SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - The Boko Haram “Technical Defeat” Ruse is Unraveling

The three arms of government in the Federal Republic of Nigeria are - the Executive (Presidency), Legislative (National Assembly) and the Judiciary. Although the President is in total control of the armed forces and security agents he/she cannot enforce his will on the society outside the law no matter how good he/she thinks about the benefits of his will to the country. The president belongs to a political party just as each law maker in the National Assembly belongs to a political party. Where the majority of the National Assembly members belongs to the same political party as the President, collaboration between the Executive and the Legislature should be smooth and making laws for the purpose of implementing the political manifesto of the party on which platform they were elected would not be a problem. The 3rd arm of the government, the Judiciary is independent and their task is just to interpret and execute the law justly and expeditiously. For the past three years, Buhari's hands have been tied back by the Nigerian Legislative and Judicial powers without the concerned glance of the Nigerian intellectuals who instead ignorantly blame Buhari for not knocking down Boko Haram and treasury looters completely. Thus, Farooq Kperogi could write, "In the past few weeks, Boko Haram killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers, which is more than it has ever done since the beginning of the insurgency. Yet the federal government has not considered it fitting to acknowledge this tragedy, much less condole with the families of the deceased soldiers." Here, Farooq Kperogi did not bother to tell us the source of his information that Boko Haram killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers in the past few weeks. Yet, Farooq Kperogi is not in Nigeria and he was not an eyewitness of the combats where he made Boko Haram to have killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers. How many Nigerian soldiers were actually killed in the past few weeks and which previous figures of Nigerian soldiers casualties is he comparing the last few weeks with? When and where were the soldiers killed? Farooq Kperogi probably thinks that promulgation of salacious rumour is part of his job as a professor of English language when he conjured up that Boko had killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers in the past few weeks, but no one is obliged to believe his sweet and distasteful propaganda. 

As if he were a master of ventriloquism, Farooq wrote, "I periodically speak with relatives and friends in the military fighting Boko Haram, and they say little or nothing has changed except that propaganda and media management have become more effective. The fat cats in the military still exploit and feed fat on the misery of the foot soldiers." Farooq's relatives and friends in the military who are supposed to be fighting Boko Haram must be the fat cats in the military still exploiting and feeding fat on the misery of the foot soldiers. Obviously, only fat cat military relatives and friends of Farooq Kperogi could have time and afford to speak to him while foot soldiers are dying in the battle field. The war is still lingering on because Farooq's fat cat military relatives and friends are profitting from the war financially, although it is not as eye-popping as under Jonathan. Should the security agents arrest and arraign those fat cat military relatives and friends of the learned professor, the first thing he would do is to shout that Buhari is a dictator. The next step is to get a successful lawyer who knows the judges but not the law to arrange bails and sine die adjournments of the unpatriotic fat cat military friends and relatives. 

The military fat cats, relatives and friends of Farooq have gossiped to him that nothing has changed in the war against Boko Haram under Buhari in comparison with Jonathan. That is completely untrue. The entire world knew that when Buhari took over from Jonathan, 29 May 2015, a fifty-thousand square kilometres land area in the Northeast of Nigeria was occupied and declared a Caliphate by Boko Haram. In spite of internal saboteurs represented by military fat cats who are relatives and friends of Farooq Kperogi, Boko Haram is no longer in control of any land area in Nigeria. All the military top dogs and politicians under President Goodluck Jonathan who shared among themselves billions of dollar meant to procure arms for our foot soldiers to fight Boko Haram have been arrested, arraigned in courts and granted bail with many of them surrendering money and acquired properties to the federal government. So, on the part of President Muhammadu Buhari, something has really changed in the military prosecution of the war against Boko Haram which now resorts to hit and run banditry. That the corrupt Judiciary in Nigeria has failed to dispense justice according to the law against those who stole money appropriated to buy arms to fight insurgencies and by their action allowed Boko Haram to grow wings cannot be blamed on Buhari. It is obvious that the military fat cats who are friends and relatives of Farooq Kperogi still exploit and feed fact on the misery of the foot soldiers fighting Boko Haram because their predecessors in office who did the same thing have been granted freedom from penalty by the independent third arm of the government, the corrupt Nigerian Judiciary. And there, Buhari is helpless.

S. Kadiri   

---

Från: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> för Farooq A. Kperogi <farooqkperogi@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 29 september 2018 10:45
Till: USAAfrica Dialogue
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - The Boko Haram "Technical Defeat" Ruse is Unraveling

 

Saturday, September 29, 2018

The Boko Haram "Technical Defeat" Ruse is Unraveling

By Farooq Kperogi, Ph.D.

Twitter: @farooqkperogi

In the past few weeks, Boko Haram killed hundreds of Nigerian soldiers, which is more than it has ever done since the beginning of the insurgency. Yet the federal government has not considered it fitting to acknowledge this tragedy, much less condole with the families of the deceased soldiers.

In fact, on the day the fallen soldiers were given an undignified mass burial, President Buhari met with senators in the Presidential Villa to save his increasingly threatened second-term ambition.  To this day, he has never said a word about this horrible tragedy even though he is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

Several reports have also surfaced that the soldiers fighting on the frontlines are owed several months' worth of allowances and that many of them are now practically beggars. TheCable's investigations show that the military men fighting Boko Haram are practically being forced to commit suicide because they are severely ill equipped.

In other words, there is no difference between President Goodluck Jonathan and President Muhammadu Buhari in the prosecution of the war against Boko Haram. Well, the only difference is that the Buhari regime has been more effective in muzzling the press and in intimidating private individuals in the northeast into not disclosing the true situation of the Boko Haram insurgency in the region.

What is now coming to light in spite of government's studious efforts to suppress it supports my column of February 24, 2018 titled "Bursting the Myth of Buhari's Boko Haram 'Success'." Almost everything I said in that column is bubbling to the surface now. The sanguinary in-fighting among Boko Haram members, which I said was the biggest reason for the lull in its attacks, is now well-known. The Daily Trust of September 14 reported that fighters formerly loyal to Mamman Nur, a factional leader of Boko Haram, killed him in August.

I have taken the liberty to reproduce my previous article, which seemed incredulous to many people when it was first published:

A false narrative that several people cherish about the Buhari government is the notion that its singular greatest achievement is its success in containing, downgrading, or defeating Boko Haram. It's like a consolation prize to compensate for the government's abject failure in every index of governance. I recognize that taking away the consolation prize of Buhari's Boko Haram success narrative would cause psychic and cognitive dislocation in many people who will ignore the substance of my argument and launch petulantly juvenile ad hominem attacks on me, but I'm already used to that.

But the question I always ask people who talk of the Buhari administration's "success" in "downgrading" or "technically defeating" Boko Haram (whatever in the world that means) is: what exactly has Buhari done that hasn't been done by his predecessor to bring about his so-called success? The only intelligent answer I've received is that he ordered the relocation of the command center for Nigeria's military operation against Boko Haram to Maiduguri. Well, that's commendable, but it conceals the unchanged, sordid underbelly of military authorities.

For instance, the military is still severely underfunded and ill-equipped. Soldiers on the front lines are still owed backlogs of allowances; several of them still starve and survive on the goodwill of do-gooders. Two videos of the heartrending conditions of our military men fighting Haram went viral sometime ago, and military authorities were both embarrassed and caught flatfooted. I periodically speak with my relatives and friends in the military fighting Boko Haram, and they say little or nothing has changed, except that propaganda and media management have become more effective. The fat cats in the military still exploit and feed fat on the misery of the foot soldiers.

Even on the symbolic plane, which is the easiest to navigate, Buhari hasn't been better than his predecessor. He did not visit our foot soldiers in Borno to boost their morale nor did he visit IDPs whose misery has become one of the most horrendous humanitarian disasters in the world. He only visited Borno on October 1, 2017—more than 2 years after being in power—to celebrate Independence Day with the military after so much pressure was brought to bear on him by critics. There are three major reasons why the intensity of the Boko Haram scourge has subsided, none of which has anything to do with Buhari's policies on Boko Haram.

One, our foot soldiers, like always, have never wavered in their bravery and persistence in spite of their prevailing untoward conditions. This isn't because of the president; it is in spite of the president.

Two, Boko Haram has been weakened by an enervatingly bitter and sanguinary internal schism. Since at least September 2016, the Abubakar Shekau and Abu Musab al-Barnawi factions of Boko Haram have killed each other more than the military has killed them.

Three, and most important, the conspiracy theories and tacit, if unwitting, support that emboldened Boko Haram in the north because a southern Christian was president have all but disappeared, making it easy for the military to get more cooperation from the local population. Remember Buhari said, in June 2013 in a Liberty Radio interview in Kaduna, that the military's onslaught against Boko Haram amounted to "injustice" against the "north." Babachir David Lawal, then a CPC politician, infamously said Boko Haram was a PDP plot to "depopulate" the northeast because the region doesn't vote PDP. As my friend from the northeast noted on my Facebook page, "Borno elder Shettima Ali Monguno used to call BH 'our children' and he only stopped after he was kidnapped for ransom by the group."

The Northern Elders Forum in 2013 said Boko Haram members should be given amnesty, not killed. Even then PDP chairman Bamanga Tukur said in 2011 that "Boko Haram is fighting for justice. Boko Haram is another name for justice." Several Borno elders and everyday citizens protected Boko Haram members and frustrated the military. In fact, in June 2012, Borno elders told the government of the day to withdraw soldiers fighting Boko Haram terrorists from the state. (But when the military dropped a bomb and killed scores of IDPs, these Borno elders didn't even as much as say a word of condemnation.)

I published letters in 2014 from Borno readers of my column that said the people would rather live with Boko Haram than cooperate with the military because they believed the military was part of a grand plot to annihilate them. The military was so frustrated that it almost wiped out the entire village of Baga in April 2013 when residents provided cover for Boko Haram insurgents who escaped into the area. I wrote to condemn the military at the time.

All this changed because the president is no longer a Christian from the south. Buhari isn't just a northern Muslim; his mother is half Kanuri, and that's why most (certainly not all) people from the region intentionally exaggerate the extent of safety and security in the region even when the facts give the lie to their claims. It's all ethnic solidarity. A Maiduguri person with a PhD actually once confided in me that he would never stop supporting Buhari and propagandizing on his behalf because of the Kanuri heritage he shares with him. Imagine what uneducated and barely educated people from the region think.

Because someone with some Kanuri blood in him is president, Boko Haram is no longer a plot to depopulate the northeast. No northern elder is pleading amnesty on the group's behalf. The group is no longer fighting "for justice." Killing them is no longer "injustice" to the "north." And everything is now hunky-dory. Ethno-regional bigotry will be the death of Nigeria.

Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D.

Associate Professor

Journalism & Emerging Media
School of Communication & Media

Social Science Building 

Room 5092 MD 2207

402 Bartow Avenue
Kennesaw State University

Kennesaw, Georgia, USA 30144
Cell: (+1) 404-573-9697
Personal website: www.farooqkperogi.com

Twitter: @farooqkperog

Author of Glocal English: The Changing Face and Forms of Nigerian English in a Global World

"The nice thing about pessimism is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised." G. F. Will

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.