I looked up this word today : Nerd . I don't know if it's a good or a bad word..
"In other words, there is no difference between President Goodluck Jonathan and President Muhammadu Buhari in the prosecution of the war against Boko Haram. Well, the only difference is that the Buhari regime has been more effective in muzzling the press and in intimidating private individuals in the northeast into not disclosing the true situation of the Boko Haram insurgency in the region."
I have read no further. No argument It should be more profitable to read the Bible instead.
It's an interesting subject : Farooq vs. Muhammadu Buhari and Boko Haram
True: President Buhari promised to eliminate Boko Haram and that's what he is trying to do. It's not easy. He would have loved to report yesterday , on Nigeria's 58th anniversary of self-government that the deed was done, that Boko Haram was no more. Had been "quenched".Maybe you could do or could have done better. Wipe them out? Just like that? Who knows? Just look at what's happened in Syria! Imagine if Boko Haram started operations in Owerri or paid a courtesy call on Abuja and left their trademark fingerprints there, death and destruction, a few corpses and blown up churches, mosques and markets all over the place
Well, according to some reliable reports the incidents of Jihad and Terrorism the world over has diminished these past couple of years . The conditions in the various theatres of terrorist jihad, vary from place to place and the peculiar landscape that's Boko Haram's Nigeria also has its own special condition. And special agenda.
Ever with an axe to grind, here's some more painful reading: "the Buhari regime has been more effective in muzzling the press and in intimidating private individuals in the northeast into not disclosing the true situation of the Boko Haram insurgency in the region." , opines Professor Farooq Kperogi . Surely another exaggeration . What is he saying? That Boko Haram is stronger now than ever before? As if he has not heard this good news commandment :Thou shalt not exaggerate. To inflate the figure to 10,000 when it's only 10o0 is surely , inexactitude , grammatically or terminologically speaking , or otherwise...
Could the Professor / author of the article kindly supply the evidence to support his raw accusation? Does he want us to believe that during the Goodluck Jonathan presidency of 2010-2015 – culminating in the kidnapping of the Chibok Girls - and the aforementioned Goodluck's late and ineffectual response to that crisis, ( it was a total fiasco) – that the general situation of Boko Haram terrorism was being assessed and reported more accurately and combated more effectively, under Dr. Goodluck Jonathan? In that case why were they not eliminated altogether during his presidency? He certainly did not succeed in eliminating corruption either. Or the lootocracy that's almost as bad as , if not worse than Boko Haram.
As has been said ad nauseam, authors are entitled to eat their own opinions, but we want facts on the table. I'm sure that a fact-check which would show that Boko Haram does not think that life was much better, more comfortable for them under Major-General Buhari, than under Dr. Goodluck Jonathan the gentle zoologist under whose presidency they could and did operate more freely with much less fear and much less restraint, sowing havoc everywhere, without fear of Allah subhana wa ta'ala or fear of reaping the whirlwind of their own genocide, total extermination?
Since I don't know, I asked Dr. Google about the babble : unpaid soldiers during presidency of Goodluck Jonathan
It's a distinct disadvantage sitting on the moon or another part of planet and writing opinion pieces about Nigeria,
so I herewith, humbly retire
On Saturday, 29 September 2018 13:51:10 UTC+2, Farooq A. Kperogi wrote:Saturday, September 29, 2018
The Boko Haram "Technical Defeat" Ruse is Unraveling
By Farooq Kperogi, Ph.D.
Twitter: @farooqkperogi
In the past few weeks, Boko Haram killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers, which is more than it has ever done since the beginning of the insurgency. Yet the federal government has not considered it fitting to acknowledge this tragedy, much less condole with the families of the deceased soldiers.
In fact, on the day the fallen soldiers were given an undignified mass burial, President Buhari met with senators in the Presidential Villa to save his increasingly threatened second-term ambition. To this day, he has never said a word about this horrible tragedy even though he is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
Several reports have also surfaced that the soldiers fighting on the frontlines are owed several months' worth of allowances and that many of them are now practically beggars. TheCable's investigations show that the military men fighting Boko Haram are practically being forced to commit suicide because they are severely ill equipped.
In other words, there is no difference between President Goodluck Jonathan and President Muhammadu Buhari in the prosecution of the war against Boko Haram. Well, the only difference is that the Buhari regime has been more effective in muzzling the press and in intimidating private individuals in the northeast into not disclosing the true situation of the Boko Haram insurgency in the region.
What is now coming to light in spite of government's studious efforts to suppress it supports my column of February 24, 2018 titled "Bursting the Myth of Buhari's Boko Haram 'Success'." Almost everything I said in that column is bubbling to the surface now. The sanguinary in-fighting among Boko Haram members, which I said was the biggest reason for the lull in its attacks, is now well-known. The Daily Trust of September 14 reported that fighters formerly loyal to Mamman Nur, a factional leader of Boko Haram, killed him in August.
I have taken the liberty to reproduce my previous article, which seemed incredulous to many people when it was first published:
A false narrative that several people cherish about the Buhari government is the notion that its singular greatest achievement is its success in containing, downgrading, or defeating Boko Haram. It's like a consolation prize to compensate for the government's abject failure in every index of governance. I recognize that taking away the consolation prize of Buhari's Boko Haram success narrative would cause psychic and cognitive dislocation in many people who will ignore the substance of my argument and launch petulantly juvenile ad hominem attacks on me, but I'm already used to that.
But the question I always ask people who talk of the Buhari administration's "success" in "downgrading" or "technically defeating" Boko Haram (whatever in the world that means) is: what exactly has Buhari done that hasn't been done by his predecessor to bring about his so-called success? The only intelligent answer I've received is that he ordered the relocation of the command center for Nigeria's military operation against Boko Haram to Maiduguri. Well, that's commendable, but it conceals the unchanged, sordid underbelly of military authorities.
For instance, the military is still severely underfunded and ill-equipped. Soldiers on the front lines are still owed backlogs of allowances; several of them still starve and survive on the goodwill of do-gooders. Two videos of the heartrending conditions of our military men fighting Haram went viral sometime ago, and military authorities were both embarrassed and caught flatfooted. I periodically speak with my relatives and friends in the military fighting Boko Haram, and they say little or nothing has changed, except that propaganda and media management have become more effective. The fat cats in the military still exploit and feed fat on the misery of the foot soldiers.
Even on the symbolic plane, which is the easiest to navigate, Buhari hasn't been better than his predecessor. He did not visit our foot soldiers in Borno to boost their morale nor did he visit IDPs whose misery has become one of the most horrendous humanitarian disasters in the world. He only visited Borno on October 1, 2017—more than 2 years after being in power—to celebrate Independence Day with the military after so much pressure was brought to bear on him by critics. There are three major reasons why the intensity of the Boko Haram scourge has subsided, none of which has anything to do with Buhari's policies on Boko Haram.
One, our foot soldiers, like always, have never wavered in their bravery and persistence in spite of their prevailing untoward conditions. This isn't because of the president; it is in spite of the president.Two, Boko Haram has been weakened by an enervatingly bitter and sanguinary internal schism. Since at least September 2016, the Abubakar Shekau and Abu Musab al-Barnawi factions of Boko Haram have killed each other more than the military has killed them.
Three, and most important, the conspiracy theories and tacit, if unwitting, support that emboldened Boko Haram in the north because a southern Christian was president have all but disappeared, making it easy for the military to get more cooperation from the local population. Remember Buhari said, in June 2013 in a Liberty Radio interview in Kaduna, that the military's onslaught against Boko Haram amounted to "injustice" against the "north." Babachir David Lawal, then a CPC politician, infamously said Boko Haram was a PDP plot to "depopulate" the northeast because the region doesn't vote PDP. As my friend from the northeast noted on my Facebook page, "Borno elder Shettima Ali Monguno used to call BH 'our children' and he only stopped after he was kidnapped for ransom by the group."
The Northern Elders Forum in 2013 said Boko Haram members should be given amnesty, not killed. Even then PDP chairman Bamanga Tukur said in 2011 that "Boko Haram is fighting for justice. Boko Haram is another name for justice." Several Borno elders and everyday citizens protected Boko Haram members and frustrated the military. In fact, in June 2012, Borno elders told the government of the day to withdraw soldiers fighting Boko Haram terrorists from the state. (But when the military dropped a bomb and killed scores of IDPs, these Borno elders didn't even as much as say a word of condemnation.)
I published letters in 2014 from Borno readers of my column that said the people would rather live with Boko Haram than cooperate with the military because they believed the military was part of a grand plot to annihilate them. The military was so frustrated that it almost wiped out the entire village of Baga in April 2013 when residents provided cover for Boko Haram insurgents who escaped into the area. I wrote to condemn the military at the time.
All this changed because the president is no longer a Christian from the south. Buhari isn't just a northern Muslim; his mother is half Kanuri, and that's why most (certainly not all) people from the region intentionally exaggerate the extent of safety and security in the region even when the facts give the lie to their claims. It's all ethnic solidarity. A Maiduguri person with a PhD actually once confided in me that he would never stop supporting Buhari and propagandizing on his behalf because of the Kanuri heritage he shares with him. Imagine what uneducated and barely educated people from the region think.
Because someone with some Kanuri blood in him is president, Boko Haram is no longer a plot to depopulate the northeast. No northern elder is pleading amnesty on the group's behalf. The group is no longer fighting "for justice." Killing them is no longer "injustice" to the "north." And everything is now hunky-dory. Ethno-regional bigotry will be the death of Nigeria.Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D.Associate ProfessorJournalism & Emerging Media
School of Communication & MediaSocial Science BuildingRoom 5092 MD 2207402 Bartow Avenue
Kennesaw State University
Kennesaw, Georgia, USA 30144
Cell: (+1) 404-573-9697
Personal website: www.farooqkperogi.comTwitter: @farooqkperogAuthor of Glocal English: The Changing Face and Forms of Nigerian English in a Global World
"The nice thing about pessimism is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised." G. F. Will
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment