Sunday, December 2, 2012

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - ON PHILOSOPHY AND REASONABLENESS

Prof.,

Make you no mind Shina. Na so he dey teach his students? No wonder they tell him that philosophy cannot bake bread. How can he introduce philosophy in Nigeria without citing Azikiwe on Renascent Africa or Awolowo on The People's Republic and expect the students to find the rehashing of Bertrand Russel's boring tome relevant?

How can the introduction to philosophy in Nigeria begin and end by quoting dead white men and expect Obasanjo not to dismiss the discipline as a yeye subject. Especially when one of the white men quoted by Shina, David Hume, was notoriously racist in his empiricist methodology that assumed that since he could not see any evidence of contributions to civilization by Africans, therefore Africans must be inferior to Europeans - a key flaw in empiricism that forced Rene Descartes to adopt the alternative methodology of rationalism on the ground that his senses might deceive him but his reason would be a more reliable guide to truth.

Shina, when you cite Socrates, do you inform your students that according to Cheikh Anta Diop, Socrates and most of the Greeks studied in Africa in some cases for more than 40 years to learn the philosophy for which Socrates was condemned to death for teaching 'foreign ideas' against Greek superstitions?

You implicitly recommend the rationality of Cartesianism but failed to add that Leopold Senghor critiqued that when he said that reason was Hellenic while feeling was Negroid; an alternative to 'I think, therefore I am' would be 'I feel, therefore I am' - an alternative that implicitly supports the racist assumption of white supremacists that Africans are irrational, a line of thought that forced Soyinka to dismiss Negritude with the quip: The Tiger does not profess its Tigritude, to which Senghor responded with the retort, the tiger does not profess because it does not talk; but maybe the Tiger talks all right, it might be that both Soyinka and Senghor do not understand Tigerese, as Derrida might argue.

Shina, there is a grave danger in privileging rationality as the only human virtue especially when it comes to death and dying. Such a philosophy was directly implicated in the Nazi holocaust as Zygmunt Bauman demonstrated in Modernity and the Holocaust and linked to the abominable policies of 'starvation as a legitimate weapon of war' that cost more than 3 million Nigerian lives in 30 months as Achebe demonstrated in There Was A Country. There is an old Igbo saying that when they carry the corpse of someone else, it appears that they are carrying the carcass of a dog. Reason without morality, love and compassion paves the road to genocide.

Given that human beings are not simply rational computers without emotions, it makes sense that the bereaved should be allowed to grieve for their beloved without being dismissed as irrational. Ancient Africans in Kemet invented the scientific method of embalming their dead to preserve them for life in eternity and even built majestic pyramids for their dead kings. We may quarrel with them about the opportunity costs of spending such fortunes to bury their dead when they could have built universities and research labs to advance knowledge but we cannot deny that the respect that they gave to their dead was a measure of the love that they had for their living nor that their funeral science has allowed us to get glimpses of classical African civilization today.

When you compare the cost of burial ceremonies that are completely commercialized and out-sourced to undertakers or morticians in capitalist Europe and North America with the relatively average low-cost of funerals in Africa, it will make you wonder who is more reasonable about costs of dying which reflects the disparities in the costs of living in societies suffering from affluenza compared to the starvelings of the world.

I do agree with your implicit suggestion that we must all encourage our people to invest more than they spend on funerals by, for example, asking for funeral donations to be sent to NGOs in the name of the dead rather than squander scarce resources on Aso Ebi and Owambe. Your explicit recommendation that we spend more on education than we spend on burials is in order too and maybe we already do that: just add up the total costs of educating children for twelve or more years and you will come to the conclusion that education costs indeed outstrip burial costs in most cases even though the government should step up and take more of the responsibility of paying the costs for educating our people with public funds.

The practice in industrialized countries is for most people to buy insurance policies to ensure that their loved ones would not be burdened with funeral expenses while the government writes a cheque from tax funds for the education of the population in the first 12 years of education. Call it rational or emotional if you like, we need to encourage our people to invest more of their income in savings that will take care of rainy days and encourage more compliance with taxation to raise more revenue to be spent on public education. Of course kleptocracy is more of a problem for our people than the political economy of the volume of tears shed for their departed beloved.

Yes, let us cut our coats according to our clothes but we must not continue to teach our students that our people are somehow less human by buying into the white-supremacist ideology that Africans are more emotional than Europeans: White people also have feelings - they feel hungry and feel angry and feel happy too. And Africans are also very rational despite our compassion for the suffering of others, a compassion that the neurotic may scoff at but would never erase because it is part of what makes us human.

Biko


--- On Sun, 2/12/12, ebere onwudiwe <eonwudiwe20@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: ebere onwudiwe <eonwudiwe20@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - ON PHILOSOPHY AND REASONABLENESS
To: "usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com" <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Date: Sunday, 2 December, 2012, 4:04

Dear Adeshina,
"Remember Obasanjo's (in)famous statement about useless disciplines and miseducation in Nigeria."  What did OBJ actually say about
useless disciplines and miseducation in Nigeria?
Thanks,
ebere

From: "shina73_1999@yahoo.com" <shina73_1999@yahoo.com>
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 7:42 PM
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - ON PHILOSOPHY AND REASONABLENESS

Recently, Toyin Adepoju posted an article by one Dr Agazie titled 'Where Do We Bury You When You Die?'.
When I read this wonderful essay, it moved me on many fronts. The most immediate is that I am now able to finally identify a kindred spirit in my personal and professional fight against rampant irrationality and illogicality in the Nigerian society. I am not assuming that I am the only crusader against these menace; I am simply saying that this is the first powerful article that will come to my notice on an issue I have felt uncomfortable about for so so long.

Second, I now have a document I can recommend to my first year philosophy students on an indigenous, and indeed wasteful, issue that most people, even the educated ones, take for granted in the name of tradition.


Permit me a pedagogical comment. I have been teaching Introduction to Philosophy for some few years now. My strategy for teaching is occasioned by the notoriety Philosophy has acquired over the years as, well, one of the 'useless disciplines' (if not the most 'useless', apart from Classics and maybe history)that has nothing to contribute to personal and national development. Remember Obasanjo's (in)famous statement about useless disciplines and miseducation in Nigeria.


The manner I was taught philosophy which I inadvertently adopted only leads to further obfuscation and perplexity for the students who are already confounded on what impact philosophy will have on their life prospects. However, I got the benefit of a 'reeducation' from a beloved late Professor who understood the dynamics of instructing the students on what philosophy means and how it impacts their lives.


This is what I now teach. I begin with eliciting from the students their preconceived ideas and fears about philosophy: philosophy is esoteric and abstract; philosophers are atheists and therefore will surely go to hell; philosophy does not bake bread; etc. I tell the students to hold these preconceptions at the background of their minds and compare them with what they will get to learn about philosophy. I then go on to confront the professional philosophers' fondness for the standard definition of philosophy as having no definite definition by saying that philosophy over the centuries has acquired two standard conceptions: Philosophy as worldview and Philosophy as critical thinking.


Philosophy as worldview derives from the etymology of the word-philosophia-or the love of wisdom. And that wisdom translates into the comprehensive sets of ideas and beliefs about what we consider to be important about life and existence. At the first level,  humans are homo philosophicus-philosophers who don't have the time to philosophise or have lost the requisite curiosity to instigate their inquiry to the humdrum of human existence. At the second level, we critically confront our ideas and beliefs which we all have as a compass to cope with and navigate life and existence but we hardly worry about their intellectual foundation. Socrates said 'an unexamined life is not worth living'.


It is at this second level of conceiving philosophy that I bump into the many accepted and digested or undigested assumptions, ideas and beliefs of the students about themselves, their cultures, their relationship with others or with their society or with the state, and so on. This is the most interesting aspect of the course because I then switch my role from being a teacher to an enlightened questioner or a Socratic interlocutor, probing and interrogating. The issue of burial, marriage and other traditional issues, as well as political issues about justice and questions like 'why must I obey the state', often surface with lots of outcries!

It doesn't take long for the issue about critical thinking to devolve into the idea of reason and reasonableness, and philosophy's significant role in challenging man's favourite natural and cognitive advantage. Yet, like David Hume recognised many years ago, man is more a slave to the passions than to reason! Burials, say, move us much more than driving ourselves to the limit to educate our children. Some of us are familiar with the Yoruba 'owambe' stereotype.

How, for instance, does this unreasonableness interact with the supposed capacity of the informal sector of the economy which is saddled with the task of alleviating the suffering of the people in the hands of a lecherous state? 


You begin to see my delight with Dr Agazie's article. It can become a point of debate for the students, a perspective on reasonableness. What is missing now is the balance, a counter-perspective on, maybe, why the 'tradition' of wasteful spending on such matters is necessary and inescapable. Why most of us are beholden to such 'traditions' even in the face of overwhelming evidences.


I await someone on this forum who can help me play the devil's advocate.


Adeshina Afolayan

Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
  For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
  For previous archives, visit  http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
  To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-   
  unsubscribe@googlegroups.com




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha