Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - REVISITING THE SINGLE-TERM PROPOSAL-The Punch

Here is my preliminary take on Dr. Akinola's piece. I worry that presidential and/or governorship term limit debates in the Nigerian polity have been lop-sidedly driven, unfortunately, by what Dr. Akinlola identified as "the context of the history and ethnological realities of our nation." From my own standpoint, presidential or governorship term limits ought be guided mainly by the social development status and needs/urgencies of the country, and not the political office ambitions of persons from one ethnic/geopolitical zone or the other. A point that these overly ambitious politicians must keep in mind is that at any given time, only one person can emerge as President or Governor out of a polity of millions of people. Even if, hypothetically-speaking, the presidency was "zoned" to only one geopolitical component of the country, it is impossible for every qualified citizen within that zone to become president within a life time or within a generation. So, in my view, the duration of the office of President should be determined mainly by the socioeconomic development imperatives/urgencies of the nation.

Given its resources challenges and severe gaps and deficits in globally-contextually standards of living, a typical developing country faces urgencies on the trajectory of social development, and thus, should not be saddled with a requirement to conduct expensive national/state elections ever so often. In addition, privatization of the nation's natural resources (with appropriate taxes to affected local, state and national tiers of governance), as well as privatization of the means of production and distribution, would help re-direct the focus of political leadership towards the management, rather than distribution, of resources.  It would also help re-direct the focus of elected national and state officials towards ensuring a civil, orderly and just society where the super-structures and engines of society work at all levels. Nigeria's political leadership role as a distributor of socioeconomic resources, rather than a manager of resources and human affairs, has driven the craving by the various component groups of Nigeria for ethnic/regional zoning of the presidency.

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:42 AM Anthony Akinola <anthony.a.akinola@gmail.com> wrote:
OPINION

Revisiting Jonathan's single term proposal

 October 31, 2018
Ex-President Goodluck Jonathan

Anthony Akinola

The destination of the Presidency will continue to be an issue in Nigerian politics, prompting here another look at the single-term proposal. Erstwhile President Goodluck Jonathan's proposal of a single, six-year tenure for president and governor is not seminal. But significant nevertheless.  The idea of a single-term enjoys informed opinion and was in fact forcefully presented to the Political Bureau established by the military government of Ibrahim Babangida in 1986.  Gen Olusegun Obasanjo, one honest critic of the politics of the Second Republic (1979-1983), specifically suggested a single-term of six years to the Bureau.

ADVERTISING

The Political Bureau identified  with the informed views of many Nigerians regarding the desirability of a single-term presidency in the context of the history and ethnological realities of our nation but the military leadership rejected their recommendations of a single-term of five years in favour of the existing two-terms of four years each.  It is not as if the recommendation of the Political Bureau would have mattered; the transition engineered by the then military regime was dishonest and led to nothing!

Be that as it may, the idea of a single-term executive – once or twice approved by the legislative arm of government – continues to be trumpeted by individuals and groups.  A group of well-informed and well-meaning Nigerians, The Patriots, amplified the idea as did also members of the Nigerian Bar Association in the early years of the current Republic.  The proposal by Jonathan calls for thorough debate, and its relevance and desirability are being echoed in the run-up to the 2019 elections.

Constitutional limit to the length of time a political leader spends in office is important.  We in Africa know what the pernicious consequences unlimited tenure could be, as elected leaders are transformed into monarchs of some sort.  Presidential tenure has not been the most contentious issue in the USA whose constitutional arrangements inform ours.  Until Franklin Delano Roosevelt, elected president in 1932, it was always assumed that the American president was conventionally limited to two terms in office. However, Roosevelt was the only American President to have spent more than two terms in office; he died in 1945 during his fourth term.  His successor, Harry S. Truman, established the Hoover Commission in 1947 to look into the prospect of presidential term limits.  The outcome was the 22nd Amendment of 1951 which limited the American President to two terms, or a maximum of 10 years where a President had started off by completing the tenure of another. The idea of a one-term presidency was however seriously considered in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal.

The two-term presidency is rationalised in political or academic argument.  It is argued that a second term ensures that a hardworking President has enough time to complete their programmes.  It also serves the purpose of rewarding hard work, as the less successful President is replaced after a term in office.  These arguments resonate in Nigeria, even when native wisdom should inform us that the nature of one's political environment is the most important consideration in all of this.  The political arrangement of Switzerland, the second oldest written constitution after the USA, comes to mind here.

The fact that one has been limited to a single term in office would not mean that one would embrace non-performance as a policy. It does not mean the president or governor would bring their bed to office and snore away  Every individual wants to be remembered for something.  In any case, there is always a mechanism — impeachment, for instance, by which a pathetic President can be removed from office.  There is also the political party machinery which will not go to sleep while its candidate messes up its prospects in a future election. The single-term presidency is therefore not without its checks and balances!

This writer has himself been one advocate of a single-term executive; here are the extracts from the arguments he once advanced in support of this idea "… firstly, when the Executive is not in a position to seek re-election, there will be little or no inducement to use the instrument of state to facilitate electoral fraud.  This is to say that the President would be wary of any scandal that could tarnish the reputation of his administration … secondly, the President would be induced to devote more of his attention to office, rather than dissipate energy over the question of re-election.  It is common knowledge that a reasonable part of the first term is devoted to seeking re-election …

Thirdly, the President would be more of a father figure advancing the national interest to secure a place for himself in history.  He may have been elected on the platform of a particular party, he can nevertheless afford to be non-partisan in certain circumstances … finally, a one-term provision could not but be reasonable in the Nigerian society where the ethno-regional origin of the national leader would for a very long time be a major issue.  It would be hypocritical not to acknowledge this (see Anthony Akinola, Rotational Presidency (1996), pp 56-57)".

The proposal that has now been identified with Jonathan  has recently been echoed and embellished by Senator Ike Ekweremadu. In supporting a position this writer, among many others, has advocated for many decades, he is of  the view that the six-year proposal should be blended with the principle of  leadership rotation along defined constituencies. The wisdom in this proposal could unfold in the 2019 elections as the voting decision in some blocs may be informed mainly by what is anticipated in 2023. Political leaders in the South-East have been urging their people to support the Peoples Democratic Party in 2019, not least because one of their own, Peter Obi, is Vice-Presidential candidate of that major party and could deliver the presidency to their bloc in 2023. In a similar vein, a serving minister in the current administration, Babatunde Fashola, recently admonished potential voters in the South-West to support the second term bid of Muhammadu Buhari in order for the region to also produce the president in 2023 under the platform of the APC. With this type of sentiment expressed in major regions of the federation, it can hardly be doubted that the destination of the presidency will continue to be a disturbing issue in complex Nigeria for a very long time to come.

Dr Anthony Akinola, Oxford, United Kingdom

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Sincerely,

Victor O. Okafor, Ph.D.
Professor and Head
Department of Africology and African American Studies
Eastern Michigan University
Tel: 734.487.9594


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha