kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
517 803-8839
harrow@msu.edu
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 5:55 PM
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: The Return of the Taliban in Afghanistan Amidst the Inescapability of Western Civilization
Cornelius,
Al Jazeera, a Middle Eastern network, which cannot be accused of Europhilia, is also running an investigative film titled Afghanistan: No Justice for Women of the consistent series of assassinations of women in that country simply for going to work, bombings of schoolgirls for being in school, a no-work-for-women and no-school-for- women policy that is described as having been a staple of Taliban policy, leading to conclusions that those assasinations were carried out by people of such crazy persuasions, inflaming fears of such inhumanities continuing under the Taliban.
Al Jazeera is also running a report stating that the UN reports that the Taliban is going from house to house flushing out in revenge attacks those who worked with the US and NATO.
Al Jazeera is also running a report from Amnesty International about a recent massacre carried out by the Taliban.
As for Muhammed, the little I know about him does not impress me deeply, particularly when compared with Jesus and the Buddha, who were pacifists who had no desire to control anyone while Muhammed was significantly a person who modeled the current prominence of Muslims trying to force others to live according to ridiculous and inhuman Islamic laws.
I am also unimpressed by his theft of the childhood of the little girl he insisted on marrying while there were mature women to choose from, a stance possibly feeding the destructive culture of marrying female children in Northern Nigeria.
The Koran certainly contains much that is sublime and Islam is magnificent in many ways, but so is Judaism with its origination of the theory of divinely inspired genocide. You are not going to find Jews enacting such horrors today, but the negativities of the founder continue to re-emerge in Islam.
I'm interested in serious engagement with these issues. I'm not interested in sweeping claims of Islamophobia, the uncritical liberal approach when one at times points out the limitations of Islam.
If you disagree with my views, please present a personal point of view, justified by logic and evidence. Please don't direct me to any links to read. It's also good if you are able to sustain your own views and not rely on Ken for help.
Thanks
toyin
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 21:01, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:
For the past four days, al Jazeera's Inside Story has been about the latest developments in Afghanistan
99.999% of the proud people of Afghanistan identify as Muslims and all of them are probably familiar with Surah Al-Ma'idah Ayat 51 which reads
"O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. "
From that point of view, many of those who worked with the West as translators, interpreters etc could be regarded as traitors, albeit , according to the Taliban , these people will be granted "amnesty"...
It has just been announced that Uganda is the first African country that will be receiving refugees from Afghanistan, 2, 000 of them...
How should confirmed Europhiles and Islamophobes respond to these views of
George Bernard Shaw on Islam and Prophet Muhammad :
2. "I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him – the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity."
3. "I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today."
Sir George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.
--On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 10:51:44 UTC+2 Cornelius Hamelberg wrote:
In response to that Pound poem that I posted, my most preceptive Igbo Bro sent me this message, a fitting ( laudable) rejoinder for one so immersed in genocide studies :
What was his reward for flattering evil? : Coming to terms with Ezra Pound's politics
(That was some real food for thought, about the journey from gladness to madness )
I could only reply that I/we /some of us are well aware of Ezra Pound's reputation in that regard and the whole purpose of some provocative postings, in this case Pound's satirical venture, another can of worms, was to provoke some reaction from General Adepoju, the connoisseur and mighty devourer of modern poetry in general and Pound's Cantos in particular with a special interest in insurrectionist lines like these.
In another thread, my most respected Bro Biko recommending that "They (the Taliban) should now join states in the US by legalizing marijuana because it is known to be medicinal and therefore should not be forbidden as Haram. Legalization of marijuana will bring in wealth and employment opportunities for many families as they recover from the war and the government can tax their profits."
I have no choice but to take him to task for saying this. In the name of the alchemy whereby base copper is transmuted to gold – to goodness and humility in the name of peace, love and harmony, I can only remind my Dear Bro that Tony Blair ( or B-liar if you will ) once said that the UK military was in Afghanistan in order to stave off the flooding of the streets of London ( and Glasgow?) with cheap heroin, since long ago, giving rise to songs like this: Needle of Death
I first met Harvey Tristan Cropper in the autumn of 1976, shortly after returning to Stockholm from a few months in Upper State New York and that very first time I visited him at his studio and up to now, I'll never forget how serious he looked when he told me, "Cornelius, I know that you're a scholar and a curious muthafucker and that's why I'm telling you this and you had better listen good: There's a thing called he-or-in and it's so good – you should never go near it!" Up till today, I have never seen this thing ( apart from once, when I saw it in the movie "French Connection" ) and I have never been near it. And I will forever be thanking dear Harvey...
In 1979 when I walked through Kungsträdgården with Brer Soyinka, on the way to his hotel (The Grand Hotel) maybe because of the enormous Afro he was sporting then and his casual wear ( safari) we were approached by one of the layabouts who plied the area. "What does he want?" - Some expensive shit. 1985 someone tried to sell me some " brown" What's that? It's good, I was told, about 100 times stronger than hash. Now , my deputy rabbi had told me " it's a commandment to be happy", but who in his right mind would want something like that? Better to be like Mujahid Dokubo here
Bottom line: We should listen to Professor Gloria Emeagwali – just as the Almighty told Abraham: " Listen to Sarah!"
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 23:53, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm just an observer.
As the book people dem say, "all's well that ends well" - in this thread the denouement to what started off as denunciation, condemnation, critical disagreeableness verging on Islamophobia and disdain for the underachievers among the non-Westerners wound up in amicable reconciliation with Adepoju moving full cosmic circle and now in full cosmic embrace and essential agreement with Don Harrow who among other achievements can count his induction of Adepoju into reading about Sufism! Alhamdulillah!
If we should substitute comic for cosmic, we get another picture.
I thank Almighty God, the Omniscient & Omnipotent that this discussion is over, at least temporarily the old man has died - the death of those nafs, until Adepoju's resurrection and next resurgence when he reverts to conflating his arch-enemies with peaceable Islam - his arch-enemies, namely paranoid apparitions and apprehensions of "Northern Hegemony" the malevolent & violent intentions of Boko Haram, the supportive role of Miyetti Allah with regard to Fulani Herdsmen and what in a less sober state of mind Adepoju refers to as Brother Buhari's "terrorist Government"
Of course, in the final analysis we could endorse Adepoju's universal mission, and alchemy the means whereby the nafs (in human nature) are crucified, transmuted to gold – to goodness and humility in the name of peace and love!
After all our agreements and disagreements there is still one outstanding matter in today's world of Islam the matter of blasphemy and how it's viewed by Sharia Law. It is an area in which we do not expect any trouble in Afghanistan since, as one of the Taliban spokespersons informed us on BBC today, "99.999%" of the people of Afghanistan are Muslims (all kinds) none of whom is going to blaspheme that Muhammad salallahu alaihi wa salaam is not a prophet, or that Allah is not God or - like that egomaniac Christopher Hitchens who wrote a book that " God Is Not Great"
In his " An Afterword" to the 1994 edition of " a rabbi talks with Jesus" the rabbi in question, Jacob Neusner had this to say on page 149 of that book:
" I cannot imagine a Jew who grew up in a Muslim country writing such a book about Muhammad.( or surviving its publication for very long"
I'd like to add that
The gate of Ijtihad has not been closed in Shia Jurisprudence ( as eloquently discussed in Ashk Dahlén's seminal Islamic Law, Epistemology and Modernity: Legal Philosophy in Contemporary Iran – and also some of the perambulations to be found in the blog and writings of one Abdolkarim Soroush
The perception among some of the notable Shia Scholars that Shiism incorporates "sufism"
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 21:21, Oluwatoyin Adepoju <ovde...@gmail.com> wrote:
striking summation ken and a moving comment on the black panthers
--On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 20:06, Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu> wrote:
--i think the muslim brotherhoods have been generally, broadly defined by the western press as islamist, throwing together moderate and more extremist groups. the Ennahda tunisian "muslim" or islamist party has also been described as democratic. it functions in a multiparty, plural party democracy. in egypt the muslim brotherhood, where Sissi finally got elected after the arab spring began, was also like that. i would certainly distance those parties from al qaeda or boko haram or the alqaeda parties of the maghreb or function in the sahel, which are very militant.i know there were several such parties at play when timbuktu was taken, back some 20 years ago; and that the various parties were very different.everyone nowadays is speculating on what colors the taliban will fly today. i haven't a clue. but isis in syria was monstrous. between them and ennadha is a day and night difference.the most interesting for us might be the muslim brotherhood in egypt, which nassar and sadat succeeded him, they tried to parlay their turn to military dictatorship on the suppression of the brotherhood, which they unjustly painted as violent fanatics.
that's all. we need to be very cautious in this arena about throwing all these groups into the same hat, when in fact they might be not only different from each other, but much closer to humanist values in many important ways.
an equivalent in this country was when the black panthers were demonized, while they were, like the brotherhood, concerned with actually getting food into poor neighborhoods.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Oluwatoyin Adepoju <ovde...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 2:07 PM
To: usaafricadialogue <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: The Return of the Taliban in Afghanistan Amidst the Inescapability of Western Civilizationthanks for those clarifications, Ken. ill be more alert to such contextualizations.
could you clarify this-what does Islamist mean in this context-''there are islamist parties that are not violent or extreme''
im not describing the Islamic extremists as representing Islam.
my view is closer to this from you-
to be sure, liberal muslim voices have been stifled by circumstances: the threats from the extremists, ... the muslim communities in europe, where the small minority of extremists has given a bad name to all and fed into the rightwing islamophobes.
--On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 16:14, Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu> wrote:
--toyin, your questions are good.my understanding is that the fundamentalist, strict, militant version of islam you describe is not only not the only version, but not the dominant, not the version most muslims in most muslim countries support. i'd bet my hat on that.
the tradition of commentary and hadith represents one side of the religious branches, where study and thought continue, even if, as in christianity and judaism, orthodox branches overrely on frozen texts.. but more relevant is the modernist tendency everywhere in the muslim world since the erly 20th century, w figures like mohammed ali in egypt or ataturk. the modernizing dominant tendency was in iraq, under the dictator sadam. it is certainly dominant throughout north africa, and lebanon. well, practically everywhere in the muslim world. i don't know why you'd want to focus on the extremists, who are, i agree, horrible, as if they themselves represent the whole of islam.
so, i'll give a jewish equivalent. we have orthodox, or what are called ultraorthodox. they hold beliefs and practice social ways like the islamists. no one would say they represent or encompass judaism, or all the jews, or the dominant tendency that defines the religion. same with boko haram or the others. i see them oppressing other muslims in their neck of the world; kidnapping other muslim children, holding them for ransom.
in some places islam and christian sections are at war, like the c.a.r. but the real work of islamists is not jihad but power and money.there are islamist parties that are not violent or extreme: the ruling party in tunisia, and the brotherhood in egypt.
you want to argue that violent extremism represents all muslims. to be sure, liberal muslim voices have been stifled by circumstances: the threats from the extremists, and the islamophobia on the other that would make intra-muslim critique appear to be traitrous. but the violent extremists are a minority, even a small minority. examples could be drawn from the muslim communities in europe, where the small minority of extremists has given a bad name to all and fed into the rightwing islamophobes.bestken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Oluwatoyin Adepoju <ovde...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:00 AM
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: The Return of the Taliban in Afghanistan Amidst the Inescapability of Western CivilizationKen,--
What aspects of my writing give credence to your view that I see all Muslims as sharing those inhuman ideologies?
You quoted me as referencing "groups fighting globally to advance their Islamic visions...from ...Boko Haram to Al Shabbab to Al Qaeda to the Taliban to ISIS.."
How does that quote imply or state I'm referring to all Muslims?
I stated the value of the Islamic extremists persuading other Muslims of the value of their extremist vision.
Does that not suggest a recognition that violent extremism is not shared by all Muslims?
In the light of these questions about my writing, what do you think justifies your describing my views as an attack on Islam?
Perhaps you were referencing my description of the Islamic world generally as not having moved beyond particular limitations.
The more liberal Muslims certainly exist but what is the dominant force in Islam generally?
That does not suggest that all Muslims are violent extremists. The violent extremists represent a heightening of tendecies already present in Islamic history and thought, tendencies some Muslims choose not to identify with, but which some insist on identifying with.
Muhammed was a warrior and empire builder, a person described as forcing people to accept Islam or face the consequences.
Today's Islamic groups are following the same vision while some other Muslims choose not to live that way.
What is the level of critical interrogation the Koran and Islamic law have sustained at the hands of Muslims?
How free has Koranic commentary been?
Why is Sharia law still represented by such short sighted inhumanities as cutting off people's hands for theft or stoning them to death for adultery?
Those are clearly the dictates of a less sophistcated age, in which understanding of human nature was less complex.
To what degree has Sharia law undergone reform?
My argument is that Islam as a whole seems stuck in relatively uncritical approaches to it's spirituality, an orientation sustained by the muderous tendencies of those Muslims, terrorists and average citizens, who make themselves killer enforcers of Islamic purity as well as the more extreme ones who organise themselves to force others through sustained fear of death through their terror to submit to their rigid forms of Islam.
In the midst of this crisis, how loud are the voices of Muslims condemning the inhumanities of their extremist brethren or in calling for reform within their religion?
I'm making statements as well as asking questions.
Thanks
Toyin
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 10:00 Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu> wrote:
--a last point on toyin adepoju's attack on islam.
toyin, you seem to be saying that all muslims share the same beliefs with regard to modernity, to western thought, to the sciences, to progress, etc.you wrote: "The groups fighting globally to advance their Islamic visions are uniformly savages, massacerers of innocents, throwbacks to the more barbaric periods of human existence when power is won by force rather than by persuasion, people unable to convince others of the quality of their vision and persuade people to give the Islamic devotees a chance to lead them but insist on forcing compliance through fear, making people fear for their lives by killing those who don't see things their way, from Africa to the Middle East to Asia, Boko Haram to Al Shabbab to Al Qaeda to the Taliban to ISIS, they are all the same-"accept us or die."
i remember when the ALA conference was held in alexandria, on the eve of the war in iraq. our speaker, who had to replace edward said who was ill with the cancer that took his life, was an academic in egypt. he said, if you (americans) invade and impose a regime on iraq, you will only lend credence to the fundamentalists who claim that westernization and modernization are inimical to islam. you will make it impossible for us, who are liberal minded muslims, to speak to the people with credibility.
the muslims you are describing, toyin, represent a piece of islam, just as i would say trump represents a group of americans. in both cases, the real victims of these militant fundamentalist types are the less dogmatic, more progressive, more liberal, more open minded people. often, the muslim militants' real target is other muslims. consider the sahel, for instance, or even afghanistan. the target of trump's hatred is liberals (in the american sense), and he uses hatred of others to fuel the flames. the islamic fundamentalists similarly use xenophobia, hatred of others, of "non-believers") as reason to attack those liberal or modernist muslims.who is in the majority, in the muslim world? by far the non-fundamentalists. that should be obvious in nigeria, where boko harem hardly represents the majority, even in the north. where their targets are often muslim people, who don't succomb to their views. the extreme views you describe do not fit the vast majority of people in almost any muslim country i know, unless they are at war, like yemen. it doesn't describe any country in north africa, or even in the middle east. i would argue it doesn't describe iran, even. itsleadership is revolutionary guards, its people are not.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: Harrow, Kenneth <har...@msu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 10:46 PM
To: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: The Return of the Taliban in Afghanistan Amidst the Inescapability of Western Civilizationi agree with cornelius onhis points, except that pakistanis pretty hard on those who do not hoe a pretty narrow religious, muslim line. if you dare depart from basic muslim beliefs, in a narrow fundamentalist sense, you risk being punished or killed. remember malala.
i don't think that is enough to explain a whole society. pakistan is no doubt rich in a number of wonderful ways, from the arts to culture, and probably learning. but they are too rigid when it comes to offering critiques of religion. remember malala.
cross the border into india, and the same story, reversed. if you are muslim and wish to marry a hindu person, you will be punished and forbidden from doing so.
they are nuts. and the people who wish to live by their hearts and souls instead of dogmatic faith pay the price.remember malala,ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
From: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 7:00 PM
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: The Return of the Taliban in Afghanistan Amidst the Inescapability of Western CivilizationOluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju the alchemist,
I suppose that it's alright for you to be either sitting in the NEPA darkness over there in Lagos, contemplating the cosmos, thinking about Newton, trying to find your computer keyboard by candlelight or alternately luxuriating somewhere outside your study, washed by some moonlight, contemplating moving covertly or not so covertly on some big booty, in the darkness of night or blessed by moonlight – not war booty, but big, beautiful booty...
Seriously, if not, and reserving big booty for later, you could start here with this piece by Pound for your special contemplation as it covers what Professor Harrow has been getting across to us or at least to me in this thread - so far.
Today, Ashura, the 10th of Muharram is the saddest day in the Islamic calendar. You may well imagine how it is being observed in Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, all thoughts on the significance of Imam Hussain's sacrifice – as pivotal Islamic idealism and chivalry, and in the eternal battle between good and evil. an exemplary lesson on the sacrifice that's sometimes necessary when standing up to tyranny.
War is hell. Remember the Iran - Iraq War …
Who can predict what the Middle East will look like in 2041?
I guess if you had for some reason or other been in Afghanistan a few days ago when the Taliban took over and declared, not martial law but Sharia Law you would have been one of those ones scrabbling for a place in one of the big bomber planes hoping to get airlifted the hell out of Kabul - and ditto you would also be one of the ones scrambling to be airlifted to the United States should the Nigerian Taliban eventually sweep across the country and miraculously set up a new government in Abuja.
I'd just like to partly clarify one thing that needs clarification and leave it to Ken to explain what he meant by "pakistan is the key to afghanistan"
Just see what you get when you Google " Pakistan is the key to Afghanistan "
The Taliban were mostly educated in Pakistani Schools, by which token Pakistan is the ideological headquarters of the Taliban. Pakistan itself cannot be accused of any of the excesses of the earlier Taliban rule in Afghanistan and therefore let us hope, and pray that Pakistan will exercise a restraining hand on their Taliban students now in power in Afghanistan....
Let us pray as you continue your philosophical ruminations about the meaning of history and thank your lucky stars that you are not in Kandahar just now...
--On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 16:50:11 UTC+2 ovdepoju wrote:
Edited
I understand the Taliban says women will now be allowed to work and to go to school.
I also understand they are guaranteeing press freedom within limits defined by the aviodance of character assassination.
From within my admittedly little informed mind, I then asked, if they are going to adhere to those two pillars of liberal society, if I'm using the right term, then how are they different from the Western civilization I understand they see themselves as an alternative to?
Instead of this perpetual fighting to force yourselves on people, why not present your beautiful visions for social development and persuade people to vote for you?
People are struck by theTaliban's resilience, but resilience to what greater good of the Afghan people?
The guns they are using, the communications systems they employ, the vehicles they drive, are all products of Western ingenuity, enabled by hard won changes in Western society that enabled those innovations.
People paid with their lives and their liberty for the freedom to think and create that took Western societies from the religion encased world of the Middle Ages to its current scienitific and technological dominance and general position in the global knowledge space as well as the social and economic freedoms and empowerments that makes the West the most advanced in all indices of human development, in spite of their inadequacies.
None of the structures that define modernity in a global sense is the outcome of non-Western societies talk less Islamic cultures.
True, Africa and particularly Asia and the Arab and Persian worlds have played strategic roles in the foundations of science and it's relationship to technology, as well as developing sophisticated learning systems and complex writing well beforeEurope but it was in Europe that these global possibilities, in harmony with Europe's own native achievements, achieved the highest synthesis humanity has reached so far, achievements taken further by Europe's North American cultural satellites, particularly the US.
Human history is best understood as the development of a single group of people, demonstrating qualities that define humanity as different from other species on Earth, qualities mediated by diverse cultures, yet fundamentally the same.
All peoples have religion. How does it contribute to quality of life, is the question.
I'm not impressed by claims of superrority of value over Western societies as defined by secularism and liberal democratice culture as these claims of superiority may be advanced by advocates of Islam.
The groups fighting globally to advance their Islamic visions are uniformly savages, massacerers of innocents, throwbacks to the more barbaric periods of human existence when power is won by force rather than by persuasion, people unable to convince others of the quality of their vision and persuade people to give the Islamic devotees a chance to lead them but insist on forcing compliance through fear, making people fear for their lives by killing those who don't see things their way, from Africa to the Middle East to Asia, Boko Haram to Al Shabbab to Al Qaeda to the Taliban to ISIS, they are all the same-"accept us or die."
Most human beings don't want to live like that. It enhances people's sense of worth if they are allowed to decide who leads them. It strenthens the sense of life's value and encourages cooperation towards the common goals that unite a community.
The West first developed this vision of common decision making about community leadership to it's current levels.
It was also in the West that, to the best of my knowledge, women were first allowed to vote and generally participate in running public society at the scale of participation seen today, an achievement won largely by generations of self sacrificing struggle by Western women, struggle even unto the sacrifice of their lives.
Are visions of Islamic society offering something better than this model of choosing one's leaders through opportunities open to all citizens?
There is much talk in Islam of divine revelation, of commandments from God about how human beings should live, ideas mediated by Muhammed, the founder of Islam and presented in the Koran and collections of Muhammed's sayings.
Claims of divine revelation and guidance are widespread across the world.
The Yoruba origin Ifa system of knowledge claims the world began at Ife, and have their own scriptures, ese ifa, representing wisdom mediated by divine sources.
Judaism references the Garden of Eden as the beginning of humanity and the Talmud, among other scriptures, their own compilations of divine wisdom, which, in turn, provides the foundations of the Christian Bible, another book described by it's devotees as divinely inspired.
I'm not aware of any foundational religious texts, except perhaps the ese ifa, more extensive than those of the Hindus, from the Rig Veda to the Mahabarata, the Ramayana and the Upanishads.
Most, perhaps all societies have claims of divine wisdom and texts, oral or written, believed as embodying this wisdom.
The question is-how do these beliefs advance the quality of human life?
Is human life improved by the Islamic law policy of cutting off the hands of thieves? Are the thieves ' life circumstances thereby improved, making them less likely to steal?
In being dettered from stealing by losing a hand, are they thereby more productive members of society or are they now handicapped and less likely to benefit society?
In stoning to death two married people who commit adultery, as I am informed is enjoined by Islamic law, are the reasons for that adultery thereby addressed, the psychological, interpersonal and physical issues and drives that inspired the act in the first place thereby examined and acted upon?
Does that stoning to death assist any soul searching on the part of all parties involved, leading to better understanding of questions of compatibility, mutual responsibility and individual needs?
I see Muslims can be particularly sensitive to their beliefs being addressed in ways different from their approval, leading in numerous cases to killing others for those views the Muslims find abhorrent.
Such Muslims thereby persist in attitudes it's sister religion Christianity has moved on from.
But really, what are religious beliefs if not ideas no one can prove, no one can validate, referring to realities beyond the reach of most people, an alternate universe claimed by believers to be the source of reality?
If God exists, how does killing or brutalising people who don't believe in him going to improve his own existence?
All the ideas depicting centring of human well being I have described above are represented by Western liberal culture and represent the most advanced understanding of human possibility yet reached, in my view.
Islam is centred on the prophethood of Muhammed, described as the last prophet.
What are we to say of the head of the US based religious group ECKANKAR, described by the group as the only direct representative of the Creator of the universe, a position established by the group's founder Paul Twitchell, a US citizen who made this claim for himself and the others following in leadership of the school. Their beautiful books written by Twitchell, described as divinely inspired, advance this view.
It's great to have a faith, but it's only one of many, and no more necessarily valid than all the others.
The question is- how does that faith improve human lives?
Can you convince others to share your faith through the quality of your own life and it's impact on other's lives?
What is the response to this question by the Taliban, Boko Haram, ISIS and other Islamic groups trying to force others to live by their faith?
Until such questions are taken seriously in a sustained manner accross generations in world societies, the West, which has long built itself significantly on such questions will remain the cultural point or gravitation for most people, regardless of the system of government in their own countries.
Thanks
Toyin
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/6b97d9ff-bf91-4f9b-ac9b-261224918e79n%40googlegroups.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB51915530C19C234FA4EEE813DAC09%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfNRcFsCNwydQgENsXP82nN%3DvYcUSPpjgp2zQGaHiftYag%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB5191F36339595493D787BCF0DAC09%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfOB8ms1S2N8ESC2NHfJoVw3ML_YwF8ThQ4%2BX4wOuErePQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB519130A71CD47956088BE53FDAC09%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/usaafricadialogue/G3Yv_SyM_MU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfP6vOd0YmX4xpFwgtKPSCEpf4uzOYrJBXc_j%2Bibj1XxAA%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/cb6a7cab-b977-4412-9df2-99e7bce97182n%40googlegroups.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfOPP67GX%3DC-iCe2s69KMKRh-Fi95YwHzDXD0LhCDAH7kA%40mail.gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment