Didn't we know already the outcome of a contest between a black African asylum seeker-immigrant woman working as a hotel maid in America and a powerful caucasian economist-banker international figure IMF boss and possible future president of France? Match anyone of the descriptions of each protagonist and judge for yourself. For example:
black vs. caucasian = caucasian wins;
woman vs. man = man wins;
economist banker vs. hotel maid = economist-banker wins,
asylum seeker immigrant vs. international figure IMF boss....
The outcome was predictable from the start.
Kwasi
Kwasi Gyan-Apenteng,
Journalist & Communications Consultant
Accra
President,
Ghana Association of Writers
PAWA House, Accra
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Nafissatou Diallo Raped Twice
From: afrstime@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:11:25 -0400
.jpg)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
black vs. caucasian = caucasian wins;
woman vs. man = man wins;
economist banker vs. hotel maid = economist-banker wins,
asylum seeker immigrant vs. international figure IMF boss....
The outcome was predictable from the start.
Kwasi
Kwasi Gyan-Apenteng,
Journalist & Communications Consultant
Accra
President,
Ghana Association of Writers
PAWA House, Accra
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Nafissatou Diallo Raped Twice
From: afrstime@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:11:25 -0400
Dominique Strauss-Khan (left) and Nafissatou Diallo (right)
Aug. 24 - Yesterday, Tuesday 23rd August, the New York City's Manhattan District Attorney Mr. Cyrus Vance's office decided to drop of all charges against Mr. Dominique Strauss-Khan, who had been accused by Ms. Nafissatou Diallo, an immigrant from Guinea, who accused him of trying to rape her. The Manhattan DA based his action on spurious argument about Ms. Diallo having made false statements in the past, which should have had nothing to do with establishing whether she was raped or not by Strauss-Khan. By dropping the case, the Manhattan District Attorney's office has raped Ms. Diallo twice.
In his motion to dismiss the case, what is clearly established is that the defendant, residues of Mr. Strauss-Khan's sperm was found on Ms. Diallo's dress. Now because of the fact that they inferred she had lied in the past, that they could not establish truthfulness as to how this came about, whether it was consensual or not.
Read the Motion to Dismiss and make your comment as to whether Mr. Cyrus Vance was justified or not in dismiss all charges against Mr. Strauss-Khan. (Read more)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment