Thursday, May 31, 2012

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

Thanks. By the 'on-shore'/'off-shore' distinction, I mean the dimension of the 'publish or perish' syndrome which insists that a large part of your publication must be in foreign journals while a certain percentage must be local. Not minding that there are bad journals outside Nigeria (just as we have many within), and also not minding the relevance of whatever is written and its context. So, in most cases, colleagues dig out journals from every nooks and crannies of everywhere to publish. Consequently, teaching, for instance, suffer.

Adeshina Afolayan
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

From: OLUWATOYIN ADEPOJU <toyinvadepoju@gmail.com>
Sender: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:57:29 +0100
To: <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

Memorable:

"Philosophy is essentially a critical understanding of the universe and man's place in it in search of a wisdom befitting action."

Could you please explain this : 'off-shore' /'on-shore' distinction' ?

Big food for thought:

'The seriousness of academic publishing, for me, must also touch on the quality of what you are saying and HOW you say it.'

thank you very much.

toyin




On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:37 PM, <shina73_1999@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, my characterisation of these journals as deadly refers to their very high standard. Yet, the question is at what point does 'high standard' becomes elitist and beyond accessibility? This point is really crucial with the discipline of Philosophy which suffers eternally from a self-reflexivity that hurts its very disciplinary image. Philosophy is essentially a critical understanding of the universe and man's place in it in search of a wisdom befitting action. Yet, this has been turned into a close, obtuse and esoteric arguments amongst professional philosophers that makes their discipline less relevant.

The seriousness of academic publishing, for me, must also touch on the quality of what you are saying and HOW you say it. That is why the 'off-shore' /'on-shore' distinction sometimes appear nonsensical. Contributing to a debate that achieves nothing does not appear serious to me. And that is the sum of what you get from a typical 'highbrow' philosophy journal like Nous.

Adeshina Afolayan


Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

From: OLUWATOYIN ADEPOJU <adifada1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:17:19 +0100
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

By 'deadly, Shina, i suppose you mean 'uncompromising in their very high standards'?

Chidi has a very important point but i wonder if he not overstating the case for the dissemination capacities of the Internet.

The Web demonstrates both expansiveness and diffusion, qualities that may both enable scope of penetration of various audiences and dissipate the capacity for such penetration.

Yes, theoretically, the web gives unfettered access to a global audience.

But, in practical terms, this scope is not necessarily automatic.The sheer, ever increasing volume and diversity of Web traffic implies that so much is available to so many that much is missed by many.

It takes real commitment to random web crawling, directed Web  searching  and archiving, and skill in these activities to keep tabs on all one finds of interest online.

Also, the sheer volume of data and speed of emergence of data means that peoples'  Internet behavior  may be likened to islands of mutual interest in a dynamic sea of information, as people come together in communities to share interests.

How does one penetrate maximally these interest communities of interests similar to one's own? There are so many such communities.

There is also a world of difference between a skilled reviewer and the average reader, as evident, for example, from the various qualities of review visible at Amazon and the various levels of sophistication in threads on Facebook.

A skilled reviewer can sum up in a few words what the average reader might be unable to do in so many words.

That can make the difference btw a book being bought or  not by particular readers.

Look at this for example on Charles Jencks' The Universe in the Landscape

                                                                                                              Jencks seeks to define a new landscape iconography based on forms and themes that may be eternal,
                                                                                                                in the sense that they crystallise nature's laws, some of which have been recently discovered. To see a 
                                                                                                                 world in a grain of sand was a poetic quest of William Blake and, in a different sense, to find the universe
                                                                                                                in a ritual landscape was a goal of prehistoric cultures. Jencks allies these spiritual affinities with the view
                                                                                                                of science that stresses the common patterns that underlie all parts of the cosmos, thus making them like
                                                                                                                our home planet, and the universe in a landscape.



After reading that, I just had to buy the book.

toyin

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:17 PM, <shina73_1999@yahoo.com> wrote:
I ahree with you, Bode. Of course, people still get bad academic papers published through the so called peer review mechanism. All I need to do is to send the papers to a journal where I know someone or some journals that asked you to nominate a reviewer. But all the same serious scholarship requires seriousness in publishing. Nothing stops a scholar from sending a paper to a first rate journal in his discipline for critical review rather than patronising a third or fourth rate journal. In philosophy for instance, journals like Philosophy, Mind, Nous, Analysis are deadly. Though those of us in the third world resent their elitism and inability to respond to mundane needs which philosophy addresses.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

From: Olabode Ibironke <ibironke@msu.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:53:05 -0400
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

The presumption here is that "peer review" in the context of Farooq's argument will result in "quality control". I am not so sure that has always being the case, especially with the phenomenon of god-fatherism and the politics of academic publishing in general. If any thing, it seems in most disciplines, and especially in medical sciences, these peer reviews are gatekeeping measures really that invalidate methods and truths that challenge or are outside disciplinary orthodoxy. I am therefore equally uncomfortable with the apparent conservatism of this defense of conventional academic practices at the same time as I sympathize with the sentiment to call attention to the problems of academic self-publishing.

Bode

On May 28, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Ikhide <xokigbo@yahoo.com> wrote:

It is pure madness for anyone in academia to even think of starting a journal of scholarship without peer review. Folks know what Professor Kperogi is talking about but it is easier to dance around the truth than to acknowledge it. Our scholarship is stuck in a dank dark corner. It is an easy fix; folks should stop the bs and do the work. If ASUU started a peer-reviewed journal for free on its site, and the articles had rigor in them, eventually they would make so much money and acquire so much fame, it would virtually run itself. Nope. All we have are BROKEN links, three or so years after I initially complained on this forum. How it is possible to respect such nonsense is a mystery to me. What is the excuse? These are not scholars.
 
What stops local universities from collaborating to do a peer reviewed journal? Nope, there is no money to "share" in such a project. Besides, our kids are not in those "institutions," who cares?
 
- Ikhide
 
Stalk my blog at www.xokigbo.com
Follow me on Twitter: @ikhide
Join me on Facebook: www.facebook.com/ikhide



From: Farooq A. Kperogi <farooqkperogi@gmail.com>
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

 As Moses has artfully articulated in his first intervention, this isn't so much about the model of publishing as it is about the absence of any sort of quality control for putatively academic books published by Lambert and other POD publishers. Note that my article is SOLELY concerned with ACADEMIC books that university teachers present to the Tenure and Promotion committees of their departments to advance to the next rank in the professional hierarchy. It's NOT about non-academic books, although even non-academic books could some copy-editing before they are published.

 If POD books work for creative or other kinds of writers, all well and good. But the tradition of the academe, which hasn't changed at the time of sending this email, privileges books and journal articles that are peer-reviewed. Books published by Lambert Academic Publishing and other POD publishers are NOT peer-reviewed. They are not even copy-edited. These facts ALONE make them unworthy of being used as bases for promotion in the university.

If POD publishers can submit books sent to them to the crucible of the peer-review process (with all its drawbacks)--and properly copy-edit them before publishing--many people will have no problems with them.

It's as simple as that.

Farooq


Personal website: www.farooqkperogi.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/farooqkperogi

"The nice thing about pessimism is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised." G. F. Will



On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi.opara@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Chidi, of course anyone can order a POD book from Amazon or Barnes and Noble, but don't they have to know about the book and trust that the book was run through the grind of review and editorial scrutiny before they will order it? With traditional publishing outfits these assurances are a normal part of the process. Traditional publishing outfits already have an audience made up of their own authors, reviewers, and university and other institutional libraries that maintain an account with them. This assures a wide circulation. a POD author has no such reach and has to advertise his/her book with friends, family, and on lists like US-AfricaDialogue. They'd be lucky if anyone outside of this small circle knows about their book let alone order it. And, of course, the vast worldwide library system remains for the most part closed to the POD and self-publishing industry. This is why most POD-published texts rarely circulate and are thus limited in their ability to disseminate whatever insight inheres in them. Traditional publishers also have established marketing and advertising arms and strategies that POD platforms lack. The former often obtain member lists from professional and academic organizations such as the ASA, AHA, MLA, etc., with thousands of members worldwide. Advertising traditionally published books and journals, even if these are electronic publications, to these audiences ensures that even the most obscure or esoteric book or journal will circulate. Traditional publishers also advertise their books in trade, academic, and popular publications, again ensuring publicity and circulation".
---------Moses Ochonu.
 
Moses, the constraints you mentioned above are not peculiar to Print On Demand books, they also apply to self–published traditional books.
----CAO.
 

From: Moses Ebe Ochonu <meochonu@gmail.com>
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 8:17 PM

Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

Ken, again, you raise very provocative questions, and you're right that answers will correspond to location and local dynamics. That said, I am disappointed that, once again and quite predictably, your diagnosis and solution congealed to the rather hackneyed cop out of resource dearth. I believe Basil Ugochukwu did a fantastic job of debunking the resource argument, albeit for Nigeria only. Like him, I no longer believe that all problems afflicting the academy in Africa can or should be reduced to the cliche of resource gap. In Nigeria, university funding has improved modestly over the last ten years, and as Basil eloquently argued, the amount that it would take to sustain a rigorously edited and peer-reviewed journal is a drop in the budgetary bucket of the universities, the NUC, and ASUU. The bigger problem, for me, is what Professor Alemika, who is based in Nigeria, outlined: proliferation of journals and the abuse of easy publishing platforms that compromise editorial and evaluative processes. Even the patronage of POD and self-publishing platforms can be streamlined/standardized to solve the problem of sloppy review and editorial oversight if our colleagues at home are self-critical enough to put their minds to it. ASUU can and should lead this charge.

Chidi, of course anyone can order a POD book from Amazon or Barnes and Noble, but don't they have to know about the book and trust that the book was run through the grind of review and editorial scrutiny before they will order it? With traditional publishing outfits these assurances are a normal part of the process. Traditional publishing outfits already have an audience made up of their own authors, reviewers, and university and other institutional libraries that maintain an account with them. This assures a wide circulation. a POD author has no such reach and has to advertise his/her book with friends, family, and on lists like US-AfricaDialogue. They'd be lucky if anyone outside of this small circle knows about their book let alone order it. And, of course, the vast worldwide library system remains for the most part closed to the POD and self-publishing industry. This is why most POD-published texts rarely circulate and are thus limited in their ability to disseminate whatever insight inheres in them. Traditional publishers also have established marketing and advertising arms and strategies that POD platforms lack. The former often obtain member lists from professional and academic organizations such as the ASA, AHA, MLA, etc., with thousands of members worldwide. Advertising traditionally published books and journals, even if these are electronic publications, to these audiences ensures that even the most obscure or esoteric book or journal will circulate. Traditional publishers also advertise their books in trade, academic, and popular publications, again ensuring publicity and circulation.


On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tracy Flemming <flemmint@gvsu.edu> wrote:
Has anyone taught Front Line of Freedom: African Americans and the Forging of the Underground Railroad in the Ohio Valley? I haven't decided if I'm going to use it for an upcoming underground railroad class. For an On Demand text, I think students might respond well to it. 

http://www.kentuckypress.com/live/title_detail.php?titleid=1958


--
Tracy Flemming, Ph.D.
Visiting Assistant Professor
African/African-American Studies 
Grand Valley State University
107 Lake Ontario Hall
1 Campus Drive
Allendale, Michigan 49401-9403
USA

On May 28, 2012, at 11:28 AM, "Chidi Anthony Opara" <chidi.opara@yahoo.com> wrote:

"The author is promised royalties if the book sells a certain number of copies. Of course, no print-on-demand book sells enough copies for the author to earn any royalties".
------------Farooq A. Kperogi
 
The above statement does not sound to me as referring only to academic publications. I publish poetry books on the Print On Demand platform and I have been receiving royalties since 2009.
----CAO.
 
"The fact that these POD and self-published books and journals, whatever their insight, do not circulate beyond the author/editor and their family and friends. As a result, their insights are lost to the academic and intellectual community".
------Moses Ochonu.
 
Print On Demand books are available on the online bookshops and can be purchased by anybody.
------CAO
 
"In reality, the publishing house merely prepares a camera-ready copy of the manuscript, prints and mails a free author's copy of the book, and waits for orders".
--------Farooq A. Kperogi.
 
That is what they should do as online bookshops. Are they supposed to build warehouses, print the books, store them therein and await orders?
-----CAO.
 
"I recognize that things are changing, but I would hate to see that change occur at the expense of long established protocols for disseminating ideas in a readable, edifying form. I have my issues with academic review, which is by no means a perfect arbiter of quality, but we can discuss that another day".
------Moses Ochonu.
 
Here lies the problem, acceptance of change in all ramifications have always been a problem. There is always that inclination to orthodoxy.
------CAO.
 
 

From: Moses Ochonu <meochonu@gmail.com>
To: "usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com" <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities

Ken, you make valid points. However, I understand Farooq to be arguing not against self-publishing or print-on-demand (POD) publishing per se. I understand him, rather, to be be critiquing:

1. The growing trend IN NIGERIA to pass off vanity publishing as an academic accomplishment and to proceed to fraudulently ascend the academic ladder on the basis of that. His argument here is not that these publications may not have some insights but that they violate the ethos of peer review, quality control, and editorial oversight, long established as valuational mechanisms in the academy.

2. The fact that these POD and self-published books and journals, whatever their insight, do not circulate beyond the author/editor and their family and friends. As a result, their insights are lost to the academic and intellectual community.

3. That because there is little or no editorial intervention in the work the quality is often poor, and even when one is able to access the book or journal it is a turn off. If you cannot read a text because it is riddled with grammatical, structural, and stylistic problems how can you get to its insights, if any?

I recognize that things are changing, but I would hate to see that change occur at the expense of long established protocols for disseminating ideas in a readable, edifying form. I have my issues with academic review, which is by no means a perfect arbiter of quality, but we can discuss that another day.

Sent from my iPad
 
On May 27, 2012, at 8:28 AM, kenneth harrow <harrow@msu.edu> wrote:

sounds like what we have called "Self-Publishing" presses. this is not necessarily a fraudulent thing, unless its claims are misleading. but self-publishing presses have been around forever, and as  you say, farooq, the books are not vetted, so do not "count" towards a publication in any real sense. on the other hand, if your manuscript has not succeeded in getting a publisher, you can go ahead and do it, and then send copies for reviews to journals. if the text gets a favorable review, you can build on that.
i don't think this is bad at all, unless it is duplicitous. as long as everyone realizes it is a self-published text, it can enter into the public domain and possibly gain an audience.
fiction authors have done this in the past; and "publishing" with electronic sources has made this even easier--which is a good thing, i believe. for instance, africultures is able to produce an enormous amount of great stuff, without the long process of vetting  print journals go through, which can delay publication by up to two years. africultures is not self-publishing, but it is also not following the rigorous processes of print journals in its vetting.
sort of like blogs, or even comments in major newspapers that follow editorials or articles. often the comments, another form of self-publishing, are much better than the piece on which they comment.
things are changing....
ken

On 5/27/12 1:02 AM, Farooq A. Kperogi wrote:

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Print-on-demand Book Scams and Nigerian Universities


By Farooq A. Kperogi

The other day, a friend of mine on Facebook proudly announced that his master's thesis had been published into a book by a German publishing company called Lambert Academic Publishing. Several people congratulated him. But I didn't. I knew he had been scammed—and that he would in turn unwittingly scam the Nigerian university system where he works as a lecturer.

Since reading his self-congratulatory post, I have heard of scores of other Nigerian university teachers who have published "academic books" through Lambert and other such Euro-American publishing companies. Before this trend becomes an epidemic, I thought I should call attention to an emerging, borderline fraudulent publishing model called "print on demand."

This is the way the model works. Author mills (that is, deceptive publishing houses that publish ANY work submitted to them) based in Europe and America use software to crawl the Internet (sometimes real people do the Web prowling) for any mention of "thesis" or "dissertation" on the Internet. The web crawler will identify the email addresses associated with the authors of the theses or dissertations and then send them an email using a standard email template that goes something like this:

"I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Lambert Academic Publishing.
In the course of a research on the … I came across a reference to your thesis on "...". We are an international publisher whose aim is to make academic research available to a wider audience.
LAP would be especially interested in publishing your dissertation in the form of a printed book.
Your reply including an e-mail address to which I can send an e-mail with further information in an attachment will be greatly appreciated. I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,
Acquisition Editor
LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG & Co. KG
Saarbrücken
Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken Germany."
I have received many variations of this email template at least five times in the past few years. If a person agrees to publish his/her dissertation or thesis with the company, the company will request that the manuscript be sent to them via email. Within six weeks, the book will be "out." Of course, it will neither be peer-reviewed by experts in the field nor will it be proofread by a copy editor. So it comes out embarrassingly error-ridden. It's basically garbage in, garbage out. As an American who submitted his manuscript to Lambert put it in a blog post, "it is very evident that no one at the publication house bothered to do any editing. There are multiple grammatical errors."

In reality, the publishing house merely prepares a camera-ready copy of the manuscript, prints and mails a free author's copy of the book, and waits for orders. The company makes money when the author's friends and relations place an order for the book--or when the author purchases extra copies of the book to share with friends and family. Since they print only when an order is placed (thus the name "print on demand"), they lose nothing. I am told that authors from the Third World are required to pay for their author's copy. 

The front- and back-page prototype of the book will be displayed on the publishing company's website and on Amazon.com—and that's it. You will never find the book in any bookstore or library. There is no media publicity for the book by the publisher, no advertising, no marketing, no distribution, and no critical reviews in academic or popular journals.

The author is promised royalties if the book sells a certain number of copies. Of course, no print-on-demand book sells enough copies for the author to earn any royalties.

Here is why Nigerian university administrators should be concerned about print-on-demand books. One, they do not go through any kind of review before they are published. In fact, many people have experimented with sending a farrago of mumbo jumbo to these publishing companies to see if they will be published. And, sure enough, they often get published. No manuscript sent to print-on-demand publishers is ever returned as unpublishable, however awfully it may have been written. As most people know, only peer-reviewed books can count toward promotion in academia. 

Two, they have limited or no materiality. By this I mean that there are usually no more than a few copies of the "books" in circulation. That means they add nothing to the disciplinary conversations of their areas since they can't be found in libraries and bookstores. In other words, they are basically worthless.

Third, our people have been brainwashed into thinking that anything published in the West must be of high quality. People may innocently think Lambert is a legitimate academic press because it has a German address. Before you know it, many people will be promoted to professors based purely on fraudulent books they publish with the company, which American writer Victoria Strauss aptly called "an academic author mill". That would be unfair to people who struggle against all odds to produce high-quality scholarship. 

Many countries are waking up to the academic fraud that print-on-demand books are. The Australian Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC), for instance, has blacklisted books published by Lambert Academic Publishing. The Nigerian Universities Commission (NUC) has a responsibility to do the same.

Related Articles:

Personal website: www.farooqkperogi.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/farooqkperogi

"The nice thing about pessimism is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised." G. F. Will

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--   kenneth w. harrow   distinguished professor of english  michigan state university  department of english  east lansing, mi 48824-1036  ph. 517 803 8839  harrow@msu.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com



--
There is enough in the world for everyone's need but not for everyone's greed.


---Mohandas Gandhi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha