Sunday, August 31, 2025

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Between a Modern Artistic Master and an Ancient Deity: Bruce Onobrakpeya, Agbarha Spiritual Arts and Ekene

Between a Modern Artistic Master and an Ancient Deity: Bruce Onobrakpeya, Agbarha Spiritual Arts and Ekene 

                     


A superb, though incidental example, of an Onobrakpeya blend of the sublimely mysterious and the everyday.

A lucky shot by myself at an edition of the Lagos art fair Art X, showing an Onobrakpeya sculpture foregrounded by an elegantly dressed and delicately seated young woman, with a partial image of another young woman disappearing into the right of the picture,  black skin radiant.

The verticular majesty of the sculpture, its pyramidal formation and intricate inscriptional network concentrating a universe of mysterious yet powerful communicative force through every inch of the regal surface, is vintage Onobrakpeya, qualities highlighted by the exquisite display of the piece, values the presence of the women amplify by similarity and contrast.

Is the humanoid figure evocative of an angelic presence, a divine messenger, as suggested by its towering elegance?

Is it an extraterrestrial, its form emblazoned with symbols aspiring to bridge the gap between its own thought systems and ours, an identity travelling as a sentient information stream from a distant galaxy,  filtered and concretized by Onobrakpeya in his wide ranging creative wanderings, without his knowing that what he takes as a work of art is that and more, a sentient entity he has given form as it waits for whatever length of time it may take-years or millennia, for its message to be decoded by its brethren on the third planet from the dwarf star in the Milky Way galaxy, the very terrestrial brethren whose presence is on display in their beauty and cultural refinement around the mysterious Onobrakpeya elongation,  akin to ancient stone monuments in centuries vanished civilisations, yet brought to life by a disciple of the convergence of the eternal and the temporal, the perennial and the immediate, the ancient and the contemporary?

Concentric circles of dispersion and integration, of expression and coordination, rthyms of harmony between center and circumference, evoking Japanese poet Matsuo Basho's miracle of poetic condensation and evocative force, "breaking the silence of an ancient pond, a frog jumps into water, a deep resonance", contemplative  mind sinking into cosmos, drinking from the bowl prior to entering the tea house as one observes the sea beyond, juxtapositions evoking the relationship between sea and bowl of water and between self and cosmos, a strategic motif of Japanese gardening; expanding and contracting circlesv surmounted by a rhombus, a stylised shape of two triangles facing upward and downward, evoking balance; topped by what may be seen as an eye of vision, itself surmounted by another stylized diamond structure, and another, marching upward in a straight sequence towards the integrative centre represented by the head of this mysterious figure as the hands frame its body in a circle of unity, of completeness, of wholeness, radiating centuries of archetypal symbolism manifest across the world.

Forms of life. The women's presence dramatizes biological, human life in its blend of sentience and skeletal,  neural and muscular coordination, radiant within flesh and cultural constructs represented by clothes and even a style of elegant sitting and the process of reading, highlighting  the object the woman is reading from, likely a mobile phone- a reading experience dramatizing a dialogue between artifact and human, akin to the sculpture positioned to inspire such a dialogue between itself and its viewers.

On the left of the picture is another strategic Onobrakpeya image, a circle with an arrangement of forms at its centre and a network of abstractions round its circumference and concentrated in a square at the top of the space, an expression of Onobrakpeya's recurrent experimentation with an instrument of arcane knowledge, the opon ifa of the Yoruba Ifa system of knowledge through which intersections of relationships between fate and free will at the intersection of self and cosmos are explored.

Scriptic forms play around the circumference, evocations of humanity's explorations of implications of infinity, abstractions further constellating in a square at the stop of the space,  a cloud of expressive forms suggesting condensations of enquiry and its outcomes, a network of ideational possibilities distllations of possibilities of knowledge akin to the odu ifa, the spatial/graphic/numerical and verbal networks through which existence and its development are explored in Ifa, suggesting a template through which symbol configurations such as the elegant majesty of the pyramidal personage may be explored.

   
             Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju
                         Compcros 

                           Abstract 

This essay locates the art of the Nigerian artist Bruce Onobrakpeya, complemented by his writings, as one of the greatest dramatizations of of the contributions of African spiritualities to the meaning of existence.

The essay focuses on a comparison between Onobrakpeya's work and the spirituality of Ekene, the water spirit that is the central deity of Onobrakpeya's natal Agbarha community in the Niger Delta.

Ekene metaphysics of the mysterious presence of the animate within the inanimate is described as correlative with Onobrakpeya's use of conventional forms such as African, Christian and technological references in unleashing a globally resonant projection of the animation of cosmos by mystery and meaning.

This analysis is complemented by a close study of a picture of two works by Onobrakpeya juxtaposed  with images of two people in the same space as the works when the picture was taken, a dialogue between artistic and human presence the discussion explores. 


Introduction: A Convergence of Creativity and Spirit across African Thought and Arts

Some of the most powerful and enduring expressions of African thought are found in works of art—whether visual, literary, or performative. 

These creations demonstrate the profound capacity of indigenous spiritualities and philosophies to give existence meaning and purpose. These creative forms do not merely reflect culture; they shape and sustain meaning, offering pathways into the metaphysical and existential dimensions of life.

Akan Adinkra visual symbols, for example, embody philosophical concepts of wisdom, strength, and interconnectedness, influencing modern design and thought, catalytic for such artists as Owusu-Ankomah and Rikki Wemega-Kwawu.

The Nigerian Cross River and Cameroonian Nsibidi scripts, with their intricate ideographic systems, echo in the contemporary abstractions of artist Victor Ekpuk, who transforms these ancient signs into vibrant explorations of meaning across various domains.

Igbo Uli body and wall painting traditions, rich in symbolic motifs drawn from nature and cosmology, have profoundly enriched the art and thought of Obiora Udechukwu, Uche Okeke, and other luminaries of the Nsukka Art School, fostering a post-colonial aesthetic rooted in cultural revival.

The transformation of the Osogbo Osun forest into a visual dramatization of Yoruba Orisa cosmology through the sculptures and architecture of Susanne Wenger and the New Sacred Art movement—documented in writings by and about Wenger—exemplifies how sacred spaces can become living artworks, merging ecology, spirituality, and creativity.

This tradition is not limited to visual art. It permeates literature, as seen in the works of Wole Soyinka, celebrated as unique projections of the ideational and inspirational force of classical Yoruba spirituality and philosophies, weaving myth, ritual, and existential inquiry into narratives plumbing depths of ultimate value in the African cosmos. 

Akan nature philosophies, emphasizing harmony with the environment, shape the narrative of Ghanaian writer Ayi Kwei Armah's novel The Healers, portraying healing as an individual and communal process, in unity with nature.

Malian scholar Ahmadou Hampâté Bâ's retelling of Fulani mythic thought in Kaidara: A Fulani Cosmological Epic from Mali and his essays on Bambara and Fulani epistemologies illuminate the intricate worldviews of these communities, offering mythic, metaphysical and epistemic insights into West African cosmologies, demonstrating the philosophical depths of oral traditions.

 It finds epic scale in the poetry and magnificent introduction to Masisi Kunene's Anthem of the Decades, which maps Zulu cosmology, structure of the universe,  and epistemology, ways of knowing, celebrating the interplay of the human mind, nature, and cosmos.

All these examples, demonstrating how art serves as a vessel for philosophical inquiry, spiritual expression, and cultural continuity, 
highlight the dynamic creativity inherent in African knowledge systems, particularly those indigenous to the continent.
 
The Journey of a Master

One of the greatest visual artists in this spectrum of masters, extending into inimitable engagements with Christianity, his  art complemented by his writings,  is Bruce Onobrakpeya.

Rising from its Urhobo origins in Nigeria's Niger Delta, his work creates a unique dialogue with Benin, Yoruba, Akan, Fulani and Christian cultures, as well as with modern technology represented by  electronic devices and combustion engine vehicles exemplified by cars, reworking their visual identities into ocularly sensitive projections of numinous power,  a sense of the awesome and sublime, the intimate and glorious, though multi-media installations,  prints and paintings, amplified through poetry and prose across a career he sustains in his ever developing inventiveness into his 90s, embodying a lifelong dialogue with the cosmos.

How did such a unique configuration of creativity and decades powered  work emerge? 

What fuels the master's rocket propelled journey from his emergence on the national scene through membership of the famous Zaria Rebels, a student society at the Amadou Bello University, Zaria whose  insistence on creating art inspired by and speaking to their environment rather than focusing on  art fed by colonial models  proved pivotal in the development of post-clasical Nigerian art, his work evolving into a constellation of influences, drawing from his Mushin, Lagos neighborhood, his Urhobo heritage, and his broader Nigerian, African and global interactions?

Exploring  the Master's Configurations and Catalysts

My explorations of the artist's journey is taking me into the various books and articles written about him and by him as well as interviews with him by different people, into my own discussions with him and his neighbours in his Mushin, Lagos neighbourhood, and with people who have been close to him across various points of his career.

Attending the annual Harmattan Workshop, and international artists' conclave organised by the Bruce Onobrakpeya Foundation in its February 2024 edition proved particularly strategic in this quest, taking me into zones yet uncovered in the decades of Onobrakpeya scholarship. 

Not only did I have the privilege of observing the artist's daily life over a two week period,  dialoguing with him in the context of interaction with artists from various parts of the world converging for the workshop, and studying first hand the magnificent cascade of art by Onobrakpeya and other artists at the two galleries at the Onobrak Art Centre in the workshop site, I was privileged to commence immersion in the spiritual thought, practices and arts of Onobrakpeya's native Agbarha community where the worksop is held, specifically in Agbarha-Otor,  the largest of the twenty six communities constituting Agbarha. 

I was at last able to move beyond textual study of  relationships between  Onobrakpeya's work and Urhobo thought and arts to experiencing firsthand  those endogenous cultural forms and their resonance with the creativity of the contemporary artist as it constellates an intercultural matrix of influences.

Understanding the art of the  greatest Christian artist ever, Michelangelo Buonarroti, along with that of his fellow Renaissance masters, such as Raphael Santi and Leonardo da Vinci, is immeasurably  aided by a study of the Bible, the Christian scripture from which the artists drew their subjects.

Without such knowledge,  as well as an appreciation of the classical Greco-Roman artistic and philosophical traditions that shaped the interpretation of the Christian message, the sublime art of those masters lose half of their communicative force for the viewer. 

The same holds about the relationship between Japanese gardening and Zen Buddhism, between classical Indian dance and Hinduism, among other examples of such cultural synergies and creative reworkings.

Classical African spiritualities and philosophies, unlike the Christian, Hindu and Buddist examples, are more oral than written, more performative than documented, a cultural landscape in which widespread writing is a recent development of perhaps the last one hundred years in traditions that have been growing for thousands of years, reaching beyond even that span into the origins of human existence in Africa.

Engagements with such traditions through textual study, observation and practice has been transformative for my understanding of the universe,  intersecting with my journeys across Asian and Western thought as these have blossomed across time.  

Hence, the encounter with Agbarha spiritual masters and their arts, particularly in their physical proximity to Onobrakpeya's art in his two Agbarha-Otor galleries, within the inspirational force created by the contemplative ambience of the location of those galleries in the Onobrak Art Centre in the sparsely developed outskirts of Agbarha-Otor, has been mentally and emotionally  reconfigurative for me, enriching the associative possibilities of the plenitude represented by the Onobrakpeya universe.

       The Ekene Cosmos

Drops of water pervading air. Liquid nutrition suffusing the human form. Aquatic nourishment feeding earth. Dynamic flows structuring the material cosmos.  

"Dew fall quickly
dew fall slowly...
thus was the earth created
filled with purpose"

Aquatic images of terrestial and human structuring, of cosmic creativity,  derived from Benin and Yoruba Olokun, from Chinese thought, and others, filtered through the Yoruba poem "Ayajo Asuwada " represent for me the associative force of Ekene, the central deity of Agbarha, whose worship I stumbled upon on a fateful day as I passed through Agbarha-Otor on leaving its outskirts where the Harmattan Workshop is held.

Journeys from distant regions to an Agbarha concentration. Creative dynamisms travelling to converge at a point in space. Reconfigurative potencies flashing at the eyes, yet enclosing depths beyond  immediate gaze.

Those are my conjunctions between Bruce Onobrakpeya and Ekene, the water spirit described as travelling from outside Agbarha to concentrate his presence in the Agbarha-Otor sacred groves every fifteen years as he is called upon during the Ekene festival.

Ekene belief embodies the mystery of the transcendent within the mundane. Water—ubiquitous, nourishing, and invisible in its vaporous form—becomes a metaphor for divine presence and cosmic creativity.

    Arcane Dyamisms Between Onobrakpeya 
    and Ekene

The aesthetic force of Bruce Onobrakpeya's greatest art travels from an arcane depth to achieve visibility in the everyday.

Ekene represents the belief that something transcendent of the everyday exists within the everyday, within the ubiquity and commonness of water, something gloriously projective of the possibilities of the universe, enabling life and consciousness even within the inanimate, its marvel enhanced by its invisibility to conventional sight and its ability, in its intangible form, to move across physical locations. 

Onobrakpeya's art is pervaded by and concentrates such sensitivities,  a sense of wonder at the cosmos as something mysterious and glorious, a senstivity projected through the visual forms of classical African art, Christian thought and modern technology.

Like Ekene, understood as an intelligence distant from conventional perception yet represented by water in its spatial and biological ubiquity, Onobrakpeya's art resonates with that profound senstivity even as it does so through the use of material forms made familiar by classical African ritual art, Christian art and the technological universe.

Onobrakpeya's visual language, shaped by classical African ritual forms, Christian iconography, and technological motifs, mirrors Ekene's metaphysical essence—an intelligence beyond conventional perception, yet intimately woven into the fabric of existence.

In this convergence of artist and deity, of gallery and grove, of pigment and prayer, we glimpse the enduring power of African spirituality to animate art and illuminate life.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAGBtzfOZQ7GzcyPhZhOppxds%3D5nWtBF2GvaDxq%3D3dOCfiQs8tA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Replaced by bots? No, AI needs academics more than we need it

An excellent critique of the possibilities (positive and negative) of the ever evolving realities of AI in any narrow or broad sense. For example, one problem apparently inherent in any AI or in any unknown unknown persists as not knowing what one does not know because we never know ALL of the present or ALL of the past or or ALL of the future of any phenomenon — though not all consequences or risks associated with such unknowing or unknowns are equal. 

Oohay




On Sunday, August 31, 2025, 11:26 AM, Toyin Falola <toyinfalola@austin.utexas.edu> wrote:

Replaced by bots? No, AI needs academics more than we need it


For some, the apparent capacities of artificial intelligence (AI) question the very existence of universities. Indeed, a narrative of inevitable digital replacement has recently come to colour strategic discussions of the already beleaguered financial position of the UK's major universities, radically dividing the educational and academic communities.


Opinions vary: some see AI's dramatic infiltration into personal creativity and learning as acutely destabilising to human purpose, skills and capacities, as well as undermining fundamental ethics, rights and freedoms. Others take a more sanguine approach, viewing AI as simply the next step in the evolution of digital improvement in human society, replacing costly human inadequacies with faster, more efficient and more tailored responses to the customer bases of governments, corporations and educational institutions.


These debates over whether AI is a "good thing" are only set to become more heated. However, they overlook a fundamental and practical issue. The past 30 years have been marked by overhyped speculations about innovations aimed at saving the dream of economic growth. Whether it be the dot-com bubble, derivatives financing or subprime mortgage selling, all have been accompanied by the same messianic enthusiasm that presently attends AI advocacy, and all have proved to be gateways to large-scale financial failure at a societal level.


Before risking the systematic adoption of AI at a national or institutional level therefore, universities should ask serious questions regarding the economic and technical conditions of the present AI boom – the volatile venture capital gold rush buoying the industry up and setting prices artificially low, the critical information ecology involved in AI design itself, and the potential negative consequences of mass adoption of AI itself. Moreover, attention must now be paid to the very purpose of education at the higher education level, whose artificial distortions have been highlighted by the arrival of AI. Individually and in combination, these issues question both the "myth of human replacement" that is commonplace in AI debates and, more substantially, the very sustainability of the AI industry itself.


Here, universities need to be aware of the vital role they play as cultural brokers in the development of human use of AI. After all, it did not emerge from the world of corporate capitalism, but rather from the higher education sector itself, largely as university spin-off companies in the US, UK and China – academic and scientific initiatives that only later attracted major venture capital. Universities therefore cannot collectively treat AI as a challenging or inconvenient "external factor of the world" to which they must simply capitulate or accommodate.


If universities wish to secure both their own survival and their responsibilities to wider society, there is an urgent need for them to take a clear, informed and value-based stance on the AI question. Such a stance must resolve the tension between AI's demonstrable usefulness in the fields of science, technology and medicine on the one hand, and its cognitively, socially and politically damaging potential on the other.


However, we need to be aware that we may presently misunderstand how AI works, and the conditions of its existence. Indeed, we may miss the fact that an AI-informed future will require more of what universities presently provide, not less.


The costs of AI


One of the more worrisome aspects of AI is its prodigious resource consumption, which places significant limits on its sustainability. Each of Google's 9 billion AI-powered daily search requests is estimated to use 7-9 watt-hours of energy, equivalent to running a 100-watt light bulb for five and a half minutes. The AI industry is remarkably secretive about its electricity and freshwater consumption, making such estimates impossible to verify; but it is clear that the AI industry now consumes resources on a par with entire nation-states, even driving the resurrection of the previously moribund international nuclear power industry.


While the environmental costs of this kind of energy usage are disquieting enough, the fact remains that little of this comes free. AI companies are presently the forefront of one of the largest venture capital gold rushes in financial history, with $59.6 billion (£44.4 billion) being invested globally in the first quarter of 2025, including a gargantuan $40 billion investment in OpenAI by Softbank. Such huge funding means that AI companies presently have little need to make AI pay for itself, but a strong need to ensure that it will soon.


Adopting AI for business processes therefore looks good now (when its services are almost free), but companies and institutions (including universities) that depend on AI for core processes must anticipate significant cost growth later when venture capitalists seek a return on their investment.


Not all AI is equal, however. Practically, there are two basic types of AI available on the market: Narrow (or task-specific) AI and General AI. Narrow AI is designed to perform specific tasks that are time-critical or beyond the capabilities of ordinary humans: cancer diagnostics, drug discovery, facial recognition or AI's wunderkind, DeepMind's protein-folding prediction software AlphaFold, whose authors received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024.


By contrast, General AI programs are designed to attempt any formalisable problem. These include generative AI and large language models such as ChatGPT, Lama, Cohere and Gemini. These tend to be the AIs that students now (unwisely) use to write their essays, and that companies use to produce task-specific interfaces, including timetabling, task organisers and interview processing. Generally speaking, Narrow AI does the jobs humans probably couldn't do, while General AI does the jobs that humans can and probably should do.


The difference between these two is signal, because energy consumption is proportional to the size of the training database, not the nature of the problem. Narrow AIs use comparatively small databases, mining only the material relevant to the assigned task: even a large "narrow" AI such as Alphafold used a training base of 147,000 previous protein-folding solutions. By comparison, General AIs have enormous databases (Meta's Lama 4 Behemoth AI, presently in development, is estimated to use a training database of 30 trillion datapoints).


Universities should therefore think critically not just about whether to adopt AI, but rather what kind of AI and for what purposes, and anticipate dramatic fluctuations in cost and availability as the venture capital window closes.


The needs of AI


The second sustainability problem lies in AI's use of intellectual resources. There is a tendency to view AI as an autonomous third-party provider, external to the human population, one that can independently provide educational, organisational and analytical services that allow employers to simply replace expert human staff. This zero-sum game mentality lies at the very heart of the replacement anxiety between machines and humanity that surrounds AI. This involves a profound misunderstanding of how AI works. AI providers are not independent external providers: they repurpose material that humans themselves produce.


General AI models (particularly large language models, or LLMs) depend on vast, pre-constructed training databases of humanly-produced data, created by you and me in books, articles, essays, newspaper articles and social media posts. Sophisticated algorithms then map their tagged contents to identify existing nodes and relationships that are treated as statistical probabilities, which are used to generate answers relevant to the user's request, presented in a natural language form.


While most people are aware of these basic features of AI functionality, their policy ramifications are worth emphasising. While AI certainly transforms and augments the basic data that exists in its training databases to produce its results, it nonetheless only works within an informational ecology that requires high-quality human resources as sustenance. This means that AI is already cybernetic: if AI can be likened to a brain, then we as humans are its neurons, whose outputs are brought together by the executive functions of AI's algorithms to address specific tasks. AI is not an "alien"; it is us, transformed and magnified.


This dependence on human product is ongoing, required every time an AI performs a calculation. To provide world-relevant responses, AI models must be fed a constant supply of up-to-date information, producing a huge demand for data. This demand is so voracious it is beginning to challenge and compromise the legal order of the existing knowledge world. The UK government's recent proposals to change copyright laws to render previously protected intellectual property available to AI data scrapes have met with trenchant resistance in the legislature. Meta's use of intellectual property from the LibGen "pirate" library in Russia was met with international class action suits by publishers' guilds, writers, artists and performers. Since 2016, more than 30 countries have introduced laws specifically focused on AI, creating an increasingly unstable and fast-changing legal landscape. At a deeper social level, artists and writers are increasingly abandoning the digital space as a means to protect the integrity of their own work.


The problem here is straightforward: much of the high-quality human data that AI relies on to function effectively is produced by humans, motivated by financial recompense, public recognition or personal expression. The tendency of AI to undermine those motivations does not simply compromise the legal order: it undermines the very conditions of AI's own productivity.


Any serious national policy that seeks to maintain AI as part of a sustainable economic environment needs to consider not just the data needs of AI companies, but the human ecology by which that data is produced. If the latter fragments, the former will quickly stall.


AI's Achilles heel


The third problem of AI sustainability emerges from its own tendency towards "error". This is often referred to as the autophagy problem. In the view of many AI scientists and designers, autophagy constitutes an existential threat to the AI environment, particularly when the technology becomes commercially dominant.


Any AI calculation involves subtle but significant errors, many of which are integral to it performing effectively. This may seem counterintuitive, but even a generative AI producing spectacularly helpful and technically accurate answers is nonetheless engaged in a statistical and linguistic transformation of its data hinterland, rather than an actual replication of it. Just as a photograph of a landscape is not the same thing as the landscape it captures, AI's synthetic results are not "the same" as the information it was trained on, carrying within them the hidden algorithmic and statistical "rules" of the algorithm itself.


Such "errors" are initially hardly noticeable, barely influencing AI's effective accuracy. Their presence, however, becomes important as humans use AI daily, and the more AI services are called upon to do ever-increasing percentages of our daily human work. When this happens, an AI's synthetic results inevitably get fed back into its newly-updated database. Unfortunately, because AI's synthetic results cannot be readily identified as such (a fact utilised by certain students), the next iteration of AI processes treats these synthetic results as though they were humanly-produced. This "self-consumption" (autophagy) means that the errors and transformations implicit in the original results become compounded, eventually geometrically, as generations of synthesis follow.


The effects of autophagy have been tracked and debated with growing alarm by the AI research community itself. In the absence of reliable fresh data, free from synthetic products, AI models quickly tend towards "model collapse" under the weight of their compounded errors, much like audio feedback on a sound stage. Researchers at Rice University found that images reiteratively reproduced through AI became increasingly chaotic and eventually meaningless. Somewhat more disturbingly, text-based generative AI tended towards increasingly bland, monolithic narratives as AI reproduces its own digital consensus. Recent research published in the BMJ applied the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test to a variety of AI programs, discovering significant "cognitive impairment" similar to humans in the early stage of dementia. This decline, moreover, occurred swiftly: what takes decades in a human took months for an AI – a function of the very speed that we value so much in the digital world.


As AI is pushed ever more insistently into our everyday lives, the pool of real-world data will become increasingly coloured by synthetic AI material. As administrators, students, authors and civil servants use AI to write more and more of their daily material, it becomes impossible to tell the human product from the synthetic. Combined with the prodigious data demands for training General AIs, the consequences of autophagy become increasingly unavoidable. Estimates place the time limit on AI's access to high-quality human data in terms of months: many place the threshold as close as late 2026, with low-quality data lasting only a few years longer.


Unlike most other technologies, the technical accuracy of artificial intelligence products may decrease with time and use, rather than improve.


The paradox of AI


If correct, the implications of these three sustainability problems are sobering. They suggest that we may be living right now in the heyday of AI, a unique but temporary apogee of venture capital support and largely uncontaminated data resources. But the best-before date on this sweet spot seems to be rapidly approaching, and the conditions for even the medium-term sustainability of AI use are neither in place nor even understood at a policy level.


As a wide variety of AI entrepreneurs, not least Sam Altmann, founding CEO of OpenAI, have pointed out, coming to terms with AI's relationship with human society is neither a technical issue nor a business one, but a question of human governance. We need to face up to the possibility that AI is not creating problems in our social and economic organisation, but revealing tensions that already existed.


Here, then, is the peculiar paradox of AI: for better or for worse, AI cannot replace us because it depends so deeply on what we do, say, write and record. We are not its rivals any more than wheat crops or dairy livestock are rivals of humanity. More vitally, the quality of AI results gets better with the improvement of the data we supply it with. Conversely, human overdependence on AI – and the cognitive offloading that comes with it – will render poorer, and eventually useless, synthetic AI production. If we want it to be better, we have to get better ourselves.


If this sounds like a win-win scenario, it may well be. However, at the moment, we seem to be heading for a lose-lose scenario, in which mass overdependence on AI does not simply threaten human jobs and skills, but artificial intelligence too.


The answer, it would seem, is straightforward: if AI cannot replace humans in the grand scheme of things, then we need to ask ourselves how we improve human creativity in order to improve AI's dependent functionality?


The future purposes of education


The problem here seems to lie in how we have formulated higher education as a teaching and learning endeavour in the first place – in particular, the shift in education towards the demands of qualifications and employability, and away from the creation of autonomous human minds as authors. That focus on the written and performative end product of education has sharpened in a world where the end product can now increasingly be replaced by AI.


Taken to its logical conclusion, a teacher can ask ChatGPT to prepare a set of questions, students can use ChatGPT to answer them, whereupon the teacher can get ChatGPT to assess them and provide feedback – meaning that an entire course assessment can occur within a few minutes and without any education actually happening. Thus the rise of student plagiarism, essay mills and indeed AI has arguably become a rational response to an educational environment that has become progressively divorced from development of autonomous, competent and creative subjects. Indeed, educational policy over the past few decades may well have created an avid but artificial market for uncritical student use of AI.


In all of this, the "end product" of education – the "learning outcome", to use a common pedagogic term – has occurred at the cost of the actual person being educated. Without trained and disciplined human subjectivity and creativity, AI models will not have the requisite training data to perform its functions and will collapse under the weight of their own self-consumed errors. AI's cybernetic nature means it still needs human subjectivity. Again, if we want it to be better, we have to get better ourselves.


At all levels of human society, the development of a sustainable human-AI economy will hinge on three basic principles of governance: first, promoting human subjectivity in order to support AI work; second, breaking the AI feedback loops that endanger its sustainability; and third, augmenting, not replacing, human knowledge, agency and subjectivity.


The first of these requires developing a value-focused culture of self-discipline that systematically resists humans cognitively offloading skills on to AI, at both a personal and an institutional level. The second will need the maintenance of appropriate contractual economic reward for sources of human creativity: put simply, we will need to pay for AI, and AI companies will need to pay for human data. The third involves returning AI to the purposes that it was designed for, that is to augment human knowledge and action, not replace it. AI is for jobs that we cannot do on our own, not those we can – but couldn't be bothered to – do. A sustainable AI economy is for protein-splicing calculations, not organising your diary; for swifter cancer diagnoses, not writing your essay. Just as overuse of antibiotics makes them resistant to disease, overuse of AI makes it useless to humanity.


For universities, the responsibilities here should be obvious; they must remain a key source of human agency, knowledge and creativity. Their human intellectual production is generally huge, especially if we include student essays, research drafts, articles, monographs and so on. Boasting significant populations of writers, scholars and scientists, they are already dedicated to the creation and dissemination of valid knowledge – that is, to human subjectivity. More than this, they promote and maintain disciplinary practices and regimes designed to ensure the quality and propriety of that knowledge output – to police plagiarism and ethical research and study, and to maintain legal compliance requirements to protect intellectual property. They are, in other words, already practised in breaking the feedback loop. And finally, they are already adept at identifying those precise and specific purposes by which AI can be used to augment, not replace, human endeavour.


Thus universities could and should negotiate as collective bodies with AI servers to provide core training data. This, of course, requires that those universities take a particular disciplinary stance towards AI use itself: that they concentrate on the human production of scientific and scholarly knowledge and insight, at both a teaching and research level, and emphasise – very much contrary to the present trend – the actual value of human capacities. And this would not just be in STEM subjects: because the needs of AI are now so wide, this would require universities to take an equally broad-based and liberal approach to knowledge production, along the classic A-Z model of disciplines.


On the teaching front, universities should be equally radical. Staff should steer students and researchers away from learnt dependence on General AI and restrict use only to Narrow AI programmes with specialised research purposes. Where AI use presents the possibilities of undermining or replacing the goals of actual human education and subjectivity itself, it should be avoided completely.


At a practical level, this obviously implies both banning General  AI use and, given the difficulties of detecting AI-written text, a global shift in the way educational establishments address the provenance of writing of all kinds. Rather than course tutors seeking out AI use post hoc through insufficient and legally weak detection software, students will need to provide authenticity reports in advance that demonstrate precisely by whom, when and how documents were produced (software for which – such as Grammarly's Authorship or Google's Brisk – is already emerging). Ironically, such environmentally and financially expensive digital solutions merely replicate the oversight conditions of "traditional" in-person, handwritten exams – methods that are now looking more and more like the most advanced and hack-proof technology available on the market.


None of this, however, can replace the deep need for education to refurbish the fundamental value of human subjectivity and authorship and reassess at a deep level the corrosive philosophy that it does not matter what people actually think and do, only what they produce.


Martin A. Mills is chair in anthropology at the University of Aberdeen.




--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BYAPR06MB4517C1127355563F71DC2CF8F804A%40BYAPR06MB4517.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Corruption

Preface
"Na waoh!!!!… Nah ya papa money??? Nah GOVAMENT money!!! Norbi your papa or mama money" — You chop, I chop … draw game! — Nobody gets hurt" — a typical dialogue that goes on everyday silently or loudly somewhere in Naija (and even more or less in the Diaspora).

A. Apparently, what separates BIG Naija corruption from the corruption in any other country lies in both the size and depth of the corruption — in Naija corruption somehow silently or quietly, silently or openly reigns as THE daily way of everyday person (the BIG ogah and the small ogah, the secular or religious or "spiritual" ogah in some group) — and most tragically, the innocent or the naive and the seasoned professional crook. Even some of the loudest critics have played some direct or indirect role in the persistence of corruption as a professional daily way of life. A disturbing number of us PRAY NOT for such corruption to end; rather we PRAY or wish fervently for the wheel of such corruption to come our way soon, sooner than later.

B. So  being on an island amid a LARGE ocean of "you chop/I chop" hurts no one — so goes the practitioners of this toxic and mesmerizing life.
Most especially, this daily way of living tends to impact (for better or worse) the poorest among us. This usually quasi "gig" economy.has a mantra: "You chop/I chop and no one gets hurt" 

C. Perhaps, only MM (the only major national leader with a major national airport name) has come closest to both the possibility and the reality what a fundamentally LESS corrupt NAIJA life would look like — . Unfortunately, such a life disappeared quickly like a firefly.

Oohay

On Sunday, August 31, 2025, 2:39 PM, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

On the surface and deep down, "There is no more corruption in Nigeria" could only mean that it has ceased, that President Tinubu has killed corruption, wiped it out, completely obliterated it. Or is it  merely a manner of speaking, as the English-man would say, "wishful thinking" ? 


Poetically speaking, you may, if you like, deem the claim to be too "hyperbolic" even given that hyperbole is an essential tool in the tool bag of the average politician's political rhetoric. 


Transposed to dealing with the erstwhile Nigerian situation, slightly modified "I gave commands;Then all smiles stopped together." could likewise have been uttered by President Tinubu and wielding as much power as he does he the all-powerful president, "he who decides everything", and indeed any of his immediate predecessors in that office could have easily said calmly, matter of factly, " I gave commands, then all corruption stopped altogether" and still not have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, because only an omnipotent God would be able to completely eradicate corruption in Nigeria, and that would have to be by some drastic measures as what was said to have been visited on Sodom and Gomorrah 


But before we rush to any premature conclusions about what sounds like President Tinubu's bout of braggadocio we must first of all consider the stage and setting where the statement was made: He was guest of honour in Brazil, Nigeria's best friend in South America and therefore a little upbeat; for full context we must look at President Tinubu's Full Address in Brazil and there we discover that only half of the sentence was quoted, because the full sentence reads,


"The reforms I've embarked on since I took over have been impactful; we have more money in the economy, no more corruption in Nigeria, and everything is going well."


If I were to reword the intentions that were meant to be expressed in that sentence, it would read thus : 


"The reforms I've embarked on since I took over have been impactful; we have more money in the economy, we are doing our best to ensure that there is no more corruption in Nigeria, and everything is going well."



On Saturday, 30 August 2025 at 23:06:34 UTC+2 Ibrahim Abdullah wrote:
Quo vadis Naija? 

On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 at 8:21 AM, Jibrin Ibrahim <jibrinib...@gmail.com> wrote:

Now that we know there is no more corruption in Nigeria!

Jibrin Ibrahim, Deepening Democracy Column, Daily Trust, 29th August 2025

The highlight of President Tinubu's visit to Brazil was the announcement by our Oga that there is no corruption any more in Nigeria today. He claimed that: "The reforms I've embarked upon since I took over in Nigeria have been very impactful. I can beat my chest for that. It was initially painful, but today the result is blossoming. It's getting clearer to the people. We have more money for the economy… no more corruption," Tinubu told his audience. 

This is not the first time this claim has been made. In May last year, President Bola Tinubu spoke of his administration's unwavering commitment to fighting corruption and recovering looted public funds, declaring that there will be no safe haven for corruption in Nigeria. The event was the Ministry of Justice Asset Recovery Summit in Abuja with the theme "Synergising Towards an Effective Assets Recovery and Management". The President announced that: "Asset recovery sends a clear and unwavering message: there will be no safe haven for corruption in Nigeria." He added that: "It is about restoring the people's trust and ensuring that every kobo of our national wealth works for the common good." He lamented the detrimental effects of corruption on national development, particularly in health, education, and infrastructure, stressing that repatriated funds are being reinvested into critical sectors to rebuild trust and promote equity under his watch.

Such statements remind me of George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984 where truth becomes falsehood and vice versa. Maybe it is more relevant to recall Goebbels's key principle of propaganda, that when you repeat a lie often enough, people will end up believing it as the gospel truth. Clearly, the President's propaganda team has no hesitation about making claims without veracity. For the majority of Nigerians however, there is a strong opinion that the current regime is one of the most corrupt in the Nation's history.

At the beginning of this administration, keen observers watched with consternation as a lot of former governors and officials investigated, and sometimes charged for corruption were appointed ministers by government. It was a clear message to the Nation that Nigeria remains on its trajectory of each government being more corrupt than the one it succeeded. In May last year, while trying to characterize the administration, I published a column entitled – "Under Tinubu, Corruption is Fighting Back with Gusto." I  referred to Nuhu Ribadu, the former Chairman of the EFCC who told Nigerians so many years ago that if you fight corruption, it fights back. Today, as the same Nuhu Ribadu, supervises the security agencies, corruption has fought back with success.

The pattern is clear, there is an unfolding trajectory of backpedalling on the progress made by anti-corruption agencies previously. Essentially, the anti-corruption agencies have become weapons to bring down opposition elements rather than catch the corrupt. If politicians from other parties are moving in hordes to join the ruling APC, it is because the evidence is clear that government is determined to protect the corrupt ones. In addition, under Tinubu, judicial corruption has become a major challenge to anti-corruption work in Nigeria. The looters have repeatedly used their influence to manipulate the judicial process and system, to block and/or delay the arrest or prosecution of suspects. This blatant disregard for the rule of law has eroded public trust and reinforced the perception that Nigeria's democracy is nothing more than a facade. Clearly, the judiciary is not living up to its responsibility of ensuring that the rule of law and provisions of the Constitution are upheld. They are complicit in the pro-corruption commitment of the regime.

There have been several allegations of judicial officers receiving bribes from politicians and politically exposed persons in-order to circumvent the law. This has watered down the respect, trust and confidence of citizens in the judiciary and negatively impacted the fight against corruption. Nigerians have witnessed too many situations where courts have granted injunctions which deterred anti-corruption agencies from inviting and prosecuting corrupt government officials and politically exposed persons.  

 

One of the most important signifiers of rising corruption under this regime is the procurement of political appointments by treasury looters serving under the current administration as ministers, legislators, or occupying leadership positions of the ruling party. They have exposed anti-corruption work to serious setback and deliberate sabotage that cripple the efficiency of the anti-corruption agencies. It is distressing to see people facing corruption allegations being appointed by the President to handle various positions of authority. This has produced a culture of impunity, where politicians engage in corrupt practices without fear of consequences.

 

We recall that at the beginning of the Tinubu Administration, the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs was revealed to have simply emptied the treasury of her ministry and transferred the monies to private bank accounts. She was suspended but the promised prosecution never happened. That was a strong pointer that the new government was a deepening rather than rejection of public corruption. The President copied the tradition set by the Buhari Administration by retaining the Petroleum portfolio and the legendary mega corruption at the NNPCL has continued with gusto.

The level of corruption has become so high that the entire society is being sucked into massive engagement with the system. One of the most dangerous developments in the country is the massive recruitment of young persons into different forms of criminality. These include traditional sectors such as political thuggery and cultism but also new sectors such as cybercrimes and human and drug trafficking. More youth are daily becoming engaged in criminal activities including ritual killings, cyber-crimes, kidnapping, prostitution, robbery and banditry. In the process, the youth, whose collective future has been continuously mortgaged by our morally bankrupt and corrupt politicians are today taking their cues from the governing class and copying them.

 

To truly establish a flourishing democracy, transparency and accountability must be strictly adhered to in governance. This requires holding politicians accountable for their actions and inactions, strengthening institutions to combat corruption, and ensuring that the allocation of resources is done in a fair and equitable manner. Only through these measures can Nigeria overcome its socio-economic challenges and build a democracy that truly serves the interests of the citizens. This unfortunately is not the trajectory we are on.

 

The most accurate way to describe Nigerian politics today is that state and society have been captured by an efficient and ruthless criminal band that is recreating politics and the political economy in its image. On a daily basis, people are lamenting about the absence of rules, ethics and red lines in politics and the economy as the cabal in power do as they please and we the citizens watch and wonder whether it's the new reality or a new rascally Nollywood production. The bold statement that corruption does not exist anymore is in a sense in character – promote falsehood without restraint.

 

Professor Jibrin Ibrahim
Senior Fellow
Centre for Democracy and Development, Abuja
Follow me on twitter @jibrinibrahim17

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/34c8cb9f-e880-4d2f-b9a2-dda90173b627n%40googlegroups.com
.

Re: [External] [SOCIAL NETWORK] Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Corruption

        THe CANCER CALLED CORRUPTION THAT IS KILLING NIGERIA: What is to be done?


Please permit me to share this video with you. This was how President Obasanjo claimed he tackled this cancer with respect to a Governor of the PDP during his term in office.


https://www.youtube.com/shorts/R6Hvw5vIUNs



It is proper for ex-governors of Kogi and Delta States, for example, to be asked to refund their alleged loot to the citizens of their states, for robust development, with immediate effect. It is the right thing to do.  


To economic and political leaders, civil society organizations, (NBA), Kings, Chiefs, academics, religious and ethnic leaders, and Nigerians in the diaspora, here is our challenge: 


"THE WORLD WILL NOT RESPECT AFRICA UNTIL NIGERIA EARNS THAT RESPECT. THE BLACK PEOPLE OF THE WORLD NEED NIGERIA TO BE GREAT AS A SOURCE OF PRIDE AND CONFIDENCE!"


The IMMORTAL NELSON MANDELA (our late Brother, and Former president of the Republic of South Africa).



YES, NIGERIANS, LIKE CHINA , WE CAN DO IT!!!


Ike Udogu



On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 3:39 PM Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

On the surface and deep down, "There is no more corruption in Nigeria" could only mean that it has ceased, that President Tinubu has killed corruption, wiped it out, completely obliterated it. Or is it  merely a manner of speaking, as the English-man would say, "wishful thinking" ? 


Poetically speaking, you may, if you like, deem the claim to be too "hyperbolic" even given that hyperbole is an essential tool in the tool bag of the average politician's political rhetoric. 


Transposed to dealing with the erstwhile Nigerian situation, slightly modified "I gave commands;Then all smiles stopped together." could likewise have been uttered by President Tinubu and wielding as much power as he does he the all-powerful president, "he who decides everything", and indeed any of his immediate predecessors in that office could have easily said calmly, matter of factly, " I gave commands, then all corruption stopped altogether" and still not have been telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, because only an omnipotent God would be able to completely eradicate corruption in Nigeria, and that would have to be by some drastic measures as what was said to have been visited on Sodom and Gomorrah 


But before we rush to any premature conclusions about what sounds like President Tinubu's bout of braggadocio we must first of all consider the stage and setting where the statement was made: He was guest of honour in Brazil, Nigeria's best friend in South America and therefore a little upbeat; for full context we must look at President Tinubu's Full Address in Brazil and there we discover that only half of the sentence was quoted, because the full sentence reads,


"The reforms I've embarked on since I took over have been impactful; we have more money in the economy, no more corruption in Nigeria, and everything is going well."


If I were to reword the intentions that were meant to be expressed in that sentence, it would read thus : 


"The reforms I've embarked on since I took over have been impactful; we have more money in the economy, we are doing our best to ensure that there is no more corruption in Nigeria, and everything is going well."



On Saturday, 30 August 2025 at 23:06:34 UTC+2 Ibrahim Abdullah wrote:
Quo vadis Naija? 

On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 at 8:21 AM, Jibrin Ibrahim <jibrinib...@gmail.com> wrote:

Now that we know there is no more corruption in Nigeria!

Jibrin Ibrahim, Deepening Democracy Column, Daily Trust, 29th August 2025

The highlight of President Tinubu's visit to Brazil was the announcement by our Oga that there is no corruption any more in Nigeria today. He claimed that: "The reforms I've embarked upon since I took over in Nigeria have been very impactful. I can beat my chest for that. It was initially painful, but today the result is blossoming. It's getting clearer to the people. We have more money for the economy… no more corruption," Tinubu told his audience. 

This is not the first time this claim has been made. In May last year, President Bola Tinubu spoke of his administration's unwavering commitment to fighting corruption and recovering looted public funds, declaring that there will be no safe haven for corruption in Nigeria. The event was the Ministry of Justice Asset Recovery Summit in Abuja with the theme "Synergising Towards an Effective Assets Recovery and Management". The President announced that: "Asset recovery sends a clear and unwavering message: there will be no safe haven for corruption in Nigeria." He added that: "It is about restoring the people's trust and ensuring that every kobo of our national wealth works for the common good." He lamented the detrimental effects of corruption on national development, particularly in health, education, and infrastructure, stressing that repatriated funds are being reinvested into critical sectors to rebuild trust and promote equity under his watch.

Such statements remind me of George Orwell's dystopian novel 1984 where truth becomes falsehood and vice versa. Maybe it is more relevant to recall Goebbels's key principle of propaganda, that when you repeat a lie often enough, people will end up believing it as the gospel truth. Clearly, the President's propaganda team has no hesitation about making claims without veracity. For the majority of Nigerians however, there is a strong opinion that the current regime is one of the most corrupt in the Nation's history.

At the beginning of this administration, keen observers watched with consternation as a lot of former governors and officials investigated, and sometimes charged for corruption were appointed ministers by government. It was a clear message to the Nation that Nigeria remains on its trajectory of each government being more corrupt than the one it succeeded. In May last year, while trying to characterize the administration, I published a column entitled – "Under Tinubu, Corruption is Fighting Back with Gusto." I  referred to Nuhu Ribadu, the former Chairman of the EFCC who told Nigerians so many years ago that if you fight corruption, it fights back. Today, as the same Nuhu Ribadu, supervises the security agencies, corruption has fought back with success.

The pattern is clear, there is an unfolding trajectory of backpedalling on the progress made by anti-corruption agencies previously. Essentially, the anti-corruption agencies have become weapons to bring down opposition elements rather than catch the corrupt. If politicians from other parties are moving in hordes to join the ruling APC, it is because the evidence is clear that government is determined to protect the corrupt ones. In addition, under Tinubu, judicial corruption has become a major challenge to anti-corruption work in Nigeria. The looters have repeatedly used their influence to manipulate the judicial process and system, to block and/or delay the arrest or prosecution of suspects. This blatant disregard for the rule of law has eroded public trust and reinforced the perception that Nigeria's democracy is nothing more than a facade. Clearly, the judiciary is not living up to its responsibility of ensuring that the rule of law and provisions of the Constitution are upheld. They are complicit in the pro-corruption commitment of the regime.

There have been several allegations of judicial officers receiving bribes from politicians and politically exposed persons in-order to circumvent the law. This has watered down the respect, trust and confidence of citizens in the judiciary and negatively impacted the fight against corruption. Nigerians have witnessed too many situations where courts have granted injunctions which deterred anti-corruption agencies from inviting and prosecuting corrupt government officials and politically exposed persons.  

 

One of the most important signifiers of rising corruption under this regime is the procurement of political appointments by treasury looters serving under the current administration as ministers, legislators, or occupying leadership positions of the ruling party. They have exposed anti-corruption work to serious setback and deliberate sabotage that cripple the efficiency of the anti-corruption agencies. It is distressing to see people facing corruption allegations being appointed by the President to handle various positions of authority. This has produced a culture of impunity, where politicians engage in corrupt practices without fear of consequences.

 

We recall that at the beginning of the Tinubu Administration, the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs was revealed to have simply emptied the treasury of her ministry and transferred the monies to private bank accounts. She was suspended but the promised prosecution never happened. That was a strong pointer that the new government was a deepening rather than rejection of public corruption. The President copied the tradition set by the Buhari Administration by retaining the Petroleum portfolio and the legendary mega corruption at the NNPCL has continued with gusto.

The level of corruption has become so high that the entire society is being sucked into massive engagement with the system. One of the most dangerous developments in the country is the massive recruitment of young persons into different forms of criminality. These include traditional sectors such as political thuggery and cultism but also new sectors such as cybercrimes and human and drug trafficking. More youth are daily becoming engaged in criminal activities including ritual killings, cyber-crimes, kidnapping, prostitution, robbery and banditry. In the process, the youth, whose collective future has been continuously mortgaged by our morally bankrupt and corrupt politicians are today taking their cues from the governing class and copying them.

 

To truly establish a flourishing democracy, transparency and accountability must be strictly adhered to in governance. This requires holding politicians accountable for their actions and inactions, strengthening institutions to combat corruption, and ensuring that the allocation of resources is done in a fair and equitable manner. Only through these measures can Nigeria overcome its socio-economic challenges and build a democracy that truly serves the interests of the citizens. This unfortunately is not the trajectory we are on.

 

The most accurate way to describe Nigerian politics today is that state and society have been captured by an efficient and ruthless criminal band that is recreating politics and the political economy in its image. On a daily basis, people are lamenting about the absence of rules, ethics and red lines in politics and the economy as the cabal in power do as they please and we the citizens watch and wonder whether it's the new reality or a new rascally Nollywood production. The bold statement that corruption does not exist anymore is in a sense in character – promote falsehood without restraint.

 

Professor Jibrin Ibrahim
Senior Fellow
Centre for Democracy and Development, Abuja
Follow me on twitter @jibrinibrahim17

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAPWX8rW4o8602vaTNsh36y1eVVTuRhUcWUgiQDcfWduevcHMXQ%40mail.gmail.com.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/34c8cb9f-e880-4d2f-b9a2-dda90173b627n%40googlegroups.com.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CAAVj7VrpybG_VJukBKYroSr3np-x3jk3uRrqicVggbapUq7dfg%40mail.gmail.com.
 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha