i completely agree that if you want to real, valid, effective, meaningful history of events, reporters are mostly not where to go. i discovered this when reading coverage on the rwandan genocide, esp the first books, which brought tons of information, but ascribed the situation to a fixed historical account that was composed for the naive. a fixed, teleological account. anyway, i recented went back to Re-imagining Rwanda by Pottier, and appreciated how a solid historical account brings enormously more than these newspaper accounts that purport to give in 5 lines 200 years of history. soundbites vs depth.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
517 803-8839
harrow@msu.edu
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Yahaya Danjuma <yahaya.danjuma@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 4:45 AM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - 1619 project
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 4:45 AM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - 1619 project
Not me. This was far from the only problem with it. The project seems to be an example of why historians wince when reporters try to write history, even if they have sometimes done so well.
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/89A57FCB-8873-4FAD-92E5-CC3F0D92DCC8%40gmail.com.
On May 30, 2021, at 10:10, Harrow, Kenneth <harrow@msu.edu> wrote:
could one of you historians explain to me why the 1619 project wants to make the claim that the first slaves brought to the u.s. was in 1619 when the spanish had done so earlier?
John Edward Philips
http://www.amazon.com/Slave-Elites-Middle-East-Africa/dp/0710306601
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/89A57FCB-8873-4FAD-92E5-CC3F0D92DCC8%40gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment