"A judge that has been arrested , interrogated , release on bail , docked and tried for corruption has lost the credibility, integrity and moral authority to be a judge ! He should leave the bench in the interest of the integrity of the judiciary"........Okoi Obla.This is too extreme.In all honesty, a judge should take leave with pay until all is resolved.
Afis
Sent from my iPhone--General Williams,
Should a law officer in his position and one that has knowledge of the law be making this kind of statement:
"A judge that has been arrested , interrogated , release on bail , docked and tried for corruption has lost the credibility, integrity and moral authority to be a judge ! He should leave the bench in the interest of the integrity of the judiciary"
The judge was arrested, interrogated, released on bail, docked and tried for corruption, and only for this should he "leave the bench in the interest of the integrity of the judiciary" when he has not been pronounced guilty. If Obla holds steadfastly to his pronouncements on this issue, there is every reason to believe what many have alleged to be the case in the first place – that the prosecution was nothing other than a witch hunt. The question is this, would mere stepping down satisfy and redeem the accused? Would mere stepping down be sufficient to atone for his alleged corruption? History is yet to be written, when the time comes, it would be shown that the Justices stood up to the rascality of the executive for successfully resisting attempts to politicise the judiciary. What is the difference between what a supposedly sound legal mind, who is a prosecution adviser to the president had just said and those that put tyre round the neck of a suspect, whose suspicion only came about by someone shouting ole, pouring petrol and burning him or her to death? My General, if you find comfort in the argument of our law officer, am afraid, I do not.
My regards,
OJ
From: Ishola Williams [mailto:isholawilliams@gmail.
com ]
Sent: 13 June 2017 16:22
To: John Ebohon
Cc: Okoi Ofem Obono-Obla; Politics Naija; yahoogroups; rotfash@yahoo.com; TalkNaija; Ra'ayi Riga; vincentotuonye@msn.com; Omo Oodua; Okonkwonetworks; Truth As My Weapon; olakassimmd@aol.com; Yahoo! Inc.; Naijaobserver; Agbor Ike; Mgbajala Eziokwu; nebukadineze@aol.com; Michael Adeniyi; Abba; NaijaEvent@googlegroups.com; africanworldforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [africanworldforum] Okoi Obla sef!
OJ,Haba,Give OOO some respect as a Professional.Did you read his reply to NJC? Does that response demonstrate his scant knowledge of the law?
If it that is the case,then come up with your own legal argument.
From the Layman's point of view,he has a convincing argument against the rebuttal from NJC Spokesperson.Professional assessment of another must apolitical.iw
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:57 PM, John Ebohon <ebohon@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
Go and argue this in Court with your contemporaries, stop harassing us with your scant knowledge of the law.
From: Okoi Ofem Obono-Obla [mailto:okoiobla@hotmail.com]
Sent: 10 June 2017 22:03
To: Politics Naija; yahoogroups; rotfash@yahoo.com; Ishola Williams; TalkNaija; Ra'ayi Riga; vincentotuonye@msn.com; Omo Oodua; Okonkwonetworks; Truth As My Weapon; olakassimmd@aol.com; Yahoo! Inc.; Naijaobserver; Agbor Ike; Mgbajala Eziokwu; John Ebohon; nebukadineze@aol.com; Michael Adeniyi; Abba; NaijaEvent@googlegroups.com; africanworldforum@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [africanworldforum] Okoi Obla sef!
The statement by the NJC today 10 June 2017 that there is no valid appeal against the ruling delivered by Justice Jude Okeke of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory , Abuja dated 5 April 2017 discharging and acquitting Justice AFA Ademola and two others of corruption charges is misleading . On the contrary there is a valid and subsisting appeal against the ruining of Justice Okeke. The Ruling appealed against was delivered on 5 April 2017 . We filed Notice of Appeal on the 7 April 2017. The law gives us 90 days to file Notice of Appeal from the date of delivery of the ruling . We also filed additional grounds of Appeal on the 6 June 2017 . The period for us to comply records will start to run from the 7 June 2017 to expire on the 8 August 2017 . However the court of Appeal invited both parties to attend court on the same 6 June 2017 to reconcile records of Appeal . As long as the Notice of Appeal has not been struck out the Appeal is valid and pending . Is the NJC now defense counsel to Justice Ademola? Why is NJC descending into the arena ? Is the NJC not suppose to be neutral ? A judge that has been arrested , interrogated , release on bail , docked and tried for corruption has lost the credibility, integrity and moral authority to be a judge ! He should leave the bench in the interest of the integrity of the judiciary .
A judge must be above any modicum of suspicion; scrupulously clean , indeed as clean as steel ! A judge must be like Caesar 'a wife . I call on NJC to recommend to Mr President the dismissal and retirement of all judges that have been arrested and questioned by law enforcement agencies ! Also all judges standing trial must suffer the same fate including the one that was tried and acquitted .
Sent from my iPhone
From: 'Joe Attueyi' via AfricanWorldForum <africanworldforum@
googlegroups.com >
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 7:51:16 PM
To: Politics Naija; yahoogroups; rotfash@yahoo.com; Ishola Williams; TalkNaija; Ra'ayi Riga; vincentotuonye@msn.com; Omo Oodua; Okonkwonetworks; Truth As My Weapon; olakassimmd@aol.com; Yahoo! Inc.; Naijaobserver; Agbor Ike; African GM; Mgbajala Eziokwu; ebohon@dmu.ac.uk; nebukadineze@aol.com; Michael Adeniyi; Abba; NaijaEvent@googlegroups.com
Subject: [africanworldforum] Okoi Obla sef!
9th June, 2017
PRESS RELEASE
PUTTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT
The attention of the National Judicial Council has been drawn to reactions of some members of public, particularly Legal Practitioners, Jurists, Academics and Public Office holders on the recall of the Judicial Officers that had been earlier directed to recuse themselves from performing Judicial duties pending the conclusion of investigation or determination of the cases filed against them.
Council is particularly concerned about the Press statement issued by Okoi Obono-Obla, Esq, Special Assistant to the President on Prosecution on 8th June, 2017; that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Appeal against the Ruling of Hon. Justice Jude Okeke of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, for discharging and acquitting Hon. Justice A. F. A. Ademola and 2 ORS on 7th April, 2017.
Contrary to the above statement, the Registry of the High Court of the FCT, Abuja, informed the Department of Information of the National Judicial Council that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed two Notices of Appeal in the Court; the first one on 7th April, 2017, against Hon Justice A. F. A. Ademola, his wife, Olabowale Ademola and Joe Agi, SAN. The second one was filed on 6th of June, 2017, two days after the Press Release was issued by the National Judicial Council, with additional grounds of appeal against only Hon. Justice A.F.A. Ademola.
It is on record that when the Parties were invited by High Court of the FCT for settlement of records to be transmitted to the Court of Appeal on 18th April, 2017, the Appellant failed to turn up. The Registrar of the Court further adjourned the settlement of records to 21st April, 2017, and invited all the Parties, but the Appellant again did not come to Court.
The total number of 45 days allowed for compilation of record in all circumstances expired on 7th May, 2017, for the Registrar of the Lower Court and 22nd May, 2017, for the Appellant.
Council noted that the Office of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice only filed additional grounds of appeal in the Court on Tuesday 6th June, 2017, three days after the Press Release by the Council that the Judicial Officers have been directed to resume their Judicial duties.
It was on 6th June, 2017, that letters were again issued by the Registrar to the Parties for settlement of records against 14th June, 2017.
For avoidance of doubt, by the Rules of the Court of Appeal, there cannot be a proper appeal before the Court until Parties have agreed and settled records before the Lower Court and transmit copies of such records to the Court of Appeal before an appeal number is given. It is only after an appeal number is given that an appeal is said to be entered in the Court of Appeal.
The Council confirmed from Registry of the Court of Appeal that there is no such Appeal till date. The only matter that is pending is a Motion with Number CA/A/371M/CR/2019 filed by Joe Odey Agi, SAN, against the Federal Republic of Nigeria seeking the dismissal of Appellant/Respondent appeal between the Federal Government of Nigeria Vs Joe Odey Agi for failure to transmit the Records from the Lower Court within 45 days.
Council is aware that at the Code of Conduct Tribunal, the Federal Government filed Suits against Hon. Justices N. S. Ngwuta and Inyang Okoro of the Supreme Court and A. F. A. Ademola of the Federal High Court on 8th February, 2017.
However, the Federal Ministry of Justice later withdrew the files pertaining the Suits against Hon. Justices Inyang Okoro and A. F. A. Ademola, with the intention of filing additional evidence against them.
In the case of Hon. Justice Ngwuta, he has since been arraigned before the Code of Conduct Tribunal for non-declaration of his assets.
In effect, there is currently no Suit filed against Hon. Justices Inyang Okoro and A. F. A. Ademola J. at the Tribunal.
Contrary to the allegations by Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, that Judiciary took a hasty decision to recall the Judges, and that it is not on board with anti-graft war of the Federal Government, the number of Judicial Officers that have been removed from office for misconduct particularly for corrupt practices since President Buhari administration came on board, that has been made public by National Judicial Council in October and November, 2016, speaks for itself in that vein. Some of the Judicial Officers were removed from office by dismissal or compulsory retirement by the President or Governors on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council. While a number of the Judicial Officers were reprimanded by Council in the exercise of its Constitutional powers to exercise disciplinary control over Judges of Superior Courts of record in the Federation.
Council is constrained to say that some of the Judicial Officers that have been recommended for dismissal or compulsory retirement from Office by the presidency or Governors, have not to date been removed from Office. But for suspension of the affected Judicial Officers from Office by National Judicial Council, they would have to date been still performing their Judicial duties. And these are Officers that have been found culpable of gross misconduct by National Judicial Council after due process and diligent fact finding investigation by Council based on the Rule of Law enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, National Judicial Council Judicial Discipline Regulations and Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The National Judicial Council will soon issue an advertorial on the foregoing and list out the number of Judicial Officers that have since April, 2000 when it held its inaugural Meeting to date, been dismissed or compulsorily retired by the President or Governors for gross misconduct or corrupt practices, on its recommendation; and also reprimanded by council by suspension or warning/caution.
Council is not oblivious of the fact that some major Stakeholders in the Judiciary and Justice Delivery Sector in conjunction with the Nigerian Bar Association, met with the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation and Anti-Graft and Security Agencies before the Judicial Officers were recalled, to discuss the subject matter and in particular the fate of the Judicial Officers that have not been charged and arraigned. When no progress was made, the National Judicial Council, which is the only Constitutional Institution empowered to exercise disciplinary control over Judicial Officers for misconduct, decided to recall the Judicial Officers.
It is to be stressed that our criminal justice is also predicated on accusatorial system and NOT inquisitorial. Thus, every accused person is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is proved beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution. On the foregoing, Council is compelled to inform the public that the decision it took to direct the affected Justices/Judges to recuse themselves from performing their judicial duties, was borne out of respect for the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice; and in order to maintain the integrity and sanctity of the Judiciary and sustain public confidence. However, the recent decision of the Council to recall the Judicial Officers was based on the Principles of Rule of Law and fairness.
Council reiterates that it shall continue to support the President Buhari Administration posture in its fight against corruption in all its ramifications in the Federation; and in cleansing the Judiciary of corrupt Judicial Officers, under the purview of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the principles of the Rule of Law enshrined therein.
Soji Oye, Es[truncated by WhatsApp]
Sent from my iPhone--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to africanworldforum@googlegroups.com .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/africanworldforum .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/africanworldforum/ .DED7F57B-C7AF-48A5-97D3- 09841EDF6099%40yahoo.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--
Ishola Williams
Maj-Gen (Rtd)
Exec Sec
PANAFSTRAG
Lagos.
08056210960
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to africanworldforum@googlegroups.com .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/africanworldforum .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/africanworldforum/ .C56E7A901ECCC542BD9F4BCE5C974A CF022AA55DFB%40PC3XMB-0002L. LEC-ADMIN.dmu.ac.uk
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to africanworldforum@googlegroups.com .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/africanworldforum .msgid/africanworldforum/ .17A1EA9C-72B3-4C6F-9505- B1F5F81A22A9%40gmail.com
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment