I do not know the history of the jews enormously well, but have some knowledge of it. I know the jewish bible very very well. So I feel entitled to an opinion on your question concerning Hebrew nationalism.
We (contemporary jews) struggle with terms like Hebrew and jew in referring to ourselves in biblical times. Jew seems to unite people of today with those of ancient times, even if it wasn’t used. Hebrew was also an anomalous terms, vaguely used. Mostly it was b’nai Israel, the sons of Israel, or more accurately the people of Israel, the children of Israel. Israel was Jacob who got his name changed; but that is mostly how they were known, and how moses mostly referred to them, to us. Anyway, that people had been earlier known as the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and jacab. Those were the ancestors; their descendants came to Egypt, were saved by being brought there under the instructions of joseph. They departed later under the leadership of moses, and underwent the ordeal of the exodus. The account ends with the death of moses prior to entering into canaan, across the river, the promised land.
That’s it. Nation of Hebrews? Well, I would say “nation” or “people,” as in the Yoruba nation, the Yoruba people.
Did they come together and exist in the biblical account? I would say that is not how I would put it. I would prefer, a lot, to use the kind of understanding stuart hall would provide, which is that the meaning of who they were and what they mean for us, their “descendants,” lies in the account we give of the history today. In giving that account, we create ourselves, the people who we are.
In imagining that this is an accurate account of who they are is entirely ideological, i.e., obscures the processes by which we create ourselves in giving the account. This is an althuserrian understanding of ideology, adopted by hall, the leading light, for me, of cultural studies.
Maybe with this you’ll understand my impatience with all attempts to read direct historical data from that text.
Dept of English and Film Studies
Michigan State University
619 Red Cedar Rd
East Lansing, MI 48824
I am in agreement with Olayinka's remarks. Christianity is one of the most political of religions.
Analyze carefully the Old Testament. What is it? Is Hebrew nationalism not an important aspect of the narrative? Correct me if I am wrong. Religions such as these are useful for the communities involved - to give hope in an era of stress. In that way religions such as these serve a useful psychological purpose - and they emerge in a sociological/anthropological/ historical context. Some deep philosophy emerges as well in terms of how men and women in society should or could behave in society - but as a thinker you have to step back and reflect on what the agenda really amounts to.
Ken, Obatala was not voluntarily added to the list of saints by orthodox Catholics. Candomble in Brazil and Santeria in Cuba emerged in the context of rebellion and subversion by the enslaved Africans. They had to hide their beliefs or cover them up for reasons of survival. Their so-called masters were monotheists but they themselves were polytheists, worshipping the old African religious system.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialoguefirstname.lastname@example.org
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to email@example.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.