Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Marx’s Apologists Should Be Red in the Face - The Wall Street Journal.

Again Biko thanks for corroborating the fact ( contrary to what Ken portrays as Marx's frugal newspaper columnist  living)what we have known for some time that Engels largesse  underwrote much of Marx's activities.  The origins of Fabianism which those who associate true socialists with poverty decry as champagne socialism 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

-------- Original message --------

From: 'Biko Agozino' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>

Date: 09/05/2018 16:47 (GMT+00:00)

To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com

Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Marx's Apologists Should Be Red in the Face - The Wall Street Journal.

This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Private possessions do not automatically transform people into counter revolutionaries. Engels was a freaking millionaire. What Marx, Lenin, Mandela, Castro and Fawehinmi had in common was that they were trained bourgeois lawyers but what made the difference is that they developed revolutionary consciousness. 

To expect workers to autimatically support revolutionary praxis is to expect poor white trash and poor nazi scum to oppose white supremacy given their working class backgrounds. That would be mechanical materialism as opposed to historical materialism. 

Marx called on the working class to lead other oppressed classes because they are better organized and have higher class consciousness, not because they are angels immune to the bourgeois hegemony that persuaded working class Italians to hold the keys to the fascist jails that held their leader, Gramsci. 

Fanon reminds us that part of the apathy of the peasants can be explained by the failure of the phantom bourgeoisie to mobilize them and educate them with revolutionary literature.

Biko

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Emeagwali, Gloria (History)

<emeagwali@ccsu.edu> wrote:

OK but he felt that peasants were  potentially counter-revolutionary

given their property holdings in livestock and farm land.

True?

Professor Gloria Emeagwali

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.