RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO ObamaIsGoingToSA, And Not Nigeria

Most Revered Mama Mzuri Gloria Emeagwali, will this convince you?

Nobel Committee Asks Obama "Nicely" To Return Peace Prize

By NORM DE PLEUME

 

Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, said today that President Obama "really ought to consider" returning his Nobel Peace Prize Medal immediately, including the "really nice" case it came in. 

Jagland, flanked by the other four members of the Committee, said they'd never before asked for the return of a Peace Prize, "even from a damnable war-criminal like Kissinger," but that the 10% drawdown in US troops in Afghanistan the President announced last week capped a period of "non-Peace-Prize-winner-type behavior" in 2011.  "Guantanamo's still open. There's bombing Libya. There's blowing bin Laden away rather than putting him on trial. Now a few US troops go home, but the US will be occupying Afghanistan until 2014 and beyond. Don't even get me started on Yemen!" 

The Committee awarded Obama the coveted prize in 2009 after he made a series of speeches in the first months of his presidency, which convinced the Peace Prize Committee that he was: "creating a new climate of...multilateral diplomacy...an emphasis on the role of the United Nations...of dialogue and negotiations as instruments for resolving international conflicts...and a vision of world free of nuclear arms." 

"Boy oh boy!" added Jagland. "Did we regret that press release!" 

But, he revealed the committee members were all "legless drunk" the day they voted, as it was the start of Norway's annual aquavit-tasting festival. The "totally toasted" members listened over and over to replays of Obama's Cairo speech, tearing up and drinking shots to the glorious future: a black man leading America and the world into a new era of peace, hope and goodwill. "For a few hours we were all 18 year-old students again at the beautiful, occasionally sunny University of Bergen! Oh, how we cried for joy!"  

The chairman said the committee weren't "going to be pills" about getting the Prize back because they still "basically really liked" Mr. Obama and that sending it back in a plain package by regular mail would fine if it would save him the embarrassment of a public return. But added Jagland, "things could get nasty" if the committee didn't see it by the time they announce the new Peace Prize winner in the fall. He and the committee then excused themselves to resume their celebration of Norway's annual aquavit-tasting festival.

The White House had no comment. It later announced an aggressive new covert CIA initiative to identify and apprehend Al Qaeda operatives in Scandinavia. 

> [Original Message]
> From: Emeagwali, Gloria (History) <emeagwali@mail.ccsu.edu>
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Date: 5/29/2013 2:51:55 PM
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO ObamaIsGoingToSA, And Not Nigeria
>
> 'so let's just say that the committee members who prematurely gave BOZO Obama the prize
>  in the hope that he would translate his campaign rhetoric into reality are also BOZOS.'
>
>
> How do you know that the Nobel committee  really wanted  campaign rhetoric to translate into peace?
>
> They could have given him the award  to divert our attention from the wars  that were to come
> in a neat orchestrated campaign.
>
> Who are  these  Nobel award  givers, anyway?
>  Just thinking out loud.
>
>
> Professor Gloria Emeagwali
> africahistory.net
> vimeo.com/user5946750/videos
> Documentaries on Africa and the African Diaspora
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com [usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Edward Mensah [dehasnem@uic.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:59 PM
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama IsGoingToSA, And Not Nigeria
>
> Come to think about it,  it is conceivable that the presidency in the hands of neo-cons could have resulted or led to the bomb, bomb Iran slogan being actualized.  Just thinking!  And Syria too!   Remember the reasons we gave for declaring war on Iraq?  At least your 'BOZO' is giving peace a chance by not rushing into bombing Syria. I pray that  your neo-cons do not push him into doing anything more destructive than we are seeing now through the use of drones.  God Willing, he will keep the peace at this level.
>
> Kwaku Mensah
> Chicago
>
> From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com [mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abdul Bangura
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:58 AM
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com; usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Kwabena Akurang-Parry; basil ugochukwu
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama IsGoingToSA, And Not Nigeria
>
> Hmmmmm....so the word "peace" in the Nobel Peace Prize is a misnomer? Back to the drawing board, Osagyefo Ed Mensah. I lived and studied in Sweden, I wrote a paper on the competing sentiments over the award at Stockholms Universitet, I attended the ceremonies in 1982, so let's just say that the committee members who prematurely gave BOZO Obama the prize in the hope that he would translate his campaign rhetoric into reality are also BOZOS. They should recall the award.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Edward Mensah<mailto:dehasnem@uic.edu>
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: Kwabena Akurang-Parry<mailto:KAParr@ship.edu>; basil ugochukwu<mailto:ugochukwubc@yahoo.com>
> Sent: 5/29/2013 3:57:06 AM
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama IsGoingToSA, And Not Nigeria
>
> No, no, no, Bangura you got  it all wrong. The Nobel Peace Prize was not given for peace because he had no experience in keeping the peace; not when his entire political experience was representing a portion of the South Side of Chicago in the Illinois Senate in Springfield.  Obama, in the minds of many, was given the peace prize for keeping John McCain's hands off the nuclear weapons.  Remember the joke Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran?
>
> Kwaku Mensah
> Chicago
>
> From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> [mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abdul Bangura
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:53 PM
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>; usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: Kwabena Akurang-Parry; basil ugochukwu
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama IsGoingTo SA, And Not Nigeria
>
> No, No, No, Mama Mzuri Gloria Emeagwali, we Genu-wine Bonafide Americans invented BOZO and it has nothing to do with your Spanish rendition. The word for slave in Spanish is esclavo.
>
> The following snippet from Wikipedia will help:
>
> "Bozo is a clown<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clown> character very popular in the United States, peaking in the 1960s as a result of widespread franchising<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchising> in early television<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television>. Originally created by Alan W. Livingston<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_W._Livingston> for a children's storytelling record-album and illustrative read-along book set and portrayed by Pinto Colvig<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinto_Colvig>...."
>
> Meet the original BOZO and BOZO Obama whose warmongering has made a mockery of the Nobel Peace Prize:
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CE5C6A.AC2A38A0]<http://manhattaninfidel.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bozo-the-clown.jpg>    [cid:image002.jpg@01CE5C6A.AC2A38A0] <http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbCePu2UQWodCbKv3H2r5wWE_ZoR1Rv4bB5A8BfsK3dbgTb4u1qUjhaR7ZMZJ7nE16UwNy7bSqfE1ylT6d7KVU9Qm8-GmNsCrdfXLNI-wsP6Pk23Er7CkL34mrstGDuHdntW8-lLFIV1E/s400/obama%252Bclown.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/donald-trump-to-moderate-gop-debate-marvelous-or-mess/question-2316973/comment-72865905/&usg=__J2JHbntWpVWQhjntym5DM0dswRo=&h=400&w=318&sz=29&hl=en&start=15&sig2=iKGPDAvJptbSz9CZp48dCg&zoom=1&tbnid=fcCvifAFAVwiEM:&tbnh=124&tbnw=99&ei=v3mlUZfdFdG90QHVv4Eo&um=1&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CEgQrQMwDg>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Emeagwali, Gloria (History)<mailto:emeagwali@mail.ccsu.edu>
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: Kwabena Akurang-Parry<mailto:KAParr@ship.edu>; basil ugochukwu<mailto:ugochukwubc@yahoo.com>
> Sent: 5/28/2013 5:18:03 PM
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama IsGoingTo SA, And Not Nigeria
>
> I am actually tired of this word 'Bozo' for anyone. I  believe it means 'slave' in Spanish.
> I could be wrong, though.
>
> Bangura what does it mean to you?
>
> GE
>
> From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> [mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abdul Bangura
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:03 PM
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>; usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: Kwabena Akurang-Parry; basil ugochukwu
> Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama Is GoingTo SA, And Not Nigeria
>
> Oga Ugochukwu, my best friend Osagyefo Kwabena Akurang-Parry who I love like my blood brother knows that I will not call him a BOZO because he is doing his best for our people and he does not work for me. But I have the right to call Obama a BOZO because he is my public servant, I pay his salary, I pay for the Air Force One he enjoys, I pay for his medical visits to Bethesda and before that close to my house at Walter Reed, I even pay for his hair cut, etc. So as long as Obama continues to butcher, insult and marginalize our Afrikan people, I will call him a BOZO.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: basil ugochukwu<mailto:ugochukwubc@yahoo.com>
> To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: 5/28/2013 1:23:40 PM
> Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama Is GoingTo SA, And Not Nigeria
>
> Oga Kwabena,
> Please lay off BOZO, BOZO, BOZO Bangura!
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Akurang-Parry, Kwabena" <KAParr@ship.edu<mailto:KAParr@ship.edu>>
> To: "usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>" <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:54:05 PM
> Subject: RE: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama Is Going To SA, And Not Nigeria
>
> Malam  Bangura:
>
> Couldn't you be critical of President Obama without the name-calling, such as "Bozo"? It does not speak well of you as a teacher, scholar, author, and mentor. Your obsession with anti-Obamaism has become a debilitating disease of the mind.
>
> Kwabena
> ________________________________
> From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> [usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Abdul Bangura [theai@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:00 AM
> To: USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: leonenet
> Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Now We Know Why BOZO Obama Is Going To SA, And Not Nigeria
> Bravo, South Afrika!
>
> Now we know why BOZO Obama is going to South Afrika, and not Nigeria. As I have been making the clarion call for a long now and I will do so again soon, Nigeria, Take Your Leadership!  Many of the internal problems will disappear as the people become united in the common cause of leading Afrika.
> The race is on: Manufacturer sets sights on market for armed drones
> Slideshow: Armed drones around the world<http://slideshow.nbcnews.com/id/51645809/displaymode/1247/?wbSlideShowId=51645809&wbSection=news&wbSlideShowTeaseId=51645997>
> [cid:image003.jpg@01CE5C6A.AC2A38A0] <http://slideshow.nbcnews.com/id/51645809/displaymode/1247/?wbSlideShowId=51645809&wbSection=news&wbSlideShowTeaseId=51645997>
> Staff Sgt. Brian Ferguson/U.S. Air Force
> The military use of armed drones in the Middle East and Afghanistan has brought more countries and companies into the market for such weapons. Here are some of the un-crewed aerial vehicles that are known to carry weapons or that might be adapted to carry them.
> Launch slideshow<http://slideshow.nbcnews.com/id/51645809/displaymode/1247/?wbSlideShowId=51645809&wbSection=news&wbSlideShowTeaseId=51645997>
> By Keir Simmons and Gil Aegerter, NBC News
> On a sprawling complex just outside Pretoria, South Africa, a government-owned arms manufacturer is preparing to test an armed drone that it hopes to begin selling soon to governments around the world.
>
> The company, Denel Dynamics, says the armed version of the Seeker 400, which will carry two laser-guided missiles, will enable so-called opportunistic targeting at a range of up to about 155 miles.
> "These are not combat systems, they are foremost reconnaissance systems," Sello Ntsihlele, executive manager of UAV systems for Denel, told NBC News. He added: "(But if) you speak to any general, show him the capability, he will tell you, 'I want to have munitions.'"
> The company's move is but one signal that the era when only a small club of countries possessed weaponized drones is drawing to a close.
> Critics say the coming proliferation of the lethal remote-controlled flying machines will forever change the face of counterterrorism operations and, eventually, warfare itself – and not for the better.
> "The U.S. has set a moral precedent," said Jenifer Gibson of the human rights group Reprieve. "A state can declare someone a terrorist and just go out and kill them."
> Reprieve campaigns against what it calls illegal drone strikes.
> Supporters of military drones argue that they are an essential tool against terrorists hiding in remote areas and that their ability to strike with precision minimizes civilian casualties. Reprieve rejects the notion that drones are precision weapons and claims many civilians have been killed.
> Who has drones — and who wants them
> Only three countries are known to currently operate armed unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, as drones are technically known -- the U.S., the U.K. and Israel -- according to a recent report by the think tank RUSI<http://www.rusi.org/publications/whitehallreports/ref:O51509D843E399>. The report suggested there are only currently around 1,000 armed drones worldwide.
> But China also is believed to have developed weaponized drones; the U.S. has said it would arm drones operated by Italy; and France and Germany also have decided to acquire them, according to arms trade experts and published reports.
> And according to Peter Singer, director of the Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence at the Brookings Institute, at least 26 countries have surveillance drones of a size or type that have been or could be armed, and roughly 20 countries are trying to either develop or acquire weaponized drones.
> So far, the United States is the only country known to have transferred armed drone technology -- and solely to Britain, which flies U.S.-built Predators in Afghanistan.
> U.S. sales of drones, armed and unarmed, "are considered on a case-by-case basis, consistent with U.S. law, regulation and policy, as well as our international commitments, including under the multilateral nonproliferation regimes," a Pentagon spokesman said in an email to NBC News. A State Department spokesman declined to comment on the record.
> U.S. reluctance to share its cutting-edge military drone technology outside a few trusted NATO partners like Britain and Italy is viewed as an opportunity by arms manufacturers like Denel Dynamics.
> The company aims to be among the first suppliers of armed drones to market, if tests of the armed versions of the Seeker 400 -- expected to begin in "a month or two" and last up to six months, according to Ntsihlele -- are successful. South Africa would have to purchase the armed drones first before the company would begin marketing them elsewhere, but if that happens Denel sees opportunities for growth elsewhere, particularly in "Africa and the Middle East," he said.
> Ntsihlele declined to say how much the armed Seeker 400 will cost, but said it will be far cheaper than the Predator and Reaper, the armed drones used for anti-terrorism operations by the U.S. military in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, which cost approximately $20 million and $56.5 million apiece, respectively. And unlike those UAVs, it would not require satellite technology, being controlled instead through "line of sight" communications. That limits its range but makes it potentially available to nations without sophisticated space-based guidance systems.
> The drone market
> President Barack Obama, in a speech last Thursday<http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18448515-obama-reframes-counterterrorism-policy-with-new-rules-on-drones?lite>, said he would impose new limits on drone strikes against foreign terrorists in an attempt to reduce civilian casualties to near zero and ensure that only enemies who pose a "continuing, imminent threat" to the United States are targeted.
> "What we are trying to do with our (anti-terror) strategy is turn it back over to the host country and local forces," the New York Times quoted the Pentagon's top counterterrorism official Michael Sheehan as saying. "That is the future."
> The sale of armed drones to other governments raises similarly thorny issues though.
> [cid:image004.jpg@01CE5C6A.AC2A38A0]
> Khaled Abdullah / Reuters file
> Yemeni tribesmen stand on the rubble of a building in the village of Azan that was destroyed by a U.S. drone air strike on Oct. 14, 2011. Tribal elders say that suspected al Qaeda militants Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the son of slain U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, and six others were killed in the attack.
> There are no international restrictions on sales of armed drones. Beyond sanctions and embargoes governed by the Security Council, the United Nations does not regulate arms and arms-technology sales, although the Arms Trade Treaty approved in April by the General Assembly may change that if it is eventually ratified by enough nations.
> In Denel's case, Ntsihlele indicated that the South African government would limit sales only to governments that would be "accountable and responsible" and agree to "opportunistic" use of the weapons on justified targets. "That target could be a pirate, or could be a terrorist," he said.
> The company also provided this statement to NBC News: "All of our activities ... take place within the framework of decisions taken by international organs such as the United Nations, the policies of the South African government and the regulatory prescripts imposed by the National Conventional Arms Control Committee and the Directorate Conventional Arms Control," referring to two South African government organizations.
> Assuming it gets its product to market, Denel is expected to quickly encounter plenty of competition.
> "To the extent that the U.S. backs off the armed drone business, it allows countries like China, in particular, to say they'll fill the marketplace," said Dennis Gormley, who teaches intelligence and military issues at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.
> China already has shown an armed drone resembling a smaller Reaper at an air show last fall, and photos surfaced on Chinese websites earlier this month showing what appeared to be an unmanned combat aerial vehicle known as the Lijan, or "Sharp Sword." The Lijan closely resembles the U.S. Navy's remote-controlled X-47B drone, which recently launched from an aircraft carrier<http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/navys-x-47b-drone-completes-first-carrier-takeoff-1C9922371> for the first time.
> Israel will also be a marketplace competitor. It is a leader in armed drones and is already considered the biggest exporter of unarmed drone technology.
> Turkey also has developed a reconnaissance drone, the Anka, for spying on Kurdish insurgents. Last summer, the Turkish Defense Industry Executive Committee said that TAI, the company that builds the Anka, was starting research and development on an armed variant, the Anka +A.
> Turkey had been intensely interested in buying armed drones from the U.S., said William Hartung, director of the arms and security project at the Center for International Policy. So far, the U.S. has resisted selling it such technology, despite its NATO membership, he said.
> Iran also has made unsubstantiated claims to have armed drones.
> Terrorism concerns
> The spread of armed drone technology to volatile regions like the Middle East inevitably stirs concern that terrorists could obtain the airborne weapons. So far, the Lebanese militia group Hezbollah, considered a terrorist organization by the U.S., is the only group believed to possess the UAVS. It has flown several unarmed drones containing explosives over Israel and, in one case, apparently used an armed drone to attack an Israeli ship, according to published reports<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/14/AR2006071401786.html>.
> The possibility of using small drones as attack platforms was driven home by a video posted on YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jplh7uatr-E> in December by an anonymous group called Dangerous Information. It showed a small electric-powered drone equipped with a GoPro video camera and paintball gun, first flying through a neighborhood, then attacking human-figure targets in a field.
> The development of smaller drones has been accompanied by new smaller munitions that don't require the Predator's 450-pound payload capacity. Denel's Seeker 400, for example, will have a payload half that, according to a company brochure, but still be capable of carrying two laser-guided missiles.
> "There is the development of smaller and smaller weapons, some of them specifically for UAVs," said Philip Finnegan, director of corporate analysis for the Teal Group<http://www.tealgroup.com/>, which conducts market analysis in the aerospace and defense industry. "So they'll be able to use smaller platforms."
> While armed drones appear certain to be added to more countries' arsenals in the near future, analysts say they expect the military sector will remain a relatively small piece of the overall drone market for some time to come. A big reason for that is the restrained growth in defense budgets worldwide and cuts by the U.S. military in spending on drones, which also affect research and development.
> "There is short-term pressure on the industry. " It's a combination of budgetary pressure and the withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan," Finnegan said. "Longer term, the U.S. remains heavily committed to advanced UAV technology."
> And sales to smaller nations are likely to be slow due to the fact that even with prices falling, armed drones remain prohibitively expensive, Denel's Ntsihele said, recounting conversations with prospective buyers.
> "When they get to know the product, they get shocked," he said.
> Keir Simmons is a correspondent in NBC News' London bureau; Gil Aegerter is an NBC News staff writer in Redmond, Wash.; NBC News' Marc Smith and Robert Windrem also contributed reporting to this article.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com<mailto:USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<mailto:usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
> For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
> For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
> To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
> unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
>    For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
>    For previous archives, visit  http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
>    To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-    
>    unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>