My recollection is that the term terror/terrorists began with bush at 9/11. Sure, it existed before, but he created the phrase "war on terror." Since then the term has expanded geometrically so that now all regimes in the world label their opposition "terrorists." It is a means of authenticating those in power, as toyin says, delegitimizing opposition, and thus undermining political systems that permit oppositional politics, i.e. democracies. It is basically antidemocratic by permitting those in power to define those who do not legitimately oppose their power.
Remember, how in the older days when we espoused revolution more enthusiastically, another term came to be used, or set of terms. They were defined around "state" as in "state terrorism," where the state permitting itself to perform acts it denied to individual groups, typically oppositional groups. Close to that were "raisons d'etat," or the state's rationalizations for its actions, or kissinger's realpolitik, another form of raison d'etat.
The united states supported israel, but not unconditionally because it also wanted saudi oil, not to mention iraqi or iranian or uae etc oil. It supported, and continues to support egypt, with billions in military aid annually. It had a middle eastern policy, not just an israeli policy, and israel, after all, has no oil, only jews with a jewish lobby in the u.s. that did not prevent trump's election, and ultimately supported trump.
Already i've read of biden opposing an israeli invasion of gaza; the u.s.is not automatically pro netanyahu.
Recall trump's son in law making deals with the saudis….
Ken
Get Outlook for iOS
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Toyin Falola <toyinfalola@austin.utexas.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 9:43:40 AM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - What was I saying?
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 9:43:40 AM
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - What was I saying?
Dear sir:
Hegemonic power is framed in moral terms: power is moral; challenges to power is immoral. Whatever power does is regarded as moral. Power then defines challenges to it in amoral terms as in terrorism. Critics of power are then labeled: anti US/anti-order, anarchists. And what you wrote below, to power, is treated as out of order. And to defenders of power, they ask: "why did you leave your shit-hole country to teach us what to do?' Hegemonic power, historically, has always been dangerous.
TF
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/PH0PR06MB9004109B508D0BE483911D40F8D5A%40PH0PR06MB9004.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment