| Kidnapping: Theories on solving the Nigerian nightmare KAYODE KETEFE It will take a great sociologist to discriminate between numerous problems confronting Nigeria and identify the most detrimental to the nation's quest for progress. The problems are legions - corruption, insecurity, illiteracy, infrastructural backwardness, criminality, religious bigotry, ethnicity, accursed leadership, stagnation etc Of course, it is trite that all of these are inter-connected, but to isolate the single most important factor responsible for the miserable condition of Nigeria would be a matter of academic conjecture resolvable only within the same nebulous paradigm of hen/egg precedence paradox. Be that as it may, the shocking news of the kidnap of the mother of the Finance Minister and the Coordinating Minister of the economy, (Prof. Okonjo Iweala) Professor Mrs. Kamene Iweala, which recently hit headlines across the world, has opened another depressing chapter in the annals of kidnapping and general insecurity in the land. Kidnapping for ransom, which began as form of protest by militants in the Niger-Delta region to protest the callous environmental damage unleashed by oil exploration/exploitation cum infrastructural neglect by the federal government, has since blossomed into a criminal, big time multibillion naira business, nurtured with the same entrepreneurial passion as with a legitimate enterprise. Kidnapping is now essentially a commercial project for all comers who could lay hand on guns and who are crazy enough to trade other people's lives for filthy lucre. Every lazy bone now sees abduction as a shortcut to instant wealth; it has become magical money spinners for the ne'er do well. The menace has spread into virtually all parts of the country with varying degree of intensity as some areas are particularly reputed as hotspots. To reel out the names of prominent figures who had been kidnapped for ransoms in the past would occupy the rest of the space in this piece and would require continuation in part two! Unfortunately the Nigerian Security system, in all its ramifications has, more often than not, played the second best to the kidnappers. Goaded on by impunity, the kidnappers had been having a field day, ravaging the land recklessly, claiming victims among the lowly and the mighty and picking up easy dough almost for the asking. Numerous amounts of foreign direct investments have found their ways into alternative but more stable climes as a result of the scourge. This is not to talk of direct impact of decline in quality of life we now lead as a result of insecurity. Furthermore, many skilled and resourceful Nigerians in the Diaspora who can contribute to the nation's growth are afraid to come home. A number of approaches may be offered as counter-measures to check the rampancy if not eradicate the problem of kidnapping. The first one is "no payment method". This is a strategy of cultivating the practice of calling the bluff of the marauders by refusing to oblige them with ransom payments. One is not oblivious of practical difficulty of inculcating this mentality in Nigerians. A number of people would readily offer money to procure the freedoms of their loved ones. But the paradox is that the more ransom is paid, the more kidnapping becomes prevalent. If this culture of "no payment" is entrenched, at least, commercial kidnapping would stop. Let us face it, kidnappers don't drink blood! What they want is money, and if it is fairly certain no ransom would be forthcoming, they would not find the crime lucrative. Those who think this is not realistic should ponder on situations where ransoms are collected and still the kidnapers kill the victim. Could that be worse than calling the bluff of the kidnapers? But this approach calls for highly efficient security system to crush the kidnappers. The second approach is the technological one. A number of crimes in developed countries have been solved through deployment of appropriate technology. For example, kidnapping for ransom invariably involves making a phone call, at least to inform the relatives of the victims of the incident and to demand ransom. We know that whenever a call is made, the signal never go to recipient directly but through a central processing facility. Thus, the service provider acts as the interface between the caller and receiver and can easily trace the call in real time. It never ceased to beat me why our security agents often neglect, fail or prove incapable of employing technology forensically. There are so many crimes that would have been solved through simple activity of tracing the GSM calls or the internet-based messages. The advantage of technological approach is that it can even been employed as pre-emptive measure. The third approach is legal approach. This could be done, for instance, by promulgating law which stipulates exceedingly severe punitive measures, like very lengthy imprisonment terms or even life imprisonment for the offence of kidnapping. If such a law is made and strictly enforced, it would constitute a check to the crime of human snatching. The treatment of all these as separate approaches is merely theoretical. In practical terms they should be employed collectively. Nigeria must find a way to overcome this abduction for lucre menace if we are desirous of making progress. |
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment