Sam,
He unconceded after conceding, maybe, in the light of evidences of serious irregularities, should that not be looked into? Should his alleged atrocities as President mean that he is not entitled to justice, if he is aggrieved? How would we know if he is genuinely aggrieved or not, if we are not disposed to at least, hearing him out? Must the man concede just because conceding is now in vogue in Africa?
CAO.
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment