--Who declared Fulani herdsmen a terrorist group?Who are the international terrorist watch agencies and how are they composed?On whose authority did they proclaim themselves international terrorist watch agencies and from where did they derive their power of investigation? Who are their financiers?S. Kadiri
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin.adepoju@gmail.com>
Sent: 24 January 2021 17:19
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Caution on Divisive CampaignsFulani herdsmen militia is a terrorist group whose activities are tracked and recorded by international terrorist watch agencies who have declared them one of the top 3 or 4 deadliest terrorist groups in the world.
I'll read the rest of your post and see if there is anything else I need to respond to
Toyin
--On Sun, Jan 24, 2021, 17:00 Salimonu Kadiri <ogunlakaiye@hotmail.com> wrote:
--If the Federal government can subsidise crops' farmers, it must be just to subsidise pastoral farmers too. Ranching is long overdue in Nigeria but because it is in our nature not to plan for anything, herders have to continue to roam around the country to find open forest to graze cattle.
I disagree with your claim that Fulani herdsmen have become a terrorist force. In all ethnic groups and professions/trades, there are criminals. There are criminal professors, as you know, in all the ethnic groups in Nigeria who habitually demand sex from their female students in exchange for pass grades but that cannot turn all professors in Nigeria into sex addicts. If I remember very well, you, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju, once disclosed that you are an Edo indigene. Your Edo origin reminds me of the front-page cover of the then Newswatch Magazine of October 9, 2000, that carried the following headline : Sex, Power, Politics - Can Igbinedion Win the Battle Against Prostitution? Starting from page 8 of the magazine, the title was, *Igbinedion versus Prostitutes.* The article that covered 11 pages was written by Maureen Chigbo with the following introduction : In spite of stiff opposition, Governor Lucky Igbinedion of Edo State signs into law a bill which stipulates harsh penalties for practitioners of sex trade and their sponsors. The front cover as well as page 9 of the magazine featured Edo prostitutes deported from Italy. Up till today, the Edo indigenes are known to be exporters of pimps and whores into Europe. Hardly can a Nigerian walk in any street of Europe without being accosted by male Caucasians with request if he can fix a Nigerian whore for him. Conversely, male Caucasians always ask any Nigerian woman, regardless of her education, profession and marital status, sighted in the public how much it would cost him to penetrate her in between the legs with his one-eye snake because the Caucasians believe that all Nigerian women in Europe are whores. To cut the story short and despite the general knowledge among Nigerians that Edo is the main whore exporting State in Nigeria to Europe and elsewhere, I will fight till my last breath against anyone who asserts that all Edo men and women are pimps and whores. There may be criminals among Fulani herdsmen but majority of them are law abiding and would always fulfil required legal conditions to live peacefully with their fellow countrymen/women anywhere in Nigeria.
Finally, if you say no to ranches in Nigeria, you should also say no to fertilizers for crops' farmers, no to imported electric generators, no to fuel importation and no to importation of personal cars, because all the above-mentioned items are subsidised.S. Kadiri
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin.adepoju@gmail.com>
Sent: 23 January 2021 15:44
To: usaafricadialogue <USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Caution on Divisive CampaignsNo RUGA, no ranches please.
Fulani herdsmen have become a terrorist force.
Accommodating them in your land is courting disaster.
Toyin
--On Sat, Jan 23, 2021, 15:34 Salimonu Kadiri <ogunlakaiye@hotmail.com> wrote:
--The debate also completely departs from Mallam Garba Shehu's 'call for restraint on both sides and urge the state government and the leadership of Fulani communities to continue their dialogue for a good understanding that will bring an urgent end, (to) the nightmarish security challenges facing the state'- Salihu Lukman. What kind of education made Garba Shehu to elevate Miyetti Allah cattle breeders' association as an equal partner to the elected government of Ondo State, from which the Governor must seek consent and approval before taking any measure to guarantee the security and welfare of all people in Ondo State in accordance with Section 14 : 2 of the 1999 constitution as altered? If the Special Assistant on Media and Publicity to President Buhari, Garba Shehu, had limited himself to his above cited childish statement by Salihu Lukman, one would just have overlooked it. However, Mr. Lukman covered up the thuggery perpetrated by Garba Shehu in trying to obstruct Governor Akeredolu from exercising powers conferred on him, by Section 14: 2 of the constitution, to secure lives and properties of the people of Ondo State. What caused the absurd reaction of the presidential thug, Garba Shehu?
It all began on Monday, 18 January 2021, when the Governor of Ondo State, Rotimi Akeredolu, ordered herdsmen who are illegally occupying government's forest reserves in the State to vacate the forests within seven days. The reason for the order, he said, was because the forest reserves were being used for criminal activities by criminal elements, posing as herdsmen. The literate oaf in the presidency, Garba Shehu, reacted, "Akeredolu, being a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and indeed the former president of the Nigerian Bar Association will be the least expected to unilaterally oust thousands of herders who have lived all their lives in the State on account of the infiltration of the forests by criminals." Whereas, Governor Akeredolu order was that herders should vacate government forest reserves, Garba Shehu maliciously understood it as an intention to unilaterally oust thousands of herders who have lived all their lives in the state. From his own crooked distortion of the order promulgated by Governor Akeredolu, Garba Shehu went further to demean and ridicule the Governor of Ondo State by accusing him of violating the Constitutional rights of herders despite the fact that he, Akeredolu, is a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and was a former President of Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). A major cause of Nigeria's underdevelopment, industrially, economically, and socially, is that the merits required for appointment/employment into any office are ethnicity and religion. That is the core reason why the country is constantly in a mess because as the Yoruba aphorism put it, 'Ológìní t'ólo gbéwù ekùn wò, kò lè ri ode bí ekùn sé, roughly translated to, the cat wears the fur of a leopard but it cannot prey like leopard. The reaction of Garba Shehu to the order of Governor Akeredolu exposed him as a person who got appointed as Special Assistant to President Buhari on Media and Publicity because he is a Northerner and a Muslim. Thinking that he is defending the interest of Northerners and ignorantly believing that only Northerners are herders, he mistook order to herders by Governor Akeredolu to vacate government forest reserves in Ondo State for herders to vacate Ondo States. The man, Garba Shehu seems not to know the meaning of government forest reserves where it is practically forbidden to hunt and farm (both crops and animal husbandry). "It often happens," Giovanni Boccaccio once wrote, "that he who endeavours to ridicule other people, especially in things of a serious nature becomes himself a jest and frequently to his own cost." Who is a constitutional novice, Rotimi Akeredolu or Garba Shehu?
Ethnic irredentists and donkey heads who would rather identify themselves as Northerners instead of Nigerians immediately joined the hollow-minded mouthpiece of misery, Garba Shehu, to question the constitutional right of Governor Rotimi Akeredolu to order herdsmen to vacate government forest reserves within seven days. In their contused mind, the ethnic irredentists claimed that Governor Akeredolu's order to herders to vacate government forest reserves violate Section 41(1) of the Nigeran Constitution that permits every Nigerian to move and live at any place of their choice in Nigeria. In elucidating their crass ignorance, they claimed that Section 43 of the Constitution grants, to all Nigerians the right to live and own property anywhere in Nigeria. Suddenly, the self -identified Northerners become Nigerians just to claim that their kith and kin have the right to occupy government forest reserves with their cattle. The Land Use Act vested the ownership of land on the government of each State, thus, the government in each State is empowered to issue and revoke, at will, certificate of occupancy of any portion of land/forest under its jurisdiction. The shameless ethno-religious blockheads think that the only constitutional right herdsmen have and worthy of fighting for is to freely wonder with their cattle in government forest reserves in Ondo State. Yet, at the height of herders/crop-farmers clash in 2019, the Federal government proposed to modernise nomadic pastoralism whereby the primitive custom whereby herders wander around in search of forage for their cattle would be replaced with ranches. The National Economic Committee (NEC) led by the vice President, Yemi Osinbajo, and consisting of Governors from all the 36 states in Nigeria, set up a technical