From: ...
Subject: Fwd: 10 things to emulate from japan: Can we begin that way in our South Sudan;,We pray...
Barikiwe/Pam
10 THINGS TO EMULATE FROM JAPAN
10 THINGS TO EMULATE FROM JAPAN
1. THE CALM
Not a single visual of chest-beating or wild grief. Sorrow itself has been elevated.
2.THE DIGNITY
Disciplined queues for water and groceries. Not a rough word or a crude gesture.
3. THE ABILITY
The incredible architects, for instance. Buildings swayed but didn't fall.
4. THE GRACE
People bought only what they needed for the present, so everybody could get something.
5. THE ORDER
No looting in shops. No honking and no overtaking on the roads. Just understanding.
6. THE SACRIFICE
Fifty workers stayed back to pump sea water in the N-reactors. How will they ever be repaid?
7. THE TENDERNESS
Restaurants cut prices. An unguarded ATM is left alone. The strong cared for the weak.
8. THE TRAINING
The old and the children, everyone knew exactly what to do. And they did just that.
9. THE MEDIA
They showed magnificent restraint in the bulletins. No silly reporters. Only calm reportage.
10.THE CONSCIENCE
When the power went off in a store, people put things back on the shelves and left quietly
Barikiwe/Pam
Libyan War And Control Of The MediterraneanRick RozoffMarch 30, 2011 19:25A year after assuming the post of president of the FrenchRepublic in 2007, and while his nation held the rotatingEuropean Union presidency, Nicholas Sarkozy invited theheads of state of the EU's twenty-seven members and thoseof seventeen non-EU Mediterranean countries to attend aconference in Paris to launch a Mediterranean Union.In the words of Britain's Daily Telegraph regarding thesubsequent summit held for the purpose on July 13, 2008,"Sarkozy's big idea is to use imperial Rome's centre ofthe world as a unifying factor linking 44 countries thatare home to 800 million people."Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, however, announced that hisnation would boycott the gathering, denouncing theinitiative as one aimed at dividing both Africa and theArab world, and stating:"We shall have another Roman empire and imperialistdesign. There are imperialist maps and designs that wehave already rolled up. We should not have them again."[1]The unprecedented summit was held with the intention of"shift[ing] Europe's strategic focus towards the MiddleEast, North Africa and the Balkans." [2]Less than three years later Sarkozy's Mirage and Rafalewarplanes were bombing Libyan government targets,initiating an ongoing war being waged by France, theUnited States, Britain and what the world news media referto as an international coalition - twelve members of theNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization and the emirate ofQatar - to overthrow the Gaddafi government and implant amore pliant replacement.The Mediterranean Sea is the main battle front in theworld currently, superseding the Afghanistan- Pakistan wartheatre, and the empire of the new third millennium - thatof the US, the world's sole military superpower in thewords of President Barack Obama in his Nobel Peace Prizeacceptance speech, and its NATO partners - is completingthe transformation of the Mediterranean into its marenostrum.The attack on Libya followed by slightly more than threeweeks a move in the parliament of the EasternMediterranean island nation of Cyprus to drag that stateinto NATO's Partnership for Peace program [3], which ifultimately successful would leave only three of twentynations (excluding microstate Monaco) on or in theMediterranean Sea not full members of NATO or beholden toit through partnership entanglements, including those ofthe Mediterranean Dialogue (Algeria, Egypt, Israel,Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia): Libya, Lebanonand Syria.NATO membership and partnerships obligate the affectedgovernments to open their countries to the US military.For example, less than a year after becoming independentMontenegro had already joined the Partnership for Peaceand was visited by then-commander of U.S. Naval ForcesEurope Admiral Harry Ulrich and the submarine tender EmoryS. Land in an effort "to provide training and assistancefor the Montenegrin Navy and to strengthen therelationship between the two navies." [4]. The next monthfour NATO warships, including the USS Roosevelt guidedmissile destroyer, docked in Montenegro's Tivat harbour.If the current Libyan model is duplicated in Syria asincreasingly seems to be the case, and with Lebanonalready blockaded by warships from NATO nations since 2006in what is the prototype for what NATO will soon replicateoff the coast of Libya, the Mediterranean Sea will beentirely under the control of NATO and its leading member,the U.S.Cyprus in the only European Union member and indeed theonly European nation (except for microstates) that is -for the time being - not a NATO member or partner, andLibya is the only African nation bordering theMediterranean not a member of NATO's MediterraneanDialogue partnership program.Libya is also one of only five of Africa's 54 countriesthat have not been integrated into, which is to saysubordinated to, the new U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM).The others are:Sudan, which is being balkanized as Libya may also soonbe.Ivory Coast, now embroiled in what is for all intents acivil war with the West backing the armed groups ofAlassane Ouattara against standing president LaurentGbagbo and under the threat of foreign militaryintervention, likely by the AFRICOM- and NATO-supportedWest African Standby Force and possibly with directWestern involvement. [5]Eritrea, which borders Djibouti where some 5,000 U.S. andFrench troops are based and which was involved in an armedborder conflict with its neighbour three years ago inwhich French military forces intervened on behalf ofDjibouti.Zimbabwe, which is among likely candidates for the nextU.S.-NATO Operation Odyssey Dawn-type militaryintervention.The Mediterranean has been history's most strategicallyimportant sea and is the only one whose waves lap theshores of three continents.Control of the sea has been fought over by the Persian,Alexandrian, Carthaginian, Roman, Byzantine, Ottoman,Spanish, British and Napoleonic empires, in part or inwhole, and by Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany.Since the end of World War Two the major military power inthe sea has been the U.S. In 1946 Washington establishedNaval Forces Mediterranean, which in 1950 became the U.S.Sixth Fleet and has its headquarters in the Mediterraneanport city of Naples.In fact the genesis of the US Navy was the Naval Act of1794, passed in response to the capture of Americanmerchant vessels off the coast of North Africa. TheMediterranean Squadron (also Station) was created inreaction to the first Barbary War of 1801-1805, also knownas the Tripolitan War after what is now northwesternLibya. The US fought its first naval battle outside theWestern Hemisphere against Tripolitania in 1801.US Naval Forces Europe-Africa, also based in Naples, isassigned to the Sixth Fleet and provides forces for bothU.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command. Itscommander is Admiral Samuel Locklear III, who is alsocommander of NATO's Allied Joint Force Command Naples.He has been coordinating US and NATO air and missilestrikes against Libya from USS Mount Whitney, the flagshipof the Sixth Fleet, as commander of Joint Task ForceOdyssey Dawn, the US Africa Command operation in charge ofUS guided missile destroyers, submarines and stealthbombers conducting attacks inside Libya.Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations (thehighest-ranking officer in the U.S. Navy), recently statedthat the permanent U.S. military presence in theMediterranean allowed the Pentagon, which "already waspositioned for operations over Libya," to launch OdysseyDawn on March 19. "The need, for example in the openingrounds, for the Tomahawk strikes, the shooters werealready in place. They were already loaded, and that wentoff as we expected it would.""That's what you get when you have a global Navy that'sforward all the time....We're there, and when the guns gooff, we're ready to conduct combat operations.. .." [6]On March 22 General Carter Ham, the new chief of U.S.Africa Command, visited the U.S. air base in Ramstein,Germany and met with British, French and Italian air forceleaders to evaluate the bombing campaign in Libya. Hepraised cooperation with NATO partners before the warbegan, stating, "You can't bring 14 different nationstogether without ever having prepared for this before."[7]As the AFRICOM commander was in Germany, Defence SecretaryRobert Gates was in Egypt to meet with Field MarshalMohamed Hussein Tantawi, commander in chief of theEgyptian armed forces and chairman of the Supreme Councilof the Armed Forces, to coordinate the campaign againstLibya.The Pentagon's website reported on March 23 that forcesattached to AFRICOM's Task Force Odyssey Dawn had flown336 air sorties, 108 of them launching strikes and 212conducted by the U.S. The operations included 162 Tomahawkcruise missile attacks.Admiral Roughead stated that he envisioned "no problem inkeeping operations going," as the Tomahawks will bereplaced from the existing inventory of 3,200. Enough tolevel Libya and still have plenty left over for the nextwar. [8]The defeat and conquest, directly or by proxy, of Libyawould secure a key outpost for the Pentagon and NATO onthe Mediterranean Sea. The consolidation of U.S. controlover North Africa would have more than just regionalrepercussions, important as they are.Shortly after the inauguration of U.S. Africa Command, LinZhiyuan, deputy director of the Chinese People'sLiberation Army Academy of Military Sciences, wrote thefollowing:"By building a dozen forward bases or establishments inTunisia, Morocco, Algeria and other African nations, theU.S. will gradually establish a network of military basesto cover the entire continent and make essentialpreparations for docking an aircraft carrier fleet in theregion."The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) with theU.S. at the head had [in 2006] carried out a large-scalemilitary exercise in Cape Verde, a western African islandnation, with the sole purpose of controlling the sea andair corridors of crude oil extracting zones and monitoringhow the situation is with oil pipelines operating there."[A]frica Command represents a vital, crucial link for theUS adjustment of its global military deployment. Atpresent, it is moving the gravity of its forces in Europeeastward and opening new bases in Eastern Europe."The present US global military redeployment centersmainly on an 'arc of instability' from the Caucasus,Central and Southern Asia down to the Korean Peninsula,and so the African continent is taken as a strong point toprop up the US global strategy."Therefore, AFRICOM facilitates the United Statesadvancing on the African continent, taking control of theEurasian continent and proceeding to take the helm of theentire globe." [9]Far more is at stake in the war with Libya than control ofAfrica's largest proven oil reserves and subjugating thelast North African nation not yet under the thumb of theUS and NATO. Even more than domination of theMediterranean Sea region.1) Daily Telegraph, July 10, 20082) Daily Telegraph, July 14, 20083) 'Cyprus: U.S. To Dominate All Europe, MediterraneanThrough NATO', Stop NATO, March 3, 20114) United States European Command, May 24, 20075)' Ivory Coast: Testing Ground For U.S.-Backed AfricanStandby Force', Stop NATO, January 23, 20116) U.S. Department of Defense, March 23, 20117) U.S. Air Forces in Europe, March 23, 20118) U.S. Department of Defense, March 23, 20119) People's Daily, February 26, 2007,Rock Rozoff is editor of Stop NATO, where this articlefirst appeared. The photo is by BRQ Network.
From: Folu Ogundimu <folu@me.com>
Date: March 31, 2011 10:54:26 PM EDT
To: Folu Ogundimu <ogundimu@msu.edu>
Subject: Huffington Post: DAVID BROMWICH: The CIA, the Libyan Rebellion, and the President
Since Western countries launched air strikes against Libya two weeks ago with a view to protecting civilians, a number of questions have been raised regarding the likely duration of the air attacks, the exit strategy for the participating countries, the meaning of success for such a mission, the nature of the Libyan opposition and whether the overthrow of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi is one of the objectives.
All these questions are legitimate and answers to them are likely to determine the level of support, which the countries participating in the implementation of the UN Security Council resolution 1973 on the no-fly zone will continue to receive.
The international conference convened in London on Tuesday this week, which was attended by more than 30 countries, as well as the African Union and the Arab League, was expected to provide credible answers to some of these questions, but it failed to do so.
Earlier in the week, US President Barack Obama spoke on the Libyan conflict at the National Defence University in Washington, DC, but his address was primarily designed to answer his American critics and fell short of providing answers to these fundamental questions.
President Obama argued that had the US and other coalition partners not acted at the time they did, many Libyans in Benghazi and adjacent towns would have been attacked and brutalised by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's forces.
While the United Nations and the Western European countries involved in enforcing the no-fly zone have defended their actions on the basis of the 2005 World Summit resolution on the responsibility to protect, Obama argued that he was driven by American values and the national interest.
More than 10 years ago, this would not have been surprising because many humanitarian interventions were underpinned by self-regarding, rather than other-regarding, factors.
Indeed, most countries committed resources and acted faster when there was a coincidence between their realpolitik concerns and humanitarian problems.
However, following the unanimous adoption of the resolution on the responsibility to protect in 2005, it would be expected that a leading power like the US would be guided by international norms rather than national interests.
Would this explain why there has been no appetite for intervention in Côte d'Ivoire, where Laurent Gbagbo has refused to step down four months after the Independent Electoral Commission declared on 2nd December 2010 that the opposition leader, Alassane Ouattara, had won the second round of the presidential elections?
The essence of President Obama's address this week is that unless humanitarian problems are framed in terms of American values and national interest, the US is unlikely to intervene.
A former UN Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar said in 1991 that "the principle of protection of human rights cannot be invoked in a particular situation and disregarded in a similar one. To apply it selectively is to debase it".
This was emphasised by another former UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, in 1999 when he said: "If the new commitment to intervention in the face of extreme suffering is to retain the support of the world's people, it must be fairly and consistently applied, irrespective of region or nation".
It is imperative that the countries participating in the Libyan conflict take global norms seriously.
Prof Makinda teaches at Murdoch
April polls, Insecurity and our perceptive problem By KAYODE KETEFE The inability of our law enforcement institutions to cope with the problems of insecurity in Nigeria has become an enduring reality- being a fact we all seem to have grudgingly accepted as a part of our destiny. This grim resignation is illustrated by the fact that majority have put their security in the hands of God, while the more affluent citizens have, in addition to divine supplications, resorted to floating their private security apparatus for protection of dear properties and dearer lives. Insecurity has always abounded, but what we have been witnessing in recent times, specifically from the past two years, is gradually a dawning reality that the matter has gone out of hands. At no other times has the collapse of security in Nigeria been this total. From the incessant harassment of Boko Haram warriors in Bornu State and environs to the intractable onslaught of Niger Delta militants in the South-South, the octopus of insecurity spreads its dreadful tentacles of criminality and violence across the land. From the South- West to South-East, ritual killers and kidnappers are on rampage, prowling with rapacious indifference, confident in the knowledge of impunity. Explosives and other arms and ammunition are being wantonly deployed by God-knows-whom. With the fury of a thunderstorm, the bombs are exploding across the land, leaving waste and tragedy in its trail. This uncharacteristic incendiary aspect to the insecurity challenge, which was ushered in on the Independence Day last October, has since become a recurrent decimal, hovering menacingly on the political firmament, and spreading alarm and trepidation at every gathering. Added to all the foregoing was the recent politically-motivated violence, culminating in wanton killings and maiming all over the polity, constituting evil prognostications for the forthcoming polls. Severe crises have rocked states like Oyo, Ekiti ,Ondo, Akwa Ibom, Borno, Bayelsa, Plateau, Niger, while skirmishes and pockets of violence have blighted the peace in Ondo, Ekiti, Ebonyi and Lagos states. But how did the matter come to this sorry pass? Under Section 4 of the Police Act, the Nigerian Police is charged with the responsibility of prevention and detection of crime, protection of lives and property, apprehension of offenders and enforcement of all laws and regulations. Despite this wide latitude of powers, the police have proven unequal to the challenges. Each time there is a major violence or assassination, the police authorities would promise heaven and earth. Their usual rhetoric is "the perpetrators of this dastardly act would be brought to book"; or "no stone will be left unturned to unmask the criminals". Yet nothing would happen and before you know it, another series of violence would occur and the police would keep repeating those annoying clichés of turning stones and bringing unknown people to book! No breakthrough! To add salt to injury, those in government are often fond of saying because Nigeria is a large nation complex, these problems are to be expected. "You can't compare Nigeria with Ghana, we are far bigger, so there are bound to be more problems here" are the kind of illogical postulations that they often peddle. I see this kind of argument as being predicated on wrong evaluation and warped perception. If we have a population of 152 million and a land mass of 923,768 km2, it follows also that we have enormous resources at our disposal to tackle our problems well beyond the capacity of a smaller nation. We need to change the orientation which fatalistically recognises the inevitability of problems; we must embrace a paradigm shift from negative mentality that only dwells on assumed weaknesses to the one affirming our strength. Imagine the biblical episode of David and Goliath. (1 Samuel ch.17) The philistine giant was a terror to the Israelite army by virtue of his larger-than-life size which made them regarded him "too big to fight with". (An example of defeatist perception) But David, with correct attitude, saw the beefy oversized body of the giant as a target too big to miss for his sling! We all know the rest of the story. It needs to be pointed out that the Goliath himself suffered from perception problem. He simply could not fathom any engagement with David on the battle field, David was too tiny to be considered a worthy foe. To him, he would simply gathered up David with one gigantic swing of his huge hand, crumple him and fling his mangled corpse into the valley of Ellah. He paid dearly with his life for that misconception because a foe is a foe no matter how tiny. So with correct attitude, we can all say that Nigeria is too big and too talented with human and other resources to succumb to the onslaught of problems facing her. We must overcome our problems and difficulties. This allusion to "too big to fight" and "too big to miss" dichotomy of mentality is an apt satire which mocks the shallowness of the arguments seeking to reconcile us with the inevitability of our problems. So with the "slingshot" of political will cum strategic planning and the "stones" of adequate funding, we can crack open the skull of the giant calling itself our problems-by this I mean not only the problem of insecurity but also other challenges of our nation. |
100 THOUSAND POETS FOR CHANGE: An Anthology
(Ed. Anny Ballardini & Obododimma Oha, in collaboration with MICHAEL ROTHENBERG)
"We will turn to the idea of the messianic in Chapter Ten of this book, but for the moment it suffices to stress that both Benjamin and Agamben employ the term in singular fashion. For them, a messianic idea of history is not one in which we wait for the Messiah to come, end history, and redeem humanity, but instead is a paradigm for historical time in which we act as though the Messiah is already here, or even has already come and gone. What is so difficult about Agamben's use of the term messianic is how radically it is to be distinguished from the apocalyptic. Agamben says that to understand "messianic time" as it is presented in Paul's letters "one must first distinguish messianic time from apocalyptic time, the time of the now from a time directed towards the future" (LAM, 51). To this he adds, "If l had to try to reduce the distinction to a formula, I would say that the messianic is not, as it is always understood, the end of time, but the time of the end" (LAM, 51). The model of time corresponding to this idea is one that no longer looks for its decisive moment in a more or less remote future, but instead finds it in every minute of every day, in this world and in this life; and it is through such expressions as "dialectics at a standstill" and "means without end" that the two thinkers aim to return our gaze from the distant future to the pressing present."
( from GIORGIO AGAMBEN: A Critical Introduction, Leland de la Durantaye, 2009, p. 120)
Set in the context of this split between "the end of time" and "the time of the end" is Michael Rothenberg's recent invitation for the global writing public to participate in "a demonstration/celebration of poetry to promote serious social and political change" titled 100 THOUSAND POETS FOR CHANGE on 24 September, 2011. As protests for political reforms sweep across North Africa, the Middle East, in some parts of Europe, in the United States, with the recent disasters in The Gulf of Mexico and in Japan, one cannot help thinking about the "Rothenberg Project" as a highly significant creative response to change as something more than an adjustment to the way social relations are constructed.
Obododimma Oha and Anny Ballardini, in collaboration with Michael Rothenberg's event, will edit and feature outstanding poetic compositions for the 100 THOUSAND POETS FOR CHANGE on Fieralingue's Poets' Corner. Visual artwork, poems, poetic fiction, poetic nonfiction, and photographs to be submitted for consideration should go beyond the simple and gratuitous statement that 'a change is needed.' Our present, our Messianic time requires a STILLSTELLUNG (Benjamin's word) translated by Dennis Redmond in On the Concept of History (1940) with "an objective interruption of a mechanical process" into which we have been engulfed. Dennis Redmond continues in his explanation of STILLSTELLUNG: "rather like the dramatic pause at the end of an action-adventure movie, when the audience is waiting to find out if the time-bomb/missile/terrorist device was defused or not." We feel that we are living in a similar situation, and we are in need of a Stillstellung followed by ideas to offer our politicians, to make students/friends/our communities more aware of how we can change, revise history, start over again.
Visual works and photographs for submission are to be saved in JPEG format, while texts, which should not have rigid formatting, are to be in Word. All submissions should be emailed to the editors anny.ballardini@gmail.com and obodooha@gmail.com by September 1, 2011 with "100 THOUSAND POETS FOR CHANGE" in the Subject line.
Best wishes,
Obododimma Oha
Anny Ballardini
SIGN UP TO JOIN US AT 100 THOUSAND POETS FOR CHANGE-- THE EVENT
Ps. If you are interested in signing up to participate as a reader, organizer or attendee, in the 100 Thousand Poets for Change event on September 24, 2011, (in your town) please go to Facebook for more details and indicate that you would like to attend the event. Link:
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=106999432715571 . At Facebook you will be able to read more about event organization ideas and our thoughts about "what kind of change." Over a thousand people have already signed up and over twenty cities have begun to organize events for their communities. JOIN US!!
Where is the popular uprising in the streets, as we saw in Egypt after the air bombers protected the rebels and the masses were free to come out? The rebels need to be carried on the backs of Western nations and it has resorted to covert mission, the CIA on the ground in Libya, and military super powers to topple one leader in an African nation? Oil and imperialistic madness.--
From: nowa_o@yahoo.com
Reply-to: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
To: defsec@egroups.com
Sent: 3/31/2011 9:56:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: [NIgerianWorldForum] Gaddafi will stay in Libya "until the end": spokesman
Gaddafi will stay in Libya "until the end": spokesman
TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi will stay in the country "until the end" to lead it to victory against its enemies, a government spokesman said on Thursday.
Speaking after former Foreign Secretary Moussa Koussa defected and flew to Britain on Wednesday, the spokesman said Western air strikes against Libya had only united its top leadership against "a clear enemy."
"If this aggression did anything, it only rallied people around the leader and the unity of the nation," Mussa Ibrahim said in Tripoli. "Especially now. They see a clear enemy."
Asked if Gaddafi and his sons were still in the country, he said: "Rest assured, we are all here. We will remain here until the end. This is our country. We are strong on every front."
He added: "We are not relying on individuals to lead the struggle. This is a struggle of the whole nation. It's not dependent on individuals or officials."
Ibrahim refused to comment on Koussa's defection, saying there would be a formal government statement later in the day.
"We have millions of people leading this struggle. If anyone feels tired, feels sick or exhausted, if they want to take a rest, it just happens. I am not confirming anything," he said.
Ibrahim dismissed suggestions that coalition air strikes had tipped the balance in favor of rebel forces fighting against Gaddafi troops, or encouraged ordinary people to seek change after Gaddafi's four-decade rule.
"With the air strikes bombarding every Libyan city, you don't see people coming out en masse demanding any change," he said. "Where is a popular revolution? Where are the tribes coming out and saying to the leader: 'Leave the country'? You need to read the signs."
(Reporting by Maria Golovnina; Editing by Elizabeth Fullerton)
----------------------
__._,_.___.
__,_._,___
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
-- kenneth w. harrow distinguished professor of english michigan state university department of english east lansing, mi 48824-1036 ph. 517 803 8839 harrow@msu.edu
On 3/31/11 12:56 AM, Emeagwali, Gloria (History) wrote:
> 1. Building his political platform around a narrow, xenophobic,
>
> ethnic- based constituency incapable of meaningful coalition building;
>
>
>
> 2. Underestimating the wide support of Alassane Ouattara - and the impact of
> his electoral campaign on various regions of Cote d'Ivoire across ethnic and
> religious boundaries;
>
> 3. Underestimating the shrewdness, commitment and military capability and
>
> determination of Soros Guillaume and the New Forces;
>
> 4. Biting the hand that saved him from defeat in 2002- France;
>
> 5. Undermining his support from women by his assassination of
> unarmed female protesters;
>
> 6. Transforming university students into paid thugs and indisciplined gangsters-
> and giving encouragement to his wife's band of assassins and
>
> Duvalier style 'tonton macoute';
>
> 7. Undermining regional support by xenophobic and genocidal
>
> campaigns against West Africans from at least six countries;
>
>
>
> 8. Recklessly destroying the political capital accumulated in his
>
> early days - when he seemed to be an anti-colonial pan Africanist;
>
>
>
> 9. Associating himself with fanatic rabble rousers such as the
>
> so-called young patriots - who started to believe their own
>
> genocidal and irrational, xenophobic rhetoric;
>
>
>
> 10. Utilizing the services of indisciplined mercenaries committed to
>
> CharlesTaylor -style mayhem, rape and murder.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
> www.africahistory.net
> www.esnips.com/web/GloriaEmeagwali
> ________________________________________
> From: Emeagwali, Gloria (History)
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 11:21 PM
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com; nigerianid@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Why Libya?
>
> Ten reasons why.....
>
> 1. To divert attention from the unrest in Bahrain, Yemen and potentially Saudi Arabia - and complicate
> the possibilities for military assistance to the pro-democracy forces there.Omogui's article is fantastic on this issue.
>
> 2. To facilitate access to oil in the post Gadhafi era- from the oil wells of grateful Benghazi -
> given the rising demand from China and Japan and Germany, poised to abandon nuclear power.
>
> 3. To divert attention from the high unemployment, inflation and massive economic crisis in the West compounded by the
> temporary demise of Japan, the major supplier of electronics parts etc for the auto and computer related industries.
>
> 4. To replenish and fuel the military industrial complex with its voracious appetite for new wars.
>
> 5. To advertise the new generation of fighter jets, tomahawk cruise missiles etc for sale. Note the clear sales pitch in
> CNN and other media reporting..
>
> 6. Gadhafi's consistent hostility towards the State of Israel, the major ally of the West.
>
> 7. War -making helps to beef up the portfolio of American presidential aspirants and incumbents.
> (Not necessarily the case in Sarkhozy's France?)
>
> 8. Hillary Clinton is thinking about her illusionary Bosnia war escapade and wants a real war.
>
> 9. The total idiocy, lack of foresight and inflexible stubbornness of Muammar Gadhafi and his heir apparent-
> determined to stay in power at all costs.
>
> 10. The Iraq war started on March 19, 2003. Today is March 19.
>
>
> Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
> www.africahistory.net
> www.esnips.com/web/GloriaEmeagwali
>
>
>
>
--
kenneth w. harrow
distinguished professor of english
michigan state university
department of english
east lansing, mi 48824-1036
ph. 517 803 8839
harrow@msu.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
From: nowa_o@yahoo.com
Reply-to: NIgerianWorldForum@yahoogroups.com
To: defsec@egroups.com
Sent: 3/31/2011 9:56:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: [NIgerianWorldForum] Gaddafi will stay in Libya "until the end": spokesmanGaddafi will stay in Libya "until the end": spokesman
TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi will stay in the country "until the end" to lead it to victory against its enemies, a government spokesman said on Thursday.
Speaking after former Foreign Secretary Moussa Koussa defected and flew to Britain on Wednesday, the spokesman said Western air strikes against Libya had only united its top leadership against "a clear enemy."
"If this aggression did anything, it only rallied people around the leader and the unity of the nation," Mussa Ibrahim said in Tripoli. "Especially now. They see a clear enemy."
Asked if Gaddafi and his sons were still in the country, he said: "Rest assured, we are all here. We will remain here until the end. This is our country. We are strong on every front."
He added: "We are not relying on individuals to lead the struggle. This is a struggle of the whole nation. It's not dependent on individuals or officials."
Ibrahim refused to comment on Koussa's defection, saying there would be a formal government statement later in the day.
"We have millions of people leading this struggle. If anyone feels tired, feels sick or exhausted, if they want to take a rest, it just happens. I am not confirming anything," he said.
Ibrahim dismissed suggestions that coalition air strikes had tipped the balance in favor of rebel forces fighting against Gaddafi troops, or encouraged ordinary people to seek change after Gaddafi's four-decade rule.
"With the air strikes bombarding every Libyan city, you don't see people coming out en masse demanding any change," he said. "Where is a popular revolution? Where are the tribes coming out and saying to the leader: 'Leave the country'? You need to read the signs."
(Reporting by Maria Golovnina; Editing by Elizabeth Fullerton)
----------------------__._,_.___.
__,_._,___
ethnic- based constituency incapable of meaningful coalition building;
2. Underestimating the wide support of Alassane Ouattara - and the impact of
his electoral campaign on various regions of Cote d'Ivoire across ethnic and
religious boundaries;
3. Underestimating the shrewdness, commitment and military capability and
determination of Soros Guillaume and the New Forces;
4. Biting the hand that saved him from defeat in 2002- France;
5. Undermining his support from women by his assassination of
unarmed female protesters;
6. Transforming university students into paid thugs and indisciplined gangsters-
and giving encouragement to his wife's band of assassins and
Duvalier style 'tonton macoute';
7. Undermining regional support by xenophobic and genocidal
campaigns against West Africans from at least six countries;
8. Recklessly destroying the political capital accumulated in his
early days - when he seemed to be an anti-colonial pan Africanist;
9. Associating himself with fanatic rabble rousers such as the
so-called young patriots - who started to believe their own
genocidal and irrational, xenophobic rhetoric;
10. Utilizing the services of indisciplined mercenaries committed to
CharlesTaylor -style mayhem, rape and murder.
Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
www.africahistory.net
www.esnips.com/web/GloriaEmeagwali
________________________________________
From: Emeagwali, Gloria (History)
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 11:21 PM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com; nigerianid@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Why Libya?
Ten reasons why.....
1. To divert attention from the unrest in Bahrain, Yemen and potentially Saudi Arabia - and complicate
the possibilities for military assistance to the pro-democracy forces there.Omogui's article is fantastic on this issue.
2. To facilitate access to oil in the post Gadhafi era- from the oil wells of grateful Benghazi -
given the rising demand from China and Japan and Germany, poised to abandon nuclear power.
3. To divert attention from the high unemployment, inflation and massive economic crisis in the West compounded by the
temporary demise of Japan, the major supplier of electronics parts etc for the auto and computer related industries.
4. To replenish and fuel the military industrial complex with its voracious appetite for new wars.
5. To advertise the new generation of fighter jets, tomahawk cruise missiles etc for sale. Note the clear sales pitch in
CNN and other media reporting..
6. Gadhafi's consistent hostility towards the State of Israel, the major ally of the West.
7. War -making helps to beef up the portfolio of American presidential aspirants and incumbents.
(Not necessarily the case in Sarkhozy's France?)
8. Hillary Clinton is thinking about her illusionary Bosnia war escapade and wants a real war.
9. The total idiocy, lack of foresight and inflexible stubbornness of Muammar Gadhafi and his heir apparent-
determined to stay in power at all costs.
10. The Iraq war started on March 19, 2003. Today is March 19.
Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
www.africahistory.net
www.esnips.com/web/GloriaEmeagwali
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
March 30, 2011
Pope Benedict XVI has sent Cardinal Peter Turkson to Ivory Coast to
"express my solidarity and that of the universal Church" to the
victims of a continuing struggle for power in the African country.
Cardinal Turkson, the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice
and Peace, has been charged by the Pope to seek an end to the fighting
between the supporters of two rival leaders: Alasanne Ouattara, who
was certified by UN officials as the winner of presidential elections
last November; and Laurent Gbagbo, the incumbent president, who has
refused to surrender his power.
Pope Benedict told his March 30 public audience that he has been
preoccupied with the battle in Ivory Coast, a country "traumatized by
painful internal strife and serious social and political tensions." He
pleaded for an end to the violence—which the November elections had
been designed to resolve. "No effort should be spared" to stop the
bloodshed, the Pope said.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com