So, the following is clear
1.You have been able to provide ONLY ONE scientific analysis of Oyibo's
claims,the book review by Animalu.
2.This book review is hosted at the University of Buffalo Department of
Mathematics site for Black mathematicians.It is not presented on a site for
discussion of achievements in science in general.
3.This book review by Animalu states that Oyibo's work provides a "viable
framework" for a unified theory.
4.It does not state that Oyibo has developed such a theory unlike Oyibo and
his supporters like you are claiming.The concept of a framework represents
possibility,not achievement.
5.You have not been able to show us any references that supports your
opinion on Oyibo's achievement
Your statements about Oyibo's work are simply the effusions of
an enthusiastic layperson who does not seem to understand the culture of
modern science.
You reference to Youtube shows you dont realise that ground
breaking scientific work is more likely to be presented on academic
publications than Youtube.
As for Oyibo's book publications,I get the impression he used either
self publishing or a non-academic publisher.Any scientist doing that with a
so called great discovery can hardly be serious.
Your demonstration suggests the ignorance of the culture of science evident
in the approach of some Nigerians to the Oyibi and Emeagwali controversies.
There is nothing you have written in defence of Oyibo that is not accessible
to informed lay knowledge of science.
Your fundamental statement is that Oyibo argues that the hydrogen atom is
the fundamental building block of matter.
This informed lay knowledge is also enough to show that your effort
at scientific writing looks confused.
You state "Oyibo GAGUT theorem UNIFIES the vexations disparities in the
Hisotrical Accounts of the Creation Story under the Wave-Quantum Theory"
In referring to "disparities in the Historical Accounts of the Creation
Story" are you referring to scientific accounts of creation,in which the Big
Bang model is currently dominant? Are you referring to
competing approaches to the Big Bang model? Are you referring to scientific
conceptions of the state before creation? Are you referring to mythic
accounts of creation,from the Judaeo-Christian to the Yoruba?
You also do not seem to understand whatever point you are trying to make in
making a distinction between Animalu's position and that of Oyibo in your
statement that Oyibo argues for "Isotopes of Hydrogen including Helium".
Hydrogen <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen> and *helium* are both chemical
elements <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element>. Are you now
claiming that Oyibo is admitting hydrogen and helium into the fundamental
unit of matter? Are you arguing for the constitution of helium?
The fact that you dont make these distinctions gives me the impression that
your understanding of what you are trying to say is like that of a person
who has drunk a little too much beer and is trying to count the stars in the
sky.
You state "Oyibo's claim that the Theory of Everything demands that there is
only 1 Element Hydrogen and not 119 Elements as currently held."
You thereby state that only one chemical
element<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element>exists,namely
hydrogen,as opposed to the current consensus of 118
elements.I admit your use of 119 as an error.
Are you aware of the implications of this statement?Dont you wonder why a
scientist who can make such a monumental discovery has to be championed by
you on a listerve like this one? Do you think racism can explain why these
claims for Oyibo are not being entertained by *SCIENTISTS OF ANY RACE*?
The search for a Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything is one one of
the goals of modern science.There is as yet no verified development of such
a theory.As far as I can see, Oyibo is on his own in the scientific
community in making his claim about developing such a theory.
Thanks
Toyin
On 22 October 2010 14:30, Ogonna Anyabolu <ogonna@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Toyin,
>
> You are going down the SLIPPERY road of DOOM again---let me remind you that
> this is not a STUDY of IFA Chronicles were 'different and diverging'
> opinions could be left at the hands of the public to WEIGH. While the
> overall implications of Oyibo's work is Subjective in it's METAPHYSICAL
> aspect as return to the 'Great Art and Science of Africa' -- his
> mathematical formulations are PURELY objective --meaning it's NOT open
> varying opinions.
>
> Animalu's exposition so far is the simplest and most easily accesible
> REVIEW I've seen written in such a way to accomodate 'lay-men' as yourself.
> I'm not here to teach you CONFORMAL INVARIANCE neither am I here to expound
> on solving PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Even further Animalu was kind
> enough to give the audience examples with Spatial Projective Geometry (this
> is unsual especially among those considered Experts who would rather rattle
> of tons of formula's).
>
> So my friend, as the instigator and villian in this quest, in search for
> truth -- it's your DUTY to prove WHAT has already been asserted --if you
> need to go hire a private Investigator at MIT School of Engineering--do it!
> put your money where your mouth is. Again, I took pains to go through
> Oyibo's books and the proofs way back in 2005 --- this was when i was 25 --
> I urge you do the same OR hand over the project to somebody who's more
> competent thatn you in this area, otherwise, rest your case.
>
>
> Here you go again with your arsinile mode of questioning what you DONT
> understand:
>
> "
> Animalu's view is different from yours.He does not agree with you that
> Oyibo has succeeded in creating a Grand Unified Theory.He only states that
> Oyibo's work is a viable framework for such a theory.
>
> "
>
> Of course Oyibo's Gij,j = 0 is the ONLY viable mathematical framework out
> there in the world that encompases BOTH Einsteins theories and beyond
> --that's WHY it's called a framework --it's the building block, that
> INTELLIGENT Hypothesis upon which all PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTATION would be
> built on (Animalu was kind enough to show geometrical proofs WHICH is
> another form of testing mathematical theorems). So what exactly is your
> question? You are confused brother Toyin,and i understand why, this is
> beyond your realm.
>
> Again I DO NOT have any urgency to show you ANY other PROOF or REVIEW or
> GAGUT if you REFUSE to acknowledge the ONE before you--infact my kindness in
> providing you with the SOLUTION to your QUESTION " to show you a scientific
> review of Oyibo's GAGUT by another Scientist' has been satisfied and I need
> NOT go further. In the meantime I urge you to go to Amazon and purchase two
> of Oyibo's BOOKS as published by NOVA --hopefully they still sell it.
>
> Until then keep searching --I'll be around to REBUTT the fanatics.
>
> Ogonna.
>
>
> 'Speculation is a deadly game; revise what you KNOW, the UNKNOWN must then
> drive the known' ~~ Ogonna'
>
> 'Remember to recollect YOUR past, discover YOUR present, then invite YOUR
> future to participate in ALL ~~ Ogonna'
>
> --- On *Fri, 10/22/10, toyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>*wrote:
>
>
> From: toyin adepoju <toyin.adepoju@googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: NigerianID | EMEAGWALI - REBUTTAL AND REPLY TO HIS CRITICS BY
> HIS AGENTS
> To: "Ogonna Anyabolu" <ogonna@yahoo.com>
> Cc: nigeria360@yahoogroups.com, NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com, "talk
> nigeria froum" <TalkNigeria@yahoogroups.com>, naijaexcel@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, October 22, 2010, 9:06 AM
>
> Ogonna,
>
> You are expressing your view on Oyibo's achievement which is different from
> that of the scientific analysis by Animalu.
>
> Note,though,that you are not doing a scientific evaluation of his work.You
> are summarising your position without the necessary analysis of concepts
> in mathematical physics to support your claims.
>
> Can you point us to any rigorous analysis that proves that Oyibo's work "satisfies
> ALL previous conditions for Einsteins Special and General Relativity
> mathematical and geometric Conditions and going beyond" as you claim?
>
> Can you show us any information from an authoritative scientific source
> that shows a convergence between Oyibo's ideas and the work being done at
> CERN?
>
> Can you direct us to any source that shows any scientist discussing
> Oyibo's work,apart from the Animalu link and his argument of the limit of
> Oyibo's work?
>
> Are you claiming that Oyibo's ideas have been accepted by
> the scientific establishment? Can you give us proof?
>
> Can you show us any proof that his claims are even being discussed by
> scientists apart from the Animalu link?
>
> The only reference I have seen is by a scientist who dismisses his claims
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment