct a political system or an immoral government? See what they did everywhere in the world today.". Prof. Ogungbemi

For you Sir, being a Muslim has become an undifferentiated category? All Muslims are now, by that fact alone, become complicit in 9/11? All Muslims are intrinsically dangerous? Buhari is disqualified simply because he is Muslim? And therefore, no Muslim is good for anything, not the presidency?

Ah!

I suspect you will deny/reject these assumptions. Just wondering on what basis you'll wriggle out these uncritical assumptions Sir.


Adeshina Afolayan
�
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

From: Segun Ogungbemi <segun...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:22:43 +0100
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Nigeria: Boko Haram, poverty, Jonathan and the game of musical chairs

Thanks brother Cornelius. Everyone wants power. The use of that power when it is given freely or forcefully acquired becomes a moral issue. Buhari came to power not by any democratic means at all. All military coups against a constitutionally and democratically elected government is an aberration. Buhari usurped power forcefully and governed for roughly two years and another coup swept his administration out. "Soldier go soldier come" �as Fela aptly put it.
�I have no respect for soldiers who abandoned their official responsibility and usurped power forcefully. It is immoral and unacceptable.�
Buhari as a person is a pleasant person but being a Muslim: can he be trusted? See what Muslims have turned the world to around the globe. Must Muslims be violent to able to correct a political system or an immoral government? See what they did everywhere in the world today.
�The 9/11 in 2001 still makes me sick inside. For such a heinous crime to be committed against humanity was initially unimaginable. Are Muslims the only people in the world?�
They have no tolerance and respect for human life. If they don't want to live here on earth, �why can't they leave for alijana peacefully and quietly and let those who want to live here enjoy the short span of life given to them by nature?�
Take a look at Nigerian history, has any religious group been so violent as Muslims? I have lived in this country for 67 years, I have never seen such a carnage done to one's country like what the Muslims have done to Nigeria and their leaders including Buhari would stand aloof without intervention. How can such a person say he wants my vote at the polls? He will never get it. It is not Buhari alone but all those northern leaders who see the kind of carnage Boko Haram Muslim sect has done to innocent Nigerians including children and students and failed to stop it and yet seek to become president come 2015. Is that the way to lead?�
So Cornelius, have a critical assessment of the situation as discussed above and see how Nigeria can be united by a leader of a better track record than your man, Buhari,�
You live in Sweden because it is a peaceful environment and the people are probably tolerant and accommodating.
�I had lived in the US for several years and I have respect for their tolerance and accommodating spirit. It is not a perfect society but it is still the best I have seen in my life. Why don't we aspire to be like that or like Sweden where you live?�
It is time to rethink without any emotion but just on rational ground and �common sense of morals.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 11:41 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi

The only reason why I sometimes ask probing questions is to benefit from enlightening answers. Hillel the Elder used to say, �One who does not increase his knowledge decreases it.� So, I can only congratulate you, Kusheh, and that your latest response has caused a much valued increase and a diminishing of ignorance on my part.

Generally speaking, Northerner (in Nigeria) usually implies �Muslim� although there are minority Christians such as Samuel-Szalanaga 7994 whose observations as witnessed here deserve our attention. �Having lived with Igbos in Nigeria, for almost four years, I know that when the Igbo says �Hausa-man� he means Muslim and that Islam is an essential feature of Northern identity, superseding the merely �geographic, and that� Islam is usually a strong component in Northern identity, since it also encompasses the cultural. Ok, so Gowon wasn�t Muslim and I even met an anomaly Hausa �man, one Rev. Muhammad who was studying political science and Human Rights here at Stockholm University, in Sweden a student of Professor Bj�rn Beckman.

Here you were stretching it a little. Thou shalt not exaggerate. I do not believe that it�s accurate to state that my honest �man, Muhmmadu Buhari ��was part of those who ruled for 38 years�, when in fact he was only head of state from December 31, 1983 to August 27, 1985. He did some real cleaning up before he was deposed by Babangida. The only mistake that Muhammadu Buhari made was that on departing for Mecca he promised that when he returned to Nigeria he would complete the cleaning up exercise and of course � predictably, the corrupt ones then knew that their period of impunity would come to an end when� the honest general returned from Mecca , and expecting that their corruption was going to be severely punished, cleaned up, they �took the pre-emptive action of deposing him whilst he was still on pilgrimage...

You say, �My understanding of democracy is different from yours�? Well, I�ve lived in a democratic country, Sweden, most of my life � and I�m sure that both of us agree that democracy is not only about running free and fair elections but also about strengthening democratic institutions and that that should be a goal to work for in Nigeria.

I know for a fact that with all the transparency in the world, there are still behind the scenes, horse-trading and what not in selecting/ electing a flag-bear to contest presidential elections. In Egypt for example, somehow, �the powers that be� refused the Brotherhood�s number one candidate the right to lead his party and to contest the presidential elections. That was immoral. �I cannot see the immorality in the PDP deciding in advance, this time the candidate will be a southerner on condition that the next time he or she will be a Northerner and sealing a deal on that understanding. But to renege on that understanding, that would be immoral.

The presidency of the general assembly at the UN is done on a rotational basis. Is that also immoral Sir?

I am certainly not at all qualified to run for any political post in Nigeria or elsewhere.

http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/

�
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 22:57:40 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:

Dear Cornelius,
Once again, I appreciate your response but let me clear the issue of my identity. �I am an indigenous Yagba in the present Yagba East Local Government, Kogi State, Nigeria. Geographically, Kogi State is in the north hence I am a Northerner. Culturally, traditionally and linguistically I am Yoruba. Therefore, I have a dual identity by virtue of geographical and cultural locations.�
I don't have any political ambition for now and so I don't solicit for support from any ethnic groups. �
The issue I want you to examine is this: If the north held on to power at the centre for 38 years and they did not make it to trickle down to the least well off, how can Buhari you support make it to happen when in actual fact he was part of those who ruled for 38 years? Find out the measure of trickle that got to his people then.�
Pa Awolowo ruled in the defunct Western Region and made the most remarkable impact on his people with the free education program which till today gave the Yoruba an edge in Nigeria. In Ogun State today, they have not less than 9 Universities which make it the only State in the Federation to have the largest number of both public and private universities. This does not include other tertiary institutions in Ogun State. Southwestern Nigeria has the largest number of industries in Nigeria including finance houses- I mean backing industries.�
Northern governors receive federal allocation monthly from federation accounts so also their local councils. Tell us where is the huge money they receive monthly used for in terms of education, health, poverty reduction and development? �
Please find out from the rich elites in the north how many private universities have they established in their states as groups or individuals.�
The Ibos are basically commercial entrepreneurs with a few of them in education. They still have more private universities in their states than the north. How many Presidents have the Ibos produced since independence and yet educationally they are better than the so called numerical north?�
Poverty and illiteracy have become appendage attribute of the north not because they have not had heads of state or presidents democratically elected from the region since independence but because such leaders never put education of their people on the front burner.�
My understanding of democracy is different from yours. There is no way, I believe, you can justify rotational presidency on moral grounds and call it authentic democracy.�
President Jonathan is an academic who never had enough experience in Nigerian politics before he was elected. His credentials plus his age and of course his humility endeared him to most of us who voted for him. If he wants to contest again, he will have to show his scorecards of achievements. It is the electorate who will determine his fate not you and I. So let us see how it goes if at the end of the day he wants to continue in office. You are as qualified as President Jonathan and Buhari to contest but the choice is yours.�
Merit should be the barometer with which to measure who is fit to be our president and not by rotational "arrangee"�introduced by PDP political party of "carry go".�
Segun Ogungbemi. �

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi,

Of course I am and was aware that you are from the North as that�s the first surprising point that you made in the letter that I referred to, in which you said,

�I am from the north and it is not true that the north can boast of holding to power at the centre as stated by Prof. Abdullahi.�

I was initially surprised because both your names, your first name Segun and your surname Ogungbemi are unmistakably Yoruba names and even after having made the probable location of your birth clear (Kwarra?) I still concluded that you are a Yoruba man just like me - no matter from what part of the Diaspora you shed your first tears or whether or not your umbilical cord is buried in the Sokoto, Borno or the more liberal Kaduna area.

But jokes aside that�s one of the problems of Nigeria�s and indeed Africa�s regional and tribal politics: you may be born, bred and buried in the North alright but your name proclaims you Yoruba. So which bona fide Hausa man is going to take your self-proclaimed Northern identity, seriously, just because you maybe grew up in that environment? It certainly didn�t save the Igbo traders, many of whom were born and bred in the North when the pogroms against the Igbo were perpetrated just prior to Biafra seceding as a safe haven for the Igbo people!

Of course, my dear professor, there�s no doubt that you are eminently, even pre-eminently qualified to contest the presidential elections as a Northerner who would also sweep the Yoruba vote � there�s no doubt about that, however, sweeping the Igbo vote with a name like that, would be quite another matter � as the South of Nigeria is divided between the South West and the South East, literary feuds Soyinka & supporters vs. The ascended Achebe & his fans, whilst in politics proper it�s eternally �AWO vs. ZIK � has always been � to the extent that we can quote imperial Kipling symbolically, that

OH, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,

Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God�s great Judgment Seat;

But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth,

When two strong men stand face to face, tho� they come from the ends of the earth!


�

You asked �Is democracy based on rotation?�

In my view, acceding to the rotation role playing politics in Nigeria is in the national interest of peace & prosperity and to allay both the fear and lessen the ever increasing tensions based on a perceived imbalance between the North and the South in terms of development, education, and that this perceived injustice that�s the main cause of the abject poverty in the North will be more easily righted by a Northern president. Nor do I think that the rotation system agreed upon by the PDP as an internal matter, a compromise of understanding, is in any way "undemocratic"

So, I am making a point in favour of � at this time - anointing a Northern as the presidential candidate for the PDP, most likely with a Southern running mate.

It�s easy to see without looking too far that if that does not happen then Goodluck Jonathan�s next logical option will be to retire a few more Northern Generals in the Nigerian military, to pre-empt a coup. �Of course, this is standard practice: In their time, Babangida and Abacha played it safe by retiring scores of Yoruba generals and other Yoruba top military brass.

As to the question of whether or not a Northern president will uplift the North, here is your answer below, but your answer does not solve the perceived injustice or the current poverty in the North � or take away the North�s motivation to capture/ re-capture the presidency.

Your views on this:

�The educational backwardness of the north as it is known today is not the kind that anyone can be proud of. You don't have to have a northerner as president to make life better for all northerners. Any Nigerian who becomes president of the country can do that. Let the leadership of the north since 1966-2013 show the scorecards of their achievements. For 38 years the north had ruled this country and nothing to show for it, particularly in the north. What have the masses gained from the period they had ruled the country? I think that should be what Ango ought to be concerned about and not that the north will hold on to power come 2015 as long as they want on the basis of their numerical voting power.�

Obasanjo was in power for 11 years altogether as military head of state and civilian president of Nigeria. Were the Yoruba better off than when Yar'Adua was President of Nigeria? The Yoruba will tell you that they were worse off under the leadership of their kinsman.�

You are surely overlooking the patronage that a Yoruba would receive when his kinsman is in power, ditto for the Hausa, the Fulani and of course the Igbo, and therefore, all the more reason for them to fight for their folks to be at the helm of the big business, so that at least a few kobo, more than a dollar a day should trickle down.

�

In one of his interviews Muhammadu Buhari talks about the elite and later on goes on to identify himself with that elite. This suggests to me that a Northern candidate usually comes from the elite � others say that �the Kaduna mafia� is part of it.

�

My impression is that Goodluck Jonathan is not from �the elite� � if anything is very much from the grassroots albeit nothing like my old icon, Michael Imoudu. You ask yourself the question, is Goodluck Jonathan the best that the system was able to deliver to Nigeria?

�

Finally, this democracy business (crazy-demo Fela calls it) by which the winner takes all � as happened in Egypt where the losers wanted to �share� power. In Nigerian terms Id� say that the losers also want �their share�

�

Please excuse some of my stray observations.

�

Yours sin-cerely,

�

dreary Cornelius

�

http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/

�

�

�

�


�
�
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 06:46:50 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
Drear Cornelius,
Thanks for making reference to me in this debate. You said and I quote,..."since the North insists that it�s their turn according to a rotation system agreed upon, and�Prof. Segun Ogungbemi�s misgivings about the matters notwithstanding,(he sounds as if there�s no one from the North that�s qualified to be president of Nigeria."�
�I think you misunderstood me. First,�I am from the North and there are many more people like me who are well qualified to be elected president of this country from the region. �Therefore, your insinuation is incorrect. Secondly,�My view is that rotational presidency is a PDP internal arrangement within the party which is not in our constitution. The demerit of it all is that it promotes disunity rather than unity which is what we are witnessing today.
�From the foregoing�therefore, my proposal is that the best way to secure unity in Nigerian politics is to elect anyone who is mostly suited for the job regardless which ethnic group s/he comes from in Nigeria. That will foster unity and promote enduring and genuine democracy. In other words, it will be seen to be constitutional and authentically democratic. � ��
Of course, you have every right to think that Buhari is suitable for job but it should not be based on where he comes from. And more importantly the electorate is to make that decision at the polls.
Merit and the electorate not any rotation should be the basis of our guide for the choice we make.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://groups.google.com/group
...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Nigeria: Boko Haram, poverty, Jonathan and the game of musical chairs

Thanks my colleague Cornelius. I appreciate your contributions and I envy your son's presents of Chomsky's  publications. 
Best wishes,
Segun Ogungbemi. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

 
 

Professor Segun Ogungbemi,

 

 I should only hope that the word agree affords sufficient scope for all of us to read, to fully understand and to do just that. My son keeps on giving me Chomsky publications as birthday presents. On average I read about three to four books every week, going back to when I was about twelve years old. Don't get me wrong, this is my fifth week on Cohen's "Everyman's Talmud". Sometimes, I have to make up for lost time (at my own leisure of course and entirely for pleasure)

 

There are those who say that some of the Torah "agrees" with the Quran and vise-versa. I'll let that go without digging further into any can of worms about pre-existent scripture or into the magnanimity of "before Abraham was, I am" or divine three-in-one mathematics etc.

Let me assure you, that within the realm of meaning, there's nothing that exalted Hebrew Poetry cannot do

 

In the midsixties we "did" Chomsky's syntactic structures as part of our linguistics class, shortly before Professor Chomsky chucked it out....

 

Next on my agenda ( after "Light of the world" is re-reading of Truth, Love and a little malice by Khushwant Singh

 

I remain,

 

Sincerely yours,

 

We Sweden

 


On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 20:29:05 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
Dear Cornelius,
I simply addressed the issue based on the source you cited from Chomsky. I studied Chomsky as a Ph.D student at University of Texas at Dallas in the early 80s. I have some collections of his work in my library and each time I go to the US, I buy some of his books. 
As I have said Chomsky cannot agree with Harrow because he wrote the work you cited before Harrow made his contribution recently.  Harrow can be said to be speaking in similar vein with Chomsky. 
There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that both Chomsky and Harrow share a common view on nationalism as shown in American national policy. 
So I am not in doubt.  I, however thank you for your advice. 
Segun Ogungbemi. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Professor Segun Ogungbemi. 

 

I hope that I'm reading you right.

 

I have read much of Chomsky over the years, am so familiar with him and all that Z-net that I can often anticipate eaxcatly what he's going to say. Whether it's 2007 or 2013 or futuristically or prophetically speaking you leave me no choice but to mildly insist that there are many areas of overlap and complete agreement between Chomsky and Harrow on this one.

 

 If in doubt, ask them.

 

Synchronicity

WE SWEDEN


 
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 10:59:09 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
May I say that it is very unlikely for Chomsky to agree with Harrow from what you said and I quote "In so many words Professor Chomsky agrees with Professor Harrow, especially in his "What we say goes!"
Chomsky wrote the book in 2007 and Harrow contributed to this debate in 2013. I am yet to see the definition you said in the book.
 What Chomsky talks about is secular nationalism and how the policy of the US of national interest which Reinhold Niebuhr had addressed before is more important than individual or social morality. 
Secondly,  as rightly noted by Chomsky, Christianity was far more a violent religion at the time Huntington wrote on clash civilizations. Chomsky agrees with Huntington that Christianity was one of the most savage civilizations in human history. That was in the Medieval period.  
The US is believed to be predominantly a Christian country whose foreign policy is as violent as Christianity of the Middle Ages, if not worse. 
No one will dispute this and reading Chomsky and others will convince an honest researcher on this. 
The question that lingers on then is:  Can we say that America is more violent than Islamic fundamentalism and Islamic secular nationalism? 
It depends on where one has his bias. Perhaps, verifiable facts and figures will be our guide if we are to make an unbiased judgement. 
Segun Ogungbemi. 
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Still thinking about Professor Harrow's definitions of" the religion called nationalism". In so many words Professor Chomsky agrees with Professor Harrow, especially in his "What we say goes!"

Chomsky now wants Europe to lend a helping hand.

"They say that patriotism is the last refuge
To which a scoundrel clings
Steal a little and they throw you in jail
Steal a lot and they make you king"

A short discussion about the State-ism

Can you?

Ideology, much of which is found in Islam, is known as Islamism, and Islamism has on several occasions during the past century, been an essential component in Pan-Arab nationalism. It looks like where you find oil, there too you find Islam. Nowadays, moving south faster than the Sahara desert,  Islam has moved steadfastly from the North of Nigeria and made great inroads in the South- East of the country, where we find a major Islamic leader in the person of honourable Kalabari man Alhaji Mujahid Dokubo-Asari with his own fiery admixture of fiery, national ideology. (Think: fire and petrol don't mix without spontaneous, explosive combustion)

Marxism and Maoism are also highly developed ideologies that have certain features in common with Islamism. Hitler's avowed ideology was National Socialism, was it not?

When a state becomes an object of worship, it's called idolatry. We often see this happening in sports, especially football. We are usually united then, experiencing collective victory or ignominious defeat.

We Sweden


On Saturday, 27 July 2013 13:04:18 UTC+2, Kenneth Harrow wrote:
the religion called nationalism, acting in the name of national interest; the religion called hegemony, dissembling its actions under the name of international peace-making; the religion called america first, acting in the name of god and country...
add up the numbers killed, maimed, and dominated, and we win hands down
and if you don't think the latter is a religion, you ain't a true believer
ken

On 7/27/13 3:59 AM, Segun Ogungbemi wrote:
It is not all Muslims who committed the global violence including 9/11 but those who did it were Muslims. Name any religious organizations in the world that have used violence of the magnitude the world has witnessed in the last two decades.�
Let us leave deductive and inductive methods of reasoning out of this and face the reality of morals confronting us.�
You have not examined what I have said and come out with concrete counter moral arguments. This is not about logic. It is about moral reasoning.�
See what Boko Haram sect has done in the last few years to their fellow Nigerians. Can all these killings and destruction of property be morally justified? To me that is the issue.�
Let us leave religious bigotry apart and face a common moral denominator. Human life is sacred. Early this year, a friend of mine living in Kano lost one of his sons who was planning to come home the following day and a group of Muslims saw him and short him dead at a close range very close to the gate of their house. Recently, about 10 Yoruba women traders went to Maiduguri in Brono State to buy foodstuff and they were killed by Boko Haram sect. Defenseless innocent women! �Forty two secondary students were gruesomely murdered by the same Muslim zealots.
�Human lives were destroyed just like that and you are talking about logic? Use moral logic not inductive or deductive logic Adeshina.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:52 PM, shina7...@yahoo.com wrote:

"Buhari as a person is a pleasant person but being a Muslim: can he be trusted? See what Muslims have turned the world to around the globe. Must Muslims be violent to able to correct a political system or an immoral government? See what they did everywhere in the world today.". Prof. Ogungbemi

For you Sir, being a Muslim has become an undifferentiated category? All Muslims are now, by that fact alone, become complicit in 9/11? All Muslims are intrinsically dangerous? Buhari is disqualified simply because he is Muslim? And therefore, no Muslim is good for anything, not the presidency?

Ah!

I suspect you will deny/reject these assumptions. Just wondering on what basis you'll wriggle out these uncritical assumptions Sir.


Adeshina Afolayan
�
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

From: Segun Ogungbemi <segun...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:22:43 +0100
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Nigeria: Boko Haram, poverty, Jonathan and the game of musical chairs

Thanks brother Cornelius. Everyone wants power. The use of that power when it is given freely or forcefully acquired becomes a moral issue. Buhari came to power not by any democratic means at all. All military coups against a constitutionally and democratically elected government is an aberration. Buhari usurped power forcefully and governed for roughly two years and another coup swept his administration out. "Soldier go soldier come" �as Fela aptly put it.
�I have no respect for soldiers who abandoned their official responsibility and usurped power forcefully. It is immoral and unacceptable.�
Buhari as a person is a pleasant person but being a Muslim: can he be trusted? See what Muslims have turned the world to around the globe. Must Muslims be violent to able to correct a political system or an immoral government? See what they did everywhere in the world today.
�The 9/11 in 2001 still makes me sick inside. For such a heinous crime to be committed against humanity was initially unimaginable. Are Muslims the only people in the world?�
They have no tolerance and respect for human life. If they don't want to live here on earth, �why can't they leave for alijana peacefully and quietly and let those who want to live here enjoy the short span of life given to them by nature?�
Take a look at Nigerian history, has any religious group been so violent as Muslims? I have lived in this country for 67 years, I have never seen such a carnage done to one's country like what the Muslims have done to Nigeria and their leaders including Buhari would stand aloof without intervention. How can such a person say he wants my vote at the polls? He will never get it. It is not Buhari alone but all those northern leaders who see the kind of carnage Boko Haram Muslim sect has done to innocent Nigerians including children and students and failed to stop it and yet seek to become president come 2015. Is that the way to lead?�
So Cornelius, have a critical assessment of the situation as discussed above and see how Nigeria can be united by a leader of a better track record than your man, Buhari,�
You live in Sweden because it is a peaceful environment and the people are probably tolerant and accommodating.
�I had lived in the US for several years and I have respect for their tolerance and accommodating spirit. It is not a perfect society but it is still the best I have seen in my life. Why don't we aspire to be like that or like Sweden where you live?�
It is time to rethink without any emotion but just on rational ground and �common sense of morals.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 11:41 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi

The only reason why I sometimes ask probing questions is to benefit from enlightening answers. Hillel the Elder used to say, �One who does not increase his knowledge decreases it.� So, I can only congratulate you, Kusheh, and that your latest response has caused a much valued increase and a diminishing of ignorance on my part.

Generally speaking, Northerner (in Nigeria) usually implies �Muslim� although there are minority Christians such as Samuel-Szalanaga 7994 whose observations as witnessed here deserve our attention. �Having lived with Igbos in Nigeria, for almost four years, I know that when the Igbo says �Hausa-man� he means Muslim and that Islam is an essential feature of Northern identity, superseding the merely �geographic, and that� Islam is usually a strong component in Northern identity, since it also encompasses the cultural. Ok, so Gowon wasn�t Muslim and I even met an anomaly Hausa �man, one Rev. Muhammad who was studying political science and Human Rights here at Stockholm University, in Sweden a student of Professor Bj�rn Beckman.

Here you were stretching it a little. Thou shalt not exaggerate. I do not believe that it�s accurate to state that my honest �man, Muhmmadu Buhari ��was part of those who ruled for 38 years�, when in fact he was only head of state from December 31, 1983 to August 27, 1985. He did some real cleaning up before he was deposed by Babangida. The only mistake that Muhammadu Buhari made was that on departing for Mecca he promised that when he returned to Nigeria he would complete the cleaning up exercise and of course � predictably, the corrupt ones then knew that their period of impunity would come to an end when� the honest general returned from Mecca , and expecting that their corruption was going to be severely punished, cleaned up, they �took the pre-emptive action of deposing him whilst he was still on pilgrimage...

You say, �My understanding of democracy is different from yours�? Well, I�ve lived in a democratic country, Sweden, most of my life � and I�m sure that both of us agree that democracy is not only about running free and fair elections but also about strengthening democratic institutions and that that should be a goal to work for in Nigeria.

I know for a fact that with all the transparency in the world, there are still behind the scenes, horse-trading and what not in selecting/ electing a flag-bear to contest presidential elections. In Egypt for example, somehow, �the powers that be� refused the Brotherhood�s number one candidate the right to lead his party and to contest the presidential elections. That was immoral. �I cannot see the immorality in the PDP deciding in advance, this time the candidate will be a southerner on condition that the next time he or she will be a Northerner and sealing a deal on that understanding. But to renege on that understanding, that would be immoral.

The presidency of the general assembly at the UN is done on a rotational basis. Is that also immoral Sir?

I am certainly not at all qualified to run for any political post in Nigeria or elsewhere.

http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/

�
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 22:57:40 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:

Dear Cornelius,
Once again, I appreciate your response but let me clear the issue of my identity. �I am an indigenous Yagba in the present Yagba East Local Government, Kogi State, Nigeria. Geographically, Kogi State is in the north hence I am a Northerner. Culturally, traditionally and linguistically I am Yoruba. Therefore, I have a dual identity by virtue of geographical and cultural locations.�
I don't have any political ambition for now and so I don't solicit for support from any ethnic groups. �
The issue I want you to examine is this: If the north held on to power at the centre for 38 years and they did not make it to trickle down to the least well off, how can Buhari you support make it to happen when in actual fact he was part of those who ruled for 38 years? Find out the measure of trickle that got to his people then.�
Pa Awolowo ruled in the defunct Western Region and made the most remarkable impact on his people with the free education program which till today gave the Yoruba an edge in Nigeria. In Ogun State today, they have not less than 9 Universities which make it the only State in the Federation to have the largest number of both public and private universities. This does not include other tertiary institutions in Ogun State. Southwestern Nigeria has the largest number of industries in Nigeria including finance houses- I mean backing industries.�
Northern governors receive federal allocation monthly from federation accounts so also their local councils. Tell us where is the huge money they receive monthly used for in terms of education, health, poverty reduction and development? �
Please find out from the rich elites in the north how many private universities have they established in their states as groups or individuals.�
The Ibos are basically commercial entrepreneurs with a few of them in education. They still have more private universities in their states than the north. How many Presidents have the Ibos produced since independence and yet educationally they are better than the so called numerical north?�
Poverty and illiteracy have become appendage attribute of the north not because they have not had heads of state or presidents democratically elected from the region since independence but because such leaders never put education of their people on the front burner.�
My understanding of democracy is different from yours. There is no way, I believe, you can justify rotational presidency on moral grounds and call it authentic democracy.�
President Jonathan is an academic who never had enough experience in Nigerian politics before he was elected. His credentials plus his age and of course his humility endeared him to most of us who voted for him. If he wants to contest again, he will have to show his scorecards of achievements. It is the electorate who will determine his fate not you and I. So let us see how it goes if at the end of the day he wants to continue in office. You are as qualified as President Jonathan and Buhari to contest but the choice is yours.�
Merit should be the barometer with which to measure who is fit to be our president and not by rotational "arrangee"�introduced by PDP political party of "carry go".�
Segun Ogungbemi. �

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi,

Of course I am and was aware that you are from the North as that�s the first surprising point that you made in the letter that I referred to, in which you said,

�I am from the north and it is not true that the north can boast of holding to power at the centre as stated by Prof. Abdullahi.�

I was initially surprised because both your names, your first name Segun and your surname Ogungbemi are unmistakably Yoruba names and even after having made the probable location of your birth clear (Kwarra?) I still concluded that you are a Yoruba man just like me - no matter from what part of the Diaspora you shed your first tears or whether or not your umbilical cord is buried in the Sokoto, Borno or the more liberal Kaduna area.

But jokes aside that�s one of the problems of Nigeria�s and indeed Africa�s regional and tribal politics: you may be born, bred and buried in the North alright but your name proclaims you Yoruba. So which bona fide Hausa man is going to take your self-proclaimed Northern identity, seriously, just because you maybe grew up in that environment? It certainly didn�t save the Igbo traders, many of whom were born and bred in the North when the pogroms against the Igbo were perpetrated just prior to Biafra seceding as a safe haven for the Igbo people!

Of course, my dear professor, there�s no doubt that you are eminently, even pre-eminently qualified to contest the presidential elections as a Northerner who would also sweep the Yoruba vote � there�s no doubt about that, however, sweeping the Igbo vote with a name like that, would be quite another matter � as the South of Nigeria is divided between the South West and the South East, literary feuds Soyinka & supporters vs. The ascended Achebe & his fans, whilst in politics proper it�s eternally �AWO vs. ZIK � has always been � to the extent that we can quote imperial Kipling symbolically, that

OH, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,

Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God�s great Judgment Seat;

But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth,

When two strong men stand face to face, tho� they come from the ends of the earth!


�

You asked �Is democracy based on rotation?�

In my view, acceding to the rotation role playing politics in Nigeria is in the national interest of peace & prosperity and to allay both the fear and lessen the ever increasing tensions based on a perceived imbalance between the North and the South in terms of development, education, and that this perceived injustice that�s the main cause of the abject poverty in the North will be more easily righted by a Northern president. Nor do I think that the rotation system agreed upon by the PDP as an internal matter, a compromise of understanding, is in any way "undemocratic"

So, I am making a point in favour of � at this time - anointing a Northern as the presidential candidate for the PDP, most likely with a Southern running mate.

It�s easy to see without looking too far that if that does not happen then Goodluck Jonathan�s next logical option will be to retire a few more Northern Generals in the Nigerian military, to pre-empt a coup. �Of course, this is standard practice: In their time, Babangida and Abacha played it safe by retiring scores of Yoruba generals and other Yoruba top military brass.

As to the question of whether or not a Northern president will uplift the North, here is your answer below, but your answer does not solve the perceived injustice or the current poverty in the North � or take away the North�s motivation to capture/ re-capture the presidency.

Your views on this:

�The educational backwardness of the north as it is known today is not the kind that anyone can be proud of. You don't have to have a northerner as president to make life better for all northerners. Any Nigerian who becomes president of the country can do that. Let the leadership of the north since 1966-2013 show the scorecards of their achievements. For 38 years the north had ruled this country and nothing to show for it, particularly in the north. What have the masses gained from the period they had ruled the country? I think that should be what Ango ought to be concerned about and not that the north will hold on to power come 2015 as long as they want on the basis of their numerical voting power.�

Obasanjo was in power for 11 years altogether as military head of state and civilian president of Nigeria. Were the Yoruba better off than when Yar'Adua was President of Nigeria? The Yoruba will tell you that they were worse off under the leadership of their kinsman.�

You are surely overlooking the patronage that a Yoruba would receive when his kinsman is in power, ditto for the Hausa, the Fulani and of course the Igbo, and therefore, all the more reason for them to fight for their folks to be at the helm of the big business, so that at least a few kobo, more than a dollar a day should trickle down.

�

In one of his interviews Muhammadu Buhari talks about the elite and later on goes on to identify himself with that elite. This suggests to me that a Northern candidate usually comes from the elite � others say that �the Kaduna mafia� is part of it.

�

My impression is that Goodluck Jonathan is not from �the elite� � if anything is very much from the grassroots albeit nothing like my old icon, Michael Imoudu. You ask yourself the question, is Goodluck Jonathan the best that the system was able to deliver to Nigeria?

�

Finally, this democracy business (crazy-demo Fela calls it) by which the winner takes all � as happened in Egypt where the losers wanted to �share� power. In Nigerian terms Id� say that the losers also want �their share�

�

Please excuse some of my stray observations.

�

Yours sin-cerely,

�

dreary Cornelius

�

http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/

�

�

�

�


�
�
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 06:46:50 UTC+2, seguno2013 wrote:
Drear Cornelius,
Thanks for making reference to me in this debate. You said and I quote,..."since the North insists that it�s their turn according to a rotation system agreed upon, and�Prof. Segun Ogungbemi�s misgivings about the matters notwithstanding,(he sounds as if there�s no one from the North that�s qualified to be president of Nigeria."�
�I think you misunderstood me. First,�I am from the North and there are many more people like me who are well qualified to be elected president of this country from the region. �Therefore, your insinuation is incorrect. Secondly,�My view is that rotational presidency is a PDP internal arrangement within the party which is not in our constitution. The demerit of it all is that it promotes disunity rather than unity which is what we are witnessing today.
�From the foregoing�therefore, my proposal is that the best way to secure unity in Nigerian politics is to elect anyone who is mostly suited for the job regardless which ethnic group s/he comes from in Nigeria. That will foster unity and promote enduring and genuine democracy. In other words, it will be seen to be constitutional and authentically democratic. � ��
Of course, you have every right to think that Buhari is suitable for job but it should not be based on where he comes from. And more importantly the electorate is to make that decision at the polls.
Merit and the electorate not any rotation should be the basis of our guide for the choice we make.�
Segun Ogungbemi.�


Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
�
�
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://groups.google.com/group
...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsub...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha