Human (physical) attractiveness, like beauty and sexy, is in the eye of the beholder. Kanazawa's claim is one more example of useless research that consumes scarce resources. One would expect a research university employed evolutionary psychologist to know that human attractiveness is cultural more than anything else. Opinion on human attractiveness differs within a culture by sub-culture. Attractiveness is not an attribute that is defined by global imperatives or standards. Attractiveness (including its quality) is also transcient and not entirely physical. It is a matter of pride and respect for all races. It may also depend on confidence, dignity, grace, personl carriage, and poise. Is sexy attractive? Yes and no.
A prejudiced person is not likely to find a member of the race that they are prejudiced against attractive .Is that to say that the said person is not attractive? No of course. Prejudice is consumptive. It is blinding and destructive of thought and reason. Prejudiced people are consequently almost always irrational.
Many evolutionary psychologist think of themselves as scientists. It is doubtful that Kanazawa should think of himself as a scientist. Kanazawa's U.K employers must ask themselves whether his scholarship is worth the embarrasment and falsehood that he tries hard to peddle. It should not matter any more that his employment attracts funds from Japan.
oa
________________________________________
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com [usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hetty ter Haar [oldavenue@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:32 PM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - LSE academic's claim 'black women less attractive' triggers race row
LSE academic's claim 'black women less attractive' triggers race row
Social scientist made remarks on his blog claiming he had analysed
data from an online study of physical attractiveness
Ian Sample, science correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 19 May 2011 19.30 BST
LSE has launched an internal investigation into Dr Satoshi Kanazawa's
claims that black women were less attractive than women of other
races.
Student groups at the London School of Economics are calling for the
dismissal of a social scientist who has become embroiled in a racism
row after claiming that a study showed black women to be less
attractive than women of other races.
Dr Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the institution,
published his comments on a blog and claimed he had analysed data from
an online study of physical attractiveness.
In his article for Psychology Today, Kanazawa wrote: "Black women are
… far less attractive than white, Asian, and Native American women."
The piece drew a barrage of complaints from readers and has since been
removed from the site.
The row has prompted the University of London Union Senate, the
union's legislative body, which represents more than 120,000 students,
to vote unanimously for the dismissal of Kanazawa, and to condemn his
research.
Sherelle Davids, anti-racism officer-elect of the LSE students' union,
said: "Kanazawa deliberately manipulates findings that justify racist
ideology. As a black woman I feel his conclusions are a direct attack
on black women everywhere who are not included in social ideas of
beauty."
Amena Amer, incoming LSE students' union education officer, added: "We
support free speech and academic freedom, but Kanazawa's research
fuels hate against ethnic and religious minorities promoted by neo-
Nazi groups. Not only does he use the LSE's credentials to legitimise
his 'research' but this jeopardises the academic credibility of the
LSE."
The LSE launched an internal investigation into Kanazawa's comments
after senior academics at the school, including the new director,
Judith Rees, received letters of complaint over the remarks. Dr
Kanazawa is abroad on sabbatical this year.
The incident is the latest embarrassment for the LSE, following the
resignation of previous director Sir Howard Davies, in March after
admitting that the institution's reputation had been damaged by the
acceptance of a £1.5m donation from a foundation controlled by Muammar
Gaddafi's son, Saif al-Islam.
The investigation will look at the data Kanazawa analysed and the
quality of his work, before deciding what punitive action, if any, it
can take.
In a statement, the LSE sought to distance itself from the
researcher's comments, but acknowledged freedom of academic
expression.
"The views expressed by this academic are his own and do not in any
way represent those of the LSE as an institution. The important
principle of academic freedom means that authors have the right to
publish their views – but it also means the freedom to disagree. We
are conducting internal investigations into this matter," the
statement said.
Kanazawa has been criticised in the past for substandard research in
the area of race and intelligence.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Thank's Alot
ReplyDeleteNice post I LOVE THIS SITE SEE IT
cell and buy car's
Thank's a lot