committee, headed by the then PDP Governor of Ebonyi State, David Umahi. The Committee came up with what was called, National Livestock Transformation Plan (NLTP) which was approved by all the 36 states' governors under the auspices of NEC. Immediately money was released to the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, the officials of the Ministry quickly invented their own project which they named Rural Grazing Area (RUGA). Before anyone could realize what was going on the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Dr Alhaji Muhammed Umar Bello and a Director of Procurement in the same Ministry, Dr Hussain Adamu, had begun to award and pay for fictious RUGA contracts. When RUGA scam blew open, surprisingly, some people who claimed to be speaking for Miyetti Allah asserted that the Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo, was aware of RUGA project. Osinbajo denied any knowledge of RUGA and emphasized that RUGA was inconsistent with the National Livestock Transformation Plan (NLTP). As herdsmen continued to wander across the nation on foot in search of forage for their cattle up till date, Dr Alhaji Muhammed Umar Bello has been transferred to the Ministry of Science and Technology as the Permanent Secretary. The last time I read about Dr Alhaji Muhammed Umar Bello was 18 May 2020 in online media when he was queried for purchasing a dilapidated building for seven billion naira (N7 billion) for the RUGA project. https://punchng.com/fg-queries-perm-sec-for-buying-uncompleted-building-for-n7bn/Instead of engaging the nation in useless debate over the constitutional rights of herdsmen to occupy any forest in Nigeria to graze their cattle, I think it will be reasonable for the bone-heads, acting as mouthpiece of President Buhari, to tell Nigerians what happened to the billions of naira set aside for the improvement of condition of lives of our hard-working herdsmen.
From: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Salihu Lukman <smlukman@gmail.com>
Sent: 21 January 2021 15:30
To: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Caution on Divisive CampaignsCaution on Divisive Campaigns and National Security Challenges
Salihu Moh. Lukman
Progressive Governors Forum
Abuja
The section of our manifesto – APC – An Honest Contract with Nigeria, outlined our challenge as a nation bordering on whether "we have the will and courage to unite to radically reform, modernise and move our nation forward – not looking backward to the failed policies and practices of the past. It is no longer a question of choice but of will and courage!" With all the different manifestations of many of the problems facing our dear country, Nigeria, requiring demonstration of both the will and courage by our leaders, which as our manifesto rightly emphasised, is not 'a question of choice', our leaders at all levels and across all the divide, are responding and taking initiatives in different ways. Unfortunately, the more initiatives are taken, the more some Nigerians wrongly interpret those initiatives in divisive vocabularies.
This is clearly what is at play since the statement issued by His Excellency, Rotimi Akeredolu on Monday, January 18, 2021 asking herdsmen to vacate Forest Reserves in Ondo State within seven days as well as banning night-grazing with immediate effect. The objective of the Ondo state government was well articulated, which is to ensure that the forest reserves in Ondo State are disallowed from being used as hideouts for kidnappers, bandits and other criminals.
No Nigerian, or indeed any rational person, irrespective of nationality, can oppose this laudable objective of the Ondo State government. Mallam Garba Shehu wouldn't have disagreed with the objectives as expressed in the statement of Governor Akeredolu. But somehow, from all the media debate going on, this is hardly the case. The response to the statement of Governor Akeredolu by Mallam Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to the President (Media & Publicity), on January 19, 2021, is generating all manner of debate, which is completely at variance with the intended objective announced by Governor Akeredolu. The debate also completely departs from Mallam Garba Shehu's 'call for restraint on both sides and urge the state government and the leadership of Fulani communities to continue their dialogue for a good understanding that will bring an urgent end, the nightmarish security challenges facing the state.'
Since the release of the statement by Mallam Garba Shehu, the usual divisive politics has been activated. Afenifere, Arewa, Christian groups and many Nigerians are engaging the issues, sadly in ways that may only compromise or distract our leaders from being able to summon the courage to 'reform, modernise and move our nation forward'. Ensuring that Forest Reserves, and indeed all forests, not just in Ondo State but in every part of the country are prevented from being used by kidnappers, bandits and all criminals, which as Mallam Garba Shehu correctly indicated should be given every urgency given the 'nightmarish challenges' it poses. This calls for courage on the part of our leaders to be able to initiate any viably effective reform.
It is also very clear to any rational observer that any proposal for reform may be interpreted along divisive lines and many public commentators, may prioritise debating matters of interpretation rather than the substantive proposal for reform. This necessitate that our leaders should be able to demonstrate higher decree of caution in making public statements about policy proposals, especially those that could potentially activate our national divisive fault lines. Without therefore attempting to pass any judgement on our leaders, one would have wished that in the first place, Governor Akeredelo, rather than issuing a public statement on the matter, invite the leadership of Miyetti Allah and all other groups and directly engage them on strategies of enforcement of initiatives to secure all Ondo State forests, including the ban on night grazing. In which case, what may likely come to the public should have been agreement between Ondo State government and the groups on matters of implementation of reform initiatives.
On the other hand, if Ondo State government was unable to engage groups and its decision to initiate reform as announced by Governor Akeredolu portend the possibility of violating provisions of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution as amended, given the powers of the Federal Government, rather than a public statement of caution by Mallam Garba Shehu, one would have rather recommend that the appropriate agency of the Federal Government invite the Governor, discuss the matter and agree on the best way to achieve the laudable initiative of the Ondo State government and accordingly inform Nigerians about the way forward. To make a public statement of caution suggest some disagreement between the Federal Government and Ondo State government about the desirability of reform as announced by Governor Akeredolu, which is not likely the case.
Most of the frenzied media responses on both sides is really not about achieving the laudable objective of arresting all the criminal activities going on, especially kidnapping and banditry, in every part of the country. Most times, once our divisive fault lines are activated, our emotions and sentiments, religious, ethnic and all rest, take the best part of us. Our disposition speed off the tracks of all rational considerations. With hardly any exception, both ordinary citizens and leaders behave in the same way. We need to recognise that, no matter what, the kind of criminality going on in the country require that we are united as citizens to be able to resolve it. Criminality thrives in every part of the country with the active support of local community leaders across all ethnic and religious divides.
As things are, every Nigerian should recognise that we are in emergency situation. The false divisive notion of any group initiative independent of others resolving our security challenges can only worsen the situation. "We vs them" public debate, which appears to dominate our national conversation today, especially regarding our 'nightmarish' security challenges is unfortunate. We must caution ourselves as Nigerians to rise beyond our sentiments and emotions. Above all, we must also appeal to our leaders to be much more circumspect in engaging these issues. Rather than making public statements, which can activate our fault lines, our leaders should be able to develop stronger strategies of engaging all Nigerians, especially our organisations in order to contract and mobilise implementation of agreements.
Every time spent debating in divisive terms on problems of criminality in the country, which doesn't discriminate our identities, means lost opportunity to contract or mobilise implementation of agreement. In fact, it may even mean some levels of protection for the criminals as all public attention is diverted away from the criminals to engaging the false issues of what our identities represents. In the particular case of the intended reform to secure Ondo State Forest Reserves as announced by Governor Akeredolu, since the commencement of the unhealthy debate about whether it means expelling Fulani groups from Ondo State, every specific initiative in the proposal may have been suspended. It is most likely that no direct discussion has taken place between Ondo State government and Federal Government. This will then mean that rather that exploring areas of stronger collaboration between the state government and Federal Government, we have inadvertently created some dichotomies, real or imagined.
Somehow, it is almost impossible to avoid asking the question whether both politically and legally, other agencies of government shouldn't have stepped in to resolve the issue? Partly, because of the strong campaigns for restructuring in the country, the temptation is to argue that this is another proof why our constitution is faulty and only restructuring can correct it. In this particular case, we as citizens, are the problem. All the debate going on now, has nothing to do with the provisions of the constitution or any law of the federation. Rather, it is all about our fabricated mindsets.
As a believer and campaigner for restructuring based on the need to make our governments functionally responsive, the challenge that reduced reform initiatives of governments to problems of activating our fault lines is simply a reflection of the inability of government officials – elected and appointed – to discharge their responsibilities without fear or favour as provided in the provisions of our constitutions and other statutes. While it is possible that initiatives are already taking place to resolve the issue between Ondo State government and Federal Government, to the extent that rather than announcements of resolutions of how initiatives to prevent and arrest crimes are hardly the case, confirms high degree of weakness in addressing national challenges. Instead, most of the public debate is about which group we want to support. Is there any Nigerian today who is not disturbed by the high rate of kidnapping, banditry and similar crimes? Such a Nigerian is either directly or remotely involved in kidnapping, banditry and all the crimes taking place.
Nigerians need to wake up to the reality that preventing or arresting criminal activities such as kidnapping and banditry cannot be achieved by massaging our ethnic and religious sentiments. These are criminal activities that can hardly succeed without the collaboration of community and religious leaders. In fact, there are also strong allegations of even collaboration of security officials. We therefore need to forge stronger national unity in the country to be able to initiate the kind of reforms, which can produce the expected outcomes. In addition to forging stronger national unity, we should include the issue of stiffer sanctions for both the criminals and their collaborators, much more than what is provided in our current laws. There is no reason why we should not consider the introduction of death penalties for both the criminals and their collaborators, for instance.
The easy temptation is to politicise the debate. Luckily, on this matter, both Ondo State and the Federal Government are controlled by the APC. This simply confirms the liberal atmosphere in APC. APC controlled state government is not constrained to disagree with APC controlled federal government. Put differently, APC controlled federal government is not shy from publicly disagreeing with initiatives of APC controlled state government. On a matter as grave as the issue of kidnapping, banditry and other criminal activities, it will not be treated in APC as a family affair when it affects APC controlled state government but differently with state governments controlled by other parties.
The issue is about responding to a national challenge. It is about Nigeria, which is why our leaders must exercise restraint when making public statements. If a statement is made, which potentially breach provisions of our constitution, any statement capable of activating our fault lines must be avoided. When we need to correct possible challenges arising from statements issued by our leaders, it mustn't be a case of double jeopardy. Two wrongs will never make a right. At all times, our leaders and all of us, must carry the burden of national unity such that statements and proposals for reforms should inspire Nigerians to respect each other and recognise the incontestability of supporting initiatives from every part of the country in order to prevent or arrest crime, no matter its strength. As our party manifesto rightly emphasised, 'It is no longer a question of choice but of will and courage!'
This position does not represent the view of any APC Governor or the Progressive Governors Forum
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/6DC5A9EC-FBAA-4A9A-83FD-10378130E859%40gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/HE1P193MB00760B5423914B71A741DD6EAEA00%40HE1P193MB0076.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALUsqTQ4NeyZ8ZEw_KcW7Se1n0uSw-%2BWnOvZEMU%3D9rp8hD2%3DkA%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/HE1P193MB0076ACE6AD171E3D91CC560BAEBE0%40HE1P193MB0076.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALUsqTQ-H63trrBtu5woCjyM2zYCM_ySQzq_uG9VGg%2BHUg%3DnkA%40mail.gmail.com.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/HE1P193MB00765F46653C2C1F031A98D0AEBE0%40HE1P193MB0076.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALUsqTSHdernhTK-bVJFj_OBSPEsyWstywRzduAd%3D3vh_yJLng%40mail.gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment