By Kawuma Daniel Busuulwa, MinneAfrica
November 04, 2011
"If a man cares not for his roots, how then can he care for his
branches?" –Doyle M. Davis
Pan-Africanism is a philosophy or movement with a plethora of
definitions but the underlying goal has always been succinct–uniting
people of African heritage. The outcome of unification is empowerment
and freedom from dependence. It was a fundamental concept in fighting
slavery, colonialism and apartheid. Advocates of 'African solutions to
African problems' still view pan-africanism as a necessity to tame neo-
colonialism and the ghosts of the inferiority complex. Some of the
movement icons include Edward Blyden, WEB Du Bois, Kwame Nkrumah,
Julius Nyerere, Jomo Kenyatta and Nelson Mandela among others. Pan-
Africanism has historically been a political engine with major goals
and accomplishments towards fighting injustice, inequality and human
rights violations. In modern day Africa and the Diaspora, pan-
africanism has become more or less a philosophical and toothless
cultural phenomenon. One would need an archeologist to unearth what is
left of pan-africanism. The skeletal remains of the once dynamic
creature are currently on display in the museum known as the African
Union (AU).
Following the death of Muammar Gaddafi, numerous scholars, pundits and
media outlets condemned the National Transitional Council (NTC) and
NATO allied forces for facilitating the killing and overthrow of
Gaddafi's regime. Some branded Gaddafi as the remaining voice and
visionary of Pan-africanism and indeed an African hero. Opponents of
the UN Security Council resolution 1973 also alleged that the mission
was primarily a quest for black-gold (oil) masquerading as protecting
civilians. Before we all get carried away, I think we ought to shine
some light at Pan-Africanism and refresh our minds about the core
principles laid out by the founding fathers. Dictatorship is the
antithesis of Pan-Africanism. This movement was about nurturing
political, social and economic unity, mutual respect and creating a
climate of opportunity for all Africans. Pan-Africanism was not about
power greed, the goal was empowerment. It was about creating a new
breed of leaders– not locking them up behind bars. Pan-Africanism was
about human rights, justice and tolerance not fear and intimidation.
It is sickening that Gaddafi, Robert Mugabe, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni
and others shelter under the umbrella of Pan-Africanism while
oppressing their own citizens. It has become common practice for
dictators to resort to anti-western rhetoric when questions have been
asked about their patchy and often inconsistent human-rights record
and abuse of power. The Pan-Africanism card has historically been
played effectively by the likes of Idi Amin who expelled Asians from
Uganda and Robert Mugabe who reclaimed land from white farmers in
Zimbabwe—to appease at the expense of democracy. Anyone who flies the
Pan-Africanism flag in the name of protecting Africans from carnage
and exploitation of the western world while engaging in the same
behavior he condemns is a hypocrite. Robert Mugabe, Muammar Gaddafi,
Mobutu Sese seko, Idi Amin, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, Kamuzu Banda and
many other dictators don't deserve to sit on the same table as the
founding fathers of Pan-Africanism.
Leaders should never consider themselves to be under the spell of Pan-
Africanism without preparing their respective countries for the
future. This involves putting in place strong and independent
institutions of democracy that would plant the seeds of a peaceful
power transition. Pan Africanism was never about simply ranting anti-
imperialist or anti-western rhetoric. Pan Africanism is about building
a foundation from which African nations can stand on their own feet.
Having stability and independence from foreign intervention– such as
foreign aid and policy influence by the Bretton Woods institutions.
If Gaddafi and other African dictators had the interests of Africa at
heart, they would have created a free political environment in their
countries. This would involve promoting and strengthening independent
branches of government through the ideals of 'separation of powers'
and nurturing future leaders. There would have been no need for war,
turmoil and blood-shed in Libya because people would have had a
platform to make their voices heard. Instead the power hungry leaders
create a political environment in which they are the heart and soul of
the nation. Libya and other new governments have to start from scratch
to fill the power vacuum and rebuild the broken and nonexistent
political infrastructure. That's not the behavior of an individual or
leader who acts and leads in the best interest of his people or his
continent. It is rather symbolic of the current breed of African
leaders with an insatiable appetite, desire and hunger for power.
Dictators are the enemy of African unity and the sole reason Pan-
Africanism lies in ruins today. It is no secret that what happened in
Libya could happen in Zimbabwe, Uganda and a host of other African
nations. Pan-Africanism could still be relevant today if Africa had
leaders that lived up to the core principles of this movement.
Commentators who claim that the fall of Gaddafi's regime was a counter-
revolution and a battle against the vision of a United Africa are
forgetting the essence of Pan-Africanism. "If a man cares not for his
roots, how then can he care for his branches?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment