Dear Professor Harrow,
Many thanks for your exposition and your prescriptive ideals which I think are heart-warming and ought to be widely circulated both in the United Kingdom and in EU countries that are or will soon be prospective candidates for referendums about exiting the EU. And of course over there in the Mighty States about to be made great again should Trump have his way and prevail over "Crooked Hillary" in November.
For over a decade now my son has been drumming it into my ears that " No one is illegal"- no – not one - and that no one is an alien, which noble sentiment in and of itself does not explain why Mr. Trump wants to build the Great Wall of China along the US-Mexican border. Of course the John Lennon idealists are free to imagine that borders no longer exist: "It's easy if you try" a little more difficult to swim the Channel or to Land's End from Tripoli which is situated at the edge of the Mediterranean Sea
I should like to remind us all that EU countries are signatories to a number of conventions, including the European Convention on Human Rights and other European Agreements all of which protect the rights of European citizens including rights to a minimum wage which at this stage varies from country to country. This morning's SvD has a three- page article entitled " Det fattiga England ångrar inte ´brexit" (The poor people of England do not regret Brexit) – with a focus on Great Yarmouth, a coastal town in which seven out of ten people voted to leave the EU because of their disaffection and not because of any alleged Johnsonian & Farage & Hove mass deception. The first two sentences in that article translate:" Seven out of ten people in Great Yarmouth voted Brexit and on the coastal city streets you will not find many who regret the outcome. Instead, they are seething with anger at politicians and at immigrants" N. B. Anger, not hatred.
Anti-Semitism being what it is in Europe, and habitually viewing much of international politics from a very pro-Israel perspective ( how it relates to, concerns or impacts on Israel) I have always been worried and even suspicious about the notion of the EU having a collective foreign policy - based on some kind of majority votes passed in Brussels and that's why I was encouraged by Cameron saying that the UK is needed in the EU to stand up for Israel
As Farage said in his victory speech, "I make one prediction this morning: The United Kingdom will not be the last member state to leave the European Union." Who's next? Maybe Nexit (The Netherlands) or France aided by Islamic terrorism and the fear of EURABIA. Only Time will tell. There's this four- page feature article in this morning's DN featuring the Netherlands' Geert Wilders' dire prediction that, " "Brexit is just the beginning. The EU is about to fall " and another columnist who also predicts that "2017 will be a truly fateful year for Europe" As a frequent visitor to Europe, I'm sure that even in France you can begin to smell the coffee…
The rest of what I have to say is inspired by this Sabbath's Torah portion Shelach //Numbers 13: 1- 15: 41 in which we learn that the Almighty does not deny people their freedom of choice – and that's why, "Hashem spoke to Moses, saying, "Send forth men, if you please, and let them spy out the land of Canaan that I give to the Children of Israel; one man each from his father's tribe shall you send, every one a leader among them. Moses sent them forth from the Wilderness of Paran at Hashem's command; they were distinguished men; heads of the children of Israel were they"
And unfortunately, they came back with ill-report about the Promised Land and some fearmongering etc.---quite unrelated to the fear-mongering - not always unjustified - that characterized the Brexit campaign and here I'm thinking of the wee bit about Turkey - that Turkey was about to join the EU and implanting terror in the hearts of the Brexiters that Turks were going to be immigrating to the British Isles in great masses, taking their jobs , maybe Islamising their culture a little further and so on, when in fact Turkey doesn't even seem to be that interested in joining an EU that's now falling apart…
One final little word about the holy cow known as the EU (core fragments of the resurrected Holy Roman Empire) which from my point of view maybe doesn't deserve all the reverence that it is being given. It was not founded on Torah principles, it has not entered into a covenant with Hashem, and I'm being brief here, in fact it is dominated by replacement theology of the sort that to some extent (in no small measure) contributed to the Holocaust. It is the same replacement theology that is at the root of Christian eschatology from which some of Islamic eschatology derives (a couple of days ago I encountered some Jehovah's Witness who told me that they do not operate under Mosaic Law. I asked her who abrogated the Laws of Moses and she told me, "Jesus"…
Yesterday it was Wales 3- Belgium 1
One of the things I like about football and sports generally is that it fosters respect for rules….
Last word: Marvin Gaye: Everybody needs love
Cornelius
On Friday, 1 July 2016 16:17:07 UTC+2, Kenneth Harrow wrote:
Dear Cornelius
The people have spoken. Are we supposed to say amen, no matter what? All the reports I have read on this vote indicate that a very strong component of the vote was based on anti-immigrant sentiment, and with it racism, xenophobia. I didn't invent the idea of a bigoted campaign. The use of nazi era posters with masses "invading" were a sign of the level of bigotry. Why do you want to defend this? I didn't invent the notion that young people want to be part of a cosmopolitan universe: that's how the voted.
I agree that the e.u. should be criticized, but the arguments used against it were wrong. It didn't harm the people in the countryside, according to multiple reports; it wasn't undemocratic, despite the propaganda. Surely you've seen all those reports. I would criticize it for using austerity politics that wrecked Greece and spain. That wasn't the case in the u.k.
It was a vote by people on the right who hate foreigners. Why would you want to accept that as a good thing?
ken
From: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@
googlegroups.com > on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com >
Date: Friday, July 1, 2016 at 3:18 AM
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com >
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Fw: prof olukotun's coloum
Professor Harrow,
It's Brexit. The people have spoken. I cannot understand how you could be so angry! And calling names too! "Idiots!" " racists and bigots!", "dumb to think there will be no repercussions" - in short, " It's the economy stupid!" ?
Joining the EU was not a marriage vow of "for better or worse, in sickness or in health , till death do us part" was it?
Well, here's the Farage -Cameron debate in full - although I would still like to spare you the pain of watching it, even retroactively , if you should think that it's painful (torture) – like water-boarding...
What's even more ridiculous is the idea that the EU is about to strip the EU of English as one of their official languages ! Anyway our English Language will continue as one of the bonds that keeps the Commonwealth in a loving embrace., and they ( the EU) cannot strip the global community of the English Language, thank God!
Londoners are cosmopolitans even if you mourn the alleged death of cosmopolitanism; and yet the Lord Mayor of London rejects that idea of London becoming a city state
The British Isles have always been separated from Europe ( "the continent") by the Channel and not unexpectedly mass immigration breaching Calais ( another border post) had been the most recent flashpoint for months! ( Btw – I think that it's a WW2 hangover and that the deeper psychological roots to the divorce -especially in the older generation is that the Brits have never wanted to belong to a club in which the Germans are the economic powerhouse and lording it over everybody
Now the EU authorities are insisting on "The free movement of people" as part of the package that enables the UK ( still the UK) to co-operate with other nationals in science research…
Where is your sympathy?
Empathy?
With the £ pound Sterling down ( temporarily) everybody will soon be importing from the UK, since it's cheaper to do so. Saville Row suits from the Oxford Street New Year Sales etc after the Xmas bonanza!
Shalom!
Over here, we know how our bread is buttered. For better or for worse, we're still hanging in there.
Cornelius
On Friday, 1 July 2016 06:49:43 UTC+2, Kenneth Harrow wrote:Maybe maybe. Today Britain, formerly 5th largest economy in the world, has slipped behind france. As fallen behind the frogs, thanks to their idiocy. The pound is 133, not 150. That counts a lot when you have to buy things from abroad.
Ftse isn't everything.
But that's not the real thing: the break-up was an attack on cosmopolitanism, in favor of both isolationism and racism. That's what I mourn.
ken
From: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 8:14 PM
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Fw: prof olukotun's coloum
After all the forecasts of economic doom and gloom, today's good news is that FTSE 100 hits 10-month high as Mark Carney signals Bank of England will cut interest rates after Brexit
On Friday, 1 July 2016 01:48:21 UTC+2, ayo_ol...@yahoo.com wrote:Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
From: Ibini Olaide <ibini_...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
ReplyTo: "ibini_...@yahoo.com" <ibini_...@yahoo.com>
Subject: prof olukotun's coloum
BREXIT TAKEAWAYS FOR NIGERIA
AYO OLUKOTUN
"The backtracking by Mr Johnson (former Mayor of London) and his allies has exposed the venality and cynicism of their campaign- unfortunately for Britain, far too late"
New York Times Editorial. June 28, 2016.
Defying the sombre predictions of the bookmakers and the dire warnings of global financial institutions and world leaders, the United Kingdom, in a historic referendum last week voted to opt out of the European Union. As known, the political and economic fall-outs of what is still an unfolding debacle has been momentous. They include the resignation of the Prime Minister, David Cameron, who will however hang on as lameduck until October, financial tremors travelling well beyond the United Kingdom as the Pound dropped to its lowest level in 30 years, and unprecedented national soul searching in the wake of what has been termed a national nervous breakdown. Meanwhile, analysts are examining the statistics of voting capturing divisions between London which voted to stay in the EU and the rest of the country which voted to dump it, between England which overwhelmingly voted to exit and Scotland as well as Northern Ireland which opted for the EU, between the younger population which cast their lot with the Union and the older strata which voted for britain to go it alone.
But overshadowing all these and the ominous possibilities of the break up of the UK, many are raising the troubling question of how a country reputed for its conservatism and prudence got itself into what Roger Cohen, Op-ed writer with the New York Times describes as "a collosal leap in the dark". One of the possible answers pregnant with lessons for younger democracies like Nigeria is indicated by the opening quote, sourced from the editorial opinion of wednesday in the New York Times regarding the role of politicians such as Boris Johnson, London's former mayor and Nigel Farage, leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party.
These politicians, one of whom may well be the next Prime Minister, riding on tabloid sensationalism fed the voting population with exaggerations and outright lies from which they are now hastily backtracking. For example, Johnson in the heat of the campaign, claimed that Brexit will save the money which he put at 350million pounds a week that Britain paid to the EU and spend it on the National Health Insurance Scheme and other social services. It turned out that the actual value of Britain's contribution is 150million pounds a week. Johnson and Farage have since denied making such claims. What is the lesson here? Electorates in Nigeria and elsewhere should be extremely wary of the inflated and exaggerated rhetoric of politicians who can easily eat their words and promises when trouble or disaster strikes. Here in Nigeria, the jury is still out concerning what and what the ruling All Progressive Congress promised to do for the Nigerian electorate. The result of this is a predictable crisis of rising expectations, which even if the economy were up and running could not be fulfilled. Hence, Brexit teaches us to scrutinize and interrogate our politicians and political parties regarding the promises they load us with when hunting for our votes.
The other lesson our political class can draw from Brexit is the ease and civility with which Cameron bowed out of office as a matter of principle, having staked his career on a referendum which a more thoughtful politician could have avoided. Cameron could have invented a thousand and one excuses to hang on to office but as Anthony Akinola observed in The Punch (June 27, 2016), resignations on principle are very much a part of British political culture. If our struggling democracy must overcome its arrested growth, our politicians must elevate political practice to the point where they will not employ do or die battles to gain or to remain in office. Nigerian politics is today a far cry from what it was when Chief Obafemi Awolowo voluntarily resigned from the apex civilian postion of the Federal Minister of Finance and Vice Chairman of the Federal Executive Council under the Military government of General Yakubu Gowon. Nigeria is waiting for the advent of the beautiful ones who will reclaim the moral high ground for our retarded political culture.
The British media considering their descent to degraded discourse, filled with racial slurs and hysteria concerning immigrants cannot escape blame.This is at least one ocassion when the media were absent from their assigned roles as the nation's educator and inspirational storehouse of edifying ideas.The Nigerian media, which by the way harbour an increasing share of thoughtful professionals and opinion moulders should draw a lesson from the scandalously low ebb to which the British media cascaded. They should do this with the awareness that the Nigerian media which are older than the Nigerian state have often acted as arbiters in times of national crises. Of course, they had their ignoble moments as well, such as when they became the unabashed megaphones of rival political gladiators but overall, the media, the quality media especially have often acted as agenda setters and moral compasses for a nation often adrift. That is the way to go at a time when Nigeria faces an existential battle for her very soul.
There is importantly the issue of renegotiating Nigeria through the holding of referendums even if, as in the case of Spain and Italy, they are not legally binding. In the wake of Brexit, several commentators have raised the question whether our democracy should not include the holding of referendums on such matters as the right of our nationalities to determine their future. Such persons pointing to the example of Scotland which, although voted in 2014 to stay in the UK, is currently contemplating the holding of another referendum which will allow it to go it alone and become a part of the European Union as her citizens indicated last week. The argument here is that the consent of citizens in a multinational union cannot be taken for granted but should be constantly renewed and sought. This view is in consonance with that of Professor Wole Soyinka who argued in The Punch on wednesday that Nigeria's sovereignity is not cast in stone and iron but is eminently negotiable. Of course, there are doubts whether, given the current state of our elections we can pull off referendums without the usual hitches, violence and inconclusiveness. That however is not a good enough reason not to try.
As an alternative however, it is suggested that President Muhammadu Buhari listens to the increasingly vehement opinions of our elder statesmen who are suggesting the revalidation of our besieged federalism through revisiting the key recommendations of the 2014 national conference. As Soyinka put it in The Punch on wednesday " The confab report that came under jonathan is even more superior to the one I participated in as a member of PRONACO..The recommendations strike me as workable, practical and infact, as answering some of the anxieties of this nation". Without doubt therefore, one of our takeaways from Brexit is to address the resentments of the constituent parts and nationalities that make up Nigeria, using as basis the major resolutions and recommendations of the 2014 National Conference.
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index. html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index. html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment