We must be clear about this: Israel is not today's or yesterday's South Africa nor is Israel Nazi Germany. This point does not have to be belaboured.
We have yet to hear any helpful words coming from the Arch-Bishop about the Nigerian schoolgirls - the daughters of Jesus Christ that were kidnapped (stolen) by Boko Haram and en masse converted to al- Islam or about the three Israeli teenagers that were kidnapped in Jesus' Judea and Samaria, the part of Israel that Tutu believes is "the occupied West Bank" .
How does Dr. Tutu respond to the commandment revealed at Mt. Sinai: Thou Shalt Not Steal? – Or does the Archbishop believe that the Father of Jesus Christ gave the Holy land of Israel to the Arabs – or that the Almighty no longer owns the land? Since Desmond Tutu is not a Jew, another question is, does the Archbishop think that his line of divestment is consistent with the teachings of Paul and of Jesus of Nazareth who was born in Bethlehem in Judea, which was then under Roman occupation?
This morning, after reading Ann Heberlein's article "Is it peace that we want?", Desmond Tutu the author of "The Book of Forgiveness" and the founder of " Tutu global forgiveness challenge ", comes as no surprise. The only surprise is this kind of thing.
Concerning Israel, I don't need to recapitulate the arguments against the immorality of divestment . I wonder what our forum academics think about the noxious idea of academic boycotts of Israel. Boko Haram?
Bringing it a little closer to home, here's what Iran's football coach said about last night's draw with Nigeria:
"Iran coach Carlos Queiroz said the result was "fair" and that his players deserved "sympathy and respect" for performing on the biggest stage despite the impact of economic sanctions on the country - which made it difficult to arrange friendlies.
"We're not here to perform the role of the happy loser," Queiroz said. "The fans need to know the conditions we have endured for three years to get here."
If it's moral equivalence we're after, then the question is why are there sanctions against Iran?
Talking about "friendlies", as things are today, Israel cannot play any of the football nations located in the Muslim Middle East because, as those Middle East nations say, they "cannot guarantee, the security of life or limbs of the Israeli players either in or out of the football arena " if such matches were to take place...
What would have been the result do you think, if Iran had clashed with Israel in this opening round of the Footballing World Cup in Brazil?
This is a sincere question. In my opinion, after the first half, the Israeli team would have been down to five men – and ditto for the Iranian side, since six of their players would have probably been awarded red cards by the officiating referee.
That's how it is today.
Sincerely,
On Monday, 16 June 2014 23:04:12 UTC+2, Toyin Falola wrote:
Anti-Apartheid Archbishop Tutu Calls Presbyterians to Back Divestment From Israeli Occupation
Monday, 16 June 2014 14:09 By Robert Naiman, Truthout | Op-EdCopyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.
Retired Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu, center, placed a stone on a grave on Thursday, Aug. 27, 2009, in Bilin, site of weekly protests against the Israeli barrier that bisects the village. (Photo: Rina Castelnuovo / The New York Times)
Nobel Peace Prize winner Archbishop Desmond Tutu urged Presbyterians, meeting in Detroit, to name Israel as an apartheid state and divest monies from certain companies that contribute to the occupation of the Palestinian people.
As Presbyterians meeting in Detroit consider divestment from three companies linked to the Israeli occupation of Palestine - Caterpillar, Motorola, and Hewlett Packard - Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the leader who more than any other human being alive is associated with the successful use of divestment to help overturn apartheid in South Africa, is calling on Presbyterians to choose divestment from the Israeli occupation.
Tutu received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1984 in recognition of his leadership, as general secretary of the South African Council of Churches, of the nonviolent resistance campaign to challenge apartheid.
In granting the peace Nobel to Tutu, the Nobel committee wrote (my emphasis):
The Committee has attached importance to Desmond Tutu's role as a unifying leader figure in the campaign to resolve the problem of apartheid in South Africa. The means by which this campaign is conducted is of vital importance for the whole of the continent of Africa and for the cause of peace in the world. . . .
This year's award should be seen as a renewed recognition of the courage and heroism shown by black South Africans in their use of peaceful methods in the struggle against apartheid.This recognition is also directed to all who, throughout the world, use such methods to stand in the vanguard of the campaign for racial equality as a human right.
As a leader of the nonviolent struggle against apartheid, Tutu championed divestment - efforts to pressure US institutions to sell their investments in companies doing business in South Africa and supporting apartheid by doing so.
Here's what Tutu is saying now about the prospect of Presbyterian divestment from the Israeli occupation (my emphasis):
As the Presbyterian General Assembly gathers for its biennial meeting, I reach out in prayer and solidarity that the assembly will make a strong witness for reconciliation, justice and peace. I am aware that the assembly will consider eight overtures on the confounding and intractable conflict in Israel and Palestine, however, I am especially urging the assembly to adopt the overture naming Israel as an apartheid state through its domestic policies and maintenance of the occupation and the overture calling for divestment of certain companies that contribute to the occupation of the Palestinian people. Both are worthy of adoption, by speaking truth in the first instance, and owning up to the church's complicity in maintaining the occupation through its investments in the second.
The sustainability of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people has always been dependent on its ability to deliver justice to the Palestinians. I know firsthand that Israel has created an apartheid reality within its borders and through its occupation. The parallels to my own beloved South Africa are painfully stark indeed. Realistic Israeli leaders have acknowledged that Israel will either end its occupation through a one- or two-state solution, or live in an apartheid state in perpetuity. The latter option is unsustainable and an offense to justice. We learned in South Africa that the only way to end apartheid peacefully was to force the powerful to the table through economic pressure.
The overtures proposed at the General Assembly are not about delegitimizing the State of Israel, but about ending its suppression of 4,000,000 Palestinian sisters and brothers. It's about naming an unjust system and refusing to participate in it. The stubbornness of Israel's leaders in wanting to hold onto and settling land that is not theirs can only lead to tragedy for both peoples. For the sake of them both as God's cherished, the strong witness of the two overtures is the only peaceful route left in the cause of justice and ultimate reconciliation. My prayers today are with the members of the General Assembly and with all the peoples of the Holy Land in Israel and Palestine.
My Just Foreign Policy colleague Megan Iorio and I are in Detroit this week, working to help lift up the diverse voices - Christian, Jewish, and Muslim, Palestinian and Israeli - speaking to Presbyterians in favor of divestment from the Israeli occupation.
On Sunday evening, we had the opportunity to speak with Rev. Don Wagner, a Presbyterian minister who has been a leader for decades in efforts to end the occupation and defend the human rights of Palestinians.
I asked Rev. Wagner: what's the most important thing that you think we should be telling people right now about this debate? His answer: Tell people about Archbishop Tutu's statement in support of Presbyterian divestment from the Israeli occupation.
You can join Archbishop Tutu and Rev. Wagner in calling on the Presbyterians to choose divestment here.
Robert Naiman
Robert Naiman is policy director at Just Foreign Policy and president of Truthout's board of directors.
Related Stories
"Occupation Has No Future: Militarism and Resistance in Israel/Palestine"; An Interview with Film Producer David ZlutnickBy Leslie Thatcher, Truthout | InterviewPalestinians Formally Request UN MembershipBy Neil MacFarquhar, The New York Times News Service | ReportIsrael in Political Isolation Over New Palestinian GovernmentBy Thalif Deen, Inter Press Service | Report
Toyin FalolaDepartment of HistoryThe University of Texas at Austin104 Inner Campus DriveAustin, TX 78712-0220USA512 475 7224512 475 7222 (fax)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